Abstract
In this chapter we review the literature on complex product development focusing on a project-based perspective. We start from showing the specific nature of complex product development processes, and acknowledge the need for relying on external sources of innovation and evaluating its organizational implications. We then focus on the challenges of leveraging such dispersed knowledge, pointing to the specific problems brought by the crucial role of “learning by doing” in complex product innovation processes. The chapter highlights the necessity of shifting the focus of attention from firms’ knowledge boundaries to the project knowledge boundaries, so as to gain a more fine-grained analysis of some important phenomena that happen “around” the formal boundary of the firm and cope with knowledge development problems. In the conclusion we hint at the necessity to investigate in more depth how using development projects as unit of analysis can contribute to offering new ways of performing organizational ambidexterity.
Keywords
- Product Development
- Product Development Process
- Project Level
- Product Architecture
- Organizational Mechanism
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
Original equipment manufacturers. In the automotive industry, OEM companies include, for example, General Motors, Ford, and Toyota. In some industries, such as electronics, OEMs build products or components used in products sold by another company (often called a value-added reseller, or VAR), in others they are identified as ODM (Original Design Manufacturer). Here, we refer to the OEM as the leader in its value chain, i.e., as the final system integrator.
- 3.
Empirical evidences show that firms that pushed the balance of architectural versus component-specific knowledge to the extreme limit by trying to focus on architectural knowledge and outsourcing as much component-specific knowledge as possible, are reported to have problems (Fine and Whitney 1996; Lincoln et al. 1998). In turn, this implies serious problems in coordinating and governing suppliers, leading to an increasing risk of dependency on suppliers (Fine 1998).
References
Ahn, J. H., Lee, D. J., Lee, S. Y., (2006). Balancing business performance and knowledge performance of new product development: Lessons from ITS industry. Long Range Planning 39(5): 525–542.
Ancona, D. G., Caldwell, D., (1990). Beyond boundary spanning: Managing external dependence in product development teams. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 1(2): 119–135.
Argote. L., (1999). Organizational learning: creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge. Boston: Kluwer.
Argote, L., Epple, D., (1990). Learning curves in manufacturing, Science 247(Feb): 920–924.
Ayas, K., (1997). Integrating corporate learning with project management. International Journal of Production Economics 51(1–2): 59–67.
Bahemia, H., Squire, B., (2010). A contingent perspective of open innovation in new product development projects. International Journal of Innovation Management 14(4): 603–627.
Baldwin, C. Y., Clark, K. B., (2000). Design rules: Volume 1. The power of modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Benner, M. J., Tushman, M. L., (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review 28(2): 238–256.
Bonesso, S., Comacchio, A., Pizzi, C., (2011). Technology sourcing decisions in exploratory projects. Technovation 31(10–11): 573–585.
Bresnen, M., Goussevskaia A., Swan J., (2004). Embedding new management knowledge in project-based organizations. Organization Studies 25(9): 1535–1555.
Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., (2001). Unpacking the black box of modularity: technologies, products and organizations, Industrial & Corporate Change 10(1): 179–205.
Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., (2006). Making design rules: a multidomain perspective. Organization Science 17(2): 179–189.
Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., Salter, A., (1998). Mapping and measuring innovation in project-based firms. CoPS Working Paper No. 46, SPRU, University of Sussex.
Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., Pavitt, K., (2001). Knowledge specialization, organization coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly 46(4): 597–625.
Campagnolo, D., Camuffo, A., (2010). The concept of modularity in management studies: a literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews 12, 259–283.
Cassiman, B., Di Guardo, M.C., Valentini, G., (2010). Organizing links with science: Cooperate or contract? A project-level analysis. Research Policy 39(7): 882–892.
Chesbrough, H.W., (2003). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Chesbrough, H., Kusunoki, K., (2001). The modularity trap: innovation, technology phases shifts and the resulting limits of virtual organisations, in Nonaka, I., Teece D. (eds). Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer and Utilization. (pp. 202–230). London: Sage Press.
Christensen, J.F., (2006). Wither core competency for the large corporation in an open innovation world?, in Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J. (eds). Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. (pp. 35–61). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, K.B., (1989). Project scope and project performance: the effect on parts strategy and supplier involvement in product development. Management Science 35(10): 1247–1263.
Clark, K.B., Fujimoto T., (1991). Product development performance. strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 128–152.
Cusumano, M., Nobeoka, K., (1998). Thinking beyond lean: how multi-project management is transforming product development at Toyota and Other Companies. New York: Free Press.
Davies, A., Brady, T., (2000). Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: towards repeatable solutions. Research Policy 29(7–8): 931–953.
De Maio, A., Verganti, R., Corso, M., (1994). A multi-project management framework for product development. European Journal of Operational Research 78(2): 178–191.
Dierickx, I., Cool, K., (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science 35(12) 1504–1513.
Duncan, R.B., (1976). The ambidextrous organization: designing dual structures for innovation, In Kilman, R.H., Pondy, L.R., Slevin, D.P., (eds). The Management of Organization Design (vol.1, pp. 167–188): North-Holland: New York.
Engwall, M., (2003): No project is an island: linking projects to history and context, Research Policy 32(5): 789–808.
Fine, C.H., (1998). Clockspeed: winning industry control in the age of temporary advantage. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.
Fine, C.H., Whitney, D.E., (1996). Is the make-buy decision process a core competence?, April (MIT unpublished manuscript).
Frigant, V., Talbot, D., (2005). Technological determinism and modularity: lessons from a comparison between aircraft and auto industries in Europe, Industry & Innovation 12(3): 337–355.
Gann, D.M., Salter A., (2000). Innovation in project-based, service enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems. Research Policy 29(9): 55–72.
Gibson, C.B., Birkinshaw, J., (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of management Journal 47(2): 209–226.
Helper, S.R., MacDuffie, J.P., Sabel, C., (2000). Pragmatic collaborations: advancing knowledge while controlling opportunism. Industrial and Corporate Change 9(3): 443–488.
Henderson, R.M., Clark, K.B., (1990). Architectural Innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 9–30.
Hippel, von E., (1988). The Sources of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hoang, H., Rothaermel F.T., (2010). Leveraging internal and external experience: exploration, exploitation and R&D project performance. Strategic Management Journal 31(7): 734–758.
Hobday, M., (2000). The project-based organization: an ideal form for managing complex products and systems? Research Policy 29(7–8): 871–893.
Hobday, M., Davies A., Prencipe, A., (2005). Systems integration: a core capability of the modern corporation. Industrial and Corporate Change 14(6): 1109–1143.
Hsieh K.N., Tidd, J., (2012). Open versus closed new service development: the influences of project novelty. Technovation 32(11): 600–608.
Iansiti, M., (1995). Shooting the rapids: managing product development in turbulent environments. California Management Review 38(1): 37–58.
Iansiti, M., Clark K.B., (1994). Integration and dynamic capability: evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers, Industrial and Corporate Change 3(3): 557–605.
Karlsson, C., Ahlström, P., (1996). The difficult path to lean product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13(4): 283–295.
Keegan, A., Turner, J.R., (2002). The management of innovation in project-based firms. Long Range Planning 35(4): 367–388.
Kessler, E.H., Bierly, P.E., Gopalakrishnan, S., (2000). Internal vs. external learning in new product development: effect on speed, costs and competitive advantage. R&D Management 30(3): 213–222.
Kogut, B., Zander, U., (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3(3): 383–397.
Larson, E.W., Gobeli, D.H., (1989). Significance of project management structure on development success. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 36(2): 119–125.
Leonard-Barton, D., (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal 13(S1): 111–125.
Levinthal, D.A., March J.G., (1993). The myopia of learning, Strategic Management Journal 14(S2): 95–112.
Lincoln, J.R., Ahmadjian, C.L., Mason, E., (1998). Organizational learning and purchase-supply relations in japan: hitachi, matsushita and toyota compared, California Management Review 40(3): 241–264.
Liu, L., Leitner D., (2012). Simultaneous pursuit of innovation and efficiency in complex engineering projects - A study of the antecedents and impacts of ambidexterity in project teams. Project Management Journal 43(6): 97–110.
MacDuffie, J.P., (2013). Modularity-as-Property, Modularization-as-Process, and Modularity-as-Frame: lessons from product architecture initiatives in the global automotive industry. Global Strategy Journal 3(1): 1–125.
March, J.G., (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organization learning. Organization Science 2(1): 71–87.
Mikkola, J., (2006). Capturing the degree of modularity embedded in product architectures. Journal of Product Innovation Management 23(2): 128–146.
Miozzo, M., Grimshaw, D., (2005). Modularity and innovation in knowledge-intensive business services: IT outsourcing in Germany and the UK. Research Policy 34(9): 1419–1439.
Mom, T.J., Van Den Bosch, F.A., Volberda, H.W., (2007). Investigating managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: the influence of Top-Down, Bottom-Up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. Journal of Management Studies 44(6): 910–931.
Nesta, L., Dibiaggio, L., (2003). Technology strategy and knowledge dynamics: the case of biotech. Industry & Innovation 10(3): 329–347.
Newell, S., Edelman L.F., (2008). Developing a dynamic project learning and cross-project learning capability: synthesizing two perspectives. Information Systems Journal 18(6): 567–591.
Nishiguchi, T., (1994). Strategic Industrial Sourcing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nobeoka, K., (1995). Inter-project learning in new product development. Academy of Management Proceedings August: 432–436. doi:10.5465.
Nobeoka, K., Cusumano, M.A., (1997). Multi-project strategy and sales growth: the benefits of rapid design transfer in new product development. Strategic Management Journal 18(3): 169–186.
Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H., (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
O’Reilly, C.A., Tushman, M.L., (2004). The ambidexterous organization. Harvard Business Review (April): 1–9.
O’Reilly, C.A., Tushman M.L., (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior 28, 185–206.
Orlikowski, W., (2002). Knowing in practice: enabling a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science 13(3): 249–273.
Parmigiani, A., (2007). Why do firms both make and buy? An investigation of concurrent sourcing. Strategic Management Journal 28(3): 285–311.
Parmigiani, A., Mitchell, W. (2009). Complementarity, capabilities, and the boundaries of the firm: the impact of within-firm and inter-firm expertise on soncurrent sourcing of complementary components. Strategic Management Journal 30(10): 1025–1132.
Prencipe, A., (2003). Corporate strategy and systems integration capabilities - managing networks in complex systems industries. In Prencipe, A., Davies, A., Hobday, M. (eds). The Business of Systems Integration. (pp. 114–132) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prencipe, A., Tell, F., (2001). Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms. Research Policy 30(9): 1373–1394.
Pinto, M.B., Pinto J.K., (1990). Project team communications and cross-functional cooperation in new program development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 7 (3): 200–212.
Polanyi, M., (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W., Smith-Doerr, L., (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41(1): 116–145.
Rothwell, R., (1992). Successful industrial innovation - critical factors for the 1990s. R&D Management 22(3): 221–239.
Salge, T.O., Farchi, T., Barrett, M.I., Dopson, S., (2013). When does search openness really matter? A contingency study of health-care innovation projects. The Journal of Product Innovation Management 30(4): 659–676.
Salvador, F., (2007). Towards a product system modularity construct: literature review and reconceptualization. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 54(2): 219–240.
Sanchez, R., Mahoney, J.T., (1996). Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal 17(1): 63–76.
Shenhar, A., Dvir D., (2007). Reinventing project management: the diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Boston: Harvard Business.
Staudenmeyer, N., Tripsas, M., Tucci, C., (2005). Interfirm modularity and its implications for product development, Journal of Product Innovation Management 22(4): 303–321.
Sturgeon, T.J., (2002). Modular production networks: a new american model of industrial organization. Industrial and Corporate Change 11(3): 451–496.
Swan, J., Scarbrough, H., Newell, S., (2010). Why don’t (or do) organizations learn from projects? Management Learning 41(3): 325–344.
Takeishi, A., (2001). Bridging inter- and intra-firm boundaries: management of supplier involvement in automobile product development. Strategic Management Journal 22(5): 403–433.
Takeishi, A., (2002). Knowledge partitioning in the inter-firm division of labor: the case of automotive product development. Organization Science 13(may-june): 321–338.
Takeishi, A., Fujimoto, T., (2003). Modularization in the car industry: interlinked multiple hierarchies of product, production, and supplier systems. In Prencipe, A., Davies, A. Hobday, M. (eds). The Business of Systems Integration. (pp 254–278). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tatikonda, M.V., Rosenthal, S.R., (2000). Successful execution of product development projects: balancing firmness and flexibility in the innovation process. Journal of Operations Management 18(4): 401–425.
Tushman, M.L., O’Reilly C.A., (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review 38(4): 8–30.
Tushman, M., Smith W.K., Woody, R.C., Westerman, G., O’Reilly C.A., (2010). Organizational designs and innovation streams. Industrial and Corporate Change 19(5): 1331–1366.
Ulrich, K.T., (1995). The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy 24(3): 419–440.
Weigelt, C., (2009). The impact of outsourcing new technologies on integrative capabilities and performance. Strategic Management Journal 30(6): 595–616.
West, J., Iansiti, M., (2003). Experience, experimentation, and the accumulation of knowledge: the evolution of R&D in the semiconductor industry. Research Policy 32(5): 809–825.
Wheelwright, S.C., Clark, K.B., (1992a). Revolutionizing product development. New York: The Free Press.
Wheelwright, S.C., Clark, K.B., (1992b). Creating project plans to focus product development. Harvard Business Review March-April, 70–82.
Williams, T., (2003). Learning from projects. Journal of the Operational Research Society 54(5): 443–451.
Winch, G., (1997). Thirty years of project management. What have we learned? Presented at British Academy of Management. Aston University.
Winter, S.G., Szulanski, G., (2001). Replication as strategy. Organization Science 12(6): 730–743.
Zedtwitz, von M., (2002). Organizational learning through post-project reviews in R&D. R&D Management 32(3): 255–268.
Zirpoli, F., Becker, M.C., (2011a). The limits of design and engineering outsourcing: performance integration and the unfulllled promises of modularity. R&D Management 41(1): 21–43.
Zirpoli, F., Becker, M.C., (2011b). What happens when you outsource too much. MIT Sloan Management Review 52(2): 59–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Becker, M., Errichiello, L., Zirpoli, F. (2014). A Project-Based Perspective on Complex Product Development. In: Bonesso, S., Comacchio, A., Pizzi, C. (eds) Project-Based Knowledge in Organizing Open Innovation. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6509-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6509-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6508-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6509-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)