Skip to main content
Log in

Semantic parsing with LFG and conceptual representations

  • Published:
Computers and the Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A semantic parser is presented which aims at the attainment of a high linguistic coverage and an extendibility to many languages. To this end, a frequency distionary for Italian has been classified following LFG theoretical framework and a general decoder has been implemented to pass from the syntactic. to the semantic and conceptual levels. Syntactic structural derivation is produced by complete lexical froms, lexical redundancy rules and an extended phrase structure grammar which has been implemented in Prolog using XGs. Semantic and conceptual representation are produced following Jackendoff's system of conceptual representations plus a number of additions to compute time reference mainly inspired by J. Allen's system (1983a, b). We believe that a text rethorical organizations is mainly governed by linguistic principles like the alternation of FOCUS and TOPIC, the use of definiteness to qualify referring expressions, etc. We describe two algorithm to analyse the level of text: Logical Form, which provides scope assignment to quantified expressions; an algorithm for anaphora resolution which incorporates linguistic information and a number of psycholinguistic heuristic. Finally, we briefly describe how the inference engine provided by KL-ONE is integrated into the previous modules to produce semantic entailment and linguistic inferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Allen, J.F. “Argot: A System Overview.” In Computational Linguistics. Ed. N. Cercone. Pergamon Press, 1983a, pp. 97–109.

  • Allen, J.F. “Maintaining Knowledge about Temporal Intervals.” Communications of the ACM, 26,11 (1983b), 832–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J.F. “Towards a General Theory of Action and Time.” Artificial Intelligence, 23 (1984), 123–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, D., and R. Delmonte. “Binding Pronominals with an LFG Parser.” Manuscript. University of Venice, 1989a.

  • Bianchi, D., and R. Delmonte. “From Grammatical Representation to Discourse Structure.” Manuscript. University of Venice, 1989b.

  • Bresnan, J., ed. The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J., and Kanerva. “Locative Inversion in Chichewa: A Case Study of Factorization in Grammar.” Linguistic Inquiry, 20,1 (1989), 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. Essays on Form and Interpretation. New York: American Elsevier, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmonte, R. “From Subcategorization Frames to Thematic Roles.” In Lessico, stutture e interpretazione, - Studi Linguistici Applicati I. Ed. R. Delmonte. Padova: Unipress, 1989a, pp. 167–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enç Mürvet. “Towards a Referential Analysis of Temporal Expressions.” Linguistics and Philosophy, 9 (1986).

  • Furlan, M. “Analisi delle relazioni aspetto-temporale nella frase.” In Lessico, stutture e interpretazione, - Studi Linguistici Applicati I. Ed. R. Delmonte. Padova: Unipress, 1988, pp. 131–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen, P.K. “Semantics for Lexical Functional Grammar.” Linguistic Inquiry 4 (1983), 567–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J.R., and S.M. Shieber. “An Algorithm for Generating Quantifier Scoping.” Computational Linguistics, 13, 1–2 (1987), 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioup, G. “Some Universals for Quantifier Scope.” In Syntax and Semantics 4.. Ed. J.P. Kimball. New York: Academic Press, 1975, pp. 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. “Towards an Explanatory Semantic Representation.” Linguistic Inquiry, 7 (1976), 89–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. “Believing and Intending: Two Sides of the Same Coin.” Linguistic Inquiry, 16 (1985), 445–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, I. The Representation of Implicit and Dethematized Subjects. Dordrecht: Foris, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanson, A. Die Derivation der linguistichen Inferenzen im Satz durch die Eigenschaften der Pradikat-Argument Strukturen. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Venice, 1990.

  • Sidner, C. “Focusing in the Comprehension of Definite Anaphora.” In Computational Models of Discourse. Ed. M. Brady and R. Berwick. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983, pp. 267–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. “A Reassignment of the Functions of LF.” Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 2 (1986), 265–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaenen, A. “On Syntactic Binding.” Linguistic Inquiry, 14, 3 (1983), 469–504.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Rodolfo Delmonte is associate professor of Applied Linguistics at the University of Venice. He received his doctoral degree in 1973 in Venice: he was then granted the Australian-European Award and studied in Melbourne where he received the Ph.D. degree in 1978 from Monash University. At the beginning, he worked in quantitative linguistics mainly in literary research; he was then involved in a number of major projects transferring prosodic and phonological rules of Italian into implementations for synthetic speech. Since 1983 he has been more interested in parsing both syntactic and semantic: he is lately working on an EUREKA man-machine interface project for the automatic generation of linguistic descriptions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Delmonte, R. Semantic parsing with LFG and conceptual representations. Comput Hum 24, 461–488 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186491

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186491

Key Words

Navigation