Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring Trust in European Public Institutions

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of measuring the general level of trust in public institutions is addressed. A very general framework to compute an index of trust in public institutions is proposed and it is shown how to perform an uncertainty analysis of an index of trust to test its robustness. An application to data from the sixth round of the European Social Survey is presented. It is found that Scandinavian countries are the most trustful European countries in public institutions, whereas former communist countries as well as Iberian and Mediterranean ones are much less trustful. The governments of the least trustful countries in public institutions should be very careful in monitoring this issue and should think about introducing reforms to improve citizens’ trust. Improving trust in public institutions is central to improve social capital, participation in civic activities and law-abiding behavior and then governmental legitimacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Algan, Y., & Cahuc, P. (2010). Inherited trust and growth. The American Economic Review, 100, 2060–2092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arboretti Giancristofaro, R., Pesarin, F., & Salmaso, L. (2007). Nonparametric approaches for multivariate testing with mixed variables and for ranking on ordered categorical variables with an application to the evaluation of PhD programs. In S. Sawilowsky (Ed.), Real Data Analysis (pp. 355–385). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arboretti Giancristofaro, R., Bonnini, S., & Salmaso, L. (2009). Employment status and education/employment relationship of PhD graduates from the University of Ferrara. Journal of Applied Statistics, 36, 1329–1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco, L. (2013). The impact of crime and insecurity on trust in democracy and institutions. The American Economic Review, 103, 284–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, G., Van de Walle, S., & Kampen, J. K. (2005). Potential for comparative public opinion research in public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71, 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, R. E. (2014). Whats not to trust? Rubrics of political party trustworthiness in Chile and Argentina. Party Politics, 20, 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. E., & Gronke, P. (2005). The skeptical American: Revisiting the meanings of trust in government and confidence in institutions. Journal of Politics, 67, 784–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R., Fitzpatrick, R., Fletcher, A. E., Gore, S. M., Spiegelhalter, D. J., & Jones, D. R. (1992). Quality-of-life assessment: Can we keep it simple (with discussion)? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 155, 353–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downe, J., Cowell, R., Chen, A., & Morgan, K. (2013). The determinants of public trust in English local government: how important is the ethical behaviour of elected councillors? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79, 597–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Social Survey (2014). ESS Round 6 (2012/2013). Technical Report.

  • Fayers, P. M., & Hand, D. J. (2002). Causal variables, composite indicators and measurement scales: An example from quality of life. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 165, 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graeff, P., & Svendsen, G. T. (2013). Trust and corruption: The influence of positive and negative social capital on the economic development in the European Union. Quality and Quantity, 47, 2829–2846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, B. L., & Mascherini, M. (2009). Measuring active citizenship through the development of a composite indicator. Social Indicators Research, 90, 459–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marozzi, M. (2009). A composite indicator dimension reduction procedure with application to university student satisfaction. Statistica Neerlandica, 63, 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marozzi, M. (2012a). Tertiary student satisfaction with socialization: A statistical assessment. Quality and Quantity, 46, 1271–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marozzi, M. (2012b). Composite indicators: A sectorial perspective. In C. Perna & M. Sibillo (Eds.), Mathematical and statistical methods for actuarial sciences and finance (pp. 287–294). Milan: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marozzi, M. (2014). Construction, dimension reduction and uncertainty analysis of an index of trust in public institutions. Quality and Quantity, 48, 939–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalek, J., & Zarnekow, N. (2012). Application of the rural development index to analysis of rural regions in Poland and Slovakia. Social Indicators Research, 105, 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munda, G., Nardo, M., Saisana, M., & Srebotnjak, T. (2009). Measuring uncertainties in composite indicators of sustainability. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 11, 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munda, G., & Nardo, M. (2009). Noncompensatory/nonlinear composite indicators for ranking countries: A defensible setting. Applied Economics, 41, 1513–1523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators. Paris: OECD.

  • OECD (2011). Citizens as partners: OECD handbook of information, consultation and public participation in policy making. Paris: OECD.

  • Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 168, 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saisana, M., D’Hombres, B., & Saltelli, A. (2011). Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications. Research Policy, 40, 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli, A. (2007). Composite indicators between analysis and advocacy. Social Indicators Research, 81, 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli, A., D’Hombres, B., Jesinghaus, J., Manca, A. R., Mascherini, M., & Nardo, M. (2011). Indicators for European Union policies. Business as usual? Social Indicators Research, 102, 197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shlapentokh, V. (2006). Trust in public institutions in Russia: the lowest in the world. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 39, 153–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (2013). Human development report. New York: UNDP.

  • Uslaner, E. M. (2013). Trust and corruption revisited: How and why trust and corruption shape each other. Quality and Quantity, 47, 3603–3608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., & Ang, B. W. (2009). Comparing MCDA aggregation methods in constructing composite indicators using the Shannon–Spearman measure. Social Indicators Research, 94, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Marozzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marozzi, M. Measuring Trust in European Public Institutions. Soc Indic Res 123, 879–895 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0765-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0765-9

Keywords

Navigation