Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The auditor as a change agent for SMEs: the role of confidence, trust and identification

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Managerial Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the auditor is one of the most important external business partners for an SME in terms of knowledge transfer and the mitigation of internal risks, an investigation of the performance drivers of the qualitative change induced by auditing has not taken place to date. Based on 166 auditor–client dyads (audit partners, CEOs/CFOs) of SMEs in Germany, we narrow this gap by examining the effects of auditor’s trust and auditor’s confidence in the client management and auditor’s identification with the client firm on the qualitative change induced (i.e. level of knowledge transfer, improvement of the internal control system). We find that the auditor’s identification with the client firm and the auditor’s confidence in the client management are highly relevant to the level of qualitative change perceived by the client, while previously used indicators of auditor expertise (e.g. audit firm size, level of non-audit services) do not reveal a significant effect. Interestingly, auditor’s trust in the client does not exert a significant effect, which might be due to the special setting of auditor–client relationships. In addition to the theoretical contributions, the findings have practical implications for SMEs as well as for auditors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In line with the definition of an SME of the Small Business Size Standards 2014, published by the US Small Business Administration (http://www.sba.gov), we only take into account those firms with <500 employees.

References

  • Asare SK, McDaniel LS (1996) The effects of familiarity with the preparer and task complexity on the effectiveness of the audit review process. Account Rev 71:139–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth B, Mael F (1989) Further positive effects on cooperation, prosocial behaviors and individual motivation. Acad Manag Rev 14:20–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamber EM, Iyer VM (2007) Auditors’ identification with their clients and its effect on auditors’ objectivity. Auditing 26(2):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB, Hansen MH (1994) Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strateg Manag J 15:175–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker CL, DeFond ML, Jiambalvo J, Subramanyam KR (1998) The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemp Account Res 15:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharjee S, Moreno KK, Riley T (2012) The interplay of interpersonal affect and source reliability on auditors’ inventory judgments. Contemp Account Res 29(4):1087–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird B (1995) Toward a theory of entrepreneurial competency. In: Katz JA, Brockhaus RH (eds) Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth, 2nd edn. Jai Press Inc., Greenwich, pp 51–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn R, Carey P, Tanewski GA (2010) Business advice to SMEs: professional competence, trust and ethics, vol 119. Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Boter H, Lundström A (2005) SME perspectives on business support services: the role of company size, industry and location. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 12(2):244–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow CW (1982) The demand for external auditing: size, debt and ownership influences. Account Rev 57(2):272–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung J, Monroe G (2001) A research note on the effects of gender and task complexity on an audit judgment. Behav Res Account 13:111–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung S, Narasimhan R (2001) Perceived value of mandatory audits of small companies. Managerial Auditing J 16(3):120–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J, Krishnamoorthy G, Wright A (2010) Corporate governance in the post Sarbanes–Oxley era: auditors’ experiences. Contemp Account Res 27:751–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collis J, Jarvis R, Skerratt L (2004) The demand for the audit in small companies in the UK. Account Bus Res 34(2):87–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings LL, Bromiley P (1996) The organisational trust inventory (OTI): development and validation. In: Kramer RM, Tyler TR (eds) Trust in organisations: frontiers of theory and research. SAGE Publication Inc., Thousands Oaks, pp 302–330

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson P, Honig B (2003) The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. J Bus Ventur 18(3):301–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelo L (1981) Auditor independence, ‘low balling’, and disclosure regulation. J Account Econ 3:113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeRuyter K, Wetzels M (1999) Commitment in auditor–client relationships: antecedents and consequences. Acc Organ Soc 24:57–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dopuch N, Simunic D (1980) The nature of competition in the auditing profession: a descriptive and normative view. In: Buckley J, Weston F (eds) Regulation and the accounting profession, vol 34. pp 283–289

  • Doz YL (1996) The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: initial conditions or learning process? Strateg Manag J 17(1):55–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foreman P, Whetten DA (2002) Member’s identification with multiple-identity organizations. Organ Sci 13:618–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbins M, Trotman KT (2002) Audit review: managers’ interpersonal expectations and conduct of the review. Contemp Account Res 19:411–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden-Biddle K, Rao H (1997) Breaches in the boardroom: organizational identity and conflicts of commitment in a nonprofit organization. Organ Sci 8:593–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J 17(1):109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati R (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of re-peated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad Manag J 38(1):85–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howorth C, Moro A (2006) Trust within entrepreneur bank relationships: insights from Italy. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 30(4):495–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa SL, Knoll K, Leidner DE (1998) Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. J Manag Inf Sys 14(4):29–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane AA (2010) Unlocking knowledge transfer potential: knowledge demonstrability and superordinate social identity. Organ Sci 21(3):643–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerler WA, Killough LN (2009) The effects of satisfaction with a client’s management during a prior audit engagement, trust, and moral reasoning on auditors’ perceived risk of management fraud. J Bus Ethics 85(2):109–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khurana IK, Raman KK (2004) Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of Big 4 versus non Big 4 audits: evidence from Anglo American countries. Account Rev 79:473–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King RR (2002) An experimental investigation of self-serving biases in an auditing trust game: the effect of group affiliation. Account Rev 77:265–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knechel WR, Niemi L, Sundgren S (2008) Determinants of auditor choice: evidence from a small client market. Int J Auditing 12(1):65–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko D-G, Kirsch LJ, King WR (2005) Antecedents of knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in enterprise system implementations. MIS Q 29(1):59–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki RJ, Bunker BB (1996) Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In: Kramer RR, Tyler TR (eds) Trust in organisations: frontiers of theory and research. SAGE Publications Inc, Thousands Oaks, pp 114–139

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (2000) Familiarity, confidence, trust: problems and alternative. Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations. Department of Sociology - University of Oxford, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer RC, Davies JA (1999) The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: a field quasi-experiment. J Appl Psychol 84(1):123–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer RC, Davies JA, Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organisational trust. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):709–734

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvily B, Zaheer A (eds) (2006) Does trust still matters? Research on the role of trust in inter-organisational exchange Handbook of Trust Research. Edgar Elgar, Cheltenham

  • McKinley W, Ponemon LA, Schick A (1996) Auditors’ perceptions of client firms: the stigma of decline and the stigma of growth. Acc Organ Soc 21:193–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier M (2011) Knowledge management in strategic alliances: a review of empirical evidence. Int J Manag Rev 13:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möllering G (2001) The nature of trust: from Georg simmel to a theory of expectation, Interpretation and Suspension. Sociology 35(2):403–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore DA, Tetlock PE, Tanlu L, Bazerman MH (2006) Conflicts of interest and the case of auditor independence: moral seduction and strategic issue cycling. Acad Manag Rev 31:10–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moro A, Fink M (2013) Loan manager trust and credit access for SMEs. J Bank Finance 37(3):927–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder M (2006) EU-level competence development projects in agri-food-environment: the involvement of sectoral social partners. J Eur Ind Train 30(2):80–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthusamy SK, White MA (2005) Learning and knowledge transfer in strategic alliances: a social exchange view. Org Stud 26(3):415–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen J, Karjalainen J, Niskanen M, Karjalainen J (2011) Auditor gender and corporate earnings management behavior in private Finnish firms. Manag Auditing J 26:778–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom B (2002) Trust. Edward Elgar Publishing Inc., Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom B, Berger H, Noorderhaven NG (1997) Effects of trust and governance on relational risk. Acad Manag J 40(2):308–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally J (1967) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioural research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie M, Kopp L, Lemon W (2010) Exploring trust and the auditor-client relation-ship: factors influencing the auditor’s trust of a client representative. Auditing 29(1):279–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson HA, Simmering MJ, Sturman MC (2009) A tale of three perspectives: examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance. Org Res Methods 12(4):762–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ring PS, Van de Ven AH (1992) Structuring cooperative relationships between or-ganisations. Strateg Manag J 13:483–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogelberg SG, Stanton JM (2007) Understanding and dealing with organizational survey nonresponse. Org Res Methods 10(2):195–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose JM (2007) Attention to evidence of aggressive financial reporting and intentional misstatement judgments: effects of experience and trust. Behav Res Account 19:215–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoorman DF, Mayer RC, Davies JH (2007) An integrative model of organisational trust: past, present and future. Acad Manag Rev 32(2):344–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaub MK (1996) Trust and suspicion: the effects of situational and dispositional factors on auditors’ trust of client. Behav Res Account 8:154–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Shropshire C (2010) The role of the interlocking director and broad receptivity in the diffusion of practices. Acad Manag Rev 35(2):246–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skrondal A, Petter L (2001) Regression among factor scores. Psychometrica 66(4):563–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squire B, Cousins PD, Brown S (2009) Cooperation and knowledge transfer within buyer-supplier relationships: the moderating properties of trust, relationship duration and supplier performance. Br J Manag 20(4):461–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefaniak CM, Houston RW, Cornell RM (2012) The effects of employer and client identification on internal and external auditors’ evaluations of internal control deficiencies. Auditing A J Pract Theory 31(1):39–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of group conflict. In: Austin WG, Worchel S (eds) The social psychology of intergroup relations. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, pp 33–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinsley DB (1996) Trust plus capabilities. Acad Manag Rev 21(2):335–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welter F (2012) All you need is trust? A critical review of the trust and entrepreneurship literature. Int Small Bus J 30(4):193–212. doi:10.1177/0266242612439588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi T, Yamagishi M (1994) Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivat Emot 18:129–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer A, McEvily B, Perrone V (1998) Does trust matter? Ex-ploring the effects of interorganisational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ Sci 9(2):141–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zand DE (1972) Trust and Managerial Problem Solving. Adm Sci Q 17:229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was partially funded by the Austrian Academy of certified public Accountants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenbergerstraße 69, 4040, Linz, Austria

    Ewald Aschauer

  2. University of Southern Denmark, Universitetsparken 1, 6000, Kolding, Denmark

    Ewald Aschauer

  3. University of Leicester School of Management, Ken Edwards Building, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK

    Andrea Moro

  4. Facolta’ di Economia e Commercio, Universita’ di Udine, via Tomadini, 39100, Udine, Italy

    Maurizio Massaro

Authors
  1. Ewald Aschauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Moro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maurizio Massaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ewald Aschauer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aschauer, E., Moro, A. & Massaro, M. The auditor as a change agent for SMEs: the role of confidence, trust and identification. Rev Manag Sci 9, 339–360 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0162-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0162-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation