Elsevier

Environmental Pollution

Volume 196, January 2015, Pages 185-193
Environmental Pollution

Influence of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin bioconcentration and toxicity in the marine fish European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.09.020Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Nano-TiO2 did not interfere with 2,3,7,8-TCDD detoxification and bioconcentration in liver.

  • Nano-TiO2 affected immune response towards 2,3,7,8-TCDD exposure in spleen.

  • Co-exposure caused a reduction of DNA strand breaks respect to single chemicals exposure.

  • Nano-TiO2 alone and combined with 2,3,7,8-TCDD increased MN frequencies in erythrocytes.

Abstract

The present study investigated the influence of nano-TiO2 (1 mg L−1) on 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) (46 pg L−1) bioconcentration and toxicity in the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) during 7 days in vivo exposure. A multimarkers approach was applied in different organs: detoxification in liver; innate immunity and pro-inflammatory response and adaptive immunity in gills and spleen; genotoxicity in peripheral erythrocytes and muscle. Bioconcentration of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in presence of nano-TiO2 was investigated in liver, skin and muscle as well as interaction between nano-TiO2 and organic pollutants in artificial sea water (ASW). Nano-TiO2 negatively influenced immune response induced by 2,3,7,8-TCDD in spleen but not in gills and reduced the DNA damage induced by 2,3,7,8-TCDD in erythrocytes. nano-TiO2 did not interfere with 2,3,7,8-TCDD detoxification and bioconcentration according to the observed no interaction of the nano-TiO2 with organic pollutants in ASW.

Introduction

Titanium dioxide (nano-TiO2) is one the most widespread NP used in consumer and personal care products, as well as in many industrial sectors (Robichaud et al., 2009). It is also employed for environmental applications (i.e. nanoremediation) as efficient catalyst and adsorbent of organic contaminants and heavy metals (Karn et al., 2009). Nano-TiO2 is thus released in huge amount in urban and industrial sewage and it is expected to occur in the aquatic environment at concentration of μg L−1 (PEC in water 0.7–16 ug L−1) (Batley et al., 2013). A significant input of nano-TiO2 from sunscreen products in natural surface waters has been recently reported (Gondikasam et al., 2014). From its release into soil and waterways as well as for direct use on maritime technologies, nano-TiO2 will end up in the sea, which might represents the ultimate sink such to represent an actual risk for marine organisms (Moore, 2006, Delay and Frimmel, 2012, Matranga and Corsi, 2012, Holden et al., 2013). Being listed as possible carcinogen for humans (B2, IARC, 2006), toxicological effects and ecological damage for many marine organisms cannot be excluded and need to be deeply investigated. In freshwater species, immunotoxicity, cytotoxicity and oxidative stress as well as physiological and reproductive alterations, have been well documented (Jovanovic et al., 2011, Jovanovic and Palic, 2012, Menard et al., 2011, Diniz et al., 2013, Hartmann et al., 2013, Ramdsen et al., 2013). Same effects have been already reported in invertebrate marine species (Galloway et al., 2010, Canesi et al., 2012, Barmo et al., 2013, D'Agata et al., 2014, Minetto et al., 2014). As for marine fish nano-TiO2 has shown to induce sub-lethal adverse effects on the early life stages of the brackish species Oryzias latipes as premature hatching, pericardial edema and abnormal development (Paterson et al., 2011) while the effects on adults are largely unknown. Two in vitro studies on marine mammals clearly showed that nano-TiO2 cause genotoxicity in bottle-nose dolphin leukocytes (Bernardeschi et al., 2010) and fibroblasts (Frenzilli et al., 2014). Besides toxicity caused by its inherent properties, nano-TiO2 might also interact with other co-existing environmental pollutants -as metals and organic xenobiotics-thus modifying their availability, bioaccumulation and toxicity. Such effect is reported for freshwater species where adsorption on nano-TiO2 enhances uptake and retention of Cd2+ in carp and Daphnia (Zhang et al., 2007; Hartmann et al., 2010, Hartmann et al., 2012, Hu et al., 2011, Yang et al., 2012), while bioavailability and metabolism of an organic contaminant as BDE209 is enhanced by nano-TiO2 in zebrafish larvae (Wang et al., 2014). The interaction of nano-TiO2 with organic pollutants has been also reported in sea water. Enhanced toxicity of TBT was reported in the presence of nano-TiO2 in marine abalone embryos (Zhu et al., 2011). In our previous study (Canesi et al., 2014) using the marine mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis as model species, complex interactions between nano-TiO2 with 2,3,7,8-tetracholorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) were reported on a wide range of molecular and physiological biomarkers measured in hemolymph, gills and digestive gland. The co-exposure with nano-TiO2 increased accumulation of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in whole soft tissue of mussels. Both synergistic and antagonistic sub-lethal effects were observed depending on cell/tissue type and measured biomarker. A similar study with marine clam Scapharca subcrenata showed an enhanced uptake and accumulation of Phenanthrene (PhE) in the presence of nano-TiO2 based on an high adsorption capability of nano-TiO2 in sea water (Tian et al., 2014). So far any studies have evaluated this phenomenon in fish species that possess completely different mechanisms of uptake/detoxification/toxicity compared to bivalves.

Therefore presence of nano-TiO2 in marine waters and its potential interaction with organic pollutants highlight the susceptibility of marine organisms and the need of more studies on interactive effects of nano-TiO2 with existing toxic contaminants in marine waters with particular focus on piscine models.

Amon organic pollutants 2,3,7,8-TCDD is one of the most potent carcinogenic chemical, able to elicit a wide spectrum of biological effects following specific cellular pathways (Mandal, 2005, White and Birnbaum, 2009). 2,3,7,8-TCDD and other organochlorines are usually detected in marine organisms (up to pg g−1 in fish for 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Greco et al., 2010, Nunes et al., 2011) and biomagnify through trophic webs (Corsolini et al., 2002).

In the present study we investigated the influence of nano-TiO2 on 2,3,7,8-TCDD bioconcentration and sub-lethal toxicity (detoxification, immunotoxicity, genotoxicity) in the marine fish European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax during 7 days in vivo exposure.

A multimarkers approach was applied in different organs: detoxification (CYP1A gene and EROD activity) in liver; innate immunity and pro-inflammatory response (IL-1β, IL-8, TNF-α and Cox-2) and adaptive immunity (IgM, and TRβ) in gills and spleen; DNA primary damage and micronuclei occurrence in peripheral erythrocytes; genomic stability in muscle. Bioconcentration of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in presence of nano-TiO2 was also investigated in skin, muscle and liver tissues as well as interaction in artificial sea water (ASW) between nano-TiO2 and organic pollutants.

Section snippets

Materials

The nanosized Titanium Dioxide (nano-TiO2), namely Aeroxide® (declared purity: 99.9%), was kindly supplied by Eigenmann & Veronelli (Milan, Italy). The provided batch was characterized by a combination of analytical techniques (HR-TEM, TEM-EDX, XRD, HR-TEM-SAED, BET, ICP-MS, etc.) as previously described (Barmo et al., 2013). Stock suspension of 1 mg mL−1 nano-TiO2 was prepared by dispersing the NPs in filtered (0.22 μm) artificial sea water (ASW), prepared according to ASTM protocol (2004) at

Nano-TiO2 characterization and interaction with 2,3,7,8-TCDD in ASW

TEM images of Aeroxide® nano-TiO2 P25 showed size distribution ranging approx. from 10 to 65 nm, 27 nm average (90% of the particles from 15 to 47 nm, Fig. S1), with shape partly irregular and semi-spherical (Fig. S2). According to the manufacturer, the main crystallographic phases obtained by XRD were anatase (86.5%) and rutile (13.5%), with 21 nm crystallite size. BET analysis showed a specific surface area of 54 ± 0.2 m2 g−1, with a pore size of 0.2 mL g−1. Investigation regarding inorganic

Conclusions

Results highlighted for the first time the influence of nano-TiO2 on 2,3,7,8-TCDD pathway in fish showing mostly antagonistic effects in selected organs (muscle, spleen and gills). We demonstrate that nano-TiO2 could affect immune response towards 2,3,7,8-TCDD in spleen but not interfere with detoxification and bioconcentration in liver and other organs. The observed absence of physico–chemical interaction between nano-TiO2 and 2,3,7,8-TCDD in ASW might suggest that the antagonism might occur

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Italian Ministry of Research (PRIN2009FHHP2W) Marine ecotoxicology of nanomaterials: toxicity and bioaccumulation of nano titaniun dioxide in edible species in the presence of metals and dioxin.

The high resolution GC–MS analyses of TCDD were carried out at the RECETOX research infrastructure (supported by the project of the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic LM2011028and the CETOCOEN project of the European Structural FundsCZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.001). We thank

References (70)

  • M. Faria et al.

    Oxidative stress effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticle aggregates in zebrafish embryos

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2014)
  • G. Federici et al.

    Toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): gill injury, oxidative stress, and other physiological effects

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2007)
  • G. Frenzilli et al.

    DNA damage in eelpout (Zoarces viviparus)from Göteborg harbor

    Mutat. Res.

    (2004)
  • G. Frenzilli et al.

    Cellular responses in the cyprinid Leuciscus cephalus from a contaminated freshwater ecosystem

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2008)
  • G. Frenzilli et al.

    The Comet assay for the evaluation of genotoxic impact in aquatic environments

    Mutat. Res.

    (2009)
  • T. Galloway et al.

    Sublethal toxicity of nano-titanium dioxide and carbon nanotubes in a sediment dwelling marine polychaete

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2010)
  • N.B. Hartmann et al.

    Algal testing of titanium dioxide nanoparticles-testing considerations, inhibitory effects and modification of cadmium bioavailability

    Toxicology

    (2010)
  • N.B. Hartmann et al.

    The potential of TiO2 nanoparticles as carriers for cadmium uptake in Lumbricus variegatus and Daphnia magna

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2012)
  • X. Hu et al.

    Combined effects of titanium dioxide and humic acid on the bioaccumulation of cadmium in zebrafish

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2011)
  • B. Jovanovic et al.

    Immunotoxicology of non-functionalized engineered nanoparticles in aquatic organisms with special emphasis on fish – review of current knowledge, gap identification and call for further research

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2012)
  • B. Jovanovic et al.

    Effects of nanosized titanium dioxide on innate immune system of fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas Rafinesque, 1820)

    Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.

    (2011)
  • B. Kais et al.

    DMSO modifies the permeability of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) chorion – Implications for the fish embryo test (FET)

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2013)
  • R. Klaper et al.

    Functionalization impacts the effects of carbon nanotubes on the immune system of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2010)
  • H.K. Lindberg et al.

    Genotoxicity of inhaled nanosized TiO(2) in mice

    Mutat. Res.

    (2012)
  • V. Matranga et al.

    Toxic effects of engineered nanoparticles in the marineenvironment: model organisms and molecular approaches

    Mar. Environ. Res.

    (2012)
  • A. Menard et al.

    Ecotoxicity of nanosized TiO2. Review of in vivo data

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2011)
  • D. Minetto et al.

    Ecotoxicity of engineered TiO2 nanoparticles to saltwater organisms: an overview

    Environ. Int.

    (2014)
  • M.N. Moore

    Do nanoparticles present ecotoxicological risks for the health of the aquatic environment?

    Environ. Int.

    (2006)
  • M. Naya et al.

    In vivo genotoxicity study of titanium dioxide nanoparticles using comet assay following intratracheal instillation in rats

    Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.

    (2012)
  • M. Nunes et al.

    PCDD/Fs and dioxin-like PCBs in sediments and biota from the Mondego estuary (Portugal)

    Chemosphere

    (2011)
  • J.B. Ortiz-Delgado et al.

    Tissue-specific induction of EROD activity and CYP1A protein in Sparus aurata exposed to B(a)P and TCDD

    Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.

    (2008)
  • G. Paterson et al.

    The toxicity of titanium dioxide nanopowder to early life stages of the Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes)

    Chemosphere

    (2011)
  • J.F. Reeves et al.

    Hydroxyl radicals (•OH) are associated with titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticle-induced cytotoxicity and oxidative DNA damage in fish cells

    Mutat. Res.

    (2008)
  • S. Tian et al.

    Titanium dioxide nanoparticles as carrier facilitate bioaccumulation of phenanthrene in marine bivalve, ark shell (Scapharca subcrenata)

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2014)
  • R. van der Oost et al.

    Fish bioaccumulation and biomarkers in environmental risk assessment: a review

    Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol.

    (2003)
  • Cited by (66)

    • Nanotechnology for aquaculture and fisheries

      2023, Nano-enabled Sustainable and Precision Agriculture
    • Effects of 17α-Ethinylestradiol (EE2) exposure during early life development on the gonadotropic axis ontogenesis of the European sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax

      2022, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology -Part A : Molecular and Integrative Physiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since the 1970's, in order to develop farming, the species has been largely studied (Barnabé and Billard, 1984; Sánchez Vázquez and Muñoz-Cueto, 2014). In addition, the European sea bass has been used in several ecotoxicological and toxicological studies (Conti et al., 2015; Della Torre et al., 2015; López et al., 2015; Tornambè et al., 2018; Mhadhbi et al., 2020; Soloperto et al., 2021). Nevertheless, since 2010 a continuous decline of the north Atlantic fish stock is measured (ICES, 2018) conducing the European council to adopt fishing regulations (EU Regulation 2015/523; 2016/72; 2017/127; 2018/1308; 2019/124).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text