Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The influence of economic growth, population, and fossil fuel scarcity on energy investments

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the dynamics of energy investments and clean energy Research and Development (R&D) using a scenario-based modeling approach. Starting from the global scenarios proposed in the RoSE model ensemble experiment, we analyze the dynamics of investments under different assumptions regarding economic and population growth as well as availability of fossil fuel resources, in the absence of a climate policy. Our analysis indicates that economic growth and the speed of income convergence across countries matters for improvements in energy efficiency, both via dedicated R&D investments but mostly through capital-energy substitution. In contrast, fossil fuel prices, by changing the relative competitiveness of energy sources, create an economic opportunity for radical innovation in the energy sector. Indeed, our results suggest that fossil fuel availability is the key driver of investments in low carbon energy innovation. However, this innovation, by itself, is not sufficient to induce emission reductions compatible with climate stabilization objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.rose-project.org/

  2. The same analysis can be carried out by comparing the effect of convergence under the assumption of fast growth, namely BAU FS Gr versus BAU FS Gr SL Con.

  3. R&D investments in the breakthrough technology are the same across the various scenarios with low oil because oil scarcity pushes the breakthrough technology to its upper bound. This model version features a deterministic representation of endogenous technical change. We assume that breakthrough innovations occurs if R&D investments are sufficiently high. The probabilistic nature of innovation is analyzed in Bosetti and Tavoni (2008).

  4. Popp (2002) estimated a long-run elasticity of energy patenting with respect to energy prices of 0.354. He also concluded that energy prices can stimulate innovation pretty quickly. Newell et al. (1999) examined the extent to which the energy efficiency of the menu of home appliances available for sale changed in response to energy prices between 1958 and 1993. They found that the amount of innovation and energy efficiency improvement respond to changes in energy prices within a time framework of five years. By now a large number of papers also control for the inducement effect of some indicator of environmental policy or pollution expenditure, see Popp et al. (2009) for a review.

  5. We talk about diffusion rather than invention because these technologies were invented in the 1950s and 1960s. A quick search for patent data using “horizontal drilling” and “hydraulic fracturing” as keywords, reveals that the 29 and 9 patents were granted under these keywords, respectively, between 1950 and 1960. Source: http://gb.espacenet.com/ viewed on December 30 2011.

  6. Investments in hydropower are not discussed because they do no vary across scenarios.

  7. CO2 fossil fuel emissions are considered.

References

  • Ahmad S (1966) On the theory of induced invention. Econ J 76(302):344–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang B (2005) The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide. Energy Pol 33(7):867–871. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2003.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker E, Shittu E (2006) Profit maximizing R&D investment in response to a random carbon tax. Resour Energy Econ 28:105–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanford GJ (2009) R&D investment strategy for climate change. Energy Econ 31(S1):S27–S36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosetti V, Victor DG (2011) Politics and economics of second-best regulation of greenhouse gases: the importance of regulatory credibility. The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics 32(1):1–24

  • Bosetti V, De Cian E (2013) How to make the most of unilateral climate action? Environ Resour Econ. doi:10.1007/s10640-013-9643-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosetti V, Carraro C, Galeotti M, Massetti E, Tavoni M (2006) WITCH: a world induced technical change hybrid model. Energy J, Special Issue on Hybrid Modeling of Energy-Environment Policies: Reconciling Bottom-up and Top-down 13–38

  • Bosetti V, Carraro C, Duval R, Sgobbi A, Tavoni M (2009a) The role of R&D and technology diffusion in climate change mitigation: new perspectives using the WITCH model. OECD Working Paper No. 664, February

  • Bosetti V, Carraro C, Tavoni M (2009b) Climate policy after 2012. Technology, timing, participation. CESifo Econ Stud 55(2):235–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke L, Edmonds J, Krey V, Richels R, Rose S, Tavoni M (2009) International climate policy architectures: overview of the EMF 22 International scenarios. Energy Econ 31(Supplement 2):S64–S81. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2009.10.013

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cian E, Tavoni M (2012) Can technology externalities justify carbon trade restrictions? Resour Energy Econ 34:624–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cian E, Bosetti V, Tavoni M (2012) Technology innovation and diffusion in less than ideal climate policies. An assessment with the WITCH model. Clim Chang 114(1):121–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edenhofer O, Knopf B, Barker T, Baumstark L, Bellevrat E, Chateau B, Criqui P, Isaac M, Kitous A, Kypreos S, Leimbach M, Lessmann K, Magné B, Scrieciu S, Turton H, van Vuuren DP (2010) The economics of low stabilization: model comparison of mitigation strategies and costs. Energy J 31(Special Issue 1)

  • Hicks JR (1932) The theory of wages. McMillan, London

  • Hübler M (2011) Technology diffusion under contraction and convergence: a CGE analysis of China. Energy Econ 33(1):131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hübler M, Steckel J (2012) Economic growth, decarbonization, and international transfers. Clim Dev 4(2):88–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hübler M, Baumstark L, Leimbach M, Edenhofer O, Bauer N (2012) An integrated assessment model with endogenous growth. Ecol Econ 83:118–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriegler E, Mouratiadou I et al (2013) Energy system transformations for mitigating climate change: What role for economic growth projections and fossil fuel availability? Clim Chang (this issue)

  • Leimbach M, Baumstark L (2010) The impact of capital trade and technological spillovers on climate policies. Ecol Econ 69:2341–2355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luderer G, Bosetti V, Jakob M, Leimbach M, Edenhofer O (2012) The economics of decarbonizing the energy system: results and insights from the RECIPE model intercomparison. Clim Chang 114(1):9–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell R, Jaffe A, Stavins R (1999) The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change. Q J Econ 114(3):941–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popp D (2002) Induced innovation and energy prices. Am Econ Rev 92(1):160–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popp DC, Richard NG, Adam JB (2009) Energy, the environment, and technological change, NBER Working Paper Series No. w14832. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1373342

  • Richels R, Blanford G (2008) The value of technological advance in decarbonizing the U.S. economy. Energy Econ 30(6):2930–2946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogner HH, Nakicenovic R, Grübler A (1993) Second- and third-generation energy technologies. Energy 18:461–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruttan VW (2001) Technology, growth, and development. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavoni M, De Cian E, Luderer G, Steckel J, Waisman H (2012) The value of technology and of its evolution towards a low carbon economy. Climatic Change, Special Issue: On the Economics of Decarbonization in an Imperfect World 114(1):39–57

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrica De Cian.

Additional information

This work was funded by Stiftung Mercator www.stiftung-mercator.de

This article is part of a Special Issue on “The Impact of Economic Growth and Fossil Fuel Availability on Climate Protection” with Guest Editors Elmar Kriegler, Ottmar Edenhofer, Ioanna Mouratiadou, Gunnar Luderer, and Jae Edmonds.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 123 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Cian, E., Sferra, F. & Tavoni, M. The influence of economic growth, population, and fossil fuel scarcity on energy investments. Climatic Change 136, 39–55 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0902-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0902-5

Keywords

Navigation