Elsevier

Journal of CO2 Utilization

Volume 12, December 2015, Pages 86-94
Journal of CO2 Utilization

CO2 photoreduction with water: Catalyst and process investigation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2015.06.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Evaluation of photocatalytic activity in CO2 reduction with H2O in CH4 production.

  • Optimization of a synthesis route of N-doped titania photocatalysts with both CuO as co-catalyst.

  • Study of the influence of the amount of metal dopants on photoactivity and selectivity.

  • The co-presence of Cu and N in the TiO2 systems enhance the methane production.

  • The best catalytic performances have been obtained with a small copper amount (0.2 wt.%).

Abstract

Economic development should not be separated from the concept of sustainability. The goal can be pursued by means of technologically advanced materials and processes that enable environmental protection. Carbon dioxide photoreduction using water as reducing agent could be a green and effective way to pursue this aim and titania is a good photocatalyst for this reaction. In this work the performances of N doped CuO–TiO2 photocatalysts in gas phase CO2 reduction have been studied. We have focused the attention on both the catalysts design and the process optimization. We have investigated, in particular, the effect of the presence of nitrogen and copper amount on the final catalysts performances. In order to learn high control of the catalytic process and to manage productivity and selectivity, by operating in very mild reaction conditions, the last part of the work has been centered on tuning the process parameters (CO2/H2O ratio). It has been observed that the CH4 formation is sensitive to copper amount and that exists a close correlation between the catalytic behavior and the reagents ratio.

Introduction

It is well known that climate has rapidly changed in the last decades in terms of average temperatures and severity of weather phenomena [1], [2]. Though climate variability is common and natural in geological history, nowadays it definitely has an anthropogenic boost [3]. The main driving force in climate change is the increasing concentration of greenhouse gases (GHGs) [4]. Among them, carbon dioxide emissions are the most abundant [5]: the International Environmental Agency (IEA) stated that in 2012 CO2 emissions reached 31.6 Gt [6]. Since the beginning of the industrial era, average CO2 concentration in atmosphere increased from 270 ppm to 400 ppm in May 2013 [7]. This trends are dependent on fossil fuels utilization and our economic system strongly relies on carbon-based energy technologies [8]. Therefore the two most challenging issues of the 21st century, that are CO2 increasing emissions and fossil fuels depletion, are strictly connected one to another. So it is extremely important to transform this pollutant into products whose market have worldwide dimensions, i.e. fuels [9]. The inspiration for this approach comes from nature: [10] planet Earth balanced its atmosphere composition by itself for thousands, if not millions of years by means of photosynthesis. With this natural process, plants transform water and carbon dioxide into the high energy molecules they need for living. A similar approach is believed to be a winning solution to the environmental problem. In literature, many works focus on the so-called “artificial photosynthesis” [11], [12]. The similarity is that in both cases light is the primary energy source and high energy products are formed; on the other hand, typical artificial systems are completely different from natural ones [11]. Common products are gaseous and liquid fuels, as reported in Eq. (1).x CO2 + y H2O +   solar fuels + z O2 (1)

They can be readily used in stationary and mobile applications, since they are equivalent to the fossil ones. Differently from traditional fuels, carbon dioxide from solar hydrocarbons combustion can be recycled, closing carbon circle by means of a non-biological process [11]. Moreover, solar fuels distribution is compatible with already present infrastructures for fossil hydrocarbons [13], [14]. For all these reasons, photocatalysis appears to be an attractive technology to pursue carbon dioxide photoreduction [15], [16], [17]. In this work the attention has been addressed to photoreduction of carbon dioxide using water as reducing agent [18], [19], [20], [21] (Eq. (2)).CO2 + 2 H2O  CH4 + 2 O2 ΔH° = +802 kJ/mol (2)

As a catalyst, titania has been chosen. This material is nontoxic and inexpensive, and it has good photocatalytic properties [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. It has been already applied to several environmental and energetic applications, like water splitting [28], VOC [29], [30] and NOx abatement [31], [32], [33]. Inoue et al. [34] first reported that titania is able to catalyse CO2 photoreduction with water. In fact, when irradiated, a charge separation is generated and the electron-hole pair is formed [35]: in the valence band, oxygen from water is oxidized to molecular oxygen while the excited electron reduces carbon from CO2 releasing oxygen as well [36], [37]. Then protons and reduced carbon react together generating the desired product [38].

Other stable compounds (such as CO, formic acid, formaldehyde and methanol) might be produced in this process but reaction pathway and process selectivity are highly dependent on light absorption, creation of charge carriers and their use in the process [39], [40].

Unfortunately, the relatively fast recombination rate of photoinduced electron-hole pairs and a low quantum yield for oxygen production as a result of the UV photons absorption restrict the potential photo-application of TiO2. To overcome these drawbacks, many efforts have been carried out including deposition of noble metals, dye sensitization, metal cation doping, carbon and nitrogen doping [24] and morphology and structure control [41]. Positive effects on titania photoactivity can be pursued by doping with non-metal elements like boron [42], carbon [43], nitrogen [44], fluorine [45] and iodine [46]. These dopants can either substitute oxygen in titanium dioxide lattice or occupy interstitial sites [47]. In both cases, a red shift in titania light adsorption is observed due to a decrease in band gap energy. Among non-metal dopants, nitrogen is one of the most investigated [48]. The incorporation of this element in titanium dioxide lattice causes several electronic modifications that are responsible for enhanced photoactivity: in particular, doping introduces intra band gap electronic states that cause a decrease in required energy for photoexcitation [49]. In addition to that, doping with several noble metals were tested like platinum [50], silver [51] and gold [52], [53] that stabilize the separation of photoexcited charge carriers. Generally, metal loading is very low, usually less than 1 wt.% [54]: high metal fractions are detrimental to titanium dioxide photoactivity [55]. Greater attention has been put on less precious transition metals as Fe and Cu. The incorporation of transition metal ions (e.g., Cu2+, Cu+, Fe3+, etc.) can lead to the formation of electron trapping sites and promote charge transfer from TiO2 to metal ions, thus resulting in the enhanced photoreaction of surface adsorbed species. Among the transition metal ions, Cu is an appealing dopant due to low cost, availability and enhancement of photoactivity, especially in CO2 photoreduction. The formation of pn junction between Cu and TiO2 is considered as the major reason for the improvement [56], [57]. For heterojunctions with mixed semiconductors, the difference between band edges is the major driving force to improve the charge transfer and subsequently the photocatalytic performance. There have been some studies carried out on the Cu2O/TiO2 systems, which have confirmed that this system could enhance the charge separation efficiency and lead to a high photocatalytic activity. Lalitha et al. reported that Cu2O/TiO2 nanocomposites with size about 20–40 nm exhibited higher activity than pure TiO2 in the H2 evolution [58]; Chu et al. synthesized a Cu2O/TiO2 catalyst that showed an excellent photocatalytic activity in 4-nitrophenol degradation [59]. Xu et al. [60] suggested that the Cu (identified as Cu+) species deposited on TiO2, forming Ti–O–Cu surface bonds, served as acceptors of electrons that were transferred from the TiO2 conduction band. Doping with Au or Ag nanoparticles or clusters the sensitivity of the photocatalyst to the visible spectrum can also extend due to their localized surface plasmonic resonance properties [61]. Nevertheless, Cu-loaded TiO2 catalyst compared to Ag–TiO2 photocatalysts show higher photoactivity since Cu particles act as electron trapping sites while still maintaining the mobility of photoelectrons [62]. Catalytic reduction of CO2 with H2O in the gaseous phase is further investigated by using Cu–Fe/TiO2 catalyst coated on optical fibres [63]. The synergistic presence of Fe as a co-dopant in Cu/TiO2 catalyst is has been evidenced in reduction of CO2 with H2O to ethylene at the quantum yield and total energy efficiency of 0.024% and 0.016%, respectively. While metal ion modifications of TiO2 lead to enhancements in charge separation, their effects in altering the optical properties of TiO2 are limited. In order to overcome this limit, co-doped titania photocatalysts have been studied [64]: in this way electron-hole lifetime is lengthened and visible light adsorption is shifted toward visible light. The used metals are usually noble ones (platinum, gold and silver [65]) while nitrogen is preferred among the non-metallic promoters [66]. So it would be a definite breakthrough to couple a non metal dopant like nitrogen to a less noble metal, like copper.

Catalyst tailoring aside, reaction design conditions must be carefully considered. Fluidized bed reactor is the most common photoreactor [67]. It is employed for batch processes in two-phase heterogeneous systems and generally the catalyst is suspended in an aqueous medium. For this reason the main drawback is CO2’s poor solubility in water [68]. Otherwise, many studies employ photoelectrochemical (PEC) reactors for gas phase reduction but an external electrical energy must be supplied [67]. Moreover, water adsorption on titania is generally more likely to happen compared to CO2 [69], though both have to interact on the catalytic surface for CO2 photoreduction to take place. In fact, on titania surface, water splitting reaction might also occur [70]. Other limits of this system are the low surface area and the complicated separation process required to isolate the catalyst grains. To overcome these drawbacks a valid alternative could be the use of a fixed bed reactor using gaseous reactants. In literature only few examples of gaseous CO2 photoreduction are reported and the reaction is carried out by using hard conditions in order to implement the final productivity. As a matter of fact, high temperature (up to 100 °C), pressures and irradiance (up to 500 W m−2) are suitable to improve photoactivity [63], [71], [72], though this choice makes the process more expensive and less sustainable. Moreover, the majority of the reported works employs batch processes in liquid phase. The novelty of this work is the use of N doped CuO-TiO2 photocatalysts for CO2 photoreduction in gas phase and under the mildest conditions (i.e. room temperature and atmospheric pressure and low irradiance) in order to overcome all the issues rising from the utilization of liquid phase systems. Therefore, in this work a green, innovative and effective technology for photocatalytic CO2 abatement and transformation into fuels has been reported. Particular interest has been centred on the catalyst design considering the formulation of several N doped CuO–TiO2 photocatalysts. At the best of our knowledge, only a few works focus the attention to co-promoted photocatalysts for CO2 photoreduction; in particular, literature lacks information about N doped CuO–TiO2 photocatalysts for this process in mild conditions, though these materials might be suitable to this purpose. The physico-chemical features of the catalysts and the process parameters (CO2/H2O ratio) will be analyzed and discussed in depth by correlating synthesis, characterizations and reactivity tests.

Section snippets

Catalysts synthesis

The following reagents were used as received: TiOSO4 xH2O yH2SO4 (Ti assay >29%, Sigma–Aldrich), ammonium hydroxide solution (33%, Riedel-de-Haen), sodium hydroxide (assay >97%, Carlo Erba) and Cu(NO3)2 3H2O (assay >99%, Sigma–Aldrich). A standard TiO2 reference material has been purchased by Euro Support s.r.o. It has been chosen to use this commercial sample as a reference since it is a titanium dioxide characterised by a wide surface area (339 m2/g) and anatase as crystalline phase.

All the

Results and discussion

Prior to CO2 photoreduction activity test, a series of preliminary analyses have been conducted in order to verify the quality of our results. Experiments in which the reduction of CO2 with H2O was performed in the dark with photocatalyst or under irradiation in absence of photocatalyst were carried out and the results show that neither CH4 nor CO were detected.

Conclusions

Motivated by the two most challenging issues of our society, namely CO2 pollution and fossil fuels depletion, this work has investigated the N doped Cu-photocatalysts suitable for carbon dioxide photoreduction with water in gas phase in very mild reaction condition. This technology is potentially a winning solution from both the environmental and the energy-efficiency viewpoints.

Through a simple and inexpensive synthetic strategy, the catalytic activity of titania has been improved adding a

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Tania Fantinel (Ca’ Foscari University of Venice) for the excellent technical assistance. The financial support of Regione Veneto (project ”Tecnologie e materiali innovativi per un’edilizia sostenibile in Veneto”) is gratefully acknowledged.

References (97)

  • K. Brysse et al.

    Global Environ. Change

    (2013)
  • G.A. Folberth et al.

    Urban Climate

    (2012)
  • G. Centi et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2009)
  • K. Kalyanasundaram et al.

    Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.

    (2010)
  • C. Graves et al.

    Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.

    (2011)
  • R. De Richter et al.

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. C

    (2011)
  • S. Abanades et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2011)
  • A. Corma et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2013)
  • Y. Izumi

    Coord. Chem. Rev.

    (2013)
  • T. Ohno et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2001)
  • R. Zhang et al.

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2012)
  • S. Hackenberg et al.

    Toxicol. Lett.

    (2010)
  • W.K. Jo et al.

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. A

    (2002)
  • S. Wang et al.

    Environ. Int.

    (2007)
  • M. Signoretto et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2010)
  • V. Trevisan et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2014)
  • S.S. Tan et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2006)
  • G. Liu et al.

    Sol. Energ. Mater. Sol C

    (2012)
  • V. Trevisan et al.

    Microchem. J.

    (2014)
  • Y. Yin et al.

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (2009)
  • M.V. Dozzi et al.

    J. Photochem. Photobiol.

    (2013)
  • J.J. Murcia et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2012)
  • J.A. Anderson

    Catal. Today

    (2012)
  • W.N. Wang et al.

    Aerosol Air Qual. Res.

    (2014)
  • Y. Li et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2010)
  • S. Chu et al.

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (2011)
  • Y.H. Xu et al.

    Mater. Res. Bull.

    (2008)
  • S. Krejcikova et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2012)
  • T. Nguyen et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2008)
  • H. Sun et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2013)
  • X.K. Li et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2012)
  • W. Kim et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2014)
  • X.A. Li et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2014)
  • M. Anpo et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1995)
  • M. Tahir et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2013)
  • M. Tahir et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2015)
  • D. Liu et al.

    Catal. Commun.

    (2012)
  • M. Tahir et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2013)
  • U. Diebold

    Surf. Sci. Rep.

    (2003)
  • Y. Yin et al.

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (2009)
  • M. Ni et al.

    Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.

    (2007)
  • J.C.S. Wu et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2005)
  • S. Ghasemi et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2013)
  • A. Zaleska et al.

    New and Future Developments in Catalysis—Solar Photocatalysis

  • L.S. Yoong et al.

    Energy

    (2009)
  • L. Liu et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2013)
  • J. Yu et al.

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2011)
  • B. Xin et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (42)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text