Skip to main content
Log in

Perceived Justifiability Towards Morally Debatable Behaviors Across Europe

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scientific interest in studying justifiability towards morally debatable behaviors across nations is considerable, but the statistical assessment of the issue has not been very rigorous so far. In fact, many authors measure the related constructs computing composite indicators of justifiability as unweighed averages of perceived justifiability towards morally debatable behaviors. Other than not allowing for different weights, another drawback is that even if the items have different variability, no transformation like the z score is typically applied before computing the average. Another major shortcoming of the available justifiability indexes is the lack of robustness analysis of the results, making their message weak. The aim of this paper is to design very general composite indicators of justifiability towards dishonest-illegal and personal-sexual behaviors without the shortcomings of the other indicators. The indexes are computed for a data set from the European Values Study covering 47 countries and regions. The results show that Sweden, Netherlands and Finland are the most permissive countries towards personal-sexual behaviors followed by other Western and Scandinavian countries, whereas the strictest countries are Kosovo and Turkey. The most permissive countries towards dishonest-illegal behaviors are all ex-communist countries with Belarus and Slovak Republic being the most permissive countries whereas the strictest ones are Northern Cyprus and Turkey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arboretti Giancristofaro, R., Bonnini, S., & Salmaso, L. (2007). A performance indicator for multivariate data. Quaderni di Statistica - Journal of Methodological and Applied Statistics, 9, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arboretti Giancristofaro, R., Bonnini, S., & Salmaso, L. (2009). Employment status and education/employment relationship of PhD graduates from the University of Ferrara. Journal of Applied Statistics, 36(12), 1329–1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbulescu, R., & Beaudonnet, L. (2014). Protecting us, protecting Europe? Public concern about immigration and declining support for European integration in Italy. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 15, 216–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk, S., & Klasing, M. J. (2016). Diversity and trust: The role of shared values. Journal of Comparative Economics, 44, 522–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coumans, M., & Schmeets, H. (2015). The socially excluded in the Netherlands: The development of an overall index. Social Indicators Research, 122(3), 779–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crissman, P. (1942). Temporal changes and sexual difference in moral judgments. Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EVS. (2016). European Values Study 2008: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2008). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA4800 Data file Version 4.0.0. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12458.

  • Fayers, P. M., & Hand, D. J. (2002). Causal variables, composite indicators and measurement scales: An example from quality of life. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 165, 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. (2018). Rule makers, rule breakers: How tight and loose cultures wire our world. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. C., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., et al. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332, 1100–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, M., Uz, I., Esmaeilzadeh, P., Noboa, F., Mahrous, A. A., Kim, E., et al. (2018). Do cultural norms affect social network behavior inappropriateness? A global study. Journal of Business Research, 85, 10–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S., & Phillips, D. (1986). Contrasting values in Western Europe. Unity, diversity and change. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J. R., Boski, P., & Gelfand, M. J. (2015). Culture and national well-being: Should societies emphasize freedom or constraint? PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0127173. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J. R., & Gelfand, M. J. (2014). Tightness–looseness across the 50 united states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(22), 7990–7995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, A. (2016). Environmental performance index. Technical report, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

  • Janoff-Bulman, R., & Carnes, N. C. (2016). Social justice and social order: Binding moralities across the political spectrum. PLoS ONE, 11(3), e0152479. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, D., Li, T., & Hamamura, T. (2015). Societies’ tightness moderates age differences in perceived justifiability of morally debatable behaviors. European Journal of Ageing, 12, 333–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. C., Santman, J., & Lonero, P. (1994). Findings on the revised morally desirable behaviors scale. The Journal of Psychology, Interdisciplinary and Applied, 128(1), 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marozzi, M. (2015). Measuring trust in European public institutions. Social Indicators Research, 123, 879–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkov, M., Blagoev, V., & Hofstede, G. (2013). The boundaries of culture: Do questions about societal norms reveal cultural differences? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(7), 1094–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moors, G., & Wennekers, C. (2003). Comparing moral values in Western European countries between 1981 and 1999. A multiple group latent-class factor approach. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 44(2), 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munda, G., Nardo, M., Saisana, M., & Srebotnjak, T. (2009). Measuring uncertainties in composite indicators of sustainability. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 11, 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevitte, N., & Cochrane, C. (2006). Individualization in Europe and America: Connecting religious and moral values. Comparative Sociology, 5(2–3), 203–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, A., Gelfand, M., Borkowki, W., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2017). Autocratic recidivism, in values, political action, and change in the Middle East and the Arab Spring. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittel, S. M., & Mendelsohn, G. A. (1966). Measurement of moral values: A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 22–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saisana, M., D’Hombres, B., & Saltelli, A. (2011). Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications. Research Policy, 40, 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 168, 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli, A. (2007). Composite indicators between analysis and advocacy. Social Indicators Research, 81, 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storm, I. (2016). Morality in context: A multilevel analysis of the relationship between religion and values in Europe. Politics and Religion, 9, 111–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J., & Eitle, D. (2015). The moderating role of BIS/BAS personality tendencies in the relationship between general strain and crime. Deviant Behavior, 36(11), 874–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme. (2018). Human development reports. New York: UNDPD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uz, I. (2015). The index of cultural tightness and looseness among 68 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(3), 319–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vauclair, C. M. (2010). What is right? What is wrong? And does the answer tell something about culture? An investigation into culture and morality using the values concept. Ph.D. Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.

  • Vauclair, C. M., & Fisher, R. (2011). Do cultural values predict individuals’ moral attitudes? A cross-cultural multilevel approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 645–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., & Ang, B. W. (2009). Comparing MCDA aggregation methods in constructing composite indicators using the Shannon-Spearman measure. Social Indicators Research, 94, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Marozzi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marozzi, M. Perceived Justifiability Towards Morally Debatable Behaviors Across Europe. Soc Indic Res 153, 759–778 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02490-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02490-w

Keywords

Navigation