Abstract
Purpose
Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) results are used to assess potential environmental impacts of different products and services. As part of the UNEP-SETAC life cycle initiative flagship project that aims to harmonize indicators of potential environmental impacts, we provide a consensus viewpoint and recommendations for future developments in LCIA related to the ecosystem quality area of protection (AoP). Through our recommendations, we aim to encourage LCIA developments that improve the usefulness and global acceptability of LCIA results.
Methods
We analyze current ecosystem quality metrics and provide recommendations to the LCIA research community for achieving further developments towards comparable and more ecologically relevant metrics addressing ecosystem quality.
Results and discussion
We recommend that LCIA development for ecosystem quality should tend towards species-richness-related metrics, with efforts made towards improved inclusion of ecosystem complexity. Impact indicators—which result from a range of modeling approaches that differ, for example, according to spatial and temporal scale, taxonomic coverage, and whether the indicator produces a relative or absolute measure of loss—should be framed to facilitate their final expression in a single, aggregated metric. This would also improve comparability with other LCIA damage-level indicators. Furthermore, to allow for a broader inclusion of ecosystem quality perspectives, the development of an additional indicator related to ecosystem function is recommended. Having two complementary metrics would give a broader coverage of ecosystem attributes while remaining simple enough to enable an intuitive interpretation of the results.
Conclusions
We call for the LCIA research community to make progress towards enabling harmonization of damage-level indicators within the ecosystem quality AoP and, further, to improve the ecological relevance of impact indicators.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Azevedo LB, van Zelm R, Elshout PMF, Hendriks AJ, Leuven RSEW, Struijs J, de Zwart D, Huijbregts MAJ (2013) Species richness-phosphorus relationships for lakes and streams worldwide. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22(12):1304–1314. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12080
Azevedo LB, Van Zelm R, Hendriks AJ, Bobbink R, Huijbregts MAJ (2013) Global assessment of the effects of terrestrial acidification on plant species richness. Environ Pollut 174:10–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2012.11.001
Brodie JF, Aslan CE, Rogers HS, Redford KH, Maron JL, Bronstein JL, Groves CR (2014) Secondary extinctions of biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol 29(12):664–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.09.012
Brown LE, Milner AM (2012) Rapid loss of glacial ice reveals stream community assembly processes. Glob Chang Biol 18(7):2195–2204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02675.x
Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, Kinzig AP, Daily GC, Loreau M, Grace JB, Larigauderie A, Srivastava DS, Naeem S (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486(7401):59–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11148
CBD (1992) 'Convention on Biological Diversity'. https://www.cbd.int/convention/text/. Accessed 22 July 2015
Chapin FS III et al (2000) Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405(6783):234–242. https://doi.org/10.1038/35012241
Chaudhary A, Verones F, De Baan L, Hellweg S (2015) Quantifying land use impacts on biodiversity: combining species-area models and vulnerability indicators. Environ Sci Technol 49(16):9987–9995. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02507
Curran M, de Baan L, de Schryver AM, van Zelm R, Hellweg S, Koellner T, Sonnemann G, Huijbregts MAJ (2011) Toward meaningful end points of biodiversity in life cycle assessment. Environ Sci Technol 45(1):70–79. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101444k
Curran M, Maia de Souza D, Antón A, Teixeira RFM, Michelsen O, Vidal-Legaz B, Sala S, Milà i Canals L (2016) How well does LCA model land use impacts on biodiversity?—a comparison with approaches from ecology and conservation. Environ Sci Technol 50(6):2782–2795. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04681
de Bello F, Lavorel S, Díaz S, Harrington R, Cornelissen JHC, Bardgett RD, Berg MP, Cipriotti P, Feld CK, Hering D, Martins da Silva P, Potts SG, Sandin L, Sousa JP, Storkey J, Wardle DA, Harrison PA (2010) Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits. Biodivers Conserv 19(10):2873–2893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9850-9
Díaz S, Purvis A, Cornelissen JHC, Mace GM, Donoghue MJ, Ewers RM, Jordano P, Pearse WD (2013) Functional traits, the phylogeny of function, and ecosystem service vulnerability. Ecol Evol 3(9):2958–2975. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.601
Elshout PMF, Van Zelm R, Karuppiah R, Laurenzi IJ, Huijbregts MAJ (2014) A spatially explicit data-driven approach to assess the effect of agricultural land occupation on species groups. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(4):758–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0701-x
Frischknecht R, Fantke P, Tschümperlin L, Niero M, Antón A, Bare J, Boulay AM, Cherubini F, Hauschild MZ, Henderson A, Levasseur A, McKone TE, Michelsen O, i Canals LM, Pfister S, Ridoutt B, Rosenbaum RK, Verones F, Vigon B, Jolliet O (2016) Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: progress and case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(3):429–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-1025-1
Geyer R, Lindner JP, Stoms DM, Davis FW, Wittstock B (2010) Coupling GIS and LCA for biodiversity assessments of land use. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(7):692–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0199-9
Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (2001) Eco-indicator 99, a damage orientedmethodfor life cycle impact assessment: methodology report, 3rd ed
Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, De Schryver A, Struijs J, van Zelm R (2009) ReCiPe: a life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonized category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level
Goussen B, Price OR, Rendal C, Ashauer R (2016) Integrated presentation of ecological risk from multiple stressors. Sci Rep 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36004
Hanafiah MM, Xenopoulos MA, Pfister S, Leuven RSEW, Huijbregts MAJ (2011) Characterization factors for water consumption and greenhouse gas emissions based on freshwater fish species extinction. Environ Sci Technol 45(12):5272–5278. https://doi.org/10.1021/es1039634
Hellweg S, Mila i, Canals L (2014) Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Science 344(6188):1109–1113. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248361
Hughes JB, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (1997) Population diversity: its extent and extinction. Science 278(5338):689–692. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.278.5338.689
Huijbregts M, Hellweg S, Hertwich E (2011) Do we need a paradigm shift in life cycle impact assessment? Environ Sci Technol 45(9):3833–3834. https://doi.org/10.1021/es200918b
Huijbregts M et al (2016) ReCiPe 2016: a harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level
IPPC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Core writing team, R.K. Pachaurl and L.A. Meyer (eds)
Itsubo N, Inaba A (2003) A new LCIA method: LIME has been completed. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(5):305–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978923
Itsubo N, Inaba A (2012) LIME2 life-cycle impact assessment method based on endpoint modeling
Jolliet O, Margni M, Charles R, Humbert S, Payet J, Rebitzer G, Rosenbaum R (2003) IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(6):324–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978505
Jolliet O et al (2014) Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: findings of the scoping phase. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(4):962–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0703-8
Kier G, Kreft H, Lee TM, Jetz W, Ibisch PL, Nowicki C, Mutke J, Barthlott W (2009) A global assessment of endemism and species richness across island and mainland regions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(23):9322–9327. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810306106
Koellner T, de Baan L, Beck T, Brandão M, Civit B, Margni M, i Canals LM, Saad R, de Souza DM, Müller-Wenk R (2013) UNEP-SETAC guideline on global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(6):1188–1202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0579-z
Mace GM, Reyers B, Alkemade R, Biggs R, Chapin FS III, Cornell SE, Díaz S, Jennings S, Leadley P, Mumby PJ, Purvis A, Scholes RJ, Seddon AWR, Solan M, Steffen W, Woodward G (2014) Approaches to defining a planetary boundary for biodiversity. Glob Environ Change 28:289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.009
Maia De Souza D, Flynn DFB, Declerck F, Rosenbaum RK, De Melo Lisboa H, Koellner T (2013) Land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: proposal of characterization factors based on functional diversity. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(6):1231–1242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0578-0
Maia de Souza D, Teixeira RFM, Ostermann OP (2015) Assessing biodiversity loss due to land use with life cycle assessment: are we there yet? Glob Chang Biol 21(1):32–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12709
Maire E, Grenouillet G, Brosse S, Villéger S (2015) How many dimensions are needed to accurately assess functional diversity? A pragmatic approach for assessing the quality of functional spaces. Glob Ecol and Biogeogr 24(6):728–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12299
McGill BJ, Dornelas M, Gotelli NJ, Magurran AE (2015) Fifteen forms of biodiversity trend in the anthropocene. Trends Ecol Evolut 30(2):104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.11.006
Michelsen O (2008) Assessment of land use impact on biodiversity: proposal of a new methodology exemplified with forestry operations in Norway. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:22–31
Michelsen O, Lindner JP (2015) Why include impacts on biodiversity from land use in LCIA and how to select useful indicators? Sustainability (Switzerland) 7(5):6278–6302. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7056278
Miraldo A, Li S, Borregaard MK, Florez-Rodriguez A, Gopalakrishnan S, Rizvanovic M, Wang Z, Rahbek C, Marske KA, Nogues-Bravo D (2016) An anthropocene map of genetic diversity. Science 353(6307):1532–1535. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf4381
Mouchet MA, Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D (2010) Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. Funct Ecol 24(4):867–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01695.x
Müller-Wenk R, Brandäo M (2010) Climatic impact of land use in LCA-carbon transfers between vegetation/soil and air. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(2):172–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0144-y
Mumby PJ, Chollett I, Bozec YM, Wolff NH (2014) Ecological resilience, robustness and vulnerability: how do these concepts benefit ecosystem management? Curr Opin Environ Sustain 7:22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.021
Noss RF (1990) Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv Biol 4(4):355–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00309.x
Paetzold A, Warren PH, Maltby LL (2010) A framework for assessing ecological quality based on ecosystem services. Ecol Complex 7(3):273–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.11.003
Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2006) Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol Lett 9(6):741–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00924.x
Pfister S, Koehler A, Hellweg S (2009) Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environ Sci Technol 43(11):4098–4104. https://doi.org/10.1021/es802423e
Posthuma L, de Zwart D (2012) Predicted mixture toxic pressure relates to observed fraction of benthic macrofauna species impacted by contaminant mixtures. Environ Toxicol Chem 31(9):2175–2188. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.1923
Posthuma L, De Zwart D (2014) Species sensitivity distributions. In: Encyclopedia of toxicology, 3rd edition. Elsevier Inc. Academic Press, pp 363–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386454-3.00580-7
Posthuma L, Suter GWI, Traas TP (2002) Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology. CRC-Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA
Rosenbaum R (2015) Chapter 8: Ecotoxicity. In: Hauschild M, Huijbregts M (eds) Life cycle impact assessment. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9744-3
Schipper AM, Posthuma L, De Zwart D, Huijbregts MAJ (2014) Deriving field-based species sensitivity distributions (f-SSDs) from stacked species distribution models (S-SDMs). Environ Sci Technol 48(24):14464–14471. https://doi.org/10.1021/es503223k
Stoddard JL, Larsen DP, Hawkins CP, Johnson RK, Norris RH (2006) Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition. Ecol Appl 16(4):1267–1276. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1267:SEFTEC]2.0.CO;2
Struijs J, Beusen A, De Zwart D, Huijbregts M (2011) Characterization factors for inland water eutrophication at the damage level in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(1):59–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0232-z
Taelman SE, Schaubroeck T, De Meester S, Boone L, Dewulf J (2016) Accounting for land use in life cycle assessment: the value of NPP as a proxy indicator to assess land use impacts on ecosystems. Sci Total Environ 550:143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.055
Teixeira RFM, De Souza DM, Curran MP, Antón A, Michelsen O, Milá I, Canals L (2016) Towards consensus on land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative preliminary recommendations based on expert contributions. J Clean Prod 112:4283–4287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.118
Tendall DM, Hellweg S, Pfister S, Huijbregts MAJ, Gaillard G (2014) Impacts of river water consumption on aquatic biodiversity in life cycle assessment-a proposed method, and a case study for Europe. Environ Sci Technol 48(6):3236–3244. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4048686
Valiente-Banuet A, Aizen MA, Alcántara JM, Arroyo J, Cocucci A, Galetti M, García MB, García D, Gómez JM, Jordano P, Medel R, Navarro L, Obeso JR, Oviedo R, Ramírez N, Rey PJ, Traveset A, Verdú M, Zamora R (2015) Beyond species loss: the extinction of ecological interactions in a changing world. Funct Ecol 29(3):299–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12356
van Straalen NM, Denneman CAJ (1989) Ecotoxicological evaluation of soil quality criteria. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 18(3):241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-6513(89)90018-3
Van Zelm R, Huijbregts MAJ (2013) Quantifying the trade-off between parameter and model structure uncertainty in life cycle impact assessment. Environ Sci Technol 47(16):9274–9280. https://doi.org/10.1021/es305107s
Verones F, Bare J, Bulle C, Frischknecht R, Hauschild M, Hellweg S, Henderson A, Jolliet O, Laurent A, Liao X, Lindner JP, Maia de Souza D, Michelsen O, Patouillard L, Pfister S, Posthuma L, Prado V, Ridoutt B, Rosenbaum RK, Sala S, Ugaya C, Vieira M, Fantke P (2017) LCIA framework and cross-cutting issues guidance within the UNEP-SETAC life cycle initiative. J Clean Prod 161:957–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.206
Verones F, Hanafiah MM, Pfister S, Huijbregts MAJ, Pelletier GJ, Koehler A (2010) Characterization factors for thermal pollution in freshwater aquatic environments. Environ Sci Technol 44(24):9364–9369. https://doi.org/10.1021/es102260c
Verones F, Saner D, Pfister S, Baisero D, Rondinini C, Hellweg S (2013) Effects of consumptive water use on biodiversity in wetlands of international importance. Environ Sci Technol 47(21):12248–12257. https://doi.org/10.1021/es403635j
Verones F, Huijbregts MAJ, Chaudhary A, De Baan L, Koellner T, Hellweg S (2015) Harmonizing the assessment of biodiversity effects from land and water use within LCA. Environ Sci Technol 49(6):3584–3592. https://doi.org/10.1021/es504995r
Verones F, Henderson AD, Laurent A, Ridoutt B, Ugaya C, Hellweg S (2017) Global guidance for life cycle impact assessment indicators. Chapter 2 LCIA framework and modelling guidance [TF 1 crosscutting issues]. vol 1
Zijp MC, Huijbregts MAJ, Schipper AM, Mulder C, Posthuma L (2017) Identification and ranking of environmental threats with ecosystem vulnerability distributions. Sci Rep 7(1):9298. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09573-8
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclaimer
This paper has been reviewed in accordance with Agency policy and approved for publication. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Michael Z. Hauschild
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woods, J.S., Damiani, M., Fantke, P. et al. Ecosystem quality in LCIA: status quo, harmonization, and suggestions for the way forward. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23, 1995–2006 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1422-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1422-8