Elsevier

Bioresource Technology

Volume 257, June 2018, Pages 311-319
Bioresource Technology

Review
Recent developments in biohythane production from household food wastes: A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.02.092Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Biohythane is a gaseous blend constituted by methane and 10–30% v/v hydrogen.

  • Biohythane has better combustion performances and lower emissions than other fuels.

  • Dark fermentation and second stage of AD allow hydrogen and methane production.

  • Biohythane from food wastes has been deeply discussed during this review work.

  • The major potential of biohythane application in automotive sector have been reported.

Abstract

Biohythane is a hydrogen-methane blend with hydrogen concentration between 10 and 30% v/v. It can be produced from different organic substrates by two sequential anaerobic stages: a dark fermentation step followed by a second an anaerobic digestion step, for hydrogen and methane production, respectively. The advantages of this blend compared to either hydrogen or methane, as separate biofuels, are first presented in this work. The two-stage anaerobic process and the main operative parameters are then discussed. Attention is focused on the production of biohythane from household food wastes, one of the most abundant organic substrate available for anaerobic digestion: the main milestones and the future trends are exposed. In particular, the possibility to co-digest food wastes and sewage sludge to improve the process yield is discussed. Finally, the paper illustrates the developments of biohythane application in the automotive sector as well as its reduced environmental burden.

Introduction

Hydrogen and methane are widely used in chemical and process industries (Ellaban et al., 2014) because of their high calorific value of 143 kJ/g and 55 kJ/g for hydrogen and methane, respectively (Roy and Das, 2016, Sharma and Ghoshal, 2015). Hydrogen is recognised as a clean energetic fuel since it does not release CO2 in the atmosphere during combustion (Roy and Das, 2016). Unlike other fuels, methane and hydrogen combustion does not release any NOx (nitrous oxide) and SOx (sulphur dioxide), the major contributors to air pollution (Gaffney and Marley, 2009). Methane combustion, on the other hand, still generates the greenhouse gas CO2.

The term hythane has been coined in the early 90s by the Hydrogen Component Inc. (HCI), a company which was conducting several studies concerning the feasibility of the use of a blend of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) and hydrogen as a fuel for internal combustion engines. They showed that the lean burn of mixture of hydrogen (7% by energy or 20% by volume) and CNG can reduce the emission of pollutants (mainly NOx) into the atmosphere, while maintaining the energy efficiency of CNG (Mishra et al., 2017). The use of this mixture does not require storage system neither particular changes both in the CNG engines and infrastructures. As a result HCI patented this mixture and the commercial name of this fuel was Hythane®.

Hythane displays remarkable advantages over CNG: it is a better vehicular fuel thanks to the presence of hydrogen, which improves the performance as far as the flammability range is concerned: hydrogen, in fact, it is characterized by a flame speed which is 8-fold that of methane (Moreno et al., 2012). Hydrogen stimulates methane combustion in the engine and, being an excellent reducing agent, contributes to a better catalysis also at lower exhaust temperatures, (Roy and Das, 2016). From the environmental point of view, hythane has the great advantage to reduce the greenhouse emissions into atmosphere because of the hydrogen presence which reduces the carbon content of this gaseous blend. To accentuate the environmental friendly nature of hythane, the investigation of renewable sources for hydrogen and methane production has been encouraged in the last decade. In fact, hythane is currently produced in intensive way from no sustainable processes: for example hydrogen can be obtained as main gaseous output from syngas production and methane reforming (Liu et al., 2018). The term “biohythane” has started to be used to indicate hythane produced from organic substrates, such as food wastes and agriculture residues (Mishra et al., 2017, Liu et al., 2018) by Anaerobic Digestion (AD) technology conducted in two separated phase. In this way, the production of biohythane, in comparison of the methane production by AD in a single stage, allows the reduction of the overall required fermentation time and, consequently, of the working volume of the reactors (Si et al., 2016). In addition, the attractiveness of producing hythane through a two-stage AD process, rather than the production of hydrogen alone, stems from the fact that the latter is not economically sustainable due to the low production rates and yields of dark fermentation (Valdez-Vazquez and Poggi-Varaldo, 2009, Abreu et al., 2016). Theoretically, a hydrogen yield of 4 mol/mol glucose can be achieved through dark fermentation. However, the hydrogen yield is seldom above 2 mol/mol glucose due to the limited metabolic fluxes and the generation of higher fatty acids (such as propionate and butyrate) and alcohols (Zhang et al., 2011), which means that only about 7.5–15% of the energy contained in organic wastes is converted to H2 (Si et al., 2016a, Mamimin et al., 2017, Luo et al., 2017).

Biohythane production advantages are well described by Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) models, which emphasise that single and two-stage AD processes allow for the reduction of the wastes led to landfills and the release of greenhouse gases (methane, carbon dioxide) to the atmosphere. AD, in fact, leads to a reduction of CO2 eq emissions by 90%, compared to the scenario where organic substrates are released in urban landfill or simply disposed on soil (Franchetti, 2013). This is attributed to the fact that, when the biogas is burned to produce electricity, all the CH4 is converted to CO2. On the contrary, with conventional uncontrolled disposal systems, the methane from wastes degradation, is all emitted unaltered into the atmosphere, increasing significantly the equivalent CO2 emissions, as methane is >20-fold effective as a greenhouse gas than CO2.

Recent LCA researches on biohythane production demonstrates that a two-stage AD process, such as that used for the production of hythane, produces a methane amount similar to the single-stage configuration. However, the simultaneous production of hydrogen, which is a carbon free fuel, allows to reduce by an additional 10% the overall CO2 equivalent emissions of the process (Franchetti, 2013). Lastly, the solid-liquid output from biohythane production is represented by digestate, which is more stable because of the lower amount of acid, nitrogen and carbon content, since the major part of the organic matter used for the AD has been already converted into biogas. In this way, apart from global warming potential (GWP), additional important LCA parameters show a better performance than single-stage AD. For example, Acidification and Eutrophication, which measure respectively the soil and air acidification, which leads to acid rain and a vegetation growth reduction (Ecoinvent database 2013) , as well as a negative accumulation of nutrients (mainly N and P compounds) in the environment (Stranddorf et al., 2005).

Section snippets

Main aspects of the biohythane production process

Anaerobic Digestion for the production of biogas, can be conducted in a single reactor (single-stage AD), or in two separate tanks (two-stage AD). Biohythane production may be carried out readily by a two-stage Anaerobic Digestion process. Over 17,000 CE full scale plants are present in Europe: 10,000 of which only in Germany, for a total generation of about 8,293 MWel (European Biogas Report, 2015). However, it is estimated that <1% of these plants are represented by full scale two-stage AD

Biohythane from household food waste

In the last decade, the increasing interest in the good performances of biohythane has attracted the attention on this technology with a consequent increase of laboratory and pilot-scale experiences. In particular, two types of wastes have been chosen by scientific community for the experimentation: food wastes and sewage sludge. The reason is due to their large worldwide availability: it has been estimated that the 72% of the single stage AD plants treating waste, actually treat food wastes,

Recent and innovative strategies for biohythane production

With the increasing interest in biohythane, innovative techniques to improve the overall yield of the two-stage AD have been investigated. As previously commented, the hydrogen molar yield is lower than the theoretical one. An alternative which is receiving great interest by the scientific community is represented by the combination of dark fermentation with a photo fermentation process. Contrary to dark fermentation, where hydrogen production occurs under anoxic or anaerobic conditions, during

Applications of biohythane

As previously described, hydrogen in combination with methane from clean organic biomasses, has several environmental benefits contributing to reduced CO2 equivalent and NOx emissions to the atmosphere, being a carbon free fuel. In addition, hydrogen is able to improve the performance of internal combustion engines, usually fed by methane from fossil sources, to reduce the methane number, which is expressed as the percentage of methane in the biohythane and is related to the knock resistance.

Conclusions

Biohythane is a gaseous blend, composed of 10–30% v/v hydrogen and 70–90% v/v methane generated by two-stage AD. Good performances have been achieved with HFW-sewage sludge codigestion. Biohythane is currently used to replace methane in the automotive sector, because hydrogen presence improves the combustion yield and reduces the CO2 equivalent and NOx emissions in the atmosphere. Anyway, to favour the adoption of cars and buses biohythane fuelled, bigger investments in the optimization of the

References (92)

  • C. Cavinato et al.

    Optimization of two-phase thermophilic anaerobic digestion of biowaste for hydrogen and methane production through reject water recirculation

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2011)
  • C.Y. Chen et al.

    Engineering strategies for the enhanced photo-H2 production using effluents of dark fermentation processes as substrate

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2010)
  • J. Cheng et al.

    Fermentative biohydrogen and biomethane co-production from mixture of food waste and sewage sludge: effects of physiochemical properties and mix ratios on fermentation performance

    Appl. Energy

    (2016)
  • S.S. Cheng et al.

    Process recovery of bio- hydrogenation in a pilot plant from methanogens invasion

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy.

    (2011)
  • S.L.H. Chiu et al.

    Identifying key process parameters for uncertainty propagation in environmental life cycle assessment for sewage sludge and food waste treatment

    J. Cleaner Prod.

    (2018)
  • C.F. Chu et al.

    A pH and temperature-phased two-stage process for hydrogen and methane production from food waste

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energ.

    (2008)
  • O. Ellabban et al.

    Renewable energy resources: current status, future prospects and their enabling technology

    Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.

    (2014)
  • V. Facchin et al.

    Effect of trace element supplementation on the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of foodwaste in batch trials: The influence of inoculum origin

    Biochem. Eng. J.

    (2013)
  • K.S. Fan et al.

    Effect of hydraulic retention time on anaerobic hydrogenesis in CSTR

    Bioresource. tech.

    (2006)
  • M. Franchetti

    Economic and environmental analysis of four different configurations of anaerobic digestion for food waste to energy conversion using LCA for: A food service provider case study

    J. Environ. Manage.

    (2013)
  • J.S. Gaffney et al.

    The impacts of combustion emissions on air quality and climate–from coal to biofuels and beyond

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2009)
  • X. Ge et al.

    Biological conversion of methane to liquid fuels: Status and opportunities

    Biotechnol. Adv.

    (2014)
  • M. Goberna et al.

    Prokaryotic communities and potential pathogens in sewage sludge: response to wastewaster origin, loading rate and treatment technology

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2018)
  • M. Gottardo et al.

    Pilot scale fermentation coupled with anaerobic digestion of food waste - Effect of dynamic digestate recirculation

    Renewable Energy

    (2017)
  • H.M. Jang et al.

    Effect of increased load of high-strength food wastewater in thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge on bacterial community structure

    Water Res.

    (2016)
  • Y. Jin et al.

    Influence of thermal pretreatment on physical and chemical properties of kitchen waste and the efficiency of anaerobic digestion

    J. Environ. Manag.

    (2016)
  • D. Karadag et al.

    Enhancement of anaerobic hydrogen production by iron and nickel

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energ.

    (2010)
  • P. Khongkliang et al.

    Hydrogen and methane production from starch processing wastewater by thermophilic two-stage anaerobic digestion

    Energy Procedia

    (2015)
  • D.H. Kim et al.

    Sewage sludge addition to food waste synergistically enhances hydrogen fermentation performance

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2011)
  • T. Kobayashi et al.

    Effect of sludge recirculation on characteristics of hydrogen production in a two-stage hydrogen-methane fermentation process treating food wastes

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy.

    (2012)
  • J.J. Lay et al.

    Influence of chemical nature of organic wastes on their conversion to hydrogen by heat-shock digested sludge

    Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy.

    (2003)
  • Z. Liu et al.

    Bioprocess engineering for biohythane production from low-grade waste biomass: technical challenges towards scale up

    Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.

    (2018)
  • S. Luo et al.

    Effective control of biohythane composition through operational strategies in an innovative microbial electrolysis cell

    Appl. Energy

    (2017)
  • C. Mamimin et al.

    Effects of volatile fatty acids in biohydrogen effluent on Biohythane production from palm oil mill effluent under thermophilic condition

    Electron. J. Biotechnol.

    (2017)
  • A.E. Maragkaki et al.

    Improving biogas production fromanaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge with a thermal dried mixture of foodwaste, cheese whey and olive mill wastewater

    Waste Manage.

    (2018)
  • F. Micolucci et al.

    Automatic process control for stable bio-hythane production in two-phase thermophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energ.

    (2014)
  • F. Micolucci et al.

    Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of the liquid fraction of pressed biowaste for high energy yields recovery

    Waste Manage. (Oxford)

    (2016)
  • F. Micolucci et al.

    Pilot scale comparison of single and double-stage thermophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste

    J. Cleaner Prod.

    (2018)
  • P. Mishra et al.

    Improvement in biohythane production using organic solid waste and distillery effluent

    Waste Manage. (Oxford)

    (2017)
  • F. Moreno et al.

    Efficiency and emissions in a vehicular spark ignition engine fuelled with hydrogen and methane blends

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2012)
  • J.D. Murphy et al.

    What will fuel transport systems of the future?

    Mater. Today

    (2011)
  • I.A. Nges et al.

    Effects of solid retention time on anaerobic digestion of dewatered-sewage sludge in mesophilic and thermophilic conditions

    Renew. Energy

    (2010)
  • D. Nguyen et al.

    Automatic process control in anaerobic digestion technology: a critical review

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2015)
  • S.K.S. Patel et al.

    Biological methanol production by immobilized Methylocella tundrae using simulated biohythane as feed

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2017)
  • S.K.S. Patel et al.

    Improvement in methanol production by regulating the composition of synthetic gas mixture and raw biogas

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2016)
  • Q. Liu et al.

    Multiple syntrophic interactions drive biohythane production from waste sludge in microbial electrolysis cells

    Biotechnol. Biofuels

    (2016)
  • Cited by (123)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text