Abstract
This paper considers Joseph Margolis’ aesthetics as an insightful way to draw a critical balance on the whole venture of defining art, with a crucial reference to Wittgenstein’s legacy. The point of departure is Margolis’ claim that the whole definition debate began with a misinterpretation of Wittgenstein’s teaching, whose meaning would not consist in denying any definition of art, but rather in refuting the possibility of giving one only, clear and distinct as well as context-independent definition of it. The chapter moves on to reconsider Margolis’ first definition of works of art as physically embodied and culturally emergent entities by focusing both on its significance within the analytic debate and on those features leading him beyond the question “What is art?”, towards a philosophy of culture and philosophical anthropology. To understand art, we need to address the question of the relation between a cultural form of life and the nature of persons or selves taking part in it. Hence, we are compelled to broaden the (vague) margins of the definition and the question arises of whether it is still worthwhile to speak of a philosophical definition of art beyond the everyday usage of the term “definition”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Becker, H. 1982. Art Worlds. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.
Bürger, P. 1984. Theory of the Avant-Garde. Minneapolis: Manchester University Press.
Cometti, J.P. 2010. Qu’est-ce que le pragmatisme? Paris: Gallimard.
Danto, A.C. 1964. The Artworld. The Journal of Philosophy 19 (61): 571–584.
Danto, A.C. 1992. The Art World Revisited: Comedies of Similarities. In Beyond the Brillo Box: The Visual Arts in Post-historical Perspective, ed. A.C. Danto. New York: Farrar Strauss Giroux.
Dewey, J. 1988. Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology, The Middle Works: 1899–1924, Vol. 14. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dickie, G. 2012. A Tale of Two Artworlds. In Danto and His Critics, ed. M. Rollins, 111–117. Chichester and Malden: Wiley-Backwell.
Dreon, R. 2017. On Joseph Margolis’ Philosophy: An Introduction. In Margolis ed. 2017: 9–30.
Gronda, R. 2015. La persistenza della tradizione: Bernstein, McDermott, Margolis e Rescher. In Il pragmatismo. Dalle origini agli sviluppi contemporanei, ed. R. Calcaterra, G. Maddalena, and G. Marchetti, 265–285. Roma: Carocci.
Hegel, G.F.W. 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Margolis, J. 1974. Works of Art as Physically Embodied and Culturally Emergent Entities. The British Journal of Aesthetics 3 (14): 187–196.
Margolis, J. 1976. Robust Relativism. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 1 (35): 37–46.
Margolis, J. 2000. The Deviant Ontology of Artworks. In Theories of Art Today, ed. N. Carroll, 109–129. Madison and London: University of Wisconsin Press.
Margolis, J. 2004. Placing Artworks—Placing Ourselves. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 1 (31): 1–16.
Margolis, J. 2009. The Arts and the Definition of the Human: Toward a Philosophical Anthropology. Standford: Stanford University Press.
Margolis, J. 2010. The Importance of Being Earnest About the Definition and Metaphysics of Art. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 3 (68): 215–223.
Margolis, J. 2014. Interview with Joseph Margolis. European Journal for Pragmatism and American Philosophy I (VI): 305–317.
Margolis, J. 2017. Three Paradoxes of Personhood: The Venetian Lectures. Milan and Udine: Mimesis International.
Mead, G.H. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Mead, G.H. 2011. Essays in Social Psychology. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.
Pryba, R. 2015. Experiencing Culture: Reconsidering the Danto/Margolis Debate. In Pragmatism, Metaphysics and Culture: Reflections on the Philosophy of Joseph Margolis, ed. D.M. Grube and R. Sinclair. Nordic Studies in Pragmatism 2. Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network.
Schiller, F. 1845. The Aesthetic Letters, Essays, and the Philosophical Letters of Schiller. Boston: C. C. Little and Brown.
Weitz, M. 1956. The Role of Theory in Aesthetics. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 1 (15): 27–35.
Wittgenstein, L. 1963. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zilioli, U. 2007. Protagoras and the Challenge of Relativism: Plato’s Subtlest Enemy. Aldershot-Burlington: Ashgate.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dreon, R. (2019). On a Certain Vagueness in the Definition of Art: Margolis’ Aesthetics and Wittgenstein’s Legacy. In: Mantoan, D., Perissinotto, L. (eds) Paolozzi and Wittgenstein. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15846-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15846-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15845-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15846-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)