Skip to main content

Galenic Causation in the Theoretical and Practical Medicine of Giambattista Da Monte

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Galen and the Early Moderns

Abstract

Giambattista Da Monte methodically discussed the causes of disease according to Galenic definitions and applied these causes in his diagnosis and treatment of patients, devising a seemingly original interpretation of the categories of procatarctic, proegoumenic or antecedent, and containing causes. While discussions of these causal categories are found in medieval medical works, during the first half the sixteenth century, medical theorists reappraised them. Niccolò Leoniceno, for example, questioned whether Galen in fact endorsed containing causes as an explanatory category. Da Monte, however, reaffirmed its importance in etiology while mapping out its relation to antecedent causes. His interest in these causes extended beyond theoretical consideration. He outlined, in his commentary on Avicenna’s Canon, how therapy should address each of the causes in an orderly fashion. Moreover, these theoretical considerations on causes are reflected in the collections of his consilia, case studies that detail his attempts to heal patients. In these case studies, Da Monte made efforts to identify various kinds of causes in order to find cures, revealing a robust understanding of disease and the limited role of humoral theory in both his etiology and his medical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For teleology in Italian Renaissance medicine, see Siraisi 1997; Distelzweig 2014; Klestinec 2011, 44–47, 51–52, 61–62.

  2. 2.

    For Niccolò’s activity and its uneven reception, see McVaugh 2006.

  3. 3.

    Galen 1904, 6: ‘Stoycos philosophos novi primos contentivam causam que et conjuncta dicitur nominare’.

  4. 4.

    Galen listed the six non-naturals at Ars medica 23. See Galen 2000, 346 (1.367K).

  5. 5.

    Translation from Galen 2011, 369.

  6. 6.

    On Containing Causes is not listed in the inventory of his library. See Mugnai Carrara 1991, 103–221.

  7. 7.

    Leoniceno 1508, 2r–2v: ‘Galenus, docens curare iam factam aegritudinem, scribit haec verba secundum translationem quae in usu habetur: “Facta vero aegritudo curabitur dispositione, a qua principaliter secundum naturam operatio laeditur, ablata, quam et ipsam dicimus aegritudinis causam”. … Galenus suo dogmati contradicit, si ita dicat dispositionem laedentem principaliter operationes non esse aegritudinem, sed causam aegritudinis’. The passage Leoniceno wants to emend is found at Ars medica 28. See Galen 2000, 361 (1.381K).

  8. 8.

    For the date of these lectures, see Da Monte 1562, sig. a7r. For the context of teaching medicine at Padua during Da Monte’s life, see Bylebyl 1979.

  9. 9.

    Da Monte cited Galen’s De pulsuum differentiis 1.1 but appears to have had in mind the passage from the beginning of Galen’s De causis pulsuum. See Galen 1821–1833, Vol. 9, 1–2.

  10. 10.

    Compare with Galen’s De causis symptomatum, 2.5 (Galen 1821–33, Vol. 7, 95).

  11. 11.

    Da Monte 1557, 542: ‘Qui non habuerit cognitionem causarum nunquam poterit recte curare ipsum morbum’.

  12. 12.

    For the genre of consilia in the Middle Ages, see Agrimi and Crisciani, 1994. For its relation to actual medical advice, see Crisciani 2004. For the new approaches of the sixteenth century, see Pomata 2010. For a history of the genre over the longue durée, see Pomata 2014.

  13. 13.

    For Crato’s career, see Gunnoe Jr. and Shackelford 2009. For Crato’s loyalty to Da Monte, see Nutton 2018, 39.

  14. 14.

    The extent to which Da Monte worked and taught in the hospital has for been controversial for long. For a summary of the literature, see Stolberg 2014a, 653–656.

  15. 15.

    Da Monte 1559a, 57r: ‘Queritur causa symptomatum: sine cognitione enim causarum non poterit curari’; Da Monte 1559a, 62r: ‘Sed ut simus boni medici, investigemus primo causas horum symptomatum’.

  16. 16.

    For his method of discovering hidden causes, see Bylebyl 1993.

  17. 17.

    Da Monte 1559a, 1r: ‘Ex omnibus intrinsecis causis, quae ad affectus capitis praeter naturam generandos conducunt, potissimae sunt ventriculi imbellicitas, atque hepatis caliditas’.

  18. 18.

    Da Monte 1559a, 47v–49r.

  19. 19.

    Da Monte 1559a, 191r: ‘Quantum attinet ad causas intrinsecas, est primo causa, quae habet formam causae antecedentis, praeter eam quae loco affecto coniuncta est’.

  20. 20.

    Da Monte 1559b, 542–543: ‘Praeponatis ea, quae foris appareant, & texetis ita simplicem historiam’.

  21. 21.

    Da Monte 1559b, 546–547: ‘Videamus an sit una horum omnium caussa, an vero diversae. Et si una, quomodo sit’.

  22. 22.

    Da Monte 1559b, 547: ‘omnia symptomata ab una caussa procedere, videlicet a pituate mixta cum bile’.

  23. 23.

    For Da Monte’s method of division and elimination, see Bylebyl 1991, 175–77; Maclean 2002, 143–144.

References

  • Agrimi, Jole, and Chiara Crisciani. 1994. Les Consilia médicaux. Brepols: Turnhout.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avicenna. 1556. Liber Canonis. Basel: Johann Herwagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bylebyl, Jerome L. 1979. The school of Padua: Humanistic medicine in the sixteenth century. In Health and mortality in the sixteenth century, ed. Charles Webster, 335–370. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Teaching ‘Methodus Medendi’ in the Renaissance. In Galen’s method of healing, ed. Fridolf Kudlien and Richard J. Durling, 157–189. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. The manifest and the hidden in the Renaissance clinic. In Medicine and the five senses, ed. W.F. Bynum and Roy Porter, 40–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabritto, Monica. 2012. Curing melancholia in sixteenth-century medical consilia between theory and practice. Medicina nei Secoli 24: 627–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisciani, Chiara. 2004. Consilia, responsi, consulti. I pareri del medico tra insegnamento e professione. In Consilium. Teorie e pratiche del consigliare nella cultura medievale, ed. Carla Casagrande, Chiara Crisciani, and Silvana Vecchio, 259–279. Florence: Sismel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Monte, Giambattista. 1554a. Consultationum medicinalium centuria prima. Venice: Vincenzo Valgrisi.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1554b. In nonum libri Rhasis ad Almansorem regem arabum. Venice: Baldassarre Costantini.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1557. In secundam fen primi Canonis Avicennae. Venice: Vincenzo Valgrisi & Baldassarre Costantini.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1559a. Consilia medica omnia. Nuremberg: Johann vom Berg & Ulrich Neuber.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1559b. Consultationum medicinalium centuria secunda. Venice: Vincenzo Valgrisi.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1559c. Consultationum medicinalium centuria tertia. Venice: Vincenzo Valgrisi.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1562. In nonum librum Rasis ad R[egem] Almansorem lectiones. Basel: Heinrich Petri & Peter Perna.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1587. Universa medicina. Frankfurt: Heirs of Andreas Wechel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Distelzweig, Peter. 2014. Fabricius’s Galeno-Aristotelian teleomechanics of muscle. In The life sciences in early modern philosophy, ed. Ohad Nachtomy and Justin E.H. Smith, 65–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominicus Gundissalinus. 1903. De divisione philosophiae, ed. Ludwig Baur. In Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters 4.2/3. Munster Westfallen: Aschendorffsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durling, Richard J. 1961. A chronological census of Renaissance editions and translations of Galen. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 24: 230–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flammini, Giuseppe. 1992. Le strutture prefatorie del commento all’antica traduzione latina degli ‘Aforismi’. In Prefazioni, prologhi, proemi di opere tecnico-scientifiche latine, ed. Carlo Santini and Nino Scivoletto, vol. 2, 579–616. Rome: Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen. 1821–1833. Opera omnia, ed. Karl Gottlob Kühn, 20 vols. Leipzig: Karl Knobloch.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1904. De causis continentibus libellus a Nicolao Regino in sermonem Latinum translatus, ed. Karl Kalbfleisch. Marburg: Universitäts-Buchdrukerei.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1969. De causis contentivis, ed. M. Lyons et al. CMG Suppl. Orient. II. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Exhortation à l’étude de la médecine. Art médical, ed. Véronique Boudon-Millot. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. On Diseases and Symptoms. Trans. Ian Johnston. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Method of Healing, Books 14. Trans. Ian Johnston and G.H.R. Horsley. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Ballester, Luis. 1998. The new Galen: A challenge to Latin Galenism in thirteenth-century Montpellier. In Text and tradition: Studies in ancient medicine and its transmission, ed. Klaus-Dietrich Fischer, Diethard Nickel, and Paul Potter, 53–83. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunnoe, Charles D., Jr., and Jole Shackelford. 2009. Johannes Crato von Krafftheim (1519–1585): Imperial physician, irenicist, and anti-Paracelsian. In Ideas and cultural margins in early modern Germany: Essays in honor of H. C. Erik Midelfort, ed. Marjorie Elizabeth Plummer and Robin Barnes, 201–216. Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankinson, Robert James. 1998a. Cause and explanation in ancient Greek thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998b. Introduction. In Galen: On antecedent causes, ed. Robert James Hankinson, 1–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Causation in Galen. In Galien et la philosophie, ed. Jonathan Barnes and Jacques Jouanna, 31–72. Geneva: Foundation Hardt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klestinec, Cynthia. 2011. Theaters of anatomy: Students, teachers, and traditions of dissection in Renaissance Venice. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leoniceno, Niccolò. 1508. In libros Galeni e greca in latinam linguam a se translatos prefatio communis. Venice: Giacomo Penzio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, Anthony A., and David N. Sedley. 1987. The Hellenistic philosophers, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclean, Ian. 2002. Logic, signs and nature in the Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurach, Gregor. 1978. Johannicius. Isagoge ad Techne Galieni. Sudhoffs Archiv 62: 148–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, Jon. 2010. Avicenna. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVaugh, Michael R. 2006. Niccolò da Reggio’s translations of Galen and their reception in France. Early Science and Medicine 11: 275–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mugnai Carrara, Daniela. 1991. La biblioteca di Nicolò Leoniceno. Tra Aristotele e Galeno: cultura e libri di un medico umanista. Florence: Olschki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutton, Vivian. 1983. Seeds of disease: An explanation of contagion and infection from the Greeks to the Renaissance. Medical History 27: 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. John Caius and the manuscripts of Galen. Cambridge: The Cambridge Philological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. An autobiography by John Caius. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pomata, Gianna. 2005. The uses of Historia in early modern medicine. In Historia: Empiricism and erudition in early modern Europe, ed. Gianna Pomata and Nancy Siraisi, 105–146. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Sharing cases: The observationes in early modern medicine. Early Science and Medicine 15: 193–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. The medical case narrative: Distant reading of an epistemic genre. Literature and Medicine 32: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambursky, Samuel. 1959. Physics of the stoics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siraisi, Nancy G. 1987. Avicenna in Renaissance Italy: The Canon and medical teaching in Italy after 1500. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Giovanni Argenterio and sixteenth-century medical innovation. Osiris 6 n.s.: 161–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Vesalius and the reading of Galen’s teleology. Renaissance Quarterly 50: 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Disease and symptom as problematic concepts in Renaissance medicine. In Res et Verba in Der Renaissance, ed. Eckhard Kessler and Ian Maclean, 217–240. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolberg, Michael. 2014a. Bedside teaching and the acquisition of practical skills in mid-sixteenth-century Padua. History of Medicine and the Allied Sciences 69: 633–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014b. ‘You have no good blood in your body’. Oral communication in sixteenth-century physicians’ medical practice. Medical History 59: 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrigiano dei Torrigiani, Pietro. 1512. Commentum in Microtegni Galieni. Venice: Filippo Penzi.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Craig Martin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Martin, C. (2022). Galenic Causation in the Theoretical and Practical Medicine of Giambattista Da Monte. In: Favaretti Camposampiero, M., Scribano, E. (eds) Galen and the Early Moderns. International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées, vol 236. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86308-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics