Abstract
“Integrated reporting ” has gained prominence during the last few years. Investors have required more information also about how sustainability issues and initiatives are expected to contribute to the long-term growth strategy of a business. This communication, which should be provided by top management, leads toward the convergence of sustainability and financial reporting into a single “narrative.” Both financial reporting and non-financial reporting together provide all stakeholders with a comprehensive view of the position and performance of a company. This process has also been encouraged by some European regulations. However, despite these, social and environmental information is still disclosed differently in consolidated annual reports and social–environmental reports. The present work focuses on such differences of content. The analysis regards both (mandatory) consolidated annual reports and (voluntary) stand-alone social–environmental reports prepared by Italian-listed corporate groups for two different accounting periods (both before and after the implementation of Directive 2003/51/EC). The final results show relevant and persistent differences in the disclosure of environmental and employee matters between financial and sustainability reporting.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The Italian Civil Code does not provide any constraints. The National Board of Chartered Accountants (CNDCEC 2009a, b) addressed this issue and tried to provide some indication about the disclosure of environmental and employee information. The same was done by the International Accounting Standard Board (IASB). This board provided a framework for the presentation of management commentary reporting. It reflects a precise decision: the standardization of such reporting could reduce its informative power, so it must be avoided.
- 2.
In previous work (Costa and Agostini 2016), the regression model was introduced considering only the variable called regulation. Here, the analysis is mainly focused on other new independent variables called discltype and page.
References
Adams C (2002) Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: beyond current theorizing. AAA J 15(2):223–250
Adams C, Harte G (1998) The changing portrayal of the employment of women in British banks’ and retail companies’ corporate annual reports. Account Organ Soc 23(8):781–812
Adams C, Coutts A, Harte G (1995) Corporate equal opportunities (non-)disclosure. Br Account Rev 27(2):87–108
Alniacik U, Alniacik E, Genc N (2011) How corporate social responsibility information influences stakeholders’ intentions. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 18:234–245
Beattie V, McInnes B, Fearnley S (2004) A methodology for analyzing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: a comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes. Accounting Forum 28(3):205–236
Beck A, Campbell D, Shrives PJ (2010) Content analysis in environmental reporting research: enrichment and rehearsal of the method in a British-German context. Br Account Rev 42(3):207–222
Belal AR (2002) Stakeholder accountability or stakeholder management: a review of UK firms’ social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting (SEAAR) practices. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 9(1):8–25
Cho C, Michelon G, Patten D, Roberts R (2015) CSR disclosure: the more things change…? AAAJ 28(1):14–35
CNDCEC (2009a) La relazione sulla gestione dei bilanci d’esercizio alla luce delle novità introdotte dal d.lgs. 32/2007. Roma, 14 Gennaio
CNDCEC (2009b) La relazione sulla gestione dei bilanci d’esercizio alla luce delle novità introdotte dal d.lgs. 32/2007—Informativa sull’ambiente e sul personale. Roma, 11 Marzo
Costa E, Agostini M (2016) Mandatory disclosure about environmental and employee matters in the reports of Italian-listed corporate groups. SEAJ 36:1–23
Dainelli F, Bini L, Giunta F (2013) Signaling strategies in annual reports: evidence from the disclosure of performance indicators. Adv Account 29:267–277
Dye RA (1985) Disclosure of nonproprietary information. J Account Res 123–145
Flöstrand P, Ström N (2006) The valuation relevance of non-financial information. Manag Res News 29(9):580–597
Global Reporting Initiative GRI (2002) Sustainability reporting guidelines on economic, environmental and social performance. Global Reporting Initiative, Amsterdam
Gray R (2002) The social accounting project and accounting organizations and society, privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique? Account Organ Soc 27:687–708
Gray R, Kouhy R, Lavers S (1995a) Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. AAAJ 8(2):47–77
Gray R, Kouhy R, Lavers S (1995b) Methodological themes. Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. AAAJ 8(2):78–101
Gray R, Adams C, Owen D (1996) Accounting and accountability: changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Grossman SJ (1981) The informational role of warranties and private disclosure about product quality. J Law Econ 24(3):461–483
Healy P, Palepu K (2001) Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: a review of the empirical disclosure literature. J Account Econ 31(1):405–440
Lehman CR (1992) Accounting’s changing roles in social conflict. Paul Chapman, London
Lev B, Zarowin P (1999) The boundaries of financial reporting and how to extend them (digest summary). J Account Res 37(2):353–385
Lober DJ, Bynum D, Campbell E, Jacques M (1997) The 100 plus corporate environmental study: a survey of an evolving environmental management tool. BSE 6(2):57–73
Mathews M (1997) Twenty-five years of social and environmental accounting research: is there a silver jubilee to celebrate? AAAJ 10(4):481–531
Milgrom P (1981) Good news and bad news: representation theorems and applications. Bell J Econ 12(2):380–391
Milne M, Adler R (1999) Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. AAAJ 12(2):237–252
Nobes C, Parker RH (2008) Comparative international accounting. Pearson Education
Pae S (2002) Discretionary disclosure, efficiency, and signal informativeness. J Account Econ 33(3):279–311
Parker L (2005) Social and environmental accountability research: a view from the commentary box. AAAJ 18(6):842–860
Parker L (2011) Twenty-one years of social and environmental accountability research: a coming of age. Accounting Forum 35(1):1–10
Parker L (2014) Constructing a research field: a reflection on the history of social and environmental accounting. SEAJ 34(2):87–92
Roca L, Searcy C (2012) An analysis of indicators disclosed in corporate sustainability reports. J Clean Prod 20(1):103–118
Schleicher T, Walker M (1999) Share price anticipation of earnings and management’s discussion of operations and financing. Account Bus Res 29(4):321–335
Seah S, Tarca A (2006) The impact of regulatory framework on management commentary reports. Available at http//ssm. com/abstract: 962628
Unerman J (2000) Reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis. AAAJ 13(5):667–680
Verrecchia R (1983) Discretionary disclosure. J Account Econ 5:179–194
Welker M (1995) Disclosure policy, information asymmetry, and liquidity in equity markets. Contemp Account Res 11(2):801–827
Zeghal D, Ahmed S (1990) Comparison of social responsibility information disclosure media used by Canadian firms. AAAJ 3(1):38–53
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Agostini, M., Costa, E. (2018). Financial and Sustainability Reporting: An Empirical Investigation of Their Relationship in the Italian Context. In: Gal, G., Akisik, O., Wooldridge, W. (eds) Sustainability and Social Responsibility: Regulation and Reporting. Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4502-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4502-8_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4501-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4502-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)