Skip to main content

Roots and Mechanisms of Thermal Comfort Expectations: From Individuals’ Own Background to Adaptation and Change

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Building Energy and Environment (COBEE 2022)

Part of the book series: Environmental Science and Engineering ((ESE))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The notion of thermal comfort has evolved through time, being the answer to various changes and influences in the built environment. Despite the common engineering definition, with measured ideal conditions matching with a state of neutrality, the concept is far more complex and requires a holistic multidisciplinary approach. Two main aspects are pivotal in the concept of comfort: expectation and adaptation, which depend themselves on several diversity-driving factors. However, their influence is nowadays generally neglected in buildings’ design and operation, and standards. The aim of this work is to understand and acknowledge, by means of a literature analysis, the different aspects that contribute to the inner workings of thermal comfort expectations and adaptation. The paper addresses all the different dynamics constituting the users’ thermal background and their attitudes towards the indoor environment. Only an in deep understanding of the possible differences between different users’ expectation and adaptation mechanisms will trigger an informed human-centric design process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amin R, Teli D, James P, Bourikas L (2016) The influence of a student’s ‘home’ climate on room temperature and indoor environmental controls use in a modern halls of residence. Energy Build 119:331–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANSI/ASHRAE (2017) Standard 55: thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman F, Carter T, Baughman A, Arens E (1998) Field study of the impact of a desktop task/ambient conditioning system in office buildings. ASHRAE Trans 104

    Google Scholar 

  • Brager G, de Dear R (2003) Historical and cultural influences on comfort expectations. In: Cole RJ, Lorch R (eds) Buildings, culture and environment: informing local and global practices. Wiley-Blackwell, pp 177–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Brager G, Paliaga G, de Dear R (2004) Operable windows, personal control and occupant comfort

    Google Scholar 

  • de Dear R, Brager G (1998) Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference. ASHRAE Trans 104:145–167

    Google Scholar 

  • de Dear R, Brager G (2002) Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55. Energy Build 34:549–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanger PO (1970) Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering. Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen, Denmark, p 244

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill LD, Webb LH, Parsons KC (2000) Carers’ views of the thermal comfort requirements of people with physical disabilities. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting

    Google Scholar 

  • Indraganti M, Rao KD (2010) Effect of age, gender, economic group and tenure on thermal comfort: a field study in residential buildings in hot and dry climate with seasonal variations. Energy Build 42:273–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1991) Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J Econ Perspect 5:193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karjalainen S (2012) Thermal comfort and gender: a literature review. Indoor Air 22:96–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Rezgui Y, Guerriero A, Zhang X, Han M, Kubicki S, Yan D (2020) Development of an adaptation table to enhance the accuracy of the predicted mean vote model. Build Environ 168

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo M, Cao B, Damiens J, Lin B, Zhu Y (2015) Evaluating thermal comfort in mixed-mode buildings: a field study in a subtropical climate. Build Environ 88:46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo M, Cao B, Ji W, Ouyang Q, Lin B, Zhu Y (2016a) The underlying linkage between personal control and thermal comfort: psychological or physical effects? Energy Build 111:56–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo M, de Dear R, Ji W, Bin C, Lin B, Ouyang Q, Zhu Y (2016b) The dynamics of thermal comfort expectations: the problem, challenge and impication. Build Environ 95:322–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo M, Zhou X, Zhu Y, Zhang D, Cao B (2016c) Exploring the dynamic process of human thermal adaptation: a study in teaching building. Energy Build 127:425–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo M, Wang Z, Brager, G, Cao B, Zhu Y (2018) Indoor climate experience, migration, and thermal comfort expectation in buildings. Build Environ 141:262–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo M, Ke Z, Ji W, Wang Z, Cao B, Zhou X, Zhu Y (2019) The time-scale of thermal comfort adaptation in heated and unheated buildings. Build Environ 151:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marín-Restrepo L, Trebilcock M, Porras-Salazar JA (2020) Adaptation by coexistence: contrasting thermal comfort perception among individual and shared office spaces. Archit Sci Rev 63:235–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moezzi M (2009) Are comfort expectations of building occupants too high? Build Res Inform 37:79–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicol JF, Humphreys M (1973) Thermal comfort as part of a self-regulating system. Build Res Pract 6:191–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons K (2002) The effects of gender, acclimation state, the opportunity to adjust clothing and physical disability on requirements for thermal comfort. Energy Build 34:593–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [Online]. Available: prisma-statement.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Prins G (1992) On condis and coolth. Energy Build 18:251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudofsky B (1964) Architecture without architects: a short introduction to non-pedigreed architecture. Doubleday

    Google Scholar 

  • Rybczynski W (1986) Home: a short history of an idea. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Satish B (2019) Beyond energy-efficient built environment—examining the relationship between the users’ cultural values and energy consumption. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci

    Google Scholar 

  • “Scopus Preview,” [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/.

  • Taylor NAS, Allsopp NK, Parkes DG (1995) Preferred room temperature of young vs aged males: the influence of thermal sensation, thermal comfort, and affect. J Gerontol Ser A 50A:M216–M221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teli D, Jentsch MF, James PAB, Bahaj AS (2012) Field study on thermal comfort in a UK primary school. In: Proceedings of 7th Windsor conference: the changing context of comfort in an unpredictable world. Windsor, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hoof J, Hensen J (2006) Thermal comfort and older adults. Gerontechnology 4:223–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Hoof J, Schellen L, Soebarto V, Wong JKW, Kazak JK (2017) Ten questions concerning thermal comfort and ageing. Build Environ 120:123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vischer JC (2008) Towards a user-centred theory of the built environment. Build Res Inform 36(3):231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson KJ, Evans J, Karvonen A, Whitley T (2016) Re-conceiving building design quality: a review of building users in their social context. Indoor Built Environ 35(3):509–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite H, Shove E, Kempton W (2000) The legacy of twenty years of energy demand management. We know more about individual behavior but next to nothing about demand. In: Jochem E, Sathaye JA, Bouille D (eds) Society, behaviour and climate change mitigation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshino H, Hong T, Nord N (2017) IEA EBC annex 53: total energy use in buildings—analysis and evaluation methods. Energy Build 152:124–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu J, Ouyang Q, Zhu Y, Shen H, Cao G, Cui W (2012) A comparison of the thermal adaptability of people accustomed to air-conditioned environments and naturally ventilated environments. Indoor Air 22:110–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yun H, Nam I, Kim J, Yang J, Lee K, Sohn J (2014) A field study of thermal comfort for kindergarten children in Korea: an assessment of existing models and preferences of children. Build Environ 75:182–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, de Dear R (2019) Impacts of demographic, contextual and interaction effects on thermal sensation—evidence from a global database. Build Environ 162

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Ouyang Q, Zhu Y, Feng C, Zhang X (2013) Experimental study of the influence of anticipated control on human thermal sensation and thermal comfort. Indoor Air 24

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been conducted within the EU H2020 Cultural-E project funded from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N. 870072.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenza Pistore .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pistore, L., Pasut, W. (2023). Roots and Mechanisms of Thermal Comfort Expectations: From Individuals’ Own Background to Adaptation and Change. In: Wang, L.L., et al. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Building Energy and Environment. COBEE 2022. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9822-5_251

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9822-5_251

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9821-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9822-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics