Characterization and reactivity of silicatic consolidants
Introduction
The porous materials, as stones and plasters, exposed to the external environment are subjected to chemical–physical decay processes that produce the loss of the consistence of the material. The phenomenon is of particular importance when it involves valuable architectural and artistic works, like masonry of historical buildings or mural paintings. The conservation project of these materials includes a consolidation intervention for restoring the physical–mechanical characteristics of the support and in particular the cohesion between material particles and their adhesion to the non-deteriorated support. Usually this operation is carried out applying polymeric compounds in organic solvent or in inorganic products [1], [2], [3].
In general the polymeric products in organic solvent have demonstrated to own good consolidant properties but also some limits related above all to the different behaviour towards the water of the consolidated material compared to the original one. Besides colour variations of the treated support are often observed and they are not always acceptable in the restoration field.
The inorganic consolidants and most of all the consolidants with a basis of silica react reducing the porosity of the material which becomes more compact and less susceptible to the water action. They have less cohesive property than the organic consolidants but they are most compatible with the support that shows a less heterogeneous behaviour in relation with water both in liquid and in vapour state. In particular sodium silicate, ethyl silicate and a colloidal suspension of silica made of particles with an average diameter of 10–15 nm [1] are the most preferably used among the inorganic consolidants made by silica. The application of these products causes after many reactions the formation of amorphous silica that acts as a consolidant and it is made by a disorderly and continuous lattice of silica tetra-coordinated tetrahedrons that make rings with 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 atoms of silicium. This structure contains numerous silanolic Si–OH groups, which however give hygroscopicity to the system, in particular where an interruption of lattice structure occurs [4], [5].
Initially the sodium silicate, the ethyl silicate and the colloidal silica, that are the objects of this study, form a gel of amorphous silica that afterwards transforms itself in xerogel because of the evaporation of solvent and assumes characteristics strictly correlated with the condition of the solvent evaporation process. It could be put forward the hypothesis that the consolidant action is exercised by the aerogel filling the accessible porous of stone [6] but it is not excluded that it could be influenced by the silicatic structures reactivity with support [7]. There is not much research on the subject but the knowledge of interactions between consolidant and support could be of great applicative interest; in fact it could allow to modify the entity of this interaction in relation to the conservation state of the support and its chemical nature.
In this study, some results on the reactivity of the sodium silicate, ethyl silicate and colloidal silica with calcium carbonate and quartz, that are the principal compounds of the stone used in historical buildings, are reported. In the first part of the research the xerogels obtained from the three silicatic systems are characterized; afterwards the chemical reactivity of xerogels are studied mixing them with calcite and quartz because they are system well-known and recognizable for the employed techniques and facilitate the interpretation of the results.
In this work, the data obtained by 29Si MAS spectroscopy on samples coming from the support–consolidant reactivity are discussed. This technique has already given interesting results in studies on the interaction between binder and aggregate of mortars with fragments of crushed bricks and on the stone decay after consolidant treatment [8], [9].
Tests correlated to some properties of the products were carried out in order to evaluate applicative aspect. The capacity of the products to penetrate into real samples and how they distribute on supports were considered determining at different depth the porosity and the porous distribution in function of cumulative volume. The cohesive capacity was measured by a method set up in laboratory and designed in expectation of an employment in building yards.
Section snippets
Samples
Table 1 reports some physical characteristics of the products employed in this study which are available in commerce at different concentration level.
The products were prepared to obtain the same dry weight/humid weight rate (silica content after solvent evaporation process). The supports employed were quartz and calcium carbonate. In this way many problems due to the presence of impurities and different porosity of the support were overcome. Quartz was ground and it was used the fraction with
Measure of specific area by BET method and small angle scattering of X-rays
The superficial area measurements of silica by BET method pointed out that from the colloidal suspension it was obtained a product with an area of about 150 m2/g, while from sodium silicate and ethyl silicate were obtained products with an area included into the 8–10 m2/g range. The great superficial area of colloidal silica is due to the small dimensions of the particles and it was evaluated by SAXS diffractometry by which it was obtained an average diameter value of 13 nm to which a superficial
Conclusion
Structural differences on silica produced by the three examined consolidants were revealed.
In xerogel coming from colloidal silica prevails the presence of Q4 systems related to tri-dimensional systems while in xerogels coming from ethyl silicate and sodium silicate prevail more planar “open” systems, much more available for a chemical interaction with calcium carbonate and quartz. The calcite reacts with xerogels involving significant structural modifications. In all cases the presence of Q3
Acknowledgement
The authors thank Prof. Vittorio Lucchini, Department of Environmental Sciences of Venice and MIUR-COFIN for the financial support of the work.
References (15)
- et al.
Interaction between clay and lime in cocciopesto mortars: a study by 29Si MAS spectroscopy
Appl Clay Sci
(2004) - et al.
Application of 29Si and 27Al magic angle sinning nuclear magnetic resonance to studies of the building materials for historical monuments
Solid State Nucl Mag Res
(1999) - Moropoulou A, Tsiourva Th, Michailidis P, Biscontin G, Bakolas A, Zendri E. Evaluation of consolidation treatments of...
- et al.
Possibilities of silica application in consolidation of stone monument
- Hansen E, Doehne E, Fidler J, Laron J, Martin B, Matteini M, et al. Review in Conservation, The International Institute...
The chemistry of silica
(1979)- AA.VV. Science of ceramic chemical processing. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ed,...
Cited by (58)
Silica-based consolidants: Enhancement of chemical-physical properties of Vicenza stone in heritage buildings
2023, Journal of Building EngineeringEvaluating two nanosilica dimensional range for the consolidation of degraded silicate stones
2022, Construction and Building MaterialsCitation Excerpt :Siloxane polymers and alkoxysilanes were often preferred to other products and widely used thanks to their chemical stability (due to Si-O bonding strength) and low viscosity, which allows good penetration depth [6]. However, they tend to greying, form a brittable superficial layer and reach limited penetration rate [7–9]. For these reasons, in the recent years, nanotechnology was exploited to develop nano-compounds based on silica and consequent innovative products proposed in conservation field for offering extra-value to the good performance of silica-based consolidants [10].
Effects of hygrothermal, UV and SO<inf>2</inf> accelerated ageing on the durability of ETICS in urban environments
2021, Building and EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :System E5 presents a silicate-based FC, with superficial plate-like silica gel aggregate which forms a homogeneous patina [57]. The presence of calcium carbonate (present both in the hydraulic lime basecoat, and possibly also as pigment or filler in the coating) can favour the development of shorter linear chains of tetrahedral silica and linear silicate structure [58]. This superficial patina is also considerably affected after the hygrothermal and UV ageing tests, with particle cohesion loss and a more heterogeneous surface (Fig. 11 h,i).
Nanolime, ethyl silicate and sodium silicate: Advantages and inconveniences in consolidating ancient bricks (XII-XIII century)
2021, Construction and Building MaterialsCitation Excerpt :Yet, the consolidating action is affected by the amount of Ca(OH)2 dispersed in the suspension as well as the type of solvent and relative humidity of the environment [17–20]. Nowadays, ethyl silicate (TEOS; tetraethyl orthosilicate) is a widespread solution in heritage conservation [21–24]. The hydrolysis of ethyl silicate occurs with release of ethanol (volatile) forming a nanosilica binding phase within the pores (Fig. 2).
The effectiveness of ethyl silicate as consolidating and protective coating to extend the durability of earthen plasters
2020, Construction and Building MaterialsCitation Excerpt :The effectiveness of the treatment was important in both plasters: 94% (52.9 µg/cm2; RSD 13.3) and 92.5% (30.4 µg/cm2; RSD 16.5) for the red and yellow plasters, respectively. The results are coherent with other studies [17] conducted on stone where ethyl silicate also improved the surface cohesion. The ethyl silicate effectiveness is higher than that achieved by Ca(OH)2 nanoparticles coatings when the treatment is evaluated for similar earthen materials (adobe) [1].
Suitability of silica nanoparticles for tuff consolidation
2019, Construction and Building MaterialsCitation Excerpt :Recently, the use of nanotechnology has contributed to the growth of new promising research based on application of inorganic nanoparticles in the stone conservation [26–32]. Silicate based products are commonly used as consolidant agent due to their proven efficacy especially on silicate stone [14–16], even in terms of more reactivity and depth of penetration than others products [33–35]. Unfortunately, their handling and application may introduce health and safety hazards due to emission of toxic volatile compounds [14,36].