Abstract
We argue that theories and methods drawn from complexity science are urgently needed to guide the development and use of digital twins for cities. The theoretical framework from complexity science takes into account both the short-term and the long-term dynamics of cities and their interactions. This is the foundation for a new approach that treats cities not as large machines or logistic systems but as mutually interwoven self-organizing phenomena, which evolve, to an extent, like living systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$99.00 per year
only $8.25 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Grieves, M. W. Product lifecycle management: the new paradigm for enterprises. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 2, 71–84 (2005).
Batty, M. Digital twins. Environ. Plan. B 45, 817–820 (2018).
Bassolas, A., Ramasco, J. J., Herranz, R. & Cantú-Ros, O. G. Mobile phone records to feed activity-based travel demand models: matsim for studying a cordon toll policy in Barcelona. Transp. Res. Part A 121, 56–74 (2019).
Deng, T., Zhang, K. & Shen, Z. J. M. A systematic review of a digital twin city: a new pattern of urban governance toward smart cities. J. Manage. Sci. Eng. 6, 125–134 (2021).
Niederer, S. A., Sacks, M. S., Girolami, M. & Willcox, K. Scaling digital twins from the artisanal to the industrial. Nat. Comput. Sci. 1, 313–320 (2021).
Hudson-Smith, A., Wilson, D., Gray, S. & Dawkins, O. Urban IoT: Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities for Mass Data Collection, Analysis, and Visualization 701–719 (Springer, 2021); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8983-6_38
Mohammadi, M. & Al-Fuqaha, A. Enabling cognitive smart cities using big data and machine learning: approaches and challenges. IEEE Commun. Mag. 56, 94–101 (2018).
Sánchez-Vaquerizo, J. A. Getting real: the challenge of building and validating a large-scale digital twin of Barcelona’s traffic with empirical data. ISPRS Int. J. Geoinf. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11010024 (2022).
Schrotter, G. & Hürzeler, C. The digital twin of the city of Zurich for urban planning. J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Geoinf. Sci. 88, 99–112 (2020).
Castells, M. The Rise of the Network Society (Wiley, 2011).
Pflieger, G. & Rozenblat, C. Introduction. Urban networks and network theory: the city as the connector of multiple networks. Urban Stud. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010377368 (2010).
Louail, T. et al. Uncovering the spatial structure of mobility networks. Nat. Commun. 6, 6007 (2015).
Bassolas, A. et al. Hierarchical organization of urban mobility and its connection with city livability. Nat. Commun. 10, 4817 (2019).
Anderson, P. W. More is different. Science 177, 393–396 (1972).
Caldarelli, G. Scale-Free Networks: Complex Webs in Nature and Technology (Oxford Univ. Press, 2007); https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199211517.001.0001
Gabaix, X. & Ioannides, Y. M. in Cities and Geography. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics Vol. 4 (eds Henderson, J. V. & Thisse, J.-F.) 2341–2378 (Elsevier, 2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80010-5
van Leeuwen, J. Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science Vol. 1. (Elsevier, 1994); https://books.google.it/books?id=6XJCxgEACAAJ
Gödel, K. Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme, I. Mon. Hefte Math. Phys. 38, 173–198 (1931).
Turing, A. M. On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. s2-42, 230–265 (1937).
Turing, A. M. On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. A correction. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 2, 544–546 (1938).
Everitt, B. S. & Skrondal, A. Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).
Waldrop, M. M. What are the limits of deep learning? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 1074–1077 (2019).
Hofman, J. M., Sharma, A. & Watts, D. J. Prediction and explanation in social systems. Science 355, 486–488 (2017).
Helbing, D. & Argota Sánchez-Vaquerizo, J. in Handbook on the Politics and Governance of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (eds Zwitter, A. & Gstrein, O.) Ch. 3 (Edward Elgar, in the press); https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358571489_Digital_Twins_Potentials_Limitations_and_Ethical_Issues
Edelenbos, J. & Klijn, E.-H. Trust in complex decision-making networks: a theoretical and empirical exploration. Adm. Soc. 39, 25–50 (2007).
Lane, D., Maxfield, R., Read, D. & van der Leeuw, S. In Complexity Perspectives in Innovation and Social Change (eds Lane, D. et al.) 11–42 (Springer, 2009).
Domaradzka, A. Urban social movements and the right to the city: an introduction to the special issue on urban mobilization. Voluntas 29, 607–620 (2018).
Bardoscia, M. et al. The physics of financial networks. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 490–507 (2021).
Haldane, A. & May, R. Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature 469, 351–355 (2011).
Battiston, S., Puliga, M., Kaushik, R., Tasca, P. & Caldarelli, G. DebtRank: too central to fail? Financial networks, the Fed and systemic risk. Sci. Rep. 2, 541 (2012).
Aleta, A., Meloni, S. & Moreno, Y. A multilayer perspective for the analysis of urban transportation systems. Sci. Rep. 7, 44359 (2017).
Lämmer, S., Gehlsen, B. & Helbing, D. Scaling laws in the spatial structure of urban road networks. Physica A 363, 89–95 (2006).
Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., Helbing, D., Kühnert, C. & West, G. B. Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 7301–7306 (2007).
Arcaute, E. et al. Constructing cities, deconstructing scaling laws. J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20140745 (2015).
Banavar, J. R., Maritan, A. & Andrea, R. Size and form in efficient transportation networks. Nature 399, 130–132 (1999).
Batty, M. Inventing Future Cities (MIT Press, 2018).
Rozenblat, C. Extending the concept of city for delineating large urban regions (LUR) for the cities of the world. Cybergeo https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.35411 (2020).
Tizzoni, M. et al. Real-time numerical forecast of global epidemic spreading: case study of 2009 A/H1N1pdm. BMC Med. 10, 165 (2012).
Cimini, G. et al. The statistical physics of real-world networks. Nat. Phys. Rev. 1, 58–71 (2019).
Ahsan, U. & Bais, A. A review on big data analysis and Internet of Things. In 2016 IEEE 13th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems 325–330 (IEEE, 2016).
Hong, L. & Page, S. E. Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 16385–16389 (2004).
Battiston, S., Caldarelli, G. & Garas, A. Multiplex and Multilevel Networks (Oxford Univ. Press, 2018); https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198809456.001.0001
Pumain, D. in Handbook on Cities and Complexity (ed. Portugali, J.) 136–153 (Edward Elgar, 2021).
Barthelemy, M. The statistical physics of cities. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 406–415 (2019).
Serafino, M. et al. True scale-free networks hidden by finite size effects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013825118 (2021).
Angelidou, M. The role of smart city characteristics in the plans of fifteen cities. J. Urban Technol. 24, 3–28 (2017).
Vojnovic, I. Urban sustainability: research, politics, policy and practice. Cities 41, 30–44 (2014).
Iacopini, I., Schäfer, B., Arcaute, E., Beck, C. & Latora, V. Multilayer modeling of adoption dynamics in energy demand management. Chaos 30, 013153 (2020).
Bianconi, G. Multilayer Networks Vol. 1 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2018); https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198753919.001.0001
Gallotti, R. & Barthelemy, M. The multilayer temporal network of public transport in Great Britain. Sci. Data 2, 140056 (2015).
Bassolas, A., Gallotti, R., Lamanna, F., Lenormand, M. & Ramasco, J. J. Scaling in the recovery of urban transportation systems from massive events. Sci. Rep. 10, 2746 (2020).
De Domenico, M., Solé-Ribalta, A., Gómez, S. & Arenas, A. Navigability of interconnected networks under random failures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 8351–8356 (2014).
Facchini, A., Mele, R. & Caldarelli, G. The urban metabolism of Lima: perspectives and policy indications for GHG emission reductions. Front. Sustain. Cities 2, 40 (2021).
Neal, Z. & Rozenblat, C. Handbook of Cities and Networks 672 (Edward Elgar, 2021); https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788114714
Strano, E., Shai, S., Dobson, S. & Barthelemy, M. Multiplex networks in metropolitan areas: generic features and local effects. J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20150651 (2015).
Buldyrev, S. V., Parshani, R., Paul, G., Stanley, H. E. & Havlin, S. Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks. Nature 464, 1025–1028 (2010).
Laboy, M. & Fannon, D. Resilience theory and praxis: a critical framework for architecture. Enquiry https://doi.org/10.17831/enq:arcc.v13i2.405 (2016).
Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990).
Anderies, J. M. & Janssen, M. A. Sustaining the Commons (Arizona State Univ., 2016).
Youn, H., Gastner, M. T. & Jeong, H. Price of anarchy in transportation networks: efficiency and optimality control. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 128701 (2008).
Maranghi, S. et al. Integrating urban metabolism and life cycle assessment to analyse urban sustainability. Ecol. Indic. 112, 106074 (2020).
Prigogine, I. & Stengers, I. The End of Certainty (Simon and Schuster, 1997).
Ospina-Forero, L., Castañeda, G. & Guerrero, O. A. Estimating networks of Sustainable Development Goals. Inf. Manage. 59, 103342 (2022).
Gershenson, C. in Complexity Perspectives on Language, Communication and Society (eds Massip, A. & Bastardas, A.) 3–14 (Springer, 2013); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32817-6
White, R., Engelen, G. & Uljee, I. Modeling Cities and Regions as Complex Systems: From Theory to Planning Applications (MIT Press, 2015).
Srivastava, N. et al. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 1929–1958 (2014).
Helbing, D. et al. Ethics of smart cities: towards value-sensitive design and co-evolving city life. Sustainability 13, 11162 (2021).
Gershenson, C. The implications of interactions for science and philosophy. Found. Sci. 18, 781–790 (2013).
Gershenson, C. Guiding the self-organization of cyber-physical systems. Front. Robot. AI 7, 41 (2020).
Geddes, P. Chapters in Modern Botany (John Murray, 1911).
Geddes, P. On the coalescence of amoeboid cells into plasmodia, and on the so-called coagulation of invertebrate fluids. Proc. R. So. Lond. 30, 252–255 (1880).
Ostrom, E. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Econ. Perspect. 14, 137–158 (2000).
Susskind, L. Complexity science and collaborative decision making. Negot. J. 26, 367 (2010).
Mosleh, W. S. & Larsen, H. Exploring the complexity of participation. CoDesign 17, 454–472 (2021).
Gilbert, N. in Artificial Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Life (eds Gilbert, N. & Conte, R.) 144–156 (UCL Press, 1995).
Bicchieri, C. The Grammar of Society (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).
Kinzig, A. P. et al. Evidence from a long term experiment that collective risk change social norms and promotes cooperation. Bioscience 63, 164–175 (2013).
Paluck, E. L. What’s in a norm? Sources and processes of norm change. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 96, 594–600 (2009).
Szekely, A. et al. Evidence from a long term experiment that collective risk change social norms and promotes cooperation. Nat. Commun. 12, 5452 (2021).
Tong, Y. & Bode, N. W. F. The principles of pedestrian route choice. J. R. Soc. Interface 19, 20220061 (2022).
Anderson, C. The end of theory: the data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired Mag. 16, 16–07 (2008).
Caldarelli, G., Wolf, S. & Moreno, Y. Physics of humans, physics for society. Nat. Phys. 14, 870 (2018).
Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P. & Haas, T. in Handbook of Cities and Networks (eds Neal, Z. & Rozenblat, C.) 273–292 (Edward Elgar, 2021).
Gershenson, C. Living in living cities. Artif. Life 19, 119–140 (2013).
Pagels, H. R. The Dreams of Reason: The Computer and the Rise of the Sciences of Complexity (Bantam Books, 1989).
Hansen, G. & Macedo, J. Urban Ecology for Citizens and Planners (Univ. Press of Florida, 2021); https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv21r3pgn
Acknowledgements
Regarding J.L.F.-V., the views of set out in this article are his own and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Commission. We thank M. Clarin from COSNET Lab/BIFI for designing Figs. 1 and 2. G.C. acknowledges support from EU Project ‘HumanE-AI-Net’, no. 952026 and from project SERICS (PE00000014) under the NRRP MUR program funded by the EU - NGEU. C.G. acknowledges support from UNAM-PAPIIT projects (IN107919, IV100120, IN105122) and from the PASPA program from UNAM-DGAPA. D.H. acknowledges support through the project ‘CoCi: Co-Evolving City Life’, which has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement no. 833168. Y.M. acknowledges support from the Government of Aragon through grant E36-20R (FENOL), and from MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 through grant PID2020-115800GB-I00. E.A. and M. Batty acknowledge support from the Alan Turing Institute under QUANT2-Contract-CID-3815811 and from the UK Regions Digital Research Facility (UKRDRF) EP/M023583/1 through EPSRC. J.J.R. acknowledges funding from MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER, UE) under Project APASOS (PID2021-122256NB-C22), and the María de Maeztu Program for units of Excellence in R&D CEX2021-001164-M by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. A.S. acknowledges support from project BASIC (PGC2018-098186-B-I00) funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ‘ERDF A way of making Europe’. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All the authors participated in the discussion and writing of this paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Computational Science thanks Paolo Santi and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Fernando Chirigati, in collaboration with the Nature Computational Science team.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Caldarelli, G., Arcaute, E., Barthelemy, M. et al. The role of complexity for digital twins of cities. Nat Comput Sci 3, 374–381 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-023-00431-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-023-00431-4
This article is cited by
-
Digital twins in city planning
Nature Computational Science (2024)
-
Defining a city — delineating urban areas using cell-phone data
Nature Cities (2024)
-
A virtual reality experiment to study pedestrian perception of future street scenarios
Scientific Reports (2024)