Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

The Palgrave Handbook of Image Studies pp 467–482Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

The Iconic (In)difference

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 1676 Accesses

Abstract

The opening sequence of Stanley Kubrick’s science fiction masterpiece 2001: A Space Odyssey is set in a desolate arid region millions of years ago, where a group of hominids is first seen munching on bushes and meager green plants amid a herd of tapirs. After being driven away from their water hole by a rival tribe, the defeated apes huddle together in a dark cave. As night falls, their eyes wide open make us, the spectators, aware of the countless unknown dangers they are afraid of: it is a matter of life and death, a Darwinian struggle for survival in which the fittest rule and the weak die. Overpowered by the fearsome antagonists and deprived of the most essential element to the lives on the desert, Kubrick’s hero apes seem to be doomed to perish.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aarsleff, Hans. 1988. “Introduction” to Wilhelm von Humboldt, On Language: The Diversity of Human Language-Structure and Its Influence on the Mental Development of Mankind (1836), VII–LXV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barasch, Moshe. 1998. Modern Theories of Art 2: From Impressionism to Kandinsky. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenberg, Hans. 1960. “Paradigmen zu einer Metaphorologie”. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 6: 5–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, Gottfried. 1978. “Zu einer Hermeneutik des Bildes”. In: Seminar: Die Hermeneutik und die Wissenschaften. Ed. by Hans-Georg Gadamer and Gottfried Boehm. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, Gottfried. 1994 [2006]. “Die Wiederkehr der Bilder”. In: Was ist ein Bild? Ed. by Gottfried Boehm. München: Wilhelm Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, Gottfried. 1995. “Bildbeschreibung. Über die Grenzen von Bild und Sprache”. In: Beschreibungskunst-Kunstbeschreibung. Ekphrasis von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. Ed. by Gottfried Boehm and Helmut Pfotenhauer. München: Wilhelm Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, Gottfried. 1996. “Zuwachs an Sein: Hermeneutische Reflexion und bildende Kunst”. In: Die Moderne und die Grenze der Vergegenständlichung. Ed. by Hans-Georg Gadamer. München: Galerie Klueser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, Gottfried (ed). 2001a. Homo Pictor. München: Saur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, Gottfried. 2001b [2012]. “Representation, Presentation, Presence: Tracing the Homo Pictor”. In: Iconic Power: Materiality and Meaning in Social Life. Ed. by Jeffrey C. Alexander, Dominik Bartmański, and Bernhard Giesen. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, Gottfried. 2004 [2007]. “Jenseits der Sprache? Anmerkungen zur Logik der Bilder”. In: Wie Bilder Sinn Erzeugen. Die Macht des Zeigens. Berlin: Berlin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, Gottfried. 2006a [2010]. “Letter to W.J.T. Mitchell”. Trans. by Jennifer Jenkins. In: The Pictorial Turn. Ed. by Neal Curtis. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, Gottfried. 2006b [2009]. “Indeterminacy. On the Logic of the Image”. In: Dynamics and Performativity of Imagination: The Image between the Visible and the Invisible. Ed. by Bernd Huppauf and Christoph Wulf. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, Gottfried. 2007. “Die Hintergründigkeit des Zeigens. Deiktische Wurzeln des Bildes”. In: Wie Bilder Sinn Erzeugen. Die Macht des Zeigens. Berlin: Berlin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, Gottfried. 2011. “Ikonische Differenz”. Rheinsprung 11. Zeitschrift für Bildkritik, 1: 170–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredekamp, Horst. 2015 [2018]. Image Acts: A Systematic Approach to Visual Agency. Trans., ed., and adapted by Elizabeth Clegg. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte, Pietro. 2020. Unframing Aesthetics. Milan and London: Mimesis International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel C. 1978 [1981]. “Where am I?” In: The Mind’s I: Fantasies and Reflections on Mind and Soul. Ed. by Douglas R. Hofstadter and Daniel C. Dennett. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, Konrad. 1887 [2001]. “Über den Ursprung der künstlerischen Tätigkeit”. In: Schriften zur Kunst, 2 vols. Ed. by Gottfried Boehm, vol. 1. München: Wilhelm Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, Konrad. 2001. Schriften zur Kunst, 2 vols. Ed. by Gottfried Boehm, vol. 1. München: Wilhelm Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedberg, David. 1989. The Power of Images: Studies in the History and Theory of Response. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1820 [1822]. “Über das vergleichende Sprachstudium in Beziehung auf die verschiedenen Epochen der Sprachentwicklung”. In: Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin aus den Jahren 1820–1821. Berlin: Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1836 [1988]. On Language: The Diversity of Human Language-Structure and Its Influence on the Mental Development of Mankind. Trans. by Peter Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, Edmund, 1904–1905 [2005]. “Phantasy and Image Consciousness”. In: Phantasy, Image Consciousness, and Memory (1898–1925). Trans. by John B. Brough, ed. by Rudolf Bernet. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imdahl, Max. 1980 [1996]. Giotto—Arenafresken. Ikonographie, Ikonologie, Ikonik. München: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1790 [2007]. Critique of Judgement. Trans. by James Creed Meredith, ed. by Nicholas Walker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean-François. 1971 [2011]. Discourse, Figure. Trans. by Antony Hudek and Mary Lydon. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majetschak, Stefan. 1997. “Die Sprachlichkeit der Kunst. Konrad Fiedlers Sprach- und Kunsttheorie im Lichte der Sprachphilosophie Wilhelm von Humboldts”. In: Auge und Hand. Konrad Fiedlers Kunsttheorie im Kontext. Ed. by Stefan Majetschack. München: Wilhelm Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1873 [1990]. “On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense”. In: Philosophy and Truth: Selections from Nietzsche’s Notebooks of the Early 1870’s. Trans. and ed. by Daniel Breazeale. New Jersey: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panofsky, Erwin. 1915. “Das Problem des Stils in der bildenden Kunst”. Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft, 10: 460–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panofsky, Erwin. 1939 [1955]. “Iconography and Iconology: An Introduction to the Study of Renaissance Art”. In: Meaning in the Visual Arts. Papers in and on Art History. Garden City and New York: Doubleday & C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinotti, Andrea. 2017. “Self-Negating Images: Towards An-Iconology”. Proceedings 1: 1–9 (https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1090856).

  • Purgar, Krešimir. 2015. “What is not an Image (Anymore)? Iconic Difference, Immersion, and Iconic Simultaneity in the Age of Screens”. Phainomena. Journal of Phenomenology and Hermeneutics, 24 (92–93): 145–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary. 1981 “Brains in a Vat”. In: Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richtmeyer, Ulrich. 2017. “Ikonische Differenz”. Image, 26: 82–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seel, Martin. 2010. The Aesthetics of Appearing. Trans. by John Farell. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoichita, Victor I. 1993 [2015]. The Self-Aware Image: An Insight into Early Modern Metapainting. New, improved, and updated edition. Trans. by Anne-Marie Glasheen. London and Turnhout: Brepols.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy

    Pietro Conte

Authors
  1. Pietro Conte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pietro Conte .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Academy of Arts and Culture, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University, Osijek, Croatia

    Krešimir Purgar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Conte, P. (2021). The Iconic (In)difference. In: Purgar, K. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Image Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71830-5_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation