Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between classical and innovative class-modelling techniques for the characterisation of a PDO olive oil

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An authentication study of the Italian PDO (protected designation of origin) olive oil Chianti Classico, based on near-infrared and UV–Visible spectroscopy, an artificial nose and an artificial tongue, with a set of samples representative of the whole Chianti Classico production and a considerable number of samples from a close production area (Maremma) was performed. The non-specific signals provided by the four fingerprinting analytical techniques, after a proper pre-processing, were used for building class models for Chianti Classico oils. The outcomes of classical class-modelling techniques like soft independent modelling of class analogy and quadratic discriminant analysis—unequal dispersed classes were compared with those of two techniques recently introduced into Chemometrics: multivariate range modelling and CAIMAN analogues modelling methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luykx DMAM, van Ruth SM (2008) Food Chem 107:897–911

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dimara E, Skuras D (2003) Eur J Market 37:690–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. European Council Regulation No 510/2006 of 20 Mar 2006

  4. European Commission Regulation No 2446/2000 of 6 Nov 2000

  5. Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali, Provvedimento of 4 Dec 2000, Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana No 13 of 17 Jan 2001

  6. Armanino C, Leardi R, Lanteri S, Modi G (1989) Chemom Intell Lab Syst 5:343–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ollivier D, Artaud J, Pinatel C, Durbec JP, Guérère M (2006) Food Chem 97:382–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lerma-García MJ, Herrero-Martínez JM, Ramis-Ramos G, Simó-Alfonso EF (2008) Food Chem 108:1142–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Valcárcel M, Cárdenas S (2005) Trends Anal Chem 24:67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sinelli N, Casiraghi E, Tura D, Downey G (2007) J Near Infrared Spectrosc 16:335–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Forina M, Boggia R, Casale M (2007) Ann Chim (Rome) 97:615–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cosio MS, Ballabio D, Benedetti S, Gigliotti C (2006) Anal Chim Acta 567:202–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Oliveri P, Baldo MA, Daniele S, Forina M (2009) Anal Bioanal Chem 395:1135–1143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Forina M, Oliveri P, Lanteri S, Casale M (2008) Chemom Intell Lab Syst 93:132–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cerrato-Oliveros C, Boggia R, Casale M, Armanino C, Forina M (2005) J Chromatogr A 1076:7–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Barnes RJ, Dhanoa MS, Lister SJ (1989) Appl Spectrosc 43:772–777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jolliffe IT (2002) Principal component analysis. Springer series in statistics, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wold S, Sjöström M (1977) Chemometrics: theory and applications. In: Kowalski BR (ed) Chemometrics: theory and application, ACS Symposium Series 52. American Chemical Society, Washington, pp 243–282

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hotelling H (1947) Multivariate quality control. In: Eisenhart C, Hastay MW, Wallis WA (eds) Techniques of statistical analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 111–184

    Google Scholar 

  20. Derde MP, Massart DL (1986) Anal Chim Acta 184:33–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Forina M, Oliveri P, Casale M, Lanteri S (2008) Anal Chim Acta 622:85–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Forina M, Casale M, Oliveri P, Lanteri S (2009) Chemom Intell Lab Syst 96:239–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Forina M, Lanteri S, Armanino C, Casolino C, Casale M, Oliveri P (2009) V-PARVUS 2009, University of Genoa, Genoa. http://www.parvus.unige.it. Accessed 2 Jan 2010

  24. Harper AM, Duewer DL, Kowalski BR, Fashing JL (1977) In: Kowalski BR (ed) Chemometrics: theory and application, ACS Symposium Series 52. American Chemical Society, Washington, pp 14–52

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MIUR) and by the University of Genoa is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Oliveri.

Additional information

Published in the special issue Chemometrics (VII Colloquium Chemiometricum Mediterraneum) with Guest Editors Marcelo Blanco, Juan M. Bosque-Sendra and Luis Cuadros-Rodríguez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oliveri, P., Casale, M., Casolino, M.C. et al. Comparison between classical and innovative class-modelling techniques for the characterisation of a PDO olive oil. Anal Bioanal Chem 399, 2105–2113 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4377-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4377-1

Keywords

Navigation