Skip to main content

Towards the Healthcare of the Future. A Delphi Consensus on Environmental Sustainability Issues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Towards the Future of Surgery

Abstract

The healthcare sector has always paid attention to social and economic sustainability. Still, healthcare is a relevant industry with a high environmental impact. There is a call to include and consider environmental sustainability as a guiding principle for the healthcare sector of tomorrow. The United Kingdom, through its NHS and Royal Colleges, has taken the lead in studying the environmental impact and providing healthcare managers and staff with guidance and checklists. In addition to more sustainable buildings and greener operations, environmental sustainability principles should be embedded in clinical practices as well.

Starting from the recent literature and UK documents, a multidisciplinary group of scholars designed a Delphi questionnaire on the topic. Twenty-seven healthcare executives from Italy participated in the pilot study.

Results underline a topic that is gaining traction in healthcare. However, much work still needs to be done to effectively include environmental sustainability practices in hospitals and especially within the clinical community.

Policymakers, healthcare managers, scholars, and scientific societies should take the lead in defining new rules and processes, measuring, assessing, and reporting results, disseminating and sharing knowledge and best practices on the topic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Massaro M, Dumay J, Garlatti A, Dal Mas F. Practitioners’ views on intellectual capital and sustainability: from a performance-based to a worth-based perspective. J Intellect Cap. 2018;19(2):367–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hall JK, Daneke GA, Lenox MJ. Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: past contributions and future directions. J Bus Ventur. 2010;25(5):439–48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883902610000200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. UN. The sustainable development goals: our framework for COVID-19 recovery. 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 17]. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sdgs-framework-for-covid-19-recovery/.

  4. Re B, Magnani G. Value co-creation in circular entrepreneurship: an exploratory study on born circular SMEs. J Bus Res. 2022;147:189–207. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322003277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Re B, Magnani G. Stakeholder engagement mechanisms and value creation in circular entrepreneurship. In: Kujala J, Heikkinen A, Blomberg A, editors. Stakeholder engagement in a sustainable circular economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Torain MJ, Maragh-Bass AC, Dankwa-Mullen I, Hisam B, Kodadek LM, Lilley EJ, et al. Surgical disparities: a comprehensive review and new conceptual framework. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223(2):408–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.04.047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Haider AH, Dankwa-Mullan I, Maragh-Bass AC, Torain M, Zogg CK, Lilley EJ, et al. Setting a National Agenda for surgical disparities research recommendations from the National Institutes of Health and American College of Surgeons summit. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(6):554–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Elk R, Felder TM, Cayir E, Samuel CA. Social inequalities in palliative care for cancer patients in the United States: a structured review. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2018;34(3):303–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2018.06.011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Barcellini A, Dal Mas F, Paoloni P, Loap P, Cobianchi L, Locati L, et al. Please mind the gap—about equity and access to care in oncology. ESMO Open. 2021;6(6):100335.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Haider AH, Scott VK, Rehman KA, Velopulos C, Bentley JM, Cornwell EE, et al. Racial disparities in surgical care and outcomes in the United States: a comprehensive review of patient, provider, and systemic factors. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(3):482–492.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kronenfeld JP, Graves KD, Penedo FJ, Yanez B. Overcoming disparities in cancer: a need for meaningful reform for Hispanic and Latino cancer survivors. Oncologist. 2021;26(6):443–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Blanford JI, Kumar S, Luo W, MacEachren AM. It’s a long, long walk: accessibility to hospitals, maternity and integrated health centers in Niger. Int J Health Geogr. 2012;11(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-11-24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Alemayehu C, Mitchell G, Nikles J. Barriers for conducting clinical trials in developing countries—a systematic review. Int J Equity Health. 2018;17(1):37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sousa MJ, Dal Mas F, Lopes Da Costa R. Editorial EJKM Volume 18 Issue 3. Advances in health knowledge management: new perspectives. Electron J Knowl Manag. 2021;18(3):407–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tennison I, Roschnik S, Ashby B, Boyd R, Hamilton I, Oreszczyn T, et al. Health care’s response to climate change: a carbon footprint assessment of the NHS in England. Lancet Planet Health. 2021;5(2):e84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30271-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. NHS. Delivering a net zero NHS. Greener NHS; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  17. The Royal College of Surgeons of England. Sustainability in the operating theatre. Standards & Research. 2022 [cited 2023 May 27]. https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/standards-and-research/standards-and-guidance/good-practice-guides/sustainability-in-operating-theatre/.

  18. The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh; The Royal College of Surgeons of England; Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow. Intercollegiate Green Theatre checklist compendium of evidence. 2022 [cited 2023 May 27]. https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/-/media/images/rcs/about-rcs/sustainability/greentheatrechecklist.pdf.

  19. National Institute for Health and Care Research Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery. Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries. Br J Surg. 2023;1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  20. The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh. Green theatre checklist environmental sustainability and surgery. 2022 [cited 2023 May 27]. https://www.rcsed.ac.uk/professional-support-development-resources/environmental-sustainability-and-surgery/green-theatre-checklist.

  21. Linstone HA, Turoff M. Delphi: a brief look backward and forward. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2010;78(9):1712–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cobianchi L, Dal Mas F, Massaro M, Bednarova R, Biancuzzi H, Filisetti C, et al. Hand in hand: a multistakeholder approach for co-production of surgical care. Am J Surg. 2022;223(1):214–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dal Mas F, Garcia-Perez A, Sousa MJ, Lopes da Costa R, Cobianchi L. Knowledge translation in the healthcare sector. A structured literature review. Electron J Knowl Manag. 2020;18(3):198–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cobianchi L, Dal Mas F, Massaro M, Fugazzola P, Coccolini F, Kluger Y, et al. Team dynamics in emergency surgery teams: results from a first international survey. World J Emerg Surg. 2021;16:47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Previtali P, Dal Mas F, Denicolai S, Venturi A, Campostrini S, Cogliati PG, et al. A multidisciplinary approach to care. A Delphi consensus on the case of Pancreas Units. In: Martellucci J, Dal Mas F, editors. Towards the future of surgery. Cham: Springer; 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna H. The Delphi technique in nursing and health research. London: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. p. 1–208.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Bidoli C, Pegoraro V, Dal Mas F, Bagnoli C, Bert F, Bonin M, et al. Virtual hospitals: the future of the healthcare system? An expert consensus. J Telemed Telecare. 2023:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bergmo TS. How to measure costs and benefits of ehealth interventions: an overview of methods and frameworks. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(11):e254.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Dal Mas F, Massaro M, Rippa P, Secundo G. The challenges of digital transformation in healthcare: an interdisciplinary literature review, framework, and future research agenda. Technovation. 2023;123:102716. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497223000275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Limb M. World will lack 18 million health workers by 2030 without adequate investment, warns UN. Br Med J. 2016;354:i5169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cobianchi L, Pugliese L, Peloso A, Dal Mas F, Angelos P. To a new normal: surgery and COVID-19 during the transition phase. Ann Surg. 2020;272:e49–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dal Mas F, Biancuzzi H, Massaro M, Miceli L. Adopting a knowledge translation approach in healthcare co-production. A case study. Manag Decis. 2020;58(9):1841–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pietrabissa A, Pugliese L, Filardo M, Marconi S, Muzzi A, Peri A. My OR goes green: surgery and sustainability. Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2022;100:317–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Dal Mas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

FD and LC conceived the idea of the study; PP, FD, SD, MA, HB, StCa, SaCu, GG, GiMa, BR, AR, AV, and LC wrote the research protocol; AGA, GBo, GBr, GiCa, GaCa, AC, RC, TC, CC, GC, GD, CD, MFG, SL, IM, MM, GiMo, MCM, GioPa, GiuPa, SP, MP, LR, EMR, AS, PS, EAT, SV took care of data collection, FD, SD and LC took care of data analysis, FD wrote the first manuscript’s draft. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the latest version of the manuscript.

Appendix

Appendix

Delphi Protocol (English Version)

Section 0: Descriptive Statistics

  1. 1.

    What is your background?

    • Business/management

    • Law

    • Clinical

    • Other

  2. 2.

    What is your role?

    • General Director

    • Scientific Director

    • Medical Director

    • Administrative Director

    • Physician/GP

    • Manager

    • Other

  3. 3.

    What is your gender?

    • Male

    • Female

    • Prefer not to answer

  4. 4.

    What is your age group?

    • Under 40

    • 41–50

    • 50–60

    • Over 60

  5. 5.

    Do you agree to be an author in the scientific publication(s) reporting the Delphi results?

    • Yes

Section 1: Sustainability Acceptance and Change Management

Think of the clinical practice within your hospital/institution/health agency/organization. On a scale from 1 to 9, where 1 = strongly disagree and 9 = strongly agree, how would you rate the following statements?

Importance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

Sustainability issues are particularly relevant in my hospital/institution/health agency/organization

         

2

Green management should be a priority in all the industrial sectors

         

3

Green management should be a priority in clinical practice

         

4

Patients should be aware of the most sustainable clinical options when co-deciding with their physician

         

5

Patients will appreciate greener clinical practices

         

6

Hospitals and other stakeholders (e.g., financing institutions and governments) will appreciate greener clinical practices

         

7

Patients will have more trust in greener clinical practices

         

8

Grants and awards should prioritize greener clinical practices

         

9

Greener clinical practices should be embedded into guidelines

         

10

Greener clinical practices should be prioritized on the agenda of scientific societies

         

11

Greener clinical practices should be prioritized on the agenda of healthcare top managers

         

12

Greener clinical practices should be prioritized on the agenda of hospitals and other stakeholders (e.g., financing institutions and governments)

         

13

Greener clinical practices should be preferred even if they are more expensive

         

14

Technology can lead to more sustainable clinical practices

         

15

Medical instruments should consider environmental efforts (e.g., limiting the use of energy, non-recyclable materials, and the creation of waste) and their end of lifecycle should be managed implementing recycling practices

         

16

The end-of-life of clinical equipment should be managed by implementing recycling practices

         

17

Non-technical skills can lead to more sustainable clinical practices

         

18

Greener clinical practices should be properly reported

         

19

Ratios and indexes connected to clinical practices should be calculated to measure and report sustainability in all medical department

         

20

Changing clinical practices can lead to fewer issues than traditional practices

         

21

Greener management of clinical practice can lead to better medical outcomes

         

22

Clinicians should be educated about environmental issues and outcomes connected with clinical activities and choices

         

23

Patients should be educated about environmental issues and outcomes connected with clinical activities and choices

         

24

It would be important to introduce sustainability practices also in procurement, selecting more sustainable products and suppliers

         

25

The end of lifecycle of products sourced from external suppliers should be managed implementing recycling practices

         

26

Governments should incentivize greener clinical practices

         

Section 2: Sustainability Habits in Clinical Practice

Think of the clinical practice within your hospital/institution/health agency/organization. On a scale from 1 to 9, where 1 = strongly disagree and 9 = strongly agree, how would you rate the following statements?

Please note that all the elements should be rated according to your knowledge

Importance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

I have a clear understanding and picture about greener clinical practices adopted my hospital/institution

         

2

My hospital/institution promotes greener clinical practices in general terms

         

3

My hospital/institution uses reusable textiles (including theater hats, sterile gowns, patient drapes, and trolley covers)

         

4

My hospital/institution endorses the reduction of water and energy consumption

         

5

My hospital/institution installed several automatic or pedal-controlled water taps

         

6

My hospital/institution recommends avoiding clinically unnecessary interventions (e.g., antibiotics, catheterization, histological examinations)

         

7

My hospital/institution recommends the creation of clinical preference lists for each operation—separate essential vs. optional items to have ready on side

         

8

My hospital/institution recommends avoiding the use of single-use surgical packs

         

9

My hospital/institution recommends opening only those sets that are needed and, when they are needed, by integrating supplementary items into sets

         

10

My hospital/institution recommends avoiding all unnecessary equipment (e.g., swabs, single-use gloves)

         

11

My hospital/institution recommends opting for reusables, hybrid, or remanufactured equipment instead of single-use (e.g., diathermy, gallipots, kidney-dishes, light handles, quivers, staplers, energy devices)

         

12

My hospital/institution recommends switching to low-carbon alternatives (e.g., skin sutures vs. clips, loose prep in gallipots)

         

13

My hospital/institution recommends recycling or using lowest carbon-appropriate waste streams as appropriate

         

14

My hospital/institution recommends using domestic or recycling waste streams for all packaging

         

15

My hospital/institution recommends arranging metals/battery collection where possible

         

16

My hospital/institution recommends that damaged reusable equipment is repaired, encouraging active maintenance

         

17

My hospital/institution recommends powering off lights, computers, ventilation, AGSS, and temperature control when the theater is empty

         

18

My hospital/institution is supplied by firms adopting sustainable practices

         

19

My hospital/institution employs sustainable “inputs” (e.g., from renewable sources, and/or made of biodegradable materials, and/or coming from recycling processes)

         

20

My hospital/institution accurately measures operating room sterile supply waste

         

21

My hospital/institution uses more leased equipment

         

22

My hospital/institution shares equipment with other hospitals/institutions

         

23

My hospital/institution encourages equipment to be shared among different clinical departments

         

Think of the clinical practice within your hospital/institution/health agency/organization. Which of the following tools should be used to promote sustainability/greener clinical practices?

Importance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

Billboards

         

2

Leaflets

         

3

Newsletters

         

4

Websites

         

5

Corporate reports

         

6

Multidisciplinary Green Teams

         

7

Invitation to attend specific training courses

         

8

Invitation to report best practices at congresses or events

         

9

Illuminated signs and meters (e.g., reporting energy consumption or other data)

         

10

Digital solutions (e.g., APPs, sensors, smart grid, …)

         

Accordingly to your knowledge and/or perception, what is the tangible impact of greener clinical practice WITHIN your hospital/institution? On a scale from 1 to 9, where 1 = low, and 9 = remarkable, how would you rate the following statements?

Please note that all the elements should be rated according to your knowledge

Importance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

Positive contribution for the environment

         

2

More engagement of the patient

         

3

Cost reduction

         

4

Better quality of care

         

5

My personal commitment

         

6

Reputation of the hospital/institution

         

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dal Mas, F. et al. (2023). Towards the Healthcare of the Future. A Delphi Consensus on Environmental Sustainability Issues. In: Martellucci, J., Dal Mas, F. (eds) Towards the Future of Surgery. New Paradigms in Healthcare. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47623-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47623-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47622-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47623-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics