Skip to main content
Log in

A combined test for differences in scale based on the interquantile range

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Statistical Papers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A class of tests due to Shoemaker (Commun Stat Simul Comput 28: 189–205, 1999) for differences in scale which is valid for a variety of both skewed and symmetric distributions when location is known or unknown is considered. The class is based on the interquantile range and requires that the population variances are finite. In this paper, we firstly propose a permutation version of it that does not require the condition of finite variances and is remarkably more powerful than the original one. Secondly we solve the question of what quantile choose by proposing a combined interquantile test based on our permutation version of Shoemaker tests. Shoemaker showed that the more extreme interquantile range tests are more powerful than the less extreme ones, unless the underlying distributions are very highly skewed. Since in practice you may not know if the underlying distributions are very highly skewed or not, the question arises. The combined interquantile test solves this question, is robust and more powerful than the stand alone tests. Thirdly we conducted a much more detailed simulation study than that of Shoemaker (1999) that compared his tests to the F and the squared rank tests showing that his tests are better. Since the F and the squared rank test are not good for differences in scale, his results suffer of such a drawback, and for this reason instead of considering the squared rank test we consider, following the suggestions of several authors, tests due to Brown–Forsythe (J Am Stat Assoc 69:364–367, 1974), Pan (J Stat Comput Simul 63:59–71, 1999), O’Brien (J Am Stat Assoc 74:877–880, 1979) and Conover et al. (Technometrics 23:351–361, 1981).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernhard G, Klein M, Hommel G (2004) Global and multiple test procedures using ordered p-values—a review. Stat Pap 45: 1–14

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Boos DD, Brownie C (1989) Bootstrap methods for testing homogeneity of variances. Technometrics 31: 69–82

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MB, Forsythe AB (1974) Robust tests for the equality of variances. J Am Stat Assoc 69: 364–367

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Büning H (2000) Robustness and power of parametric, nonparametric, robustified and adaptive tests—the multi-sample location problem. Stat Pap 41: 381–407

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Conover WJ, Johnson ME, Johnson MM (1981) A comparative study of tests for homogeneity of variances, with applications to the outer continental shelf bidding data. Technometrics 23: 351–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebhard J, Schmitz N (1998a) Permutation tests—a revival?! I. Optimum properties. Stat Pap 39: 75–85

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gebhard J, Schmitz N (1998b) Permutation tests—a revival?! II. An efficient algorithm for computing the critical region. Stat Pap 39: 87–96

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huber PJ (1981) Robust statistics. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Loughin TM (2004) A systematic comparison of methods for combining p-values from independent tests. Comput Stat Data Anal 47: 467–485

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Marozzi M (2004a) A bi-aspect nonparametric test for the two-sample location problem. Comput Stat Data Anal 44: 639–648

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Marozzi M (2004b) A bi-aspect nonparametric test for the multi-sample location problem. Comput Stat Data Anal 46: 81–92

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Marozzi M (2007) Multivariate tri-aspect non-parametric testing. J Nonparametr Stat 19: 269–282

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nair VN (1984) On the behaviour of some estimators from probability plots. J Am Stat Assoc 79: 823–830

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien RG (1979) A general ANOVA method for robust tests of additive models for variances. J Am Stat Assoc 74: 877–880

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Olejnik SF, Algina J (1988) Tests of variance equality when distributions differ in form and location. Educ Psychol Meas 48: 317–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan G (1999) On a Levene type test for equality of two variances. J Stat Comput Simul 63: 59–71

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pesarin F (2001) Multivariate permutation tests with applications in biostatistics. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigeot I (2000) Basic concepts of multiple tests—a survey. Stat Pap 41: 3–36

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Salmaso L, Solari A (2005) Multiple aspect testing for case–control designs. Metrika 62: 331–340

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker LH (1999) Interquantile tests for dispersion in skewed distributions. Commun Stat Simul Comput 28: 189–205

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Marozzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marozzi, M. A combined test for differences in scale based on the interquantile range. Stat Papers 53, 61–72 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-010-0308-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-010-0308-7

Keywords

Mathematical Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation