Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

From Geoheritage to Sustainable Development: Strategies and Perspectives in the Beigua Geopark (Italy)

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Geoheritage Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The consequence of assessing the natural and cultural heritage of a territory is the need of tools for their management. The European Geoparks Network and the Global Geoparks Network (assisted by UNESCO) have the function to provide these tools, aiming at promoting the sustainable development of a territory through the valorization and conservation of its natural and cultural heritage. Becoming an international recognised Geopark in 2005, the Beigua territory has gathered increasing attention from local authorities, tourism operators, entrepreneurs, universities and research institutions, schools, volunteers and environmental associations. During the last 5 years Beigua Geopark developed several projects and acted to raise public awareness on nature conservation. Thanks to effective collaboration with geoscientists, local authorities and tourism organisations, Beigua Geopark set up a structured network of interpretation facilities to support geotourism activities. In this direction, Beigua Geopark also launched an organised touristic offer. Connecting landscape, cultural heritage, sports facilities with unique geological and geomorphological features, Beigua Geopark presents multiple services to encourage both local and regional sustainable development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barettino D, Wimbledon WAP, Gallego E (eds) (2000) Patrimonio Geológico: conservación y gestión. Istituto Geológico y Minero de España, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley M, Burlando M, Garofano M (2008) Parco del Beigua – Beigua Geopark – GUI.PA guide al paesaggio d’Italia. Edizioni Promorama, Massa

  • Brancucci G, Burlando M (2001) La salvaguardia del patrimonio geologico: scelta strategica per il territorio. L’esperienza della Liguria. Franco Angeli Ed, Milano

  • Brilha J (2002) Geoconservation and protected areas. Environ Conserv 29:273–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brilha J (2005) Património Geológico e Geoconservação—A conservação da natureza na sua vertente geológica. Palimage Editores, Viseu

    Google Scholar 

  • Brocx M (2008) Geoheritage: from global perspectives to local principles for conservation and planning. Western Australian, Museum, Perth, Western Australia

  • Brocx M, Semeniuk V (2007) Geoheritage and geoconservation—history, definition, scope and scale. J R Soc West Aust 90:53–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Brocx M, Semeniuk V (2009) Developing a tool-kit for geoheritage and geoconservation in Western Australia. ProGeo News 2009(1):5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlando M, Firpo M, Queirolo C (2008a) Alla scoperta del Beigua Geopark – Itinerari Geologici della Liguria. Sagep Ed., Genova

  • Burlando M, Firpo M, Queirolo C (2008b) Parco del Beigua – European-Global Geopark - Guida ai Sentieri Natura. Galata Ed., Genova

  • Burlando M, Firpo M, Queirolo C (2009) Il Parco del Beigua. Sagep Ed, Genova

    Google Scholar 

  • Capponi G, Crispini L, Cancino E, Cavanna F (1999) The Gargassino valley thrust (northern Voltri group, Ligurian Alps). Boll Soc Geol Ital 118:479–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Carcavilla L, López-Martínez J, Durán J (2007) Patrimonio geológico y geodiversidad: investigación, conservación, gestión y relación con lo espacios naturals protegidos. Istituto Geológico y Minero de España, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Carcavilla L, Durán J, García-Cortés Á, López-Martínez J (2009) Geological heritage and geoconservation in Spain: past, present, and future. Geoheritage 1(2):75–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carobene L, Firpo M (2002) Forme terrazzate relitte di genesi marina lungo la costa ligure tra Genova e Savona (Liguria Occidentale). Quaternario Ital J Quatern Sci 15:53–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Carobene L, Firpo M (2005) Conservazione e valorizzazione dei geositi costieri in Liguria: l’esempio del tratto di costa tra Varazze e Cogoleto. In: La valorizzazione dello spazio fisico come via alla salvaguardia ambientale (eds) R

  • Chiesa S, Cortesogno L, Forcella F, Galli M, Messiga B, Pasquarè G, Pedemonte GM, Piccardo GB, Rossi PM (1975) Assetto strutturale ed interpretazione geodinamica del gruppo di Voltri. Boll Soc Geol Ital 94(3):555–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiesa S, Cortesogno L, Forcella F (1977) Caratteri e distribuzione del metamorfismo Alpino nel gruppo di Voltri e nelle zone limitrofe della Liguria occidentale con particolare riferimento al metamorfismo di alta pressione. Rend Soc Ital Mineralog 33(1):253–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Coratza P, Giusti C (2005) Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of geomorphosites. Quaternario 18(1):307–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauvin JC, Lozachmeur O, Capet Y, Dubrulle JB, Ghezali M, Mesnard AH (2004) Legal tools for preserving France’s natural heritage through integrated coastal zone management. Ocean Coast Manage 47:463–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling R, Newsome D (eds) (2006) Geotourism. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder W, Patzak M (2004) Geoparks—geological attractions: a tool for public education, recreation and sustainable economic development. Episodes 27(3):162–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Firpo M, Guglielmin M, Queirolo C (2006) Relict blockfields in the Ligurian Alps (Mount Beigua, Italy). Permafrost Periglac Process 17(1):71–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray M (2003) Geodiversity: valuing and conserving abiotic nature. John Wiley & Sons

  • Leite do Nascimiento MAL, Ruchkys UA, Mantesso-Neto V (2008) Geodiversidade, geoconservação e geoturismo—trinômio importante para a proteção do patrimônio geológico. Sociedade Brasileira de Geologia

  • Panizza M (2001) Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and example of geomorphological survey. Chin Sci Bull 46:4–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panizza M (2009) The Geomorphodiversity of the Dolomites (Italy): a key of geoheritage assessment. Geoheritage 1:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panizza M, Piacente S (1993) Geomorphological asset evaluation. Z Geomorph NF 87:13–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Parravicini V, Rovere A, Donato M, Morri C, Bianchi CN (2006) A method to measure three dimensional substratum rugosity for ecological studies: an example from the date-mussel fishery desertification in the north-western Mediterranean. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 86:689–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pena dos Reis R, Henriques M (2009) Approaching an integrated qualification and evaluation system for geological heritage. Geoheritage 1(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira P, Pereira D, Caetano Alves MI (2007) Geomorphosite assessment in the Montesinho Natural Park (Portugal). Geogr Helv 62:159–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Pralong JP (2005) A method for assessing the tourist potential and use of geomorphological sites. Géomorphologie: relief, processus, environnement 3:189–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser C, Murphy M, Larwood JG (2006) Geological conservation—a guide to good practice. English Nature, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E (2004) Geosite. In: Goudie A (ed) Encyclopedia of geomorphology. Routledge, London, p 440

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E, Fontana G, Kozlik L, Scapozza C (2007) A method for assessing «scientific» and «additional values» of geomorphosites. Geogr Helv 62:148–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovere A, Bellati S, Parravicini V, Firpo M, Morri C, Bianchi CN (2009) Abiotic and biotic links work two ways: effects on the deposit at the cliff foot induced by mechanical action of date mussel harvesting (Lithophaga lithophaga). Estuaries Coasts 32:333–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano E, González-Trueba JJ (2005) Assessment of geomorphosites in natural protected areas: the Picos de Europa National Park (Spain). Relief, processus, environnement. Géomorphologie 3:197–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Squinabol S. (1891) Rivista dei grossi Anthracotherium di Cadibona. Bollettino della Società Geologica Italiana 9(13)

  • Staces H, Larwood JG (2006) Natural foundations: geodiversity for people, places and nature. English Nature, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1972) Convention concerning the protection of world cultural and natural heritage. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban MA, Daniels M (2006) Exploring the links between geomorphology and ecology. Geomorphology 77(3–4):203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vacchi M, Queirolo C, Burlando M, Firpo M (2009) New geotourism perspectives in the Beigua Geopark. Epitome Geoitalia 2009(3):378–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimbledon WAP (1996) GEOSITES, a new IUGS initiative to compile a global comparative site inventory, an aid to international and national conservation activity. Episodes 19:87–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimbledon WAP, Benton MJ, Bevins RE, Black GP, Bridgland DR, Cleal CJ, Cooper RG, May VJ (1995) The development of a methodology for the selection of British sites for conservation. Part 1. Mod Geol 20:159–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Zouros N (2004) The European Geoparks Network. Geological heritage protection and local development. Episodes 27(3):165–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Zouros N (2005) Assessment, protection and promotion of geomorphological and geological sites in the Aegean area, Greece. Géomorphol relief processus environnement 3:227–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Zouros N (2007) Geomorphosite assessment and management in protected areas of Greece. The case of the Lesvos island coastal geomorphosites. Geogr Helv 62(3):169–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Zouros N, McKeever PJ (2009) European Geoparks Network and geotourism. In Neto de Carvalho C, Rodrigues J (eds) New challenges with geotourism. Proceedings of the VIII European Geoparks Conference, Idanha-a-Nova 14–16 September (2009), Portugal: 19–23

  • Zouros N, Ramsey T, McKeever P, Patzak M (eds) (2009) European Geoparks. EGN, Sigri Lesvos

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beigua Regional Nature Park, European & Global Geopark, Via Marconi 165, 16011, Arenzano, GE, Italy

    Maurizio Burlando & Cristiano Queirolo

  2. Department for the Study of the Territory and of its Resources (Dip.Te.Ris), University of Genoa, Corso Europa 26, 16132, Genoa, Italy

    Marco Firpo, Alessio Rovere & Matteo Vacchi

Authors
  1. Maurizio Burlando
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marco Firpo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cristiano Queirolo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alessio Rovere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Matteo Vacchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurizio Burlando.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burlando, M., Firpo, M., Queirolo, C. et al. From Geoheritage to Sustainable Development: Strategies and Perspectives in the Beigua Geopark (Italy). Geoheritage 3, 63–72 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0019-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0019-4

Keywords