Abstract
The significant uncertainties associated with the (eco)toxicological risks of engineered nanomaterials pose challenges to the development of nano-enabled products toward greatest possible societal benefit. This paper argues for the use of risk governance approaches to manage nanotechnology risks and sustainability, and considers the links between these concepts. Further, seven risk assessment and management criteria relevant to risk governance are defined: (a) life cycle thinking, (b) triple bottom line, (c) inclusion of stakeholders, (d) risk management, (e) benefit–risk assessment, (f) consideration of uncertainty, and (g) adaptive response. These criteria are used to compare five well-developed nanotechnology frameworks: International Risk Governance Council framework, Comprehensive Environmental Assessment, Streaming Life Cycle Risk Assessment, Certifiable Nanospecific Risk Management and Monitoring System and LICARA NanoSCAN. A Sustainable Nanotechnology Decision Support System (SUNDS) is proposed to better address current nanotechnology risk assessment and management needs, and makes. Stakeholder needs were solicited for further SUNDS enhancement through a stakeholder workshop that included representatives from regulatory, industry and insurance sectors. Workshop participants expressed the need for the wider adoption of sustainability assessment methods and tools for designing greener nanomaterials.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The authors found explicit reference in Renn (2008), which informed deeper understanding of links between risk governance and sustainability in other risk governance frameworks.
References
Althaus H-J, Pablo A, Bouamrane M et al (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. In: Benoît C, Mazijn B (eds). UNEP-DTIE, Paris
Barberio G, Scalbi S, Buttol P, Masoni P, Righi S (2014) Combining life cycle assessment and qualitative risk assessment: the case study of alumina nanofluid production. Sci Total Environ 496:122–131
Baublyte L, Mullins M, Murphy F, Tofail SA (2014) Insurance market perception of nanotechnology and nanomaterials risks. The Geneva Association Issue 54
Blaunstein R, Linkov I (2010) Nanotechnology risk management: an insurance industry perspective. In: Hull M, Bowman D (eds) Nanotechnology environmental health and safety. William Andrew Publishing Boston, Boston, pp 143–179
Breggin LK, Pendergrass J (2010) Regulation of nanoscale materials under media-specific environmental laws. In: Hodge GA, Bowman DM, Maynard AD (eds) International handbook on regulating nanotechnologies. Edward Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham
Conti JA, Killpack K, Gerritzen G, Huang L, Mircheva M, Delmas M, Harthorn BH, Appelbaum RP, Holden PA (2008) Health and safety practices in the nanomaterials workplace: results from an international survey. Environ Sci Technol 42:3155–3162
De Bruyn S, Korteland M, Davidson M, Bles M (2010) Shadow Prices Handbook Valuation and weighting of emissions and environmental impacts. March 1–140
ECHA (2011) Guidance on the preparation of an application for authorization. Available via https://www.echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13637/authorisation_application_en.pdf
ECHA (2011) Guidance on socio-economic analysis—authorisation. Available at http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13643/sea_authorisation_en.pdf
ECHA (2012) Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Available via http://echa.europa.eu/guidance-documents/guidance-on-information-requirements-and-chemical-safety-assessment
Engeman CD, Baumgartner L, Carr BM, Fish AM, Meyerhofer JD, Satterfield TA, Holden PA, Harthorn BH (2012) Governance implications of nanomaterials companies’ inconsistent risk perceptions and safety practices. J Nanopart Res 14:1–12
Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, De Schryver A, Struijs J, Van Zelm R (2009) ReCiPe 2008. A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. Available at http://www.leidenuniv.nl/cml/ssp/publications/recipe_characterisation.pdf
Gottschalk F, Kost E, Nowack B (2013) Engineered nanomaterials in water and soils: a risk quantification based on probabilistic exposure and effect modeling. Environ Toxicol and Chem 32:1278–1287
Gottschalk F, Lassen C, Kjoelholt J, Christensen F, Nowack B (2015) Modeling flows and concentrations of nine engineered nanomaterials in the Danish environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12:5581–5602
Grieger KD, Linkov I, Hansen SF, Baun A (2012a) Environmental risk analysis for nanomaterials: review and evaluation of frameworks. Nanotoxicology 6:196–212
Grieger KD, Laurent A et al (2012b) Analysis of current research addressing complementary use of life-cycle assessment and risk assessment for engineered nanomaterials: have lessons been learned from previous experience with chemicals? J Nanopart Res 14(7):1–23
Gunderson LH (2001) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington
Hansen SF, Baun A, Alstrup-Jensen K (2011) NanoRiskCat: a conceptual decision support tool for nanomaterials, Danish Ministry of the Environment
Höck J et al (2013) Guidelines on the precautionary matrix for synthetic nanomaterials. Version 3.0. Federal Office of Public Health and Federal Office for the Environment, Berne 2013, Version 3.0, Berne
Hristozov D, Gottardo S, Critto A, Marcomini A (2012) Risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: a review of available data and approaches from a regulatory perspective. Nanotoxicology 6:880–898
Hristozov D, Gottardo S, Semenzin S, Oomen A, Bos P, Peijnenberg W, Van Tongeren M, Nowack B, Hunt N, Brunelli A, Scott-Fordsman J, Marcomini A (2015) Frameworks and tools for risk assessment and management of manufactured nanomaterials. Submitted to Environmental International
IRGC (2005) Risk governance: towards an integrative approach. Available via http://www.irgc.org/publications/core-concepts-of-risk-governance/
IRGC (2007) Nanotechnology risk governance: recommendations for a global, coordinated approach to the governance of potential risks. Available at http://irgc.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/PB_nanoFINAL2_2_.pdf
IRGC (2010) Risk governance deficits. Available via http://www.irgc.org/publications/core-concepts-of-risk-governance/
IRGC (2012) An introduction to the IRGC risk governance framework. Available via http://www.irgc.org/publications/core-concepts-of-risk-governance/
IRGC (2015) IRGC guidelines for emerging risk governance. Available via http://www.irgc.org/publications/core-concepts-of-risk-governance/
Isaacs JA, Alpert CL, Bates M, Bosso CJ, Eckelman MJ, Linkov I, Walker WC (2015) Engaging stakeholders in nano-EHS risk governance. Environ Syst Decis 35:24–28
Linkov I, Seager TP (2011) Coupling multi-criteria decision analysis, life-cycle assessment, and risk assessment for emerging threats. Environ Sci Technol 45:5068–5074
Linkov I, Satterstrom F, Kiker G, Batchelor C, Bridges T, Ferguson E (2006) From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent developments and applications. Environ Int 32:1072–1093
Linkov I, Satterstrom F, Monica JC Jr, Foss S (2009) Nano risk governance: current developments and future perspectives. Nanotechnol Law Bussiness 6:203
Linkov I, Anklam E, Collier ZA, Dimase D, Renn O (2014) Risk-based standards: integrating top–down and bottom–up approaches. Environ Syst Decis 34:134–137
Lux Research (2014) State of market report on nanotechnology. Available at https://portal.luxresearchinc.com/research/report_excerpt/16215
Malsch I, Subramanian V, Semenzin E, Hristozov D, Marcomini A (2015a) Collective decision making on risk management and sustainable manufacturing of nanomaterials and the role of decision support tools. In: Proceedings 5th STS Italia conference “a matter of design”. Milan. 12–14 June 2014
Malsch I, Subramanian V, Semenzin E, Hristozov D, Marcomini A (2015b) Supporting decision-making for sustainable nanotechnology. Environ Syst Decis 35:54–75
Malsch I, Subramanian V, Semenzin E, Hristozov D, Marcomini A, Mullins M, Murphy F, Hester E, Mcalea A, Tofail SA (2015c) Empowering citizens in international governance of nanotechnologies. J Nanopart Res 17:1–19
Maynard AD (2015) The (nano) entrepreneur's dilemma. Nat Nanotechnol 10(3):199–200
Meili C, Widmer M (2010) Voluntary measures in nanotechnology risk governance: the difficulty of holding the wolf by the ears. In: Hodge GA, Bowman DM, Maynard AD (eds) International handbook on regulating nanotechnologies. Edward Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham
Mullins M, Murphy F, Baublyte L, Baublyte L, McAlea EM, Tofail SA (2013) The insurability of nanomaterial production risk. Nat Nanotechnol 8:222–224
Nanodatabase (2015) Inventory of nano-enabled products. Retrieved 07/07/2015, from http://nanodb.dk/
National Nanotechnology Initiative (2015) Stakeholder perspectives on perception, assessment, and management of the potential risks of nanotechnology. Report of the national nanotechnology initiative workshop, 10–11 Sept 2013, Washington, DC. http://www.nano.gov/node/1348. Accessed 03 Sept 2015
OECD, European Commission (2012) Series on the safety of manufactured nanomaterials No. 33: important issues on Risk Assessment of manufactured nanomaterials, Paris
Oksel C, Subramanian V, Semenzin E, Ma CY, Hristozov D, Wang X, Wilkins T, Hunt N, Costa A, Fransman W, Marcomini A (2015) Risk management along the lifecycle of nano-enabled products. Submitted to Environmental Science: Nano
Powers CM, Dana G, Gillespie P, Gwinn MR, Hendren CO, Long TC, Wang A, Davis MJ (2012) Comprehensive environmental assessment: a meta-assessment approach. Environ Sci Technol 46:9202–9208
Powers CM, Grieger KD, Hendren CO, Meacham CA, Gurevich G, Lassiter MG, Money ES, Lloyd JM, Beaulieu SM (2014) A web-based tool to engage stakeholders in informing research planning for future decisions on emerging materials. Sci Total Environ 470–471:660–668
Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (2015) Consumer products inventory. Retrieved 07/07/2015, from http://www.nanotechproject.org/cpi
Prosafe Project (2015) Promoting the implementation of safe by design. Retrieved 01/02/2016, from http://www.h2020-prosafe.eu/
Renn O (2008) Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan Publishers, London
Renn O, Roco MC (2006) Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance. J Nanopart Res 8:153–191
SCENIHR (2009) Risk assessment of products of nanotechnologies. European Commission Scientific Committee on emerging and newly identified health risks, Brussels
Seear K, Peterson A, Bowman D (2009) The social and economic impacts of nanotechnologies: a literature review. Report prepared for the Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research. Monash University, Melbourne
Semenzin E, Lanzellotto E, Hristozov D, Critto A, Zabeo A, Giubilato E, Marcomini A (2015) Species sensitivity weighted distribution for ecological risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: the n-TiO2 case study. Environ Toxicol Chem 34:2644–2659
Shatkin JA (2012) Nanotechnology: health and environmental risks. CRC Press, Boca raton
Society of Risk Analysis Nanosafety Cluster (2016) Upcoming white paper on risk governance. Retrieved 01/02/2016, from http://www.sra.org/news/sra-nanosafety-cluster
Som C, Berges M, Chaudhry Q, Dusinska M, Fernandes TF, Olsen SI, Nowack B (2010) The importance of life-cycle concepts for the development of safe nanoproducts. Toxicolology 269:160–169
Som C, Zondervan-van den Beuken E, Van Harmelen T, Güttinger J, Bodmer M, Brouwer D, Buist HE, Carroll R, Coll C, Fransman W, Hartmanis A, Hincapie I, Hischier R, Karachalios T, Kouravelou K, Kuijpers E, Ligthart T, Notter D, Nowack B, Seibold U, Schneider G (2014) LICARA guidelines for the sustainable competitiveness of nanoproducts. St. Gallen, Zeist, Dübendorf
Subramanian V, Youtie J, Porter A, Shapira P (2010) Is there a shift to “active nanostructures”? J Nanopart Res 12:1–10
Subramanian V, Semenzin E, Hristozov D, Marcomini A, Linkov I (2014) Sustainable nanotechnology: defining, measuring and teaching. Nano Today 9:6–9
Subramanian V, Semenzin E, Zabeo A, Hristozov D,Malsch I, Saling P, Van Harmelen T, Ligthart T, Marcomini A (2016) Integrating the social impacts into risk governance of nanotechnology. In: Managing risk in nanotechnology: topics in governance, assurance and transfer, Springer series on Innovation, Technology and Knowledge Management
Sun TY, Gottschalk F, Hungerbühler K, Nowack B (2014) Comprehensive probabilistic modelling of environmental emissions of engineered nanomaterials. Environ Pollut 185:69–76
Sweet L, Strohm B (2006) Nanotechnology—life-cycle risk management. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 12:528–551
TÜV SÜD Industrie Service (2013) Certification Standard CENARIOS®. Available at http://www.tuevsued.de/uploads/images/1219824286015340810363/CENARIOS_Zertifiziergrundlage_e.pdf
Van Duuren-Stuurman B, Vink SR, Verbist KJM, Heussen HGA, Brouwer DH et al (2012) Stoffenmanager Nano Version 1.0: a web-based tool for risk prioritization of airborne manufactured nano objects. Ann Occup Hyg 56:525–541
van Harmelen T, Korenromp R, van Deutekom C, Ligthart T, van Leeuwen S, van Gijlswijk R (2007) The price of toxicity: methodology for the assessment of shadow prices for human toxicity, ecotoxicity and abiotic depletion. In: Huppes G, Ishikawa M (eds) Quantified eco-efficiency, vol 2. Springer International Publishing, Berlin, pp 105–125
van Harmelen T, Zondervan-van den Beuken EK, Brouwer DH, Kuijpers E, Fransman W, Buist HB, Ligthart TN, Hincapié I, Hischier R, Linkov I, Nowack B, Studer J, Hilty L, Som C (2016) LICARA nanoSCAN: a tool for the self-assessment of benefits and risks of nanoproducts. Submitted to Environment International (in press)
Van Leeuwen CJ, Vermeire TG (2007) Risk assessment of chemicals: an introduction. Springer, Berlin
Widler T, Meili C, Semenzin E, Subramanian V, Zabeo A, Hristozov D, Marcomini A (2016) Organisational risk management of nanomaterials using SUNDS: the contribution of CENARIOS®. In: Managing risk in nanotechnology: topics in governance, assurance and transfer. Springer series on Innovation, Technology and Knowledge Management (in press)
Acknowledgments
This study was funded in part by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme [FP7/2007-2013] under ECGA No. 604305 ‘‘SUN’’. This publication reflects the views only of the authors, and the European Commission and other sponsors cannot be held responsible for any use, which may be made of the information contained therein.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Subramanian, V., Semenzin, E., Hristozov, D. et al. Sustainable nanotechnology decision support system: bridging risk management, sustainable innovation and risk governance. J Nanopart Res 18, 89 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-016-3375-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-016-3375-4