Skip to main content
Log in

Constructions and headedness in derivation and compounding

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Morphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ‘traditional’ distinction of compounds into endocentric (Eng. doorknob) and exocentric (pickpocket) is based on the presence or absence of a head constituent (Bloomfield, Language, Holt, New York, 1933); since the early eighties, the syntactic notion of ‘head’ has been extended also to derivation, claiming that English derivational suffixes, as e.g. -ness, are heads, either in an absolute sense or in a categorial sense (see Williams Linguist Inq 12:245–274, 1981; Lieber On the organization of the lexicon, Indiana university Linguistics Club, Bloomington, 1981; Lieber, in Yearbook of morphology 1989, Foris, Dordrecht, 1989; among others). In this paper, we shall first review some key issues in the morphological notion of head, illustrating well-known problematic cases, and then we shall discuss the Construction Morphology approach to headedness in derivation and compounding (Booij in The Oxford handbook of compounding, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009; Booij, in Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 2010a, 2010 Booij, Construction morphology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010b). The stipulation of a hierarchical lexicon with subschemas expressing intermediate generalizations is a powerful theoretical device in accounting for a phenomenon as headedness variation, as we shall show with a Vietnamese case study; also, inconsistencies in word-class assignment in derivation will be dealt with in a constructionist perspective. Moreover, we shall discuss the consequences of a constructionist approach to the distinction between compounding and derivation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Ch.:

Mandarin Chinese

Du.:

Dutch

Eng.:

English

It.:

Italian

Viet.:

Vietnamese

References

  • Allen, M. R. (1978). Morphological investigations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.

  • Alves, M. (1999). What’s so Chinese about Vietnamese? In G. Thurgood (Ed.), Papers from the ninth annual meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (pp. 221–242). Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.

  • Arcodia G. F. (2011) A Construction Morphology account of derivation in Mandarin Chinese. Morphology 21: 89–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arcodia, G. F., Grandi, N., & Wälchli, B. (2010). Coordination in compounding. In S. Scalise & I. Vogel (Eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding (pp. 177–198). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Bauer L. (1990) Be-heading the word. Journal of Linguistics 26: 1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer L. (1998) Is there a class of neoclassical compounds, and if so is it productive? Linguistics, 36: 403–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, L. (2001). Compounding. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher, & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals (pp. 695–707). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Bauer, L. (2005). The borderline between derivation and compounding. In W. Dressler, D. Kastovsky, O. E. Pfeiffer, & F. Rainer (Eds.), Morphology and its demarcations (pp. 97–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Bauer, L. (2006). Compound. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (Vol. II, pp. 719–726). Oxford: Elsevier.

  • Bauer, L. (2010). The typology of exocentric compounding. In S. Scalise & I. Vogel (Eds.), Crossdisciplinary issues in compounding (pp. 167–176). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Beard, R. (1998). Derivation. In A. Spencer & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), Handbook of morphology (pp. 44–65). Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Bhat, D. N. S. (1994). The adjectival category. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Bisang, W. (2001). Syntax/morphology asymmetry in Vietnamese—a consequence of contact by writing between Vietnamese, Chinese and Standard Average European Languages. In B. Igla & T. Stolz (Eds.), Was ich noch sagen wollte . . .(A multilingual Festschrift for Norbert Boretzky) (pp. 189– 201). Berlin: Akademieverlag.

  • Bisetto A., Scalise S. (2005) The classification of compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio, 4: 319–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisetto A., Scalise S. (2007) Selection is a head property. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 54: 361–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisetto, A., & Scalise, S. (2009). The classification of compounds. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding(pp. 34–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Bloomfield L. (1933) Language. Holt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, G. (2000). Inheritance. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann, & J. Mugdan (Eds.), Morphologie/Morphology (pp. 857–865). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Booij, G. (2005). Compounding and derivation—evidence for construction morphology. In W. Dressler, D. Kastovsky, O. E. Pfeiffer, & F. Rainer (Eds.), Morphology and its demarcations (pp. 109–132). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Booij, G. (2007a). Construction morphology and the lexicon. In F. Montermini, G. Boyé, & N. Hathout (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 5th Décembrettes: Morphology in Toulouse (pp. 34–44). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

  • Booij G. (2007b) The grammar of words (2nd ed.). Oxford, Oxford University Press

  • Booij, G. (2009). Compounding and construction morphology. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 201–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Booij, G. (2010a). Compound construction: Schemas or analogy? In S. Scalise & I. Vogel (Eds.), Crossdisciplinary issues in compounding(pp. 93–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Booij, G. (2010b). Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Brinton, L. J., & Traugott, E. (2005). Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, B. (1994). The evolution of grammar. Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Ceccagno, A., & Basciano, B. (2007). Compound headedness in Chinese: An analysis of neologisms. Morphology, 17, 207–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccagno, A., & Basciano, B. (2009). Sino-Tibetan: Mandarin Chinese. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 478–490). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Chen, R. (1986). 谈词甀 “性” [On the affix “-xìng”]. Xinjiang Shifan Daxue Xuebao, 2, 87–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coene, M., & D’hulst, Y. (2003). Theoretical background. In M. Coene & Y. D’hulst (Eds.), From NP to DP. Volume I: The syntax and semantics of noun phrases (pp. 1–33). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Croft W. (2001) Radical construction grammar. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Delfitto, D., & Melloni, C. (2009). Compounds don’t come easy. Lingue e Linguaggio, 8, 75–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Sciullo, A. M., & Williams, E. (1987). On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Dixon, R. M. W. (2004). Adjective classes in typological perspective. In R. M. W. Dixon & A. Y. Aikhenvald (Eds.), Adjective classes: A cross-linguistic typology (pp. 1–49). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Downing, P. (1977). On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language, 53, 810–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabb, N. (1998). Compounding. In A. Spencer & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), Handbook of morphology (pp. 66–83). Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Grandi, N. (2001). I suffissi valutativi tra derivazione e flessione: uno studio interlinguistico. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, 2, 129–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagège, C. (2005). World classes in isolating languages. In D. A. Cruse, et al. (Eds.), Lexikologie/ Lexicology (pp. 976–980). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Haspelmath, M. (2002). Understanding morphology. London/New York: Arnold/Oxford University Press.

  • Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M., Gil, D., & Comrie, B. (Eds.). (2005). The world atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hawkins, J. A., & Gilligan, G. (1988). Prefixing and suffixing universals in relation to basic word order. Lingua, 74, 219–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Himmelmann, N. P. (2004). Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang, N. P. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components (pp. 21–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Hoeksema, J. (1992). The head parameter in morphology and syntax. In D. G. Gilbers & S. Looyenga (Eds.), Language and cognition 2. Yearbook 1992 of the research group for linguistic theory and knowledge representation of the University of Groningen (pp. 119–132). Groningen: De Passage.

  • Hudson R. A. (1987) Zwicky on heads. Journal of Linguistics 23: 109–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, W. P. (2008). A new Vietnamese–English dictionary. Hyattsville, MD: Dunwoody Press.

  • Jackendoff, R. S. (2002). Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Ke, L. V. (1994). Der chinesische Einfluβ auf die vietnamesische Sprache. Münster: LIT.

  • Lieber, R. (1981). On the organization of the lexicon. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

  • Lieber, R. (1989). On percolation. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1989 (pp. 95–138). Dordrecht: Foris.

  • Lieber, R., & Štekauer, P. (2009). Introduction: Status and definition of compounding. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 3–18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Lü, S., & Rao, C. (1981). 试论非谓形容词 [Tentative remarks on non-predicative adjectives]. Zhongguo Yuwen, 2, 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, J. (2004). “X性 ”词濏探微 [On the “X xìng” word family]. Jiangtan Shifan Xueyuan Xuebao, 3, 91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magni, E. (2008). Conservazione e innovazione nella morfologia derivazionale dell’italiano: analisi sincronica e diacronica del suffisso -aio. In E. Cresti (Ed.), Prospettive nello studio del lessico italiano (pp. 497–506). Firenze: Firenze University Press.

  • Masini, F. (1993). The formation of modern Chinese lexicon and its evolution towards a national language: The period from 1840 to 1898. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series, 6.

  • Michaelis, L. A., & Lambrecht, K. (1996). Toward a construction-based theory of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language, 72, 215–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montermini, F. (2008). Il Lato Sinistro della Morfologia. La Prefissazione in Italiano e Nelle Lingue del Mondo. Milano: Franco Angeli.

  • Naumann, B., & Vogel, P. M. (2000). Derivation. In G. Booij, et al. (Eds.), Morphologie—Morphology (pp. 929–943). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Nguyen, D.-H. (1997). Vietnamese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Nguyen, D.-H. (2009). Vietnamese. In B. Comrie (Ed.), The world’s major languages (2nd ed., pp. 677– 692). London: Routledge.

  • Rainer F., Valera S. (1992) Compounding in Spanish. Rivista di Linguistica 4: 79–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Renouf, A., & Baayen, H. (1998). Aviating among the hapax legomena: Morphological grammaticalization in current British newspaper English. In A. Renouf (Ed.), Explorations in corpus linguistics(pp. 181–189). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

  • Scalise, S. (1984). Generative morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.

  • Scalise, S. (1990). Morfologia e Lessico. Bologna: Il Mulino.

  • Scalise, S. (1994). Morfologia. Bologna: Il Mulino.

  • Scalise, S. (1997). Rappresentazione degli affissi. In T. De Mauro & T. Lo Cascio (Eds.), Lessico e Grammatica. Teorie linguistiche ed applicazioni lessicografiche (pp. 171–191). Roma: Bulzoni.

  • Scalise, S., & Bisetto, A. (2008). La Struttura delle Parole. Bologna: Il Mulino.

  • Scalise, S., Bisetto, A., & Guevara, E. (2005). Selection in compounding and derivation. In W. Dressler, D. Kastovsky, O. E. Pfeiffer, & F. Rainer (Eds.), Morphology and its demarcations (pp. 133–150). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Scalise, S., & Fábregas, A. (2010). The head in compounding. In S. Scalise & I. Vogel (Eds.), Crossdisciplinary issues in compounding(pp. 109–126). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Scalise, S., Fábregas, A., & Forza, F. (2009). Exocentricity in compounding. Gengo Kenkyu. Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan, 135, 49–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E. O. (1982). The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Stump, G. T. (1993). How peculiar is evaluative morphology? Journal of Linguistics, 29, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump, G. T. (2001a). Affix position. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher, & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals (pp. 708–714). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Stump, G. T. (2001b). Inflectional morphology. A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Wälchli, B. (2005). Co-compounds and natural coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Williams, E. (1981). On the notions “lexically related” and “head of a word”. Linguistic Inquiry, 12, 245–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky A. M. (1985) Heads. Journal of Linguistics 21: 1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giorgio Francesco Arcodia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arcodia, G.F. Constructions and headedness in derivation and compounding. Morphology 22, 365–397 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-011-9189-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-011-9189-2

Keywords

Navigation