Abstract
This chapter builds the argument for the need of evaluating the performance of organizational networks from a business ethics perspective. Network performance is normally analyzed in terms of coordination and outcomes, two byproducts of network structure and governance, and not in terms of whether its content is ethical or not. But in a time when wrongdoing and unethical decision-making are more and more diffused in organizational networks and bring along very negative outputs such as costly scandals for companies and societies, embracing an ethical perspective on the evaluation of network performance may advance our knowledge on the nuanced phenomenology of network dysfunctionalities. This chapter builds its argument by bridging the two disconnected literatures of network performance and organizational unethical behavior. It starts examining how network studies have treated performance without including the ethical dimension in the picture. Then, it moves to organizational wrongdoing and discusses how unethical behavior is still theorized as a single-organization phenomenon. Third, it shows the implications of, respectively, the absence of ethical evaluations of network performance and of a networked view of wrongdoing. Finally, it paves the way (1) to future research on network studies, by addressing the role and impact of embracing ethical considerations in studying network dysfunctionalities and (2) to wrongdoing analyses by setting the basis to address wrongdoing in organizational networks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.
Aurand, T. W., et al. (2018). The VW diesel scandal: A case of corporate commissioned greenwashing. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 18(1), 23–32.
Baker, W. E., & Faulkner, R. R. (1993). The social organization of conspiracy: Illegal networks in the heavy electrical equipment industry. American Sociological Review, 58(6), 837–870.
Beckert, J., & Dewey, M. (2017). The architecture of illegal markets: Towards an economic sociology of illegality in the economy. Oxford University Press.
Beckert, J., & Wehinger, F. (2013). In the shadow: Illegal markets and economic sociology. Socio-Economic Review, 11(1), 5–30.
Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin., 88(1), 1–45.
Brass, D. J., Butterfield, K. D., & Sklaggs, B. C. (1998). Relationships and unethical behavior. A social network perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 14–31.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press.
Burt, R. S. (1999). Entrepreneurs, distrust, and third parties: A strategic look at the dark side of dense networks. In L. Thompson, J. Levine, & D. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. The American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.
Campana, P. (2020). Human smuggling: Structure and mechanisms. Crime and Justice, 49(1), 471–519.
Campana, P., & Varese, F. (2018). Organized crime in the United Kingdom: Illegal governance of markets and communities. British Journal of Criminology, 58(6), 1381–1400.
Campana, P., & Varese, F. (2022a). The determinants of group membership in organized crime in the UK: A network study. Global Crime, 23(1), 5–22.
Campana, P., & Varese, F. (2022b). Studying organized crime networks: Data sources boundaries and the limits of structural measures. Social Networks, 69, 149–159.
Cappellaro, G., Compagni, A., & Vaara, E. (2021). Maintaining strategic ambiguity for protection: Struggles over opacity, equivocality, and absurdity around the Sicilian mafia. Academy of Management Journal, 64(1), 1–37.
Castro, A., Phillips, N., & Ansari, S. (2020). Corporate corruption: A Review and an Agenda for Future Research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 935–968.
Cavallaro, L., Ficara, A., De Meo, P., Fiumara, G., Catanese, S., Bagdasar, O., Song, W., & Liotta, A. (2020). Disrupting resilient criminal networks through data analysis: The case of Sicilian Mafia. PLoS ONE, 15(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236476
Cohan, J. A. (2002). ‘I didn’t know’ and ‘I was only doing my job’: Has corporate governance careened out of control? A case study of Enron’s information myopia. Journal of Business Ethics, 40(3), 275–299.
Contag, M. et al. (2017). How they did it: An analysis of emission defeat devices in modern automobiles. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2017.66
Ewing, J. (2016, August 18). Volkswagen supplier played key role in cheating, court papers say. Retrieved June 27, 2022, from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/19/business/international/volkswagen-supplier-played-key-role-in-cheating-court-papers-say.html#:~:text=FRANKFURT%20%E2%80%94%20The%20German%20auto%20supplier,on%20behalf%20of%20car%20owners
Ewing, J. (2017, February 1). Supplierʼs role shows breadth of VWʼs deceit. New York Times. Retrieved June 27, 2022, from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/01/business/bosch-vw-diesel-settlement.html
Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. (2000). Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization Science, 11(2), 183–196.
Gollini, I., Caimo, A., & Campana, P. (2020). Modelling interactions among offenders: A latent space approach for interdependent ego-networks. Social Networks, 63, 134–149.
Greve, H. R., Palmer, D., & Pozner, J.-E. (2010). Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 53–107.
Kenney, M. (2007). The architecture of drug trafficking: Network forms of organization in the Colombian cocaine trade. Global Crime, 8(3), 233–259.
Kenney, M. (2010). Turning to the ‘Dark Side’: Coordination, exchange, and learning in criminal networks. In M. Kahler (Ed.), Networked politics: Agency, power, and governance (pp. 79–102). Cornell University Press.
Kulik, B. W. (2005). Agency theory, reasoning and culture at Enron: In search of a solution. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 347–360.
Kump, B., & Scholz, M. (2022). Organizational routines as a source of ethical blindness. Organization Theory, First Published Online.
Lee, M. T., & Ermann, M. D. (1999). Pinto ‘Madness’ as a flawed landmark narrative: An organizational and network. Social Problems, 46(1), 30–47.
Linthicum, C., Reitenga, A. L., & Sanchez, J. M. (2010). Social responsibility and corporate reputation: The case of the Arthur Andersen Enron audit failure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(2), 160–176.
Moretti, A. (2017). The network organization. A governance perspective on structure, dynamics, and performance. Palgrave Macmillan.
Moretti, A., & Zirpoli, F. (2016). A dynamic theory of network failure: The case of the Venice Film Festival and the local hospitality system. Organization Studies, 37, 607–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615613369
Muzio, D., Faulconbridge, J., Gabbioneta, C., & Greenwood, R. (2016). Bad apples, bad barrels and bad cellars: A ‘boundaries’ perspective on professional misconduct. In D. Palmer, K. Smith-Crowe, & T. Greenwood (Eds.), Organizational wrongdoing. Key perspectives and new directions (pp. 141–175). Cambridge University Press.
Nelson, J. S. (2016). The criminal bug: Volkswagen’s middle management. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2767255.
Nix, A., Decker, S., & Wolf, C. (2021). Enron and the California energy crisis: The role of networks in enabling organizational corruption. Business History Review, 95(4), 765–802.
Palazzo, G. (2019). Ethical blindness explains why good people do bad things. Aalto University Executive Education. Retrieved June 27, 2022, from https://www.aaltoee.com/aalto-leaders-insight/2019/ethical-blindness-explains-why-good-people-do-bad-things
Palazzo, G., Krings, F., & Hoffrage, U. (2012). Ethical blindness. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 323–338.
Palmer, D. A. (2012). Normal organizational wrongdoing: A critical analysis of theories of misconduct in and by organizations. Oxford University Press.
Palmer, D. A. (2013). The new perspective on organizational wrongdoing. California Management Review, 56(1), 5–23.
Pinto, J., Leana, C. R., & Pil, F. K. (2008). Corrupt organizations or organizations of corrupt individuals? Two types of organization-level corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 685–709.
Podolny, J. M., & Page, K. L. (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 57–76.
Provan, K. G., Isett, K. R., & Milward, H. B. (2004). Cooperation and compromise: A network response to conflicting institutional pressures in community mental health. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(3), 489–514.
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.
Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1995). A preliminary theory of network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 1–33.
Provan, K. G., & Sydow, J. (2010). Evaluating interorganizational relationships. In S. Cropper, M. Ebers, C. Huxham, & P. Smith Ring (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations. Oxford University Press.
Santos, F. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2005). Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organization Science, 16(5), 491–508.
Schrank, A., & Whitford, J. (2011). The anatomy of network failure. Sociological Theory, 29(3), 151–177.
Siano, A., Vollero, A., Conte, F., & Amabile, S. (2017). ‘More than words’: Expanding the taxonomy of greenwashing after the Volkswagen scandal. Journal of Business Research, 71, 27–37.
Sims, R. R., & Brinkmann, J. (2003). Enron ethics (or: Culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 243–256.
Soda, G., & Usai, A. (1999). The dark side of dense networks: From embeddedness to indebtedness. In A. Grandori (Ed.), Interfirm networks: Organization and industrial competitiveness (pp. 276–302). Routledge.
Sydow, J. & Milward, H.B. (2003). Reviewing the evaluation perspective: On criteria, occasions, procedures, and practices. Paper presented at the 10th Conference on Multi-Organizational Partnerships, Alliances and Networks (MOPAN), University of Strathclyde, Glasgow. http://www.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/w3/w3sydow/
Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 545–607.
The Economist. (2014, December 13). The dozy watchdogs. Retrieved July 2, 2022, from https://www.economist.com/briefing/2014/12/11/the-dozy-watchdogs
Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.
United Nations. (2004). United Nations convention against transnational organized crime and the protocols thereto. https://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/UNTOC/Publications/TOC%20Convention/TOCebook-e.pdf
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.
Varese, F. (2013). The structure and the content of criminal connections: The Russian mafia in Italy. European Sociological Review, 29(5), 899–909.
Vaughan, D. (1990). Autonomy, interdependence, and social control: NASA and the space shuttle challenger. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 225–257.
Vaughan, D. (1996, 2016). The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. The University of Chicago Press.
Vaughan, D. (1999). The dark side of organizations: Mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 271–305.
Whitford, J., & Zirpoli, F. (2016). The network firm as a political coalition. Organization Studies, 37(9), 1227–1248.
Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141–159.
Zhang, X., Bartol, K. M., Smith, K. G., Pfarrer, M. D., & Khanin, D. M. (2008). CEOs on the edge: Earnings manipulation and stock-based incentive misalignment. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 241–258.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article is a joint endeavor. The listing of author names is alphabetical. Credits authors: Cavara wrote Sects. 2 and 3; Cavara and Zirpoli wrote Sects. 1, 4 and 5.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cavara, R., Zirpoli, F. (2023). Ethics in Organizational Network Performance: Lessons from Organized Crime and Organizational Wrongdoing. In: Moretti, A., Balzarin, L. (eds) New Perspectives in Network Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22083-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22083-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-22082-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-22083-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)