Skip to main content
Log in

Monitoring and Control Improvement of Single and Two Stage Thermophilic Sludge Digestion Through Multivariate Analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Waste and Biomass Valorization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stable operation of high-rate thermophilic sludge anaerobic reactors is sometime hard to achieve because of the nature of the anaerobic digestion (AD) process itself and the combination of biological and chemical reactions. An interesting and innovative way to handle AD data resides in multivariate statistical approaches since a more accurate analysis can be performed and fault or abnormal schemes detections can be enhanced. In this paper, principal component analysis (PCA) was the basic multivariate tool used to compare single and two stage AD process performances when treating waste activated sludge (WAS), in order to improve their monitoring and control. Two experiments were carried out to perform single and two-stage AD using WAS and fermented WAS as substrates, respectively. Findings from the PCA model agreed with results from the univariate data analysis but additionally showed a higher variability and changes on the stability trend in the AD of WAS. Besides, multivariate statistical process control using Hotelling T2 and Shewhart control charts combined with PCA displayed an out-of-control scheme revealing a transition period, in which the stability pattern of this experiment changed strongly, towards an accumulation of volatile fatty acids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Viéitez, E.R., Ghosh, S.: Biogasification of solid wastes by two-phase anaerobic fermentation. Biomass Bioenergy 16, 299–309 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mata-Alvarez, J., Macé, S., Llabrés, P.: Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 74, 3–16 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bolzonella, D., Cavinato, C., Fatone, F., Pavan, P., Cecchi, F.: High rate mesophilic, thermophilic, and temperature phased anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: a pilot scale study. Waste Manag. 32, 1196–1201 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maspolim, Y., Guoa, C., Xiao, K., Zhou, Y., Ng, W.J.: Performance and microbial community analysis in alkaline two-stage enhanced anaerobic sludge digestion system. Biochem. Eng. J. 105, 296–305 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lv, W., Schanbacher, F.L., Yu, Z.T.: Putting microbes to work in sequence. Recent advances in temperature-phased anaerobic digestion processes. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 9409–9414 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Baere, L., Mattheeuws, B.: Anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste in Europe, status, experience and prospects. Waste Manag. 3:517–526 (2012). http://www.ows.be/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Anaerobic-digestion-of-the-organic-fraction-of-MSW-in-Europe.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2016

  7. Reed, J.P., Declin, D., Esteves, S.R.R., Dinsdale, R., Guwy, A.J.: Performance parameter prediction for sewage sludge digesters using reflectance FT-NIR spectroscopy. Water Res. 45, 2463–2472 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leite, W.R.M., Gottardo, M., Belli Filho, P., Pavan, P., Bolzonella, D.: Performance and energy aspects of single and two phase thermophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. Renew. Energy 86, 1324–1331 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor, J.K.: The role of statistics in quality assurance. Fresen. Z. Anal. Chem. 332, 722–725 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoo, C.K., Lee, J.-M., Lee, I.-B., Vanrolleghem, P.A.: Dynamic monitoring system for full-scale wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci. Technol. 50, 163–171 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wise, B.M., Gallagher, N.B.: The process chemometrics approach to process monitoring and fault detection. J. Process Control 6, 329–348 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosen, C., Olsson, G.: Disturbance detection in wastewater treatment systems. Water Sci. Technol. 37, 197–205 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jackson, J.E.: A User’s Guide to Principal Components. Wiley, New York (1991)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Jackson, D.A.: Stopping rules in principal components analysis: a comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology 74, 2204–2214 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. MacGregor, J.F., Kourti, T.: Statistical process control of multivariate processes. Control Eng. Pract. 3, 403–414 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Corominas, L., Villez, K., Aguado, D., Rieger, L., Rosen, C., Vanrolleghem, P.A.: Performance evaluation of fault detection methods for wastewater treatment processes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 108, 333–344 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cecchi, F., Pavan, P., Musacco, A., Mata-Alvarez, J., Vallini, G.: Digesting the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: moving from mesophilic (37 °C) to thermophilic (55 °C) conditions. Waste Manag. Res. 11, 403–414 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. APHA, AWWA, WEF: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st edn. APHA, Washington (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Anthonisen, A.C., Loehr, R.C., Prakasam, T.B.S., Srinath, E.G.: Inhibition of nitrification by ammonia and nitrous acid. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 48, 835–849 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  20. R Core Team: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/ (2015). Accessed 11 Sept 2016

  21. Shapiro, S.S., Wilk, M.B.: An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52, 591–611 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Mason, R., Tracy, N., Young, J.: Monitoring a multivariate step process. J. Qual. Technol. 28, 39–50 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Woodall, W.H., Montgomery, D.C.: Research issues and ideas in statistical process control. J. Qual. Technol. 31, 376–386 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Costa, J.C., Alves, M.M., Ferreira, E.C.: Principal component analysis and quantitative image analysis to predict effects of toxics in anaerobic granular sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 1180–1185 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Costa, J.C., Alves, M.M., Ferreira, E.C.: A chemometric tool to monitor high-rate anaerobic granular sludge reactors during load and toxic disturbances. Biochem. Eng. J. 53, 38–43 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Todeschini, R.: Data correlation, number of significant principal components and shape of molecules––the K correlation index. Anal. Chim. Acta 348, 419–430 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Montgomery, D.C.: Introduction to statistical quality control. Wiley, New York (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Klein, M.: Two alternatives to the Shewhart control chart. J. Qual. Technol. 32, 427–431 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, T., Chen, J., Shen, H., An, D.: Effects of total solids content on waste activated sludge thermophilic anaerobic digestion and its sludge dewaterability. Bioresour. Technol. (2016). doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.130

    Google Scholar 

  30. Smidt, E., Parravicini, V.: Effect of sewage sludge treatment and additional aerobic post-stabilization revealed by infrared spectroscopy and multivariate data analysis. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 1775–1780 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bayard, R., Gonzalez-Ramirez, L., Guendouz, J., Benbelkacem, H., Buffière, P., Gourdon, R.: Statistical analysis to correlate bio-physical and chemical characteristics of organic wastes and digestates to their anaerobic biodegradability. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 6, 759–769 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Miranda, N.D., Granell, R., Tuomisto, H.L., McCulloch, M.D.: Meta-analysis of methane yields from anaerobic digestion of dairy cattle manure. Biomass Bioenergy 86, 65–75 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ntaikou, I., Antonopoulou, G., Lyberatos, G.: Biohydrogen production from biomass and wastes via dark fermentation: a review. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 1, 21–39 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Reed, J.P., Devlin, D., Esteves, S.R., Dinsdale, R., Guwy, A.J.: Integration of NIRS and PCA techniques for the process monitoring of a sewage sludge anaerobic digester. Bioresour. Technol. 133, 398–404 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Demirel, B., Yenigün, O.: Two-phase anaerobic digestion processes: a review. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 77, 743–755 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wilson, C.A., Murthy, S.M., Fang, Y., Novak, J.T.: The effect of temperature on the performance and stability of thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Water Sci. Technol. 57, 239–246 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jackson, J.E.: Principal components and factor analysis: part I––principal component. J. Qual. Technol. 12, 201–213 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil (Process Number 99999.014588/2013-07). Furthermore, the authors thank the water utility Alto Trevigiano Servizi S.r.l. (ATS) and the Municipality of Treviso for hosting the pilot hall within the area of the municipal treatment plant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wanderli Rogério Moreira Leite.

Appendix

Appendix

See Fig. 7.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leite, W.R.M., Belli Filho, P., Gottardo, M. et al. Monitoring and Control Improvement of Single and Two Stage Thermophilic Sludge Digestion Through Multivariate Analysis. Waste Biomass Valor 9, 985–994 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9758-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9758-z

Keywords

Navigation