Skip to main content

Being for Profit, Non-profit, or Both? The Risk Advantage of Social Enterprises in the Face of Shocks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Innovation and Social Enterprises

Part of the book series: Issues in Business Ethics ((IBET,volume 62))

  • 363 Accesses

Abstract

Social enterprises experience tensions triggered by the incorporation of both a commercial and a socio-environmental logic. This may threaten their functioning during ordinary times. Yet, in the face of shocks, their dual nature may prove an advantage compared to their for-profit and non-profit counterparts. Building on research on institutional logics and uncertainty, we theorize that these organizations, in view of the knowledge, resources, competencies and relations they possess in both economic and social domains, face less risk compared to for profit and non-profit organizations when shocks call them to deal with unexpected demands from both spheres. We believe such theorization could talk to literature on hybrid organizations and risk, on for-profit and non-profit organizational forms, and on ethical issues in the creation of social impact.

Each company’s prospects for growth are inextricable from its ability to operate sustainably and serve its full set of stakeholders (..). A company cannot achieve long-term profits without embracing purpose and considering the needs of a broad range of stakeholders.

From “Larry Fink’s Letter to CEOs”, Jan 2020.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.careerfair2019unitn.it/scheda-azienda.php?idAzienda=337&idSettore=0&nomeRicercato=

  2. 2.

    The SAR NGOs linked to large NGOs such as Save the Children and Médecins Sans Frontières could rely also on strong institutional relationships (Cusumano 2019).

  3. 3.

    NGOs with an explicit political stance against the back-then ruling party faced the opposite effect, attracting more donations as their opposing political adversaries attacked them.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Riccardo Maiolini, Luca Mongelli and Pietro Versari for their support in the initial phase of this work. We thank the editors and an anonymous referee for their suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Capo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Capo, F., Rullani, F. (2022). Being for Profit, Non-profit, or Both? The Risk Advantage of Social Enterprises in the Face of Shocks. In: Vaccaro, A., Ramus, T. (eds) Social Innovation and Social Enterprises. Issues in Business Ethics, vol 62. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96596-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics