Elsevier

Journal of Organometallic Chemistry

Volume 751, 1 February 2014, Pages 412-419
Journal of Organometallic Chemistry

Preparation and reactivity of germyl complexes of ruthenium and osmium stabilised by cyclopentadienyl, indenyl and tris(pyrazolyl)borate fragments

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2013.06.028Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Synthesis of half-sandwich trichlorogermyl complexes of ruthenium.

  • Treatment with LiAlH4 or NaBH4 affords trihydridogermyl and triethoxygermyl.

  • Tp complexes of Ru and Os containing GeCl3, GeH3, Ge(OEt)3 were also prepared.

Abstract

Half-sandwich trichlorogermyl complexes Ru(GeCl3)(η5-C5H5)(PPh3)L (1) and Ru(GeCl3)(η5-C9H7)(PPh3)L (2) [L = P(OMe)3 (a), P(OEt)3 (b) and PPh(OEt)2 (c)] were prepared by allowing chloro compounds RuCl(η5-C5H5)(PPh3)L and RuCl(η5-C9H7)(PPh3)L to react with an excess of GeCl2·dioxane in ethanol. Treatment of trichlorogermyl complexes 1 and 2 with LiAlH4 in THF yielded trihydridogermyl derivatives Ru(GeH3)(η5-C5H5)(PPh3)L (3) and Ru(GeH3)(η5-C9H7)(PPh3)L (4). Instead, reaction of trichlorogermyl complexes 1 and 2 with NaBH4 in ethanol afforded triethoxygermyl complexes Ru[Ge(OEt)3](η5-C5H5)(PPh3)L (5) and Ru[Ge(OEt)3](η5-C9H7)(PPh3)L (6). Trichlorogermyl complexes with the tris(pyrazolyl)borate ligand M(GeCl3)(Tp)(PPh3)L [M = Ru (7), Os (10)] were prepared by reacting chloro compounds MCl(Tp)(PPh3)L with an excess of GeCl2·dioxane. Depending on metal centre, nature of phosphite and experimental conditions, the reaction of trichlorogermyl complexes 7 and 10 with LiAlH4 or NaBH4 afforded trihydridogermyl M(GeH3)(Tp)(PPh3)L (8, 12) and triethoxygermyl derivatives M[Ge(OEt)3](Tp)(PPh3)L (9, 11). The complexes were characterised by IR and multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and by X-ray crystal structure determination of 3a.

Graphical abstract

The preparation of trichlorogermyl complexes of ruthenium and osmium, stabilised by cyclopentadienyl, indenyl and tris(pyrazolyl)borate ligands, is described. Their reactions with LiAlH4 and NaBH4, affording trihydridogermyl and triethoxygermyl derivatives, is also reported.

  1. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

The chemistry of transition metal complexes containing trichlorogermyl GeCl3 or triorganogermyl GeR3 as ligands has been extensively studied over several decades [1], [1](a), [1](b), [2], [2](a), [2](b), [2](c), [2](d), [2](e), [2](f), [2](g), [2](h), [2](i), [2](j), [2](k), [2](l), [2](m), [2](n), [2](o), [2](p), [2](q), [2](r), [2](s), [3], [3](a), [3](b), [3](c), [3](d), [3](e), [3](f), [3](g), [3](h), [3](i), [3](j), [3](k), [3](l), [3](m), [3](n), [3](o), [3](p), [3](q), [3](r), both from a fundamental point of view and because these complexes are regarded as intermediates in a number of transition metal-catalysed transformations of group-14 element compounds [4], [4](a), [4](b), [4](c), [4](d), [5], [5](a), [5](b), [5](c), [5](d), [5](e), [5](f). A number of germyl complexes of several metals have thus been prepared, containing both mononuclear GeCl3 and GeR3 and polynuclear [GeR2GeR2GeR2] germyl groups, but relatively few have been reported with trihydridogermyl GeH3 as ligand [6], [6](a), [6](b), [6](c), [6](d).

We are interested in the synthesis and reactivity of germyl complexes of transition metals and have recently reported [7], [8] the synthesis and reactivity of trihydrido- [M]–GeH3 and organo-germyl [M]–GeR3 (R = Me, OEt, PhCtriple bondC) derivatives of Mn and Re, and the preparation of osmium complexes containing an oxo-germanium cluster as ligand. We have now extended these studies to both half-sandwich and tris(pyrazolyl)borate complexes of the iron triad of the types MCl(η5-C5H5)PPh3L, MCl(η5-C9H7)PPh3L, and MCl(Tp)PPh3L [M = Ru, Os; Tp = tris(pyrazolyl)borate; L = phosphite] and this paper reports the preparation and characterisation of new germyl complexes, including the first trihydridogermyl derivatives of ruthenium and osmium.

Section snippets

General comments

All synthetic work was carried out in an appropriate inert atmosphere (Ar, N2) using standard Schlenk techniques or an inert atmosphere dry-box. Once isolated, the complexes were found to be relatively stable in air, but were stored under nitrogen at −25 °C. All solvents were dried over appropriate drying agents, degassed on a vacuum line, and distilled into vacuum-tight storage flasks. RuCl3·3H2O and OsO4 were obtained from Pressure Chemical Co. (USA) and used as received. Phosphonite PPh(OEt)2

Cyclopentadienyl and indenyl complexes

Half-sandwich trichlorogermyl complexes of the types Ru(GeCl3)(η5-C5H5)(PPh3)L (1) and Ru(GeCl3)(η5-C9H7)(PPh3)L (2) were prepared by reacting chloro complexes RuCl(η5-C5H5)(PPh3)L and RuCl(η5-C9H7)(PPh3)L with GeCl2·dioxane in ethanol, as shown in Scheme 1.

The reaction proceeded with the insertion of GeCl2 into the Ru–Cl bond to afford trichlorogermyl derivatives 1 and 2, which were isolated in good yield and characterised.

Trichlorogermyl derivatives 1 and 2 were reacted with hydride-transfer

Conclusions

This paper reports that both half-sandwich fragments with cyclopentadienyl and indenyl ligands Ru(η5-C5H5)(PPh3)L and Ru(η5-C9H7)(PPh3)L (L = phosphite) can stabilise trichlorogermyl complexes [Ru]–GeCl3. Their reaction with group 13 hydrides, which afforded trihydridogermyl derivatives [Ru]–GeH3 with LiAlH4, was interesting, whereas triethoxygermyl complexes [Ru]–Ge(OEt)3 were only obtained with NaBH4 in ethanol. The tris(pyrazolylborate) ligand (Tp) can also stabilise trichlorogermyl

Acknowledgements

The financial support of MIUR (Rome) - PRIN 2009 is gratefully acknowledged. We also thank Mrs. Daniela Baldan, from the Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia (Italy), for her technical assistance.

References (22)

  • G. Albertin et al.

    Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.

    (2012)
  • K.M. Mackay et al.J. Parr
  • R.D. Adams et al.

    Inorg. Chem.

    (2010)
    M. Tanabe et al.

    Organometallics

    (2009)
    R.D. Adams et al.

    Inorg. Chem.

    (2009)
    M. Zyder et al.

    Organometallics

    (2009)
    J. Braddock-Wilking et al.

    Organometallics

    (2009)
    M. Zyder et al.

    J. Organomet. Chem.

    (2009)
    M. Itazaki et al.

    Organometallics

    (2009)
    R.D. Adams et al.

    Organometallics

    (2008)
    N. Nakata et al.

    Organometallics

    (2009)
    M. Tanabe et al.

    Organometallics

    (2008)
    A.Yu. Khalimon et al.

    Dalton Trans.

    (2007)
    M. Minato et al.

    Organometallics

    (2005)
    Y. Usui et al.

    Organometallics

    (2005)
    J. Braddock-Wilking et al.

    Organometallics

    (2005)
    K. Mochida et al.

    Organometallics

    (2005)
    Z.T. Cygan et al.

    Inorg. Chem.

    (2004)
    L. Yong et al.

    Organometallics

    (2003)
    G.I. Nikonov et al.

    Organometallics

    (2003)
    A.C. Filippou et al.

    Organometallics

    (2002)
  • M. Baya et al.

    Organometallics

    (2001)
    A.C. Filippou et al.

    Organometallics

    (1999)
    J.G. Winter et al.

    Organometallics

    (1998)
    A.C. Filippou et al.

    Polyhedron

    (1998)
    A. Bauer et al.

    J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.

    (1997)
    M.L. Buil et al.

    Inorg. Chem.

    (1996)
    J.R. Koe et al.

    Organometallics

    (1992)
    K.H. Pannell et al.

    Organometallics

    (1991)
    J.A. Audett et al.

    J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.

    (1988)
    D.F. Dong et al.

    Can. J. Chem.

    (1981)
    A. Bonny et al.

    J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.

    (1978)
    T. Kruck et al.

    Allg. Chem.

    (1976)
    G. Herber et al.

    Helv. Chim. Acta

    (1975)
    S.R. Stobart

    J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.

    (1972)
    R.D. George et al.

    J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.

    (1972)
    J.K. Ruff

    Inorg. Chem.

    (1971)
    F. Glockling et al.

    J. Organomet. Chem.

    (1970)
    R. Kummer et al.

    Inorg. Chem.

    (1968)
  • J.Y. Corey et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (1999)
    M. Suginome et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (2000)
    F. Ozawa

    J. Organomet. Chem.

    (2000)
    Y. Tsuji et al.

    J. Organomet. Chem.

    (2000)
  • B.-H. Kim et al.

    Adv. Organomet. Chem.

    (2005)
    N.D. Smith et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (2000)
    A.K. Roy

    Adv. Organomet. Chem.

    (2007)
    B. Marciniec

    Coord. Chem. Rev.

    (2005)
    H.K. Sharma et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (1995)
    T. Nakano et al.

    Appl. Organomet. Chem.

    (2005)
  • S.G. Anema et al.

    J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.

    (1988)
    J.A. Audett et al.

    J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.

    (1988)
    S.R. Stobart

    J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.

    (1972)
    R.D. George et al.

    J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.

    (1972)
  • G. Albertin et al.

    J. Organomet. Chem.

    (2012)
  • R. Rabinowitz et al.

    J. Org. Chem.

    (1961)
  • G. Balacco,...
  • G. Albertin et al.

    Organometallics

    (2008)
    L.A. Oro et al.

    J. Organomet. Chem.

    (1985)
  • Cited by (15)

    • Mono- and Bis-cyclopentadienyl Complexes of Ruthenium and Osmium

      2022, Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry IV: Volume 1-15
    • Synthesis and reactivity of germyl complex of Ruthenium(II)

      2019, Inorganica Chimica Acta
      Citation Excerpt :

      Crystallographic data were collected on Bruker D8 Venture diffractometer at CACTI (Universidade de Vigo) with graphite monocrhomated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) and were corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects. APEX3 [8] software was used for collecting data frames, indexing reflections, and determining lattice parameters, SAINT [9] for integration of intensity of reflections and scaling, and SADABS [10] for empirical absorption correction. The crystallographic treatment of the compound 1a was performed with the SHELXL97 program [11].

    • Synthesis, characterisation and cytotoxicity studies of ruthenium arene complexes bearing trichlorogermyl ligands

      2019, Inorganica Chimica Acta
      Citation Excerpt :

      η6-p-cymene)RuCl2]2 was cleaved with two molar equivalents of P(OMe)3, PPh3 and P(OPh)3 affording the precursors [(η6-p-cymene)Ru(PR3)Cl2] (PR3 = P(OMe)3, PPh3 and P(OPh)3), which were also prepared using standard literature procedures [31]. These easily accessible half sandwich ruthenium(II) dichloride complexes were subsequently treated with GeCl2(dioxane) in a 1:1 ratio, typically in dichloromethane affording, by facile GeCl2 insertion into the Ru-Cl bonds of the respective precursor complexes, the novel trichlorogermyl half-sandwich complexes 1–5 (Scheme 1) selectively [30]. The complexes 1–5 are remarkably stable and can be handled in air without any noticeable decomposition taking place.

    • Electronic properties and metal-ligand bonding situation in Eu(III) complexes containing tris(pyrazolyl)borate and phenantroline ligands

      2017, Journal of Luminescence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Table 4 summarizes the ratios between the relative intensities of the 5D0 → 7F2 and 5D0 → 7F1 transitions, the experimental Judd-Ofelt intensity parameters (Ω2 and Ω4), the radiative (Arad) and nonradiative (Anrad) decays, the experimental lifetime (τ), the quantum efficiency (η), and the number of water molecules (q). Calculations were conducted with the aid of the program Lanthanide Luminescence Software LUMPAC [55]. The number of water molecules was calculated according to the equation proposed by Supkowski and Horrocks [48,56,57].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text