Skip to main content

Distance Hedonic Games

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
SOFSEM 2021: Theory and Practice of Computer Science (SOFSEM 2021)

Abstract

In this paper we consider Distance Hedonic Games (DHGs), a class of non-transferable utility coalition formation games that properly generalizes previously existing models, like Social Distance Games (SDGs) and unweighted Fractional Hedonic Games (FHGs). In particular, in DHGs we assume the existence of a scoring vector \(\alpha \), in which the i-th coefficient \(\alpha _i\) expresses the extent to which an agent x contributes to the utility of an agent y if they are at distance i. We focus on Nash stable outcomes in the arising games, i.e., on coalition structures in which no agent can unilaterally improve her gain by deviating.

We consider two different natural scenarios for the scoring vector, with monotonically increasing and monotonically decreasing coefficients. In both cases we give NP-hardness and inapproximability results on the problems of finding a social optimum and a best Nash stable outcome. Moreover, we characterize the topologies of coalitions that provide high social welfare and consequently give suitable bounds on the Price of Anarchy and on the Price of Stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The girth of a graph is the length of the shortest cycle contained in it.

References

  1. Anshelevich, E., Dasgupta, A., Kleinberg, J.M., Tardos, É., Wexler, T., Roughgarden, T.: The price of stability for network design with fair cost allocation. SIAM J. Comput. 38(4), 1602–1623 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Aziz, H., Brandl, F., Brandt, F., Harrenstein, P., Olsen, M., Peters, D.: Fractional hedonic games. ACM Trans. Econ. Comput. 7(2), 6:1–6:29 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aziz, H., Gaspers, S., Gudmundsson, J., Mestre, J., Täubig, H.: Welfare maximization in fractional hedonic games. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 461–467 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balliu, A., Flammini, M., Melideo, G., Olivetti, D.: On non-cooperativeness in social distance games. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 66, 625–653 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Balliu, A., Flammini, M., Olivetti, D.: On pareto optimality in social distance games. In: Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 349–355 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Banerjee, S., Konishi, H., Sönmez, T.: Core in a simple coalition formation game. Soc. Choice Welf. 18(1), 135–153 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bilò, V., Fanelli, A., Flammini, M., Monaco, G., Moscardelli, L.: On the price of stability of fractional hedonic games. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 1239–1247 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bilò, V., Fanelli, A., Flammini, M., Monaco, G., Moscardelli, L.: Nash stable outcomes in fractional hedonic games: existence, efficiency and computation. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 62, 315–371 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Bloch, F., Diamantoudi, E.: Noncooperative formation of coalitions in hedonic games. Int. J. Game Theory 40(2), 263–280 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Bogomolnaia, A., Jackson, M.O.: The stability of hedonic coalition structures. Games Econ. Behav. 38(2), 201–230 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Brandl, F., Brandt, F., Strobel, M.: Fractional hedonic games: individual and group stability. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 1219–1227 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brânzei, S., Larson, K.: Social distance games. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 91–96 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dangalchev, C.: Residual closeness in networks. Phys. Stat. Mech. Appl. 365(2), 556–564 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dangalchev, C.: Residual closeness and generalized closeness. Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci. 22(8), 1939–1948 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Dreze, J., Greenberg, J.: Hedonic coalitions: optimality and stability. Econometrica 48(4), 987–1003 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Dutton, R.D., Brigham, R.C.: Edges in graphs with large girth. Graphs Comb. 7(4), 315–321 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Elkind, E., Wooldridge, M.J.: Hedonic coalition nets. In: 8th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2009), Budapest, Hungary, 10–15 May 2009, vol. 1, pp. 417–424 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Feldman, M., Lewin-Eytan, L., Naor, J.: Hedonic clustering games. TOPC 2(1), 4:1–4:48 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gairing, M., Savani, R.: Computing stable outcomes in symmetric additively separable hedonic games. Math. Oper. Res. 44(3), 1101–1121 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kaklamanis, C., Kanellopoulos, P., Patouchas, D.: On the price of stability of social distance games. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium, Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT), pp. 125–136 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Koutsoupias, E., Papadimitriou, C.H.: Worst-case equilibria. Comput. Sci. Rev. 3(2), 65–69 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Olsen, M.: On defining and computing communities. In: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Computing: The Australasian Theory Symposium (CATS), pp. 97–102 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Papadimitriou, C.H.: Algorithms, games, and the internet. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP), pp. 1–3 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, Z., Han, X., Dósa, G., Tuza, Z.: A general bin packing game: interest taken into account. Algorithmica 80(5), 1534–1555 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanna Varricchio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Flammini, M., Kodric, B., Olsen, M., Varricchio, G. (2021). Distance Hedonic Games. In: Bureš, T., et al. SOFSEM 2021: Theory and Practice of Computer Science. SOFSEM 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12607. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67731-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67731-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67730-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67731-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics