Abstract
Networks are pervasive in social and economic life, and the concept itself has been used to describe a plethora of different phenomena. The multidisciplinary origins of network studies gave birth to one of the most prolific and transversal areas of research for its application to many fields as different as physics, biology, linguistics, anthropology, sociology, economics and management. The network approach, in fact, “allows researchers to capture interactions of any individual unit within the larger field of activity to which the unit belongs” (Kilduff & Tsai, 2003, p. 13). In this view, the network perspective offers a distinctive focus on social interactions that allow capturing the complexity of organizations and their micro, meso and macro social systems necessary to tackle some fundamental questions for management and organization scholars. The rich multidisciplinary approach that characterized the birth and life of network studies suggests that they have the potential to complement management studies in the analysis of an increasingly complex world, where challenges as important as the digital transformation, the sustainable development, and the international tensions in the political, social, health and safety domains are changing organizations and institutions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.
Ahuja, G., Soda, G., & Zaheer, A. (2012). The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organization Science, 23(2), 434–448.
Anderson, E., & Jap, S. D. (2005). The dark side of close relationship. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(3), 75–82.
Berkman, L. F., & Syme, S. L. (1979). Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: A nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. American Journal of Epidemiology, 109(2), 186–204.
Bizzi, L. (2013). The dark side of structural holes: A multilevel investigation. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1554–1578.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.
Burt, R. S. (1995). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.
Burt, R. S., Kilduff, M., & Tasselli, S. (2013). Social network analysis: Foundations and frontiers on advantage. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 527–547.
Emirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1411–1454. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2014)0000040004
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
Gulati, R., & Srivastava, S. B. (2014). Bringing Agency Back into Network Research: Constrained Agency and Network Action. In Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks (Vol. 40, pp. 73–93). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2014)0000040004
Ibarra, H., Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2005). Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organization Science, 16(4), 359–371.
Jacobides, M. G., MacDuffie, J. P., & Tae, C. J. (2016). Agency, structure, and the dominance of OEMs: Change and stability in the automotive sector. Strategic Management Journal, 37(9), 1942–1967.
Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (2010). Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 317–357.
Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. SAGE Publications Ltd..
Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (2001). The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1), 121–146.
Moretti, A. (2017). The network organization. A governance perspective on structure, dynamics and performance. Palgrave Macmillan.
Moretti, A., & Zirpoli, F. (2016). A dynamic theory of network failure: The case of the Venice Film Festival and the local hospitality system. Organization Studies, 37, 607–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615613369
Oliveira, N., & Lumineau, F. (2019). The dark side of interorganizational relationships: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 45(1), 231–261.
Podolny, J. M., & Page, K. L. (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 57–76.
Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.
Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1995). A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems [Article]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 1–33.
Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (2001). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 414–423.
Provan, K. G., & Sydow, J. (2008). “Evaluating inter‐organizational relationships” in Cropper (ed.) et al. The Oxford Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Publishing.
Schrank, A., & Whitford, J. (2011). The anatomy of network failure. Sociological Theory, 29(3), 151–177.
Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook ((2nd ed.). ed.). CA: Sage.
Shipilov, A., & Gawer, A. (2020). Integrating research on interorganizational networks and ecosystems. Academy of management annals, 14(1), 92–121.
Soda, G., & Usai, A. (1999). The dark side of dense networks: From embeddedness to indebtedness. In A. Grandori (Ed.), Interfirm networks: Organization and industrial competitiveness (pp. 276–302). Routledge.
Sydow, J., & Windeler, A. (1998). Organizing and Evaluating Interfirm Networks: A Structurationist Perspective on Network Processes and Effectiveness. Organization Science, 9(3), 265–284. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2640223
Tasselli, S., & Kilduff, M. (2021). Network agency. Academy of Management Annals, 15(1), 68–110.
Tasselli, S., Kilduff, M., & Menges, J. I. (2015). The microfoundations of organizational social networks: A review and an agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1361–1387.
Turrini, A., Cristofoli, D., Frosini, F., & Nasi, G. (2010). NETWORKING LITERATURE ABOUT DETERMINANTS OF NETWORK EFFECTIVENESS. Public Administration, 88(2), 528–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01791.x
Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61, 674–698.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Balzarin, L., Moretti, A. (2023). Introduction. In: Moretti, A., Balzarin, L. (eds) New Perspectives in Network Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22083-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22083-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-22082-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-22083-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)