Skip to main content

Platform-Enabled Business Models in the Arts: The Impact of Digital Transformation on Visual Arts Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Perspectives in Network Studies

Abstract

Economists and sociologists have long discussed value creation in the arts and the mechanisms explaining the exchange of artistic goods. While economic literature has shown how the impossibility of information in arts markets challenges the assumption of traditional economic analysis, sociologists like Becker and Bourdieu conceive value creation in these markets as socially constructed, with actors setting the internal rules of the art “worlds” or “fields”, building success and legitimacy on their relative positions and relationships. However, none of them accounts for the effect of the digital transformation in the visual arts, which has introduced non-human actors (i.e., digital technology) within networks, affecting their performance. As the actor-network theory (ANT) studies networks through the complex interaction between human and non-human agency, this chapter reconsiders an ANT perspective to the understanding of value creation in the visual arts. By classifying platform-enabled business models across visual arts organisations, we contribute to explain the effects of digital transformation and the diffusion of platform-enabled business models on network performance in the arts through shared value creation and enhanced trust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alcácer, J., Cantwell, J., & Piscitello, L. (2016). Internationalization in the information age: A new era for places, firms, and international business networks? Journal of International Business Studies, 47(5), 499–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcacer, J., & Delgado, M. (2016). Spatial organization of firms and location choices through the value chain. Management Science, 62(11), 3213–3234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnaboldi, M., & Spiller, N. (2011). Actor-network theory and stakeholder collaboration: The case of cultural districts. Tourism Management, 32(3), 641–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (2006). The arts in the “New Economy”. Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, 1, 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bearson, D., Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2019). New Work and value creation in the platform economy: A taxonomy and preliminary evidence. eScholarship, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (2008). Art worlds: Updated and expanded. University of California Press (25th anniversary edition of the original Art Worlds 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonina, C., Koskinen, K., Eaton, B., & Gawer, A. (2021). Digital platforms for development: Foundations and research agenda. Information Systems Journal, 31(6), 869–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borghi, M., Maggiolino, M., Montagnani, M. L., & Nuccio, M. (2012). Determinants in the online distribution of digital content: An exploratory analysis. European Journal for Law and Technology, 3(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottero, W., & Crossley, N. (2011). Worlds, fields and networks: Becker, Bourdieu and the structures of social relations. Cultural Sociology, 5(1), 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1996). The rules of art. Polity.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E. (2003). Contracts between art and commerce. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(2), 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. J. (2012). Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem! The case of enterprise software. MIS Quarterly, 263–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cenamor, J., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2019). How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity. Journal of Business Research, 100, 196–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., Lettl, C., & Ritter, T. (2018). Value creation and value capture in open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(6), 930–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12471

  • Dodgson, M. (1993). Leaning, trust, and inter-firm technological linkages: some theoretical associations. Human Relations, 46(1), 77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drahokoupil, J., & Piasna, A. (2017). Work in the platform economy: Beyond lower transaction costs. Intereconomics, 52(6), 335–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. S. (2012). Governing bad behavior by users of multi-sided platforms. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 27, 1201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P., & Gawer, A. (2016). The rise of the platform enterprise: A global survey. Centre for the Global Enterprise. The Emerging Platform Economy Series, 1. https://www.thecge.net/app/uploads/2016/01/PDF-WEB-Platform-Survey_01_12.pdf

  • Gawer, A. (2021). Digital platforms’ boundaries: The interplay of firm scope, platform sides, and digital interfaces. Long Range Planning, 54(5), 102045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, B., & Ferrari, E. (2021). Intermediaries and mediators: An actor-network understanding of online property platforms. Housing Studies, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hein, A., Schreieck, M., Riasanow, T., Setzke, D. S., Wiesche, M., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020). Digital platform ecosystems. Electronic Markets, 30(1), 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, A., Weking, J., Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2019). Value co-creation practices in business-to-business platform ecosystems. Electronic Markets, 29(3), 503–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikävalko, H., Turkama, P., & Smedlund, A. (2018). Value creation in the internet of things: Mapping business models and ecosystem roles. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, R. (2018). Ecosystems: Broadening the locus of value creation. Journal of Organization Design, 7(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2019). Work and value creation in the platform economy. In Work and labor in the digital age. Emerald Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretschmer, T., Leiponen, A., Schilling, M., & Vasudeva, G. (2022). Platform ecosystems as meta‐organizations: Implications for platform strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 43(3), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerch, F., Provan, K., & Sydow, J. (2008). Network integration in regional clusters and firm innovation–A comparison of measures. Paper presented at the 2008 Academy of Management Annual Meeting August 8–13, 2008, Anaheim, .

    Google Scholar 

  • Linden, G., & Teece, D. J. (2018). Remarks on Pisano: ‘Toward a prescriptive theory of dynamic capabilities’. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(6), 1175–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mithas, S., Tafti, A., & Mitchell, W. (2013). How a firm’s competitive environment and digital strategic posture influence digital business strategy. MIS quarterly, 511–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moro Visconti, R. (2020). Corporate governance, digital platforms, and network theory: Information and risk-return sharing of connected stakeholders. Corporate governance, digital platforms, and network theory: Information and risk-return sharing of connected stakeholders, 179–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuccio, M., & Guerzoni, M. (2019). Big data: Hell or heaven? Digital platforms and market power in the data-driven economy. Competition & Change, 23(3), 312–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paoloni, M., Coluccia, D., Fontana, S., & Solimene, S. (2020). Knowledge management, intellectual capital and entrepreneurship: A structured literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(8), 1797–1818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perren, R., & Kozinets, R. V. (2018). Lateral exchange markets: How social platforms operate in a networked economy. Journal of Marketing, 82(1), 20–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peruchi, D. F., de Jesus Pacheco, D. A., Todeschini, B. V., & ten Caten, C. S. (2022). Moving towards digital platforms revolution? Antecedents, determinants and conceptual framework for offline B2B networks. Journal of Business Research, 142, 344–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, J., Cunningham, S., Hartley, J., & Ormerod, P. (2008). Social network markets: A new definition of the creative industries. Journal of Cultural Economics, 32(3), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prior, N. (2008). Putting a glitch in the field: Bourdieu, actor network theory and contemporary music. Cultural Sociology, 2(3), 301–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrank, A., & Whitford, J. (2011). The anatomy of network failure. Sociological Theory, 29(3), 151–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sele, K. (2021). Actor-network theory and routine dynamics. Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics, 73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D. (1994). The production and consumption of the arts: A view of cultural economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 32(1), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28, 118–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, K. S., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P. & Woerner, S. L. (2015, Summer). Thriving in an increasingly digital ecosystem. MIT Sloan Management Review. Published June 16. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/thriving-in-an-increasingly-digital-ecosystem/

  • Yaqub, M. Z., Srećković, M., Cliquet, G., Hendrikse, G., & Windsperger, J. (2020). Network innovation versus innovation through networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 90, 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yogev, T., & Grund, T. (2012). Network dynamics and market structure: The case of art fairs. Sociological Focus, 45(1), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoppelletto, A., Orlandi, L. B., & Rossignoli, C. (2020). Adopting a digital transformation strategy to enhance business network commons regeneration: An explorative case study. The TQM Journal.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimiliano Nuccio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mogno, S., Nuccio, M. (2023). Platform-Enabled Business Models in the Arts: The Impact of Digital Transformation on Visual Arts Networks. In: Moretti, A., Balzarin, L. (eds) New Perspectives in Network Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22083-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics