Abstract
Compounding is the most significant morphological phenomenon of Chinese. In fact, it has been shown that up to 80% of Chinese words are compounds (Zhou et al. Language and Cognitive Processes 14(5/6):525–565, 1999; Xing Teaching and learning Chinese as a foreign language: A pedagogical grammar, 2006). This paper is based on a corpus of Chinese neologisms. It aims at discussing current theoretical approaches to compounding and presents a novel analysis of Chinese compounds. We first discuss the issue of the classification of Chinese compounds, modifying the proposal put forth by Bisetto and Scalise (Lingue e Linguaggio 2:319–332, 2005), which has first been adopted for Chinese com- pounding by Ceccagno and Scalise (Lingue e Linguaggio 2:233–260, 2006). After presenting a new classification for Chinese compounding, we show the variety of structures existing inChinese compounds.We thendiscuss themuchdebatednotion of headedness in compounding, challenging the widespread idea that any language must be either right-headed or left-headed (as partially highlighted by Packard The morphology of Chinese, 2000). Crucially, Chinese seems to display three different productive patterns: right-headedness, left-headedness and two-headedness. These conclusions represent a challenge for the cross-linguistic study of compounding.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson S. R. (1985). Typological distinctions in word formation. In: Timothy S. (eds). Language typology and syntactic description (Vol. 3,). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 150–201
Baker M.C. (1986). Object sharing and projection in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 20(1): 513–553
Billings, L. A. (1997). Morphology and syntax: Delimiting stump compounds in Russian. In Proceedings of the First Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM1), Mytilene, University of Patras.
Bisetto A., Scalise S. (2002). Trasferimento di costrutti sintattici in morfologia. Lingue e Linguaggio 2: 237–261
Bisetto A., Scalise S. (2005). Classification of compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio 2: 319–332
Ceccagno A. (2008). Regolarità e peculiarità dei composti del cinese. Venezia, Cafoscarina (in press)
Ceccagno, A., & Basciano, B. (2007). Complessità della morfologia del cinese.Atti dell’XI convegno AISC, Roma 22–24 febbraio 2007 (in press).
Ceccagno A., Scalise S. (2006). Classification, structure and headedness of Chinese compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio 2: 233–260
Ceccagno, A., & Scalise, S. (2007). Composti del cinese: analisi delle strutture e identificazione della testa. In A. Palermo (Ed.), “La Cina e l’altro”, Napoli, Università degli studi di Napoli “L’orientale”, pp. 503–543.
Chang, L.-L., & Chen, K.-J. (1999).
Dòngcí cí gòu yǔ yǔ faˇ gōngnéng hùdòng chū tàn. Proceedings of the 12th Research on Computational Linguistics (pp. 67–85). Tsinchu, Taiwan.Chang L.-L., Chen K.-J., Huang C.-R. (2000). A lexical-semantic analysis of Mandarin Chinese verbs: Representation and methodology. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing 5(1): 1–18
Chao Y.R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press.
Cheng, L. L. (1997). Resultative compounds and lexical relational structures. Chinese Languages and Linguistics III: Morphology and Lexicon, 167–197.
Chi T.R. (1985). A lexical analysis of verb-noun compounds in Mandarin Chinese. Taipei, Crane
Corbin D. (1987). Morphologie dérivationelle et structuration du lexique. Tuebingen, Niemeyer.
Di Sciullo A.M., Williams E. (1987). On the definition of word, Cambridge MA, MIT Press.
Dryer M.S. (1992). The greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68: 81–138
Gianollo, C., Guardiano, C., & Longobardi, G. (2008). Three fundamental issues in parametric linguistics. In T. Biberauer (Ed.), The limits of syntactic variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins (in press).
Giegerich H. (2004). Compound or phrase? English noun-plus-noun constructions and the stress. criterion. English Language and Linguistics 8: 1–24
Huang C.T.J. (1984). Phrase structure, lexical integrity, and Chinese compounds. Journal of Chinese Teacher’s Association 19(2): 53–78
Huang C.-T. J. (1992). Complex predicates. In: Larson R., Iatroudou S., Lahiri U., Higginbotham J. (eds) Control and grammar. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publisher, pp. 109–147
Huang S. (1998). Chinese as a headless language. In: Packard J. (eds) Compounding morphology: new approaches to Chinese word formation. Berlin and New York, Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 261–283
Levin B., Rappaport Hovan M. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge MA, MIT Press.
Li Y. (1990). On V-V compounds in Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 177–207
Li Y. (2005). A theory of the morphology-syntax interface. Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1978). An explortion of Mandarin Chinese. In W. P. Lehmann (Ed.), Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language (pp. 233–266). University of Texas Press.
Li C.N., Thompson S.A. (1981). A grammar of spoken Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Lin, F. (1990). The verb-complement (V-R) compounds in Mandarin. M.A. Thesis, National Tsing Hua University.
Ling, Y. (2000).
Xiàndài Hàn yǔ suōlüèyǔ (Abbreviations in Contemporary Chinese). Beijing: Yuwen chubanshe.Longobardi G. (2003). La linguistica parametrica: un nuovo programma di ricerca tra presente futuro delle scienze del linguaggio. Lingue e Linguaggio 1: 3–30
Masini, F. (1993). The formation of modern Chinese Lexicon and its evolution toward a National Language: The period from 1840 to 1898. Monograph No. 6 of the “Journal of Chinese Linguistics”. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Molinsky, S. J. (1973). Patterns of ellipsis in Russian compound noun formations. Mouton: The Hague.
Morbo/Comp, http://morbocomp.sslmit.unibo.it/index.php?section=home.
Olsen S. (2001). Copulative compounds: A closer look at the interface between morphology and syntax. In: Booij G., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 2000. Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 279–320
Packard J. (2000). The morphology of Chinese. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Pan, W., Ye. B., & Han, Y. (2004).
Hànyǔ de gò ucífaˇ yànjiū (Research on Word Formation in Chinese). Shanghai: Huadong Shifan Daxue Chubanshe.Plag I. (1998). The polysemy of -ize derivatives. The role of semantics in word formation. In: Booij G., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 1997. Dordrecht, Foris, pp. 219–242
Plag I. (2003). Word-formation in English. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Plag I., Kunter G., Lappe S. (2007). Testing hypotheses about compound stress assignment in English: A corpus-based investigation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 3(2): 199–233
Ross C. (1998). Cognate objects and the realization of thematic structures in Mandarin Chinese. In: Packard J. (eds) Compounding morphology: New approaches to Chinese word formation. Berlin and New York, Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 205–253
Scalise S. (1983). Generative morphology. Dordrecht, Foris
Scalise S. (1994). Morfologia. Il Mulino, Bologna
Scalise S., Bisetto A., Guevara E. (2005). Selection in compounding and derivation. In: Dressler, et al. (eds) Morphology and its demarcations. Amsterdam, Benjamins, pp. 133–150
Scalise S., Guevara E. (2006). Exocentric compounding in a typological framework. Lingue e Linguaggio 2: 185–206
Selkirk E. (1982). The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Spencer A., Zaretskaya M.D. (1998). Verb prefixation in Russian as lexical subordination. Linguistics 36: 1–40
Starosta S., Kuiper K., Ng S., Wu Z. (1998). On defining the Chinese compound word: Headedness in Chinese compounding and Chinese VR compounds. In: Packard J. (eds) New Approaches to Chinese word formation. Berlin and New York, Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 346–369
Sun, C. (2006). Chinese: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press.
The Contemporary Chinese Dictionary [Chinese-English Edition]
XIÀNDÀI HÀNYǔ CÍDIAˇN [HÀN YīNG SHUāNG Yǔ ] (2000). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Trommelen M., Zonneveld W. (1986). Dutch morphology, evidence for the right-hand head Rule. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 147–169
Varela S. (1990). Fundamentos de morfologia. Madrid, Sintesis.
Wä lchli B. (2005). Co-compounds and natural coordination. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Williams E. (1981). On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word’. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 245–274
Xing J.Z. (2006). Teaching and learning Chinese as a foreign language: A pedagogical grammar. Hong Kong, Hong Kong University Press.
Zhou X., Marslen-Wilson W., Taft M. (1999). Morphology, ortography and phonology in reading Chinese compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes 14(5/6): 525–565
Dòngcí cí gòu yǔ yǔ faˇ gōngnéng hùdòng chū tàn. Proceedings of the 12th Research on Computational Linguistics (pp. 67–85). Tsinchu, Taiwan.
Xiàndài Hàn yǔ suōlüèyǔ (Abbreviations in Contemporary Chinese). Beijing: Yuwen chubanshe.
Hànyǔ de gò ucífaˇ yànjiū (Research on Word Formation in Chinese). Shanghai: Huadong Shifan Daxue Chubanshe.
XIÀNDÀI HÀNYǔ CÍDIAˇN [HÀN YīNG SHUāNG Yǔ ] (2000). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The general outline of the work was discussed jointly by the authors, however Bianca Basciano is responsible for Sects. 1–4, 5.1 and Antonella Ceccagno for Sects. 5.2, 5.3, 6–8.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ceccagno, A., Basciano, B. Compound headedness in Chinese: an analysis of neologisms. Morphology 17, 207–231 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-008-9119-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-008-9119-0