Skip to main content

Critical and Instrumental Perspectives of Interdisciplinarity for Business Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Route Towards Global Sustainability

Abstract

Sustainable Development Education is considered one of the main vectors for a sustainability transition. Sustainability is a broad field, inherently occupied by different knowledge areas that drink from each other to address the complexity of safeguarding the biosphere for the current and future human and nonhuman inhabitants. With the advent of new frameworks addressing sustainable development under a wider and more detailed lens, such as Aichi Targets, Millennium Development Goals, and ultimately the Sustainable Development Goals, the call for interdisciplinarity becomes even more needed. Interdisciplinarity can be seen as combining methods, theoretical approaches, and epistemological perspectives in diverse working groups for problem-solving; interdisciplinarity can also assume a critical perspective, grounded on the real-world problem needs. We assume that critical and instrumental perspectives, combined in the higher education milieu, can be the answer for educating leaders that hold the theoretical repertoire and the practical competencies that enable them to be agents of changing realities.

This chapter is a revised and improved part of the theoretical framework of the author’s dissertation thesis: “Martins (2021)”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aboelela, S. W., Larson, E., Bakken, S., Carrasquillo, O., Formicola, A., Glied, S. A., Haas, J., & Gebbie, K. M. (2007). Defining interdisciplinary research: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Services Research, 42(1p1), 329–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcaraz, J. M., & Thiruvattal, E. (2010). An interview with Manuel Escudero the United Nations’ principles for responsible management education: A global call for sustainability. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(3), 542–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annan-Diab, F., & Molinari, C. (2017). Interdisciplinarity: Practical approach to advancing education for sustainability and for the sustainable development goals. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apostel, L., Berger, G., Briggs, A., & Michaud, G. (Eds.). (1972). Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities (pp. 89–97). Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal, J. D. (1944). The social function of science. George Routledge & sons ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B., & Solomon, J. (1999). ‘Pedagogy, identity and the construction of a theory of symbolic control’: Basil Bernstein questioned by Joseph Solomon. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 265–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borges, J. C., Ferreira, T. C., de Oliveira, M. S. B., Macini, N., & Caldana, A. C. F. (2017). Hidden curriculum in student organizations: Learning, practice, socialization and responsible management in a business school. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland, G. H., Khalid, M., Agnelli, S., Al-Athel, S., & Chidzero, B. (1987). Our common future. New York, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cezarino, L. O., & Corrêa, H. L. (2019). Mensuração da interdisciplinaridade nos cursos de graduação em Administração. Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior (Campinas), 24(1), 174–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Veiga, J. E. (2015). Para entender o desenvolvimento sustentável. Editora 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darian-Smith, E., & McCarty, P. (2016). Beyond interdisciplinarity: Developing a global transdisciplinary framework. Transcience: A Journal of Global Studies, 7(2), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Assumpção, M. R., & Neto, M. P. M. (2020). State-of-the-art practices being reported by the PRME champions group: A reference to advance education for sustainable development. The International Journal of Management Education, 18(2), 100369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escudero, M. (2011). PRME and four theses on 20 the future of management education. Business schools and their contribution to society, 201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazenda, I. C. A. (1997). O sentido da ambiguidade numa didática interdisciplinar. Didática e formação de professores: percursos e perspectivas no Brasil e em Portugal, 3, 241–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazenda, I. C. A. (1998). A aquisição de uma formação interdisciplinar de professores. Didática e interdisciplinaridade, 17, 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazenda, I. C. A. (2008). Interdisciplinaridade e transdisciplinaridade na formação de professores. Ideação, 10(1), 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimarães, M. J. E. (2008). Interdisciplinaridade: consciência do servir. FAZENDA, ICA O que é interdisciplinaridade. Cortez Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haertle, J., Parkes, C., Murray, A., & Hayes, R. (2017). PRME: Building a global movement on responsible management education. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 66–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halberstadt, J., Timm, J. M., Kraus, S., & Gundolf, K. (2019). Skills and knowledge management in higher education: How service learning can contribute to social entrepreneurial competence development. Journal of Knowledge Management (Vol. 23, p. 1925).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, H. (1972). Discipline and interdisciplinarity. Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities, 83, 89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley, K. A. (2009). Interdisciplinary strategies as transformative change in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 34(5), 331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huda, M., Jasmi, K. A., Alas, Y., Qodriah, S. L., Dacholfany, M. I., & Jamsari, E. A. (2018). Empowering civic responsibility: Insights from service learning. In Engaged scholarship and civic responsibility in higher education (pp. 144–165). IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huutoniemi, K., Klein, J. T., Bruun, H., & Hukkinen, J. (2010). Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators. Research Policy, 39(1), 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, H. (1973). Technology and responsibility: Reflections on the new tasks of ethics. Social Research, 40, 31–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapp, K. W. (1961). Toward a science of man in society. In Toward a science of man in society (pp. 200–211). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (1984). Interdisciplinarity and complexity: An evolving relationship. Structure, 71, 72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (2006). Afterword: The emergent literature on interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research evaluation. Research Evaluation, 15(1), 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (2010). A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity, 15, 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T., & Newell, W. H. (1997). Advancing interdisciplinary studies. In Handbook of the undergraduate curriculum: A comprehensive guide to purposes, structures, practices, and change (pp. 393–415).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kysilka, M. L. (1998). Understanding integrated curriculum. Curriculum Journal, 9(2), 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, C., Waddock, S., & Sroufe, R. (2017). Torn between two paradigms: A struggle for the soul of business schools. AI Practitioner, 19(2), 108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lattuca, L. R. (2001). Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. Vanderbilt university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattuca, L. R. (2002). Learning interdisciplinarity: Sociocultural perspectives on academic work. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(6), 711–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir, Y., Rey, B., & Fazenda, I. (2001). Les fondements de l’interdisciplinarité dans la formation à l’enseignement. Éditions du CRP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, K. Y., & Kwan, C. L. (2017). The effect of environmental, social, governance and sustainability initiatives on stock value–examining market response to initiatives undertaken by listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(6), 606–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewe, M., & Rippin, N. (2015). Translating an ambitious vision into global transformation: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development (No. 7/2015). Discussion Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, R. (2012). Towards better embedding sustainability into companies’ systems: An analysis of voluntary corporate initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 25, 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynton, E. A. (1985). Interdisciplinarity: Rationales and criteria of assessment. In Interdisciplinarity revisited: Re-assessing the concept in the light of institutional experience (pp. 15–25).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, F. P. (2021). Interdisciplinarity in education for sustainable development: Business schools perspectives (Master Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. C. (1982). Varieties of interdisciplinary approaches in the social sciences: A 1981 overview. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 1, 1–37.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Molderez, I., & Fonseca, E. (2018). The efficacy of real-world experiences and service learning for fostering competences for sustainable development in higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4397–4410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mtawa, N., Fongwa, S., & Wilson-Strydom, M. (2021). Enhancing graduate employability attributes and capabilities formation: A service-learning approach. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(5), 679–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muff, K., Kapalka, A., & Dyllick, T. (2017). The Gap Frame-Translating the SDGs into relevant national grand challenges for strategic business opportunities. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 363–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulia, P., Behura, A., & Kar, S. (2016). Categorical imperative in defense of strong sustainability. Problemy Ekorozwoju–Problems of Sustainable Development, 11(2), 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okręglicka, M. (2018). Commitment to the sustainability of students within a responsible management education. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(4), 243–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orzes, G., Moretto, A. M., Moro, M., Rossi, M., Sartor, M., Caniato, F., & Nassimbeni, G. (2020). The impact of the United Nations global compact on firm performance: A longitudinal analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, 107664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, A. (2017). Engagement and employability: Integrating career learning through Cocurricular experiences in postsecondary education. NASPA-Student Affairs Administrators in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, M. (2017). Sustainability principles and practice. Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfield, P. L. (1992). The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Social Science & Medicine, 35(11), 1343–1357.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanahuja, J. A., & Tezanos Vázquez, S. (2017). Del milenio a la sostenibilidad: retos y perspectivas de la Agenda 2030 para el desarrollo sostenible.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18(2), 179–183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, N. (2004). Interdisciplinarity in theory and practice. In C. Camic & H. Joas (Eds.), The dialogical turn: New roles for sociology in the postdisciplinary age (pp. 43–64). Bowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solitander, N., Fougère, M., Sobczak, A., & Herlin, H. (2012). We are the champions: Organizational learning and change for responsible management education. Journal of Management Education, 36(3), 337–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavares, D. E. (2008). A interdisciplinaridade na contemporaneidade–qual o sentido. O que é interdisciplinaridade, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vladimirova, K., & Le Blanc, D. (2016). Exploring links between education and sustainable development goals through the lens of UN flagship reports. Sustainable Development, 24(4), 254–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A. E. (2012). Shaping the education of tomorrow: 2012 full-length report on the UN decade of education for sustainable development. UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingart, P. (2010). A short history of knowledge formations. In The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 3–14).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingart, S. B. (2013). From trees to webs: Uprooting knowledge through visualization. In Classification & visualization: Interfaces to knowledge. Proceedings of the International UDC Seminar (pp. 43–58).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wersun, A. (2017). Context and the institutionalisation of PRME: The case of the University for the Common Good. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winfield, F., & Ndlovu, T. (2019). Future-proof your degree. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education (Vol. 20, p. 1329).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, R. (2019). The spiral curriculum in higher education: Analysis in pedagogic context and a business studies application. e-Journal of Business Education and Scholarship of Teaching, 13(3), 14–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, R. (1991). Reading encyclopedias: Science and the organization of knowledge in British dictionaries of arts and sciences, 1730-1850. Isis, 82(1), 24–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Martins, F., Cezarino, L., Liboni, L. (2023). Critical and Instrumental Perspectives of Interdisciplinarity for Business Education. In: Singh, P., Milshina, Y., Batalhão, A., Sharma, S., Hanafiah, M.M. (eds) The Route Towards Global Sustainability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10437-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics