Skip to main content

Shall We (Math and) Dance?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mathematics and Computation in Music (MCM 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11502))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Can we use mathematics, and in particular the abstract branch of category theory, to describe some basics of dance, and to highlight structural similarities between music and dance? We first summarize recent studies between mathematics and dance, and between music and categories. Then, we extend this formalism and diagrammatic thinking style to dance.

M. Mannone is an alumna of the University of Minnesota, USA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An Archimedean solid.

  2. 2.

    Families of circles where every circle of a family intersects every circle of the other family orthogonally.

  3. 3.

    We can define 2-categories and n-categories.

  4. 4.

    More precisely, an abstract (and oriented) diagram is mapped into points and paths in a topological space.

  5. 5.

    Conversely, the violent bow’s movements of strings in the movie Psycho by Hitchcock well evoke the knife hitting.

  6. 6.

    According to [9], “in the dance studio, conscious use of breathing patterns can enhance the phrasing and expressivity in movement.”

  7. 7.

    The category of gestures has gestures as objects and gestures of gestures (hypergestures) as the morphisms between them. The composition of hypergestures (paths) is associative up to a path of paths [16].

  8. 8.

    From [5]: “The physical signal of dance consists of a change in position of the dancer body in space with respect to time.” We can see positions as vertices and changes of positions as arrows. Also: “movement is physically created by an infinite sequence of continuous positions in space unfolding in time.” We can represent the transition from a position to another one via an arrow representing a morphing.

  9. 9.

    In fact, a transformation between movements requires a homotopy, and homotopy is not associative (it requires a reparametrization). However, homotopy classes are associative.

  10. 10.

    In the case of total improvisation (music and dance), the diagram would be commutative.

  11. 11.

    As defined in [14], a 2-functor between two categories A and B is a triple of functions that map objects, arrows, and 2-cells of A into objects, arrows, and 2-cells of B respectively, preserving “all the categorical structures.”

  12. 12.

    Dancers can move without any (external) music if they are able to think of their pulse and to communicate with each other via touch and non-verbal indications (and the leader should be particularly clear in such indications), especially for couple dancing; but this is an unstable situation. Permutations of roles should be clearly signaled via, for example, a variation in touch or visual communication.

  13. 13.

    For tango music, this is more complicated than a simple ‘pulse extraction.’ We can instead think of categories enriched with maps from a beat to another beat containing inner maps, that is, inner pulses. In salsa, there often are recognizable patterns with clave rhythms between strong beats. The pulse can depend on the specific music style, and it can be the object of future research in itself.

  14. 14.

    Limits and colimits are generalizations of products and coproducts, respectively; they are obtained the ones from the others via reversing arrows [12].

  15. 15.

    An ellipse is used for the center of attention in [23]. The ellipsoid of Fig. 2 is a diagram connecting different elements. If the listener/audience recovers the pulse contained in conducting gestures, the two extremities of the ellipsoid can be joined, transforming it into a torus with a section collapsed into a point.

  16. 16.

    A connected category J is a category where, for each couple of objects \(j, k\in J\), there is a finite sequence of objects \(j_0,j_1,...,j_{2n}\) connecting them, that is: \(j=j_0\rightarrow j_1 \leftarrow j_2 \rightarrow ... \rightarrow j_{2n-1} \leftarrow j_{2n}=k\), where both directions are allowed [14]. Here, the morphisms are the arrows \(f_i:j_i\rightarrow j_{i+1}\) or \(f_i:j_{i+1}\rightarrow j_{i}\).

  17. 17.

    The definition of beauty is beyond the scope of this paper, and it would start a philosophical debate. We can just say that a mixture of symmetry, balance, proportion, and smoothness of movements can be overall thought of and mathematically investigated as ‘beauty’ in dance.

  18. 18.

    In a nutshell, a monoidal category, also called a tensor category, is a category C having a bifunctor \(\otimes :C\times C\rightarrow C\), that verifies pentagonal and triangular identities [12]. See [8, 16, 21] for examples of monoidal categories in music.

  19. 19.

    Categorical approaches on aesthetics of the arts [11] and of mathematics and the arts [15] can be joined with studies of nature.

References

  1. Amiot, E., Lerat, J.-P., Recoules, B., Szabo, V.: Developing software for dancing tango in Compás. In: Agustín-Aquino, O.A., Lluis-Puebla, E., Montiel, M. (eds.) MCM 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10527, pp. 91–103. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71827-9_8

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Amiot, E.: Music Through Fourier Spaces. Discrete Fourier Transform in Music Theory. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45581-5

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Arias, J.S.: Spaces of gestures are function spaces. J. Math. Music 12(2), 89–105 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Borkovitz, D., Schaffer, K.: A truncated octahedron in dance, art, music, and beyond. Abstract at Joint Mathematics Meetings in San Diego (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charnavel, I.: Steps towards a Generative Theory of Dance Cognition. Manuscript, Harvard University (2016). https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/003137

  6. Collins, T., Mannone, M., Hsu, D., Papageorgiou, D.: Psychological validation of the mathematical theory of musical gestures (2018, Submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fiore, T., Noll, T., Satyendra, R.: Morphisms of generalized interval systems and PR-groups. J. Math. Music 7(1), 3–27 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Jedrzejewski, F.: Structures algébriques et topologiques de l’objet musical. Mathematics and Music. Journée Annuelle de la Société Mathématique de France 21(21), 3–78 (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Karin, J.: Recontextualizing dance skills: overcoming impediments to motor learning and expressivity in ballet dancers. Front. Psychol. 7(431) (2016). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4805647/

  10. Kelkar, T., Jensenius, A.R.: Analyzing free-hand sound-tracings of melodic phrases. Appl. Sci. 8(135), 1–21 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kubota, A., Hori, H., Naruse, M., Akiba, F.: A new kind of aesthetics – the mathematical structure of the aesthetic. Philosophies 3(14), 1–10 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lawvere, W., Schanuel, S.: Conceptual Mathematics. A First Introduction to Categories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Lerdahl, F., Jackendoff, R.: Generative Theory of Tonal Music. MIT Press, Cambridge (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mac Lane, S.: Categories for the Working Mathematician. Springer, New York (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4721-8

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Mannone, M.: cARTegory theory: framing aesthetics of mathematics. J. Hum. Math. 9(18), 277–294 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mannone, M.: Knots, music and DNA. J. Creat. Music. Syst. 2(2), 1–20 (2018). https://www.jcms.org.uk/article/id/523/

  17. Mannone, M.: Introduction to gestural similarity in music. An application of category theory to the orchestra. J. Math. Music 18(2), 63–87 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mazzola, G., et al.: The Topos of Music: I-IV. Springer, Heidelberg (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64495-0

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Mazzola, G., Andreatta, M.: Diagrams, gestures and formulae in music. J. Math. Music 1(1), 23–46 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Patel-Grosz, P., Grosz, P.G., Kelkar, T., Jensenius, A.R.: Coreference and disjoint reference in the semantics of narrative dance. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22, 199–216 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Popoff, A.: Using monoidal categories in the transformational study of musical time-spans and rhythms (2013). arXiv:1305.7192v3

  22. Prusinkiewicz, P., Lindenmayer, A.: The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants. Springer, New York (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8476-2

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Schaffer, K., Thie, J., Williams, K.: Quantifying the Center of Attention (CA) for Describing Dance Choreography. Abstract at the Joint Mathematics Meetings in San Diego (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wasilewska, K.: Mathematics in the world of dance. In: Proceedings of Bridges 2012: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the mathematician, musician, and tango dancer Emmanuel Amiot for his helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Mannone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mannone, M., Turchet, L. (2019). Shall We (Math and) Dance?. In: Montiel, M., Gomez-Martin, F., Agustín-Aquino, O.A. (eds) Mathematics and Computation in Music. MCM 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11502. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21392-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21392-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21391-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21392-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics