Abstract
The sustainability of social-ecological systems depends on river flows being maintained within a range to which those systems are adapted. In order to determine the extent of this natural range of variation, we assess ecological flow thresholds and the occurrence of potentially damaging flood events to society in the context of the Lower Brahmaputra river basin. The ecological flow threshold was calculated using twenty-two ‘Range of Variability (RVA)’ parameters, considering the range between ± 1 standard deviation from the mean of the natural flow. Damaging flood events were calculated using flood frequency analysis of Annual Maxima series and using the flood classification of Bangladesh. The climate change impacts on future river flow were calculated by using a weighted ensemble analysis of twelve global circulation models (GCMs) outputs driving a large-scale hydrologic model. The simulated climate change induced altered flow regime of the Lower Brahmaputra River Basin was then investigated and compared with the calculated threshold flows. The results demonstrate that various parameters including the monthly mean of low flow (January, February and March) and high flow (June, July and August) periods, the 7-day average minimum flow, and the yearly maximum flow will exceed the threshold conditions by 1956–1995 under the business-as-usual A1B and A2 future scenarios. The results have a number of policy level implications for government agencies of the Lower Brahmaputra River Basin, specifically for Bangladesh. The calculated thresholds may be used as a good basis for negotiations with other riparian countries of the basin. The methodological approach presented in this study can be applied to other river basins and provide a useful basis for transboundary water resources management.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed AU (2001) Adaptability of Bangladesh’s crop agriculture to climate change: possibilities and limitations. Asia Pac J Environ Dev 7(1):71–93
Apel H, Thieken AH, Merz B, Blöschl G (2006) A probabilistic modelling system for assessing flood risks. Nat Hazard 38(1–2):79–100
Bergström S (1976) The HBV model. In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Colorado, pp 443–476
Biswas SP, Boruah S (2000) Ecology of the River Dolphin (Platanista gangetica) in the Upper Brahmaputra. Hydrobiologia 430:97–111
Boruah S, Biswas SP (2002) Ecohydrology and fisheries of the Upper Brahmaputra basin. Environmentalist 22:119–131
Brammer H, Asaduzzaman H, Sultana P (1996) Effects of climate and sea-level changes on the natural resources of Bangladesh. In: Ahmad QK, Warrick RA (eds) The implications of climate and sea-level change for Bangladesh. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 143–193
Gain AK, Immerzeel WW, Sperna Weiland FC, Bierkens MFP (2011) Impact of climate change on the stream flow of the lower Brahmaputra: trends in high and low flows based on discharge-weighted ensemble modelling. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15(5):1537–1545
Gain AK, Uddin MN, Sana P (2008) Impact of River Salinity on Fish Diversity in the South-West Coastal Region of Bangladesh. Int J Ecol Env Sci 34:49–54
Gallopín GC (2006) Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Chang 16:293–303
Giorgi F, Mearns LO (2002) Calculation of average, uncertainty range, and reliability of regional climate changes from AOGCM simulations via the “Reliability Ensemble Averageing” (REA) method. J Clim 15:1141–1158
Gleckler PJ, Taylor KE, Doutriaux C (2008) Performance metrics for climate models. J Geophys Res-Atmos 113, D06104
Grumbine RE, Pandit MK (2013) Threats from India’s Himalaya dams. Science 339:36–37
Gupta AD, Babel MS, Albert X, Mark O (2005) Water sector of Bangladesh in the context of integrated water resources management: a review. Int J Water Resour Dev 21(2):385–398
Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS (1995) Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. Columbia University Press, New York
Hofer T, Messerli B (2006) Floods in Bangladesh: History, dynamics and rethinking the role of the Himalayas. United Nations University Press, Tokyo
Hosking JRM, Wallis JR (1997) Regional frequency analysis, an approach based on L-moments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Immerzeel W (2008) Historical trends and future predictions of climate variability in the Brahmaputra basin. Int J Climatol 28:243–254
Immerzeel WW, van Beek LP, Bierkens MFP (2010) Climate change will affect the Asian water towers. Science 328:1382–1385
Knutti R (2008) Should we believe model predictions of future climate change? Philos T R Soc A 366:4647–4664
Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD, Friedlingstein P, Gaye AT, Gregory JM, Kitoh A, Knutti R, Murphy JM, Noda A, Raper SCB, Watterson IG, Weaver AJ, Zhao Z-C (2007) Global climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, pp 747–846
Mirza MMQ (1998) Diversion of the Ganges Water at Farakka and its effects on salinity in Bangladesh. Environ Manag 22:711–722
Mirza MMQ (2002) Global warming and changes in the probability of occurrence of floods in Bangladesh and implications. Glob Environ Chang 12(2):127–138
Monk WA, Wood PJ, Hannah DM, Wilson DA (2007) Selection of river flow indices for the assessment of hydroecological change. River Res App 23(1):113–122
Murphy JM, Sexton DMH, Barnett DN, Jones GS, Webb MJ, Collins M, Stainforth DA (2004) Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 430:768–772
Olden JD, Poff NL (2003) Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes. River Res App 19(2):101–121
Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Brian D, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC, Richter BD (1997) The natural flow regime - a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience 47(11):769–784
Poff NL, Brinson MM, Day JW (2002) Aquatic ecosystems and global climate change: potential impacts on inland freshwater and coastal wetland ecosystems in the United States. The Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Philadelphia
Poff NL, Tokar S, Johnson P (1996) Stream hydrological and ecological responses to climate change assessed with an artificial neural network. Limnol Oceanogr 41(5):857–863
Poff NL, Ward J (1990) The physical habitat template of the lotic systems: recovery in the context of historical pattern of spatio-temporal heterogeneity. Environ Manag 14:5–37
Räisänen J, Ruokolainen L, Ylhäisi J (2010) Weighting of model results for improving best estimate of climate change. Climate Dyn 35:407–422
Renaud FG, Birkmann J, Damm M, Gallopín GC (2010) Understanding multiple thresholds of coupled social-ecological systems exposed to natural hazards as external shocks. Nat Hazards 55:749–763
Richter BD, Davis MM, Apse C, Konrad C (2011) Short Communication: a presumptive standard for environmental flow protection. River Res App. doi:10.1002/rra.1511
Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Wigington R, Braun DP (1997) How much water does a river need? Freshw Biol 37:231–249
Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Powell J, Braun DP (1996) A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conserv Biol 10:1163–1174
Sanz DB, Garcίa del Jalόn D, Gutiérrez Teira B, Vizcaίno Martίnez P (2005) Basin influence on natural variability of rivers in semi-arid environments. Int J River Basin Mgt 3:247–259
Smakhtin VU, Shilpakar RL, Hughes DA (2006) Hydrology-based assessment of environmental flows: an example from Nepal. Hydrol Sci J 51:207–222
Sperna Weiland FC, van Beek LPH, Weerts AH, Bierkens MFP (2012) Extracting information from an ensemble of GCMs to reliably assess global future runoff change. J Hydrol 412–413:66–75
Tebaldi D, Knutti R (2007) The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections. Philos Trans Roy Soc A 365:2053–2075
Tockner K, Stanford JA (2002) Riverine floodplains: present state and future trends. Environ Conserv 29:308–330
Van Beek LPH, Bierkens MFP (2008) The Global Hydrological Model PCR-GLOBWB: Conceptualization, Parameterization and Verification. Report, Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University., available at http://vanbeek.geo.uu.nl/suppinfo/vanbeekbierkens2009.pdf
Wharton CH, Lambou VW, Newsome J, Winger PV, Gaddy LL, Mancke R (1981) The fauna of bottomland hardwoods in the southeastern United States. In: Clark JR, Benforado J (eds) Wetlands of bottom- land hardwood forests. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co, New York, pp 87–160
Xu J, Grumbine RE, Shrestha A, Eriksson M, Yang X, Wang Y, Wilkes A (2009) The melting Himalayas: cascading effects of climate change on water, biodiversity and livelihoods. Conserv Biol 23(3):520–530
Acknowledgment
Part of this research was conducted at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice and at the United Nations University – Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS), whose support is gratefully acknowledged. The authors are grateful to Bangladesh Water Development Board for providing the discharge data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOC 5333 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gain, A.K., Apel, H., Renaud, F.G. et al. Thresholds of hydrologic flow regime of a river and investigation of climate change impact—the case of the Lower Brahmaputra river Basin. Climatic Change 120, 463–475 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0800-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0800-x