Elsevier

Applied Catalysis A: General

Volumes 409–410, 15 December 2011, Pages 267-278
Applied Catalysis A: General

Unexpected events in sulfated zirconia catalyst during glycerol-to-acrolein conversion

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2011.10.015Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of the work was the analysis of the phenomena occurring during glycerol dehydration in the presence of sulfated zirconia used as solid acid catalysts; the attention was focused on catalyst deactivation. A close correlation between the sulfate content and catalytic behavior was found. In addition to the accumulation of carbon residues on the catalyst surface, there were other phenomena contributing to catalyst deactivation: (i) the self-reduction of sulfuric into sulfurous groups – an event which occurred, however, only in samples with the higher S content under anaerobic conditions – and (ii) the leaching of S from catalysts, due to the hydrolysis of sulfate groups and the formation of volatile esters. These findings are of general interest in relation to both the transformation of glycerol into acrolein by means of gas-phase dehydration and the use of sulfated zirconia catalysts for high-temperature, acid-catalyzed reactions.

Highlights

► Sulfated zirconia catalysts deactivate during glycerol dehydration into acrolein. ► The catalytic behavior of sulfated zirconia is affected by sulfate loading. ► Accumulation of heavy compounds is not the main reason for deactivation. ► Deactivation is mainly due to the self-reduction of S(VI) and to the loss of S. ► With catalysts having high S loading, O2 co-feeding limits catalyst deactivation.

Introduction

Glycerol will play a crucial role in future biorefineries, because its derivatives can be used in various sectors, such as the fuel, chemical, pharmaceutical, detergent, and building industries [1], [2]. In this context, catalytic dehydration of glycerol to acrolein has attracted great interest [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]; acrolein is mostly used as an intermediate for the synthesis of acrylic acid, this reaction being catalyzed in current industrial processes by Mo/V/W mixed oxides [19]. The best-performing catalysts with Brønsted-type acid properties include WO3/ZrO2 [5], [6], supported Keggin polyoxometalates [7], [8], [9], V/P/O [10], [11], [12], [13], rare earth pyrophosphates [11], and H-ZSM5 [12], [14], [18]; total glycerol conversion is achieved, with selectivity to acrolein as high as 70–80%. One peculiarity of this reaction is that with many of the strongly acidic catalysts studied in literature, the co-feed of oxygen helps keep the catalytic surface cleaner, thus limiting the formation of heavy deposits that may lead to catalyst deactivation [4], [20].

Among the various acid systems studied in literature, sulfated zirconia has also been considered as a possible catalyst for glycerol dehydration [5], [15], [20]. In principle, sulfated zirconia may be one suitable catalyst for this reaction, when conducted in the presence of molecular oxygen, since it has both acid and redox properties [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]; the latter may help in accelerating the removal of heavy compounds incipiently formed on the catalyst surface.

In a previous work [26], we reported on how the behavior of a sulfated zirconia catalyst (having 4.4 wt% of sulfate) in glycerol dehydration is affected by the main reaction parameters. In the present work, we discuss the effect of sulfate loading on catalytic behavior, in terms of events that are responsible for catalyst deactivation.

Section snippets

Experimental

Catalysts were prepared as described in our previous work [26], via a conventional precipitation method [27]. Table 1 shows the samples prepared, and their specific surface area after calcination; samples are labeled SZx, where SZ stands for sulfate zirconia and x for the sulfate amount (wt% SO4) present in the catalysts.

Catalysts were characterized by means of hydrogen-thermal-programmed-reduction (H2-TPR) and thermal-programmed-desorption (TPD). Hydrogen-thermal-programmed-reduction (TPR)

The effect of sulfate loading on catalytic behavior

Fig. 1(top) compares the glycerol conversion of SZ2, SZ3 and SZ4 samples in relation to the reaction temperature, under anaerobic conditions. With SZ4, glycerol conversion was close to 80% at 290 °C, but then decreased down to 55% when the temperature was increased to 360 °C, possibly because of a deactivation that contrasted the expected increase in conversion. At higher temperatures the significant conversion increase registered was also due to the contribution of homogeneous reactions [26].

Discussion

The main results of the catalytic experiments may be summarized as follows:

  • 1.

    We observed, in anaerobic conditions, a rise in the deactivation rate as the sulfur amount in sulfated zirconia increased. However, this was not due to the greater formation of heavy compounds, which may eventual be retained on catalyst surface and form residues that are precursors to coke formation; in fact, heavy products formed with similar selectivity on various catalysts, regardless of the sulfate content.

  • 2.

    The

Conclusions

The acid and redox characteristics of sulfated zirconia catalysts led us to investigate the catalytic behavior of sulfated zirconia catalysts in the gas-phase dehydration of glycerol, especially in relation to causes for catalyst deactivation under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. The catalytic behavior was found to be greatly affected by the amount of sulfate loading in catalysts; the major difference concerned the rate of deactivation, which was very low with catalysts having the lower

Acknowledgements

MIUR (Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca Scientifica) is acknowledged for the PhD grant to SG (Progetto Giovani). MIPAAF (Ministero delle Politiche Agricole Alimentari e Forestali) is acknowledged for financial support (Progetto Extravalore, PNR 2005–2007).

References (45)

  • H. Atia et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2008)
  • S.-H. Chai et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2009)
  • F. Wang et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2009)
  • C.-J. Jia et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2010)
  • F. Wang et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2010)
  • A. Corma et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2008)
  • E. Tsukuda et al.

    Catal. Commun.

    (2007)
  • L. Ning et al.

    Chin. J. Catal.

    (2008)
  • Y.T. Kim et al.

    Microp. Mesop. Mater.

    (2010)
  • L. Giebeler et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A

    (2006)
  • X. Li et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2005)
  • C. Breitkopf et al.

    Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.

    (2007)
  • M. Signoretto et al.

    Microp. Mesop. Mater.

    (2005)
  • C.A. Emeis

    J. Catal.

    (1993)
  • J. Deleplanque et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2010)
  • R. Srinivasan et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1995)
  • B.S. Klose-Schubert et al.

    Top. Catal.

    (2011)
  • M.V. Luzgin et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2004)
  • R.A. Nyquist et al.

    Infrared Spectra of Inorganic Compounds

    (1971)
  • A.C. Ferrari et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2000)
  • E. Tuinstra et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (1970)
  • A. Alhanash et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2010)
  • Cited by (44)

    • Mesoporous silica supported phosphotungstic acid catalyst for glycerol dehydration to acrolein

      2021, Catalysis Today
      Citation Excerpt :

      Hydroxyacetone is the main by-product with a yield lower than 10 %. The carbon balance was hard to calculate due to the unanalyzable heavy compounds produced and deposited on the catalyst or reactor [31,32]. Because glycerol conversion is 100 % in all cases, the acrolein yield equals to the selectivity, the highest selectivity to acrolein is obtained on HPW/MSU-x catalyst.

    • Palladium-doped sulfated zirconia: Deactivation behavior in isomerization of n-hexane

      2020, Fuel
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, there is no common acceptable conclusion about the details of the reduction reaction. Cavani et al. [16] concluded that the self-reduction of sulfates into sulfurous groups should be the main reason for the reduction, while Wang et al. [13] hold the opinion that a process of n-hexane oxidative dehydrogenation results the reduction. In the oxidative dehydrogenation process, one oxygen atom from sulfate and two hydrogen atoms from n-hexane produced one water, forming hexane and one sulfite.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text