Elsevier

Technovation

Volume 120, February 2023, 102386
Technovation

Digital transformation in the healthcare sector through blockchain technology. Insights from academic research and business developments

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102386Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Despite the potential benefits, practitioners seem to be skeptical to the application of blockchain in healthcare.

  • Comparing results from papers and patents could help clarify the research-practice gap.

  • Results indicate that the two approaches are converging but also show the development of a dark side.

  • Social dominance, use of grand theories, value creation, and technology acceptance are insights for scholars.

  • The human element and the need for standards are relevant for practitioners and policymakers.

Abstract

Healthcare research is a multidisciplinary field that looks at the entire stakeholder ecosystem. Digital transformation could assist in the resolution of problems in medical practice by introducing new value creation trends. Blockchain technology has the potential to help speed up this digital transformation process by reducing certain elements, such as data management issues. As with any new technology, its actual value must be shown because it is based on expectations rather than solid facts. This study compares the findings of a content analysis focused on papers and patents with the aim of presenting data on the expectations for blockchain implementation in the healthcare sector. While the papers provide the perspective of researchers, patents should depict the expectation of the companies and investors patenting their inventions. Comparing data from papers and patents, this paper aims to help close the research-practice gap by showing how the two expectations for blockchain application in the healthcare sector are evolving.

Introduction

While the existing literature has improved our understanding of specific aspects of digital transformation (Gong and Ribiere, 2021), in several contexts we still lack a detailed picture of its existence and consequences (Sebastian et al., 2017). Previous studies have focused on the role of digital technologies to trigger strategic changes (Urbinati et al., 2019), disrupt the way organizations create and transfer value (Chirumalla, 2021; Tian et al., 2021), and manage the social and organizational structural modifications required (Vial, 2019). However, according to Sebastian et al. (2017, p. 198), “Most big old companies' digital transformations are at an early stage—in most industries, the vast majority of established companies’ revenues still come from traditional products and services.” Similarly, digital transformation can have multiple positive effects within the healthcare sector in supporting current challenges, such as empowering a patient-centric approach, increasing operational efficiency, and supporting workflow practices (Kraus et al., 2021). However, although digital transformation has been widely analyzed and has become a trendy topic for many streams of business research, it still lacks appropriate attention to the various managerial applications (Kraus et al., 2021). While there is growing attention to digital transformation in many sectors, research and practical applications in the healthcare sector still seem fragmented and at the beginning of the journey.

Trust in data handling and security are considered among the most important reasons the healthcare sector lags behind in the implementation of digital transformation (Kraus et al., 2021). Interestingly, blockchain technology could be helpful in handling, sharing, and processing personal health records, reducing data security issues and supporting the digital transformation of the healthcare sector (Tandon et al., 2020). However, while organizations are making significant investments in blockchain-based technology, they are also taking a conservative approach due to a widespread view that the benefits might be exaggerated (Iansiti and Lakhani, 2017). Thus, while digital transformation potentially affects healthcare, the lack of trust and the fear of data security combine to limit its development. Blockchain technology can reduce the problem, but further studies are required to test its validity.

This paper contributes to the special issue on digital transformation in healthcare, understanding “the potential applications of novel digital technologies … for innovating the healthcare ecosystem.” More precisely, following the call for the special issue, this study investigates “technological trends and breakthroughs for disruptive innovation in healthcare,” with a focus on blockchain technology. As a young research field, most of the studies focused on this topic employ qualitative approaches based on case studies that allow in-depth analysis but limit the generalizability of the findings (Kraus et al., 2021). Previous studies have also highlighted that the potential benefits derived from academic research are not applied due to a gap between research and practice (Makin, 2021). In further analyzing the theoretical benefits of blockchain solutions, there is therefore also a need to understand how business entities are implementing blockchain solutions to support further practical applications of this technology.

This study seeks to answer this call by analyzing how blockchain has been studied in published papers and implemented in patented inventions through content analysis. Content analysis is an umbrella term used to extract information from a broad set of documents (Krippendorff, 2013). When employed with patents, it is used for handling technology analysis, forecasting technological developments, and providing highlights on future competitions based on emerging technology. When applied to research papers, it is used for reviewing a corpus of scholarly literature to generate new ideas, engage in critical reflections, identify future research directions, and create research questions (Massaro et al., 2016). Patent and publication sources are commonly used to chart the evolution of technologies, and the use of multiple data sources allows comparison of different outcomes of research and inventions (Goeldner et al., 2015). Indeed, patent databases provide information on technical innovations and patterns of technological advancement, while publication databases provide information on scientific advances (Kumari et al., 2019).

This paper is novel in several ways. First, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt that combines scientific papers and patent inventions in the field of blockchain in the healthcare sector, and therefore enlarges previous studies that mainly focused on scientific sources (Abu-elezz et al., 2020; Attaran, 2020; Hasselgren et al., 2020). Previous studies have used this approach to study several other technologies, such as care robotics (Goeldner et al., 2015) and emerging technologies in general (Daim et al., 2006). Second, this study enlarges previous literature reviews using broader keyword search terms that includes smart contracts and distributed ledgers (Tandon et al., 2020). Third, an analysis of word co-occurrences was used for theme extraction. This approach makes “the analyst aware of the global context and significance of concepts and … help avoid fixation on particular anecdotal evidence, which may be atypical or erroneous” (Smith and Humphreys, 2006, p. 262).

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. The next section describes the background of the study, beginning with the current challenges of digital transformation in healthcare, followed by a presentation of blockchain technology, and a discussion of how blockchain technology is a controversial topic, as well as presenting the research questions. The following section illustrates the methodology used. The findings and discussion sections depict the main results. The conclusion section ends the paper.

Section snippets

Digital transformation in the healthcare sector

The implementation and use of information and emerging technologies to alter various facets of an organization—ranging from the development of new business models to changes in current organizational processes and customer service—is usually referred to as digital transformation (Bunduchi et al., 2019; Gong and Ribiere, 2021). Indeed, new digital technologies are game-changing chances for the public sector, as well as for businesses of all sizes. Additionally, at a higher level, information and

Methodology

To answer the research question, the content analysis methodology was applied considering two different sources. First, published papers were used as a source of scientific research. Second, patents were used as examples of applied innovation. Indeed, “Publication data provide useful insights on scientific advances, whereas patent DBs [databases] provide information regarding technical inventions and patterns of technological growth” (Kumari et al., 2019, p. 2). Content analysis is a broad

Findings

Three sub-sections are used to present the results. A descriptive analysis of both datasets is discussed first, with comparisons of the numbers of scientific publications and priority patent applications at the country, organizational, and collaboration levels. Second, topic and thematic analysis is performed to better understand the content of patents and papers. Finally, topics and themes are analyzed in terms of time evolution and the difference between sources (patents vs papers).

Discussion

There is growing attention to the notion that blockchain research has been undertheorized and has provided more of a descriptive approach rather than focusing on causes and implications (Gligor et al., 2021). To overcome this critique, this section discusses the results defining some of the theoretical implications that, in my opinion, could deserve future research attention.

Conclusion

In concluding our study, recalling the initial premise could help the reader understand its value. Healthcare studies is a multidisciplinary area of research that examines an overall ecosystem of stakeholders (Campbell et al., 2000; Wallberg-Henriksson, 2013). Digital transformation could help to solve challenges in medical practice by offering new value development patterns (Kraus et al., 2021). Blockchain technology, besides being an important digital technology, could generally help speed up

Maurizio Massaro, Ph. D., is Associate Professor at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice. Before joining academia, he was founder and CEO of multiple consultancy firms. He has also served as a research center Vice President in the field of metal analysis. He has been a visiting Professor at Florida Gulf Coast University and Leicester University. He enjoys several contacts and research partnerships with universities in the USA, continental Europe, UK, Asia and Australia. His research interests

References (108)

  • R. Agarwal et al.

    The digital transformation of healthcare: current status and the road ahead

    Inf. Syst. Res.

    (2010)
  • S. Aggarwal et al.

    Attacks on blockchain

    Adv. Comput.

    (2021)
  • M. al Abdullah et al.

    Electronic health record system: adoption and influencing factors

    Int. J. Enterpren. Innovat. Manag.

    (2016)
  • T.W. Andreassen et al.

    Business model innovation and value-creation: the triadic way

    J. Serv. Manag.

    (2018)
  • M. Attaran

    Blockchain technology in healthcare: challenges and opportunities

    Int. J. Healthc. Manag.

    (2020)
  • T. Benil et al.

    Cloud based security on outsourcing using blockchain in E-health systems

    Comput. Network.

    (2020)
  • B.J. Biroscak et al.

    Leximancer software as a research tool for social marketers: application to a content analysis

    Soc. Market. Q.

    (2017)
  • S. Biswas et al.

    DAAC: digital asset access control in a unified blockchain based E-health system

    IEEE Transactions on Big Data

    (2020)
  • A. Böckel et al.

    Blockchain for the circular economy: analysis of the research-practice gap

    Sustainable Production and Consumption

    (2021)
  • M. Borup et al.

    The sociology of expectations in science and technology

    Technol. Anal. Strat. Manag.

    (2006)
  • R. Bunduchi et al.

    Coping with institutional complexity: intersecting logics and dissonant visions in a nation-wide healthcare IT implementation project

    Inf. Technol. People

    (2019)
  • A. Burton-Jones et al.

    Changing the conversation on evaluating digital transformation in healthcare: insights from an institutional analysis

    Inf. Organ.

    (2020)
  • D. Butler

    Crossing the valley of death

    Nature

    (2008)
  • Canon

    System and Method for Providing Medical Information Based on Block Chain

    (2017)
  • S. Cao et al.

    InsurTech development: evidence from Chinese media reports

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2020)
  • H.C. Chang et al.

    Emerging trends in data analytics and knowledge management job market: extending KSA framework

    J. Knowl. Manag.

    (2019)
  • S. Chenthara et al.

    Healthchain: a novel framework on privacy preservation of electronic health records using blockchain technology

    PloS One

    (2020)
  • K. Chirumalla

    Building digitally-enabled process innovation in the process Industries: a dynamic capabilities approach

    Technovation

    (2021)
  • E. Chukwu et al.

    A systematic review of blockchain in healthcare: frameworks, prototypes, and implementations

    IEEE Access

    (2020)
  • L. Cobianchi et al.

    Planning the full recovery phase: an antifragile perspective on surgery after COVID-19

    Ann. Surg.

    (2020)
  • L. Cobianchi et al.

    One size does not fit all - translating knowledge to bridge the gaps to diversity and inclusion of surgical teams

    Ann. Surg.

    (2021)
  • L. Cobianchi et al.

    Hand in hand: a multistakeholder approach for co-production of surgical care

    Am. J. Surg.

    (2021)
  • F. Dal Mas et al.

    Adopting a knowledge translation approach in healthcare co-production. A case study

    Manag. Decis.

    (2020)
  • F. Dal Mas et al.

    Smart contracts to enable sustainable business models. A case study

    Manag. Decis.

    (2020)
  • M.S. Delgosha et al.

    Discovering IoT implications in business and management: a computational thematic analysis

    Technovation

    (2021)
  • Deloitte

    Deloitte's 2020 Global Blockchain Survey

    (2020)
  • D.V. Dimitrov

    Blockchain applications for healthcare data management

    Healthcare Informatics Research

    (2019)
  • J.C. Dumay

    Grand theories as barriers to using IC concepts

    J. Intellect. Cap.

    (2012)
  • J. Dumay

    Reflections on interdisciplinary accounting research: the state of the art of intellectual capital

    Account Audit. Account. J.

    (2014)
  • A. Fusco et al.

    Blockchain in healthcare: insights on COVID-19

    Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health

    (2020)
  • C. Gong et al.

    Developing a unified definition of digital transformation

    Technovation

    (2021)
  • K.N. Griggs et al.

    Healthcare blockchain system using smart contracts for secure automated remote patient monitoring

    J. Med. Syst.

    (2018)
  • S. Haber et al.

    How to time-stamp a digital document

    J. Cryptol.

    (1991)
  • A. Hasselgren et al.

    Blockchain in healthcare and health sciences—a scoping review

    Int. J. Med. Inf.

    (2020)
  • S. Hermes et al.

    The digital transformation of the healthcare industry: exploring the rise of emerging platform ecosystems and their influence on the role of patients

    Business Research

    (2020)
  • M. Iansiti et al.

    The truth about blockchain

    Harv. Bus. Rev.

    (2017)
  • IBM

    Secure Distributed Patient Consent and Information Management

    (2017)
  • Irise

    HOSPITAL SECURITY SYSTEM THAT STORES PATIENT INFORMATION ON A BLOCKCHAIN BASIS

    (2018)
  • L. Ismail et al.

    Blockchain paradigm for healthcare: performance evaluation

    Symmetry

    (2020)
  • A. Kalla et al.

    The role of blockchain to fight against COVID-19

    IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev.

    (2020)
  • Cited by (62)

    • Capability building for digital transformation through design thinking

      2024, Technological Forecasting and Social Change
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Maurizio Massaro, Ph. D., is Associate Professor at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice. Before joining academia, he was founder and CEO of multiple consultancy firms. He has also served as a research center Vice President in the field of metal analysis. He has been a visiting Professor at Florida Gulf Coast University and Leicester University. He enjoys several contacts and research partnerships with universities in the USA, continental Europe, UK, Asia and Australia. His research interests include knowledge management, intellectual capital, sustainability in international business, and research methods. His research has been applied in multiple research contexts.

    View full text