Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Risk Assessment of PHEs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover PHEs, Environment and Human Health

  • 1076 Accesses

Abstract

Nowadays risk assessment is assuming more and more importance in the solution of problems connected with land sustainability and human health. Indeed, the risk assessment criteria are applied to identify and classify the various sites on the basis of the actual land characteristics, and the potential hazard to exposed population.

There are various exposure pathways of toxic substances to general population: direct pathways are soil ingestion, dust inhalation, dermal contact; indirect ingestion through the food chain is one of the most important pathways for the entry of PHEs into the human body.

In order to avoid possible consequences to humans and the environment, it is necessary to investigate the source, origin, pathways, distribution in all the environmental compartments, and to ascertain if metal bioaccumulation is likely to occur, affecting human health.

Risk assessment procedures include two components, the Environmental Risk Assessment and the Human Health Risk Assessment. The former has been used mainly for comparative and priority setting purposes with reference to contaminated sites. The latter refers to the possible consequences of human exposure to contaminant sources. The ecological risk is generally considered a second priority in comparison to human health risk.

Estimate of exposure levels is a central step in Ecological Risk Assessment to evaluate ecotoxicity risks posed by PHEs. For example, agricultural soils contaminated with metals result in elevated uptake and transfer of metals to vegetables; consequently, severe health hazard can be caused by the consumption of metal-contaminated vegetables. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in edible parts of vegetables is thus responsible for major health concern.

Human health risk assessment has been used to determine if exposure to a chemical, at any dose, could cause an increase in the incidence, or adverse effects, on human health.

Biological monitoring is a promising method of assessing environmental and human health risk by analysing PHEs concentration in environmental matrixes (e.g. plants, animals), or in human tissues (hairs, nails), or in a biological matrix (blood, urine). Concerning human health, biological monitoring is usually described as the measurement of a particular chemical substance, or a metabolite of that substance, in a suitable biological matrix (e.g. blood, urine, serum, and tissues such as hairs, nails, sweats), that act as an effective biomarker, allowing identification of potential hazards.

Examples of how the risk assessment process may be carried out are given with reference to exposure levels and exposure-response relationships for the contaminants of concern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abollino O, Malandrino M, Giacomino A, Mentasti E (2009) Investigation of metal pollution in soils by single and sequential extraction procedures. In: Steinberg RV (ed) Contaminated soils: environmental impact, disposal and treatment. Nova Science, New York, pp 139–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahams PW (2002) Soils: their implications to human health. Sci Tot Environ 291:1–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adriano DC (2001) Trace elements in terrestrial environments: biogeochemistry, bioavailability, and risks of metals. Springer, New York. 967 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Adriano DC, Chlopecka A, Kaplan DI, Clijters H, Vangronsveld J (1995) Soil contamination and remediation: philosophy, science and technology. In: Prost R (ed) Contaminated soils. Inra Editions, Paris, pp 465–504

    Google Scholar 

  • AERIS Software Inc. (1991) Aid for evaluating the redevelopment of industrial sites. Technical manual version 3.0, ON, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Alloway BJ (1995) The mobilization of trace elements in soil. In: Prost R (ed) Contaminated soils. INRA, Paris, pp 133–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Alloway BJ (2013) Heavy metals in soils, 3rd edn. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarenga P, Palma P, Varennes A, Cunha-Queda AC (2013) A contribution towards the risk assessment of soils from the Santo Domingo Mine (Portugal): chemical, microbial and ecotoxicological indicators. Environ Pollut 161:50–56

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2000) Standard guide for risk-based corrective action, ASTM E2081. ASTM, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelone M, Udovic M (2014) Potentially harmful elements in urban soil. In: Bini C, Bech J (eds) PHEs, environment and human health. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelone M, Vaselli O, Bini C, Coradossi N (1993) Pedogeochemical evolution and trace element availability to plants in ophiolitic soils from Tuscany (Italy). Z Pflanzen Bodenk 154:217–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailer AJ, Reed LD, Stayner LT (1997) Modeling fatal injury rates using Poisson regression: a case study of workers in agriculture, forestry, and fishing. J Saf Res 28(3):177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baize D, Van Oort F (2014) Potentially harmful elements in forest soils. In: Bini C, Bech J (eds) PHEs, environment and human health. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker AJ (1981) Accumulators and excluders strategies in the response of plants to heavy metals. J Plant Nutr 3:643–654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Basta NT, Ryan JA, Chaney RL (2005) Trace element chemistry in residual-treated soil: key concepts and metal bioavailability. J Environ Qual 34:49–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard A (2008) Cadmium and its adverse effects on human health. Indian J Med Res 128:557–564

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bertazzon S, Micheletti C, Critto A, Marcomini A (2006) Spatial analysis in ecological risk assessment: pollutant bioaccumulation in clams Tapes philipinarum in the Venetian lagoon (Italy). Comput Environ Urb Syst 30:880–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthelot Y, Valton E, Auroy A, Trottier B, Rubidoux PY (2008) Integration of toxicological and chemical tools to assess the availability of metals and energetic compounds in contaminated soils. Chemosphere 74:166–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bini C (2009) From soil contamination to land restoration. In: Steinberg RV (ed) Contaminated soils: environmental impact, disposal and treatment. Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, pp 97–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Bini C (2012) Environmental impact of abandoned mine waste: a review. Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, p 92

    Google Scholar 

  • Bini C, Maleci L, Romanin A (2008) The chromium issue in soils of the leather tannery district in Italy. J Geochem Explor 96(2–3):194–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bini C, Fontana S, Spiandorello M (2013) Towards food safety. Potentially harmful elements (PHEs) fluxes from soil to food crops. EQA Environ Qual 10:23–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RR (1998) Phytochemistry of hyperaccumulator. In: Brooks R (ed) Plants that hyperaccumulate heavy metals: their role in phytoremediation, microbiology, archaeology, mineral exploration and phytomining. CAB International, London, pp 15–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Brummer GW (1986) Heavy metal species, mobility and availability. In: Bernhard M, Brinkman R, Sadler PJ (eds) The importance of chemical speciation in environmental processes. Springer Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlon C, Pizzol L, Critto A, Marcomini A (2008) A spatial risk assessment methodology to support the remediation of contaminated land. Environ Int 34(3):397–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman PM, Mc Donald BG, Lawrence GS (2002) Weight of evidence issues and framework for sediment quality (and other) assessment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 8(7):1489–1515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chojnacka K, Chojnacki A, Górecka H, Górecki H (2005) Bioavailability of heavy metals from polluted soils to plants. Sci Total Environ 337:175–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chon HT, Lee JS, Lee JU (2011) Heavy metal contamination of soil, its risk assessment and bioremediation. Geosyst Eng 14(4):191–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang HY, Kuo CH, Chiu YD, Ho CK, Chen KJ, Wu TN (2007) A case–control study on the relationship of hearing function and blood concentrations of lead, manganese, arsenic, and selenium. Sci Total Environ 387:79–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EC (European Council) (2010) Risk assessment and mapping guidelines for disaster management. Brussels (available on line)

    Google Scholar 

  • Covello VT, Merkhofer MW (1993) Approaches for assessing health and environmental risks. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Critto A, Suter GW (2009) Environmental risk assessment. In: Marcomini A, Suter GW, Critto A (eds) Decision support systems for risk-based management of contaminated sites. Springer, New York, pp 29–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Dall’Aglio M, Da Roit R, Orlandi C, Tonani F (1966) Prospezione geochimica del mercurio. Distribuzione del mercurio nelle alluvioni della Toscana. L’industria Mineraria, XVII: 391–398. (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • De Luisa A, Giandon P, Aichner M, Nardelli F, Stringari G (1996) Copper pollution in Italian vineyard soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 27(5/8):1537–1548

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (European Commission) (2002a) Guidance document on risk assessment for birds and mammals under Council Directive 91/414/EEC

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (European Commission) (2002b) Guidance document on aquatic ecotoxicology in the context of the Directive 91/414/EEC

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (European Commission) (2003) Technical guidance document in support of the Commission Directive 93/67/CEE on risk assessment of new notified substances European Chemical Bureau, Ispra

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (European Commission) (2006) Commission regulation no 1881/2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Off J Eur Comm 364:19–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay R, Korre A (2006) A spatially-evaluated methodology for assessing risk to a population from contaminated land. Environ Pollut 142:227–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geng C, Ga Y, Li D, Jian X, Hu Q (2014) Contamination investigation and risk assessment of molybdenum on an industrial site in China. J Geochem Explor. Available online 5 Jan 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Giaccio L, Cicchella D, De Vivo B, Lombardi G, De Rosa M (2012) Does heavy metals pollution affects semen quality in men? A case of study in the metropolitan area of Naples (Italy). J Geochem Eplor 112:218–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York, 483 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P, Journel AG (1995) Integrating soil map information in modelling the spatial variation of continuous soil properties. Eur J Soil Sci 46:397–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han JX, Shang Q, Du Y (2009) Review: effect of environmental cadmium pollution on human health. Health 1(3):159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao XZ, Zhou DM, Huang DQ, Cang L, Zhang HL, Wang H (2009) Heavy metal transfer from soil to vegetables in southern Jiangsu province, China. Pedosphere 19:305–311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He ZL, Yang XE, Stoffella PJ (2005) Trace elements in agroecosystems and impacts on the environment. J Trace Elem Med Biol 19:125–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heikens A (2006) Arsenic contamination of irrigation water, soil and crops in Bangladesh: risk implications for sustainable agriculture and food safety in Asia. UN FAO report, p 46

    Google Scholar 

  • International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (2013) IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. World Health Organization (WHO). http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/index.php

  • Kabata-Pendias A (2011) Trace elements in soils and plants, 4th edn. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabata-Pendias A, Mukherjee AB (2007) Trace elements from soil to humans. Springer, Berlin, 550 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karo Bester P, Lobnik F, Erzen I, Kastelec D, Zupan M (2013) Prediction of cadmium concentration in selected home-produced vegetables. Ecotox Environ Saf 96:182–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan S, Cao Q (2012) Human health risk due to consumption of vegetables contaminated with carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. J Soil Sediments 12:178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolluru RV, Bartell SM, Pitblado RM, Strikoff RS (1996) Risk assessment and management handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 660

    Google Scholar 

  • Korre A, Durucan S, Koutroumani A (2002) Quantitative-spatial assessment of the risk associated with high Pb loads in soils around Lavrio, Greece. Appl Geochem 17:1029–1045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Langmuir D (1997) Aqueous environmental geochemistry. Prentice Hall, New York, p 600

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JS, Lee SW, Chon HT, Kim KW (2008) Evaluation of human exposure to arsenic due to rice ingestion in the vicinity of abandoned Myungbong mine site, Korea. J Geochem Explor 96:231–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lim HS, Lee JS, Chon HT, Sager M (2008) Heavy metal contamination and health risk assessment in the vicinity of the abandoned Songcheon Au-Ag mine site, Korea. J Geochem Explor 96:223–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Long ER, Chapman PR (1985) A sediment quality triad: measures of sediment contamination, toxicity and infaunal community composition in Puget Sound. Mar Pollut Bull 16:405–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo XS, Ding J, Xu B, Wang YJ, Li HBYS (2012) Incorporating bioaccessibility into human risk assessments of heavy metals in urban park soils. Sci Tot Environ 424:88–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maleci L, Buffa G, Wahsha M, Bini C (2013) Morphological changes induced by heavy metals in dandelion (Taraxacum officinale Web) growing on mine soils. J Soils Sediments 14:731–743

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Garcia MJ, Moreno JM, Moreno-Clavel J, Vergara N, Garcıa-Sanchez A, Guillamon A, Portı M, Moreno-Grau S (2005) Heavy metals in human bones in different historical epochs. Sci Tot Environ 348:51–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martorel I, Perellò G, Martì-Cid R, Castell V, Llobet JM, Domingo JL (2010) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in foods and estimated PAH intake by the population of Catalonia, Spain: temporal trend. Environ Int 36:424–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendez MO, Maier RM (2008) Phytoremediation of mine tailings in temperate and arid environments. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 7:47–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menzies NW, Donn MJ, Kopittke PM (2007) Evaluation of extractants for estimation of the phytoavailable trace metals in soils. Environ Pollut 145:121–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Micheletti C (2006) Rischio ecologico da metalli pesanti e PCB. In: Guerzoni S, Tagliapietra D (eds) Atlante della Laguna. Marsilio, Venezia, pp 210–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Jimenez E, Garcia-Gomez C, Oropesa AL, Esteban E, Haro A, Carpena-Ruiz R, Tarazona JV, Penalosa JM, Fernandez MD (2011) Screening risk assessment tools for assessing the environmental impact in an abandoned pyritic mine in Spain. Sci Tot Environ 409:692–703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuijsen M, Paustenbach D, Duarte-Davidson R (2006) New developments in exposure assessment: the impact on the practice of health risk assessment and epidemiological studies. Environ Int 32:996–1009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council), (1983) Risk assessment in the federal government: managing the process. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nriagu JO (1983) Lead and lead poisoning in antiquity. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Obrador A, Alvarez JM, Lopez-Valdivia LM, Gonzalez D, Novillo J, Rico MI (2007) Relationship of soil properties with Mn and Zn distribution in acidic soils and their uptake by a barley crop. Geoderma 137:432–443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paustenbach DJ (2002) Human and ecological risk assessment: theory and practice. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Paustenbach DJ, Finley BL, Mowat FS, Kerger BD (2003) Human health risk and exposure assessment of chromium (VI) in tap water. J Toxic Environ Health 66(14):1295–1339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peijnenburg WJGM, Zablotskaja M, Vijver MG (2007) Monitoring metals in terrestrial environments within a bioavailability framework and a focus on soil extraction. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 67:163–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petruzzelli G (1989) Recycling wastes in agriculture: heavy metal bioavailability. Agr Ecosyst Environ 27:493–503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petts J, Cairney T, Smith M (1997) Risk-based contaminated land investigation and assessment. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzol L, Critto A, Marcomini A (2009) A spatial decision support system for the risk-based management of contaminated sites: the DESYRE DSS. In: Marcomini A, Suter GW, Critto A (eds) Decision support systems for risk-based management of contaminated sites. Springer, New York, pp 157–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Quevauviller P (1998) Operationally defined extraction procedures for soil and sediment analysis: I. Standardization. Trends Anal Chem 17:289–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rampazzo G, Innocente E, Pecorari E, Squizzato S, Valotto G (2014) Potentially harmful elements in the atmosphere. In: Bini C, Bech J (eds) PHEs, environment and human health. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao CRM, Sahuquillo A, Lopez Sanchez J (2008) A review of the different methods applied in environmental geochemistry for single and sequential extraction of trace elements in soils and related materials. Water Air Soil Pollut 189:291–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rattan RK, Datta SP, Chhonkar PK, Suribabu K, Singh AK (2005) Long-term impact of irrigation with sewage sludge effluents on heavy metal content in soils, crops and groundwater – a case study. Agric Ecosyst Environ 109:310–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roth P, Werner E, Paretzke HG (2001) A study of uranium excreted in urine. An assessment of protective measures taken by the German Army KFOR Contingent. National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Radiation Protection, Neuherberg. GSF report 3/01, p 36

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomons W (1995) Environmental impact of metals derived from mining activities: processes, predictions, prevention. J Geochem Explor 52:5–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar A, Ravindran G, Krishnamurthy V (2013) A brief review on the effect of cadmium toxicity: from cellular to organ level. Int J Bio Tech Res 3(1):17–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalin G (1980) Multiple schlerosis and selenium. In: Lag J (ed) Geomedical aspects in present and future research. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, pp 81–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt CW (2010) Lead in air adjusting to a new standard. Environ Health Perspect 118:A76–A79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenzin E, Critto A, Rutgers M, Marcomini A (2009) DSS-ERAMANIA: decision support system for site-specific ecological risk assessment of contaminated sites. In: Marcomini A, Suter GW, Critto A (eds) Decision support systems for risk-based management of contaminated sites. Springer, New York, pp 205–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Siciliano SD, James K, Zhang GY, Schafer AN, Peak JD (2009) Adhesion and enrichment of metals on human hands from contaminated soil at an artic urban brownfield. Environ Sci Technol 43:6385–6390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simon L (2014) Potentially harmful elements in agricultural soils. In: Bini C, Bech J (eds) PHEs, environment and human health. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Singh DP, Kumar N, Bhargava SK, Barman SC (2010) Accumulation and translocation of heavy metals in soil and plants from fly ash contaminated area. J Environ Biol 31:421–430

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith EP, Lipkovich I, Ye K (2002) Weight of evidence: quantitative estimation of probability of impairment for individual and multiple lines of evidence. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 8(7):1585–1596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinnes E (1980) Regional distribution of arsenic, selenium and antimony in human layers of Norwegian soils. In: Lag J (ed) Geomedical aspects in present and future research. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, pp 217–222

    Google Scholar 

  • The Environment Agency of the United Kingdom (UKEA) (2009) Human health toxicological assessment of contaminants in soil, Report SC050021/SR2. The Environment Agency in England and Wales, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton I (1993) Environmental geochemistry and health in the 1990s: a global perspective. Appl Geochem 8(Suppl 2):203–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ungaro F, Ragazzi F, Cappellin R, Giandon P (2008) Arsenic concentration in the soils of the Brenta Plain (Northern Italy): mapping the probability of exceeding contamination thresholds. J Geochem Explor 96:117–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Energy (USDOE) (2011) The risk assessment information system (RAIS). US Dept. Energy, Oak Ridge Operation Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1989) Risk assessment guidance for superfund. Vol. I: human health evaluation manual (part a), EPA/540/1-89/002. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1992) Framework for ecological risk assessment, EPA/630/R-92/001. Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1997) Methodology for assessing health risk associated with multiple exposure pathways to combustor emissions. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1998) Guidelines for ecological risk assessment, EPA/630/R-95/002F. Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1999) Risk assessment guidance for superfund, vol 3, Part A. draft, revision no. 5. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2011) Screening levels (RSL) for chemical contaminants at superfund sites. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2013) Integrated risk information system. Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0425.htm

  • Veerkamp W (1994) HESP user guide, version 2.10a. Shell International Petroleum Maatschappij B.V. The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinceti M, Venturelli M, Sighinolfi C, Trerotoli P, Bonvicini F, Ferrari A, Bianchi G, Serio G, Bergomi M, Vivoli G (2007) Case–control study of toenail cadmium and prostate cancer risk in Italy. Sci Tot Environ 373:77–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wahsha M (2014) Potentially harmful elements in abandoned mine waste. In: Bini C, Bech J (eds) PHEs, environment and human health. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Song H, Chen W, Lu C, Hu Q, Ren Z et al (2011) Cancer mortality in a Chinese population surrounding a multi-metal sulphide mine in Guangdong province: an ecologic study. BMC Public Health 11:319–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhem M, Pesch B, Wittsiepe J, Jakubis P, Mikovic P, Keegan T (2005) Comparison of arsenic levels in fingernails with urinary as species as biomarkers of as exposure in residents living close to a coal-burning power plant in Prievidza District, Slovakia. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 15:89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Li Y, Wang YA, Wang YH (2011) Assessment of toxic interactions of heavy metals in multi-component mixtures using se urchin embryo-larval bioassay. Toxicol in Vitro 25:294–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi Y, Yang Z, Zhang S (2011) Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in sediments and human health risk assessment of heavy metals in fishes in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River basin. Environ Pollut 159:2575–2585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon J, Cao X, Zhou Q, Ma LQ (2006) Accumulation of Pb, Cu, and Zn in native plants growing on a contaminated Florida site. Sci Total Environ 368:456–464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Xia BC, Fan C, Zhao P, Shen S (2012) Human health risk from heavy metal contamination under different land uses near Dabaoshan Mine, Southern China. Sci Tot Environ 417/418:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou XT, Wang J, Sun SQ, Wang XH (2010) Research for drinking water supply sources and case analysis. Sichuan Environ 29:24–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Zupan M, Hudnik V, Lobnik F, Kadunc V (1995) Accumulation of Pb, Cd, Zn from contaminated soil to various plants and evaluation of soil remediation with indicator plant (Plantago lanceolata L.). In: Prost R (ed) Contaminated soils. INRA, Paris, pp 325–335

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, University of Venice, Calle Larga S. Marta, Dorsoduro, 2137, Venezia, 30123, Italy

    Claudio Bini

Authors
  1. Claudio Bini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudio Bini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali Informatica e Statistica, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, Venice, Italy

    Claudio Bini

  2. Faculty of Biology, Soil Sc. Lab., University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Jaume Bech

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bini, C. (2014). Risk Assessment of PHEs. In: Bini, C., Bech, J. (eds) PHEs, Environment and Human Health. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8965-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation