Introduction

In the last years experiments on hybrid heterojunctions between carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and Si wafers have demonstrated the possibility to achieve low-cost, high efficiency devices for photovoltaic (PV) applications1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19. The hybrid CNT-Si architectures can be ranked among the most promising systems for the next generation PV with power conversion efficiency (PCE) up to 17%10.

In these cells, the p-type Si layer (the so-called emitter) is replaced by a semi-transparent CNT film deposited at room temperature on the n-doped Si wafer, thus giving rise to an overall reduction of the total Si thickness and to the fabrication of a device with inexpensive methods at low temperatures. In particular, the CNT film deposited onto the Si wafer both acts as a conductive electrode and establishes a built-in voltage for separating photocarriers. Moreover, due to the CNT film optical semitransparency, most of the incoming light is absorbed by Si; thus the efficiency of the hybrid CNT-Si solar cell may in principle be comparable to a conventional Si p-n junction solar cell.

CNTs are also well known as the building block of many gas sensing devices20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40. Gas interaction with CNTs is known to produce remarkable resistivity changes, depending on the oxidizing or reducing nature of the gas. For instance, the exposure of p-type CNTs to oxidizing NO2 molecules reduces the CNT resistivity41, while the resistivity is increased when the CNTs are exposed to reducing gases such as NH3. In the last decade, CNTs have been indeed widely studied as sensitive materials to produce gas sensors, both in chemiresistor and chemical field-effect transistor (chem-FET)27,28,30,31,38 configurations. As schematically shown in Fig. 1-a,b, the main difference in the operational features is that in a chemiresistor (Fig. 1-a) the sensor resistance (or the current which flows through the CNTs between source and drain electrodes) and the resistance variation due to the presence of chemical species are monitored, while in a chem-FET configuration (Fig. 1-b), the current flowing through the CNTs can be also steered by a third electrode (the gate electrode), generally located below the CNT film.

Figure 1
figure 1

Read-out schemes for electrical measurements in a chemiresistor (a) and chem-FET (b) configurations. Chemiresistor gas sensor and PV cell read-out schemes of the present SWCNT-Si device (c). AFM scan of the Cell 15 surface (1 × 1 μm2). Inset: top view of Cell 15 with the two Ag parallel electrodes (d).

The electronic properties and the behaviour of a chem-FET based on CNTs are well known42. In particular, Uchida et al.43 discussed through a first-principles study the variation of the Fermi level upon changing the gate potential. The results indicate that with a positive gate potential extra electrons are injected into the CNT layer and the Fermi level EF shifts upwards; while with a negative gate potential extra holes are injected into the CNT layer and EF shifts downwards (Fig. 2a–c).

Figure 2
figure 2

Top panel: Schematic of Vgate induced variation of Ef in a CNT-based FET (ac). Bottom panel: (d) Qualitative scheme of light effect on the CNT density of states (DOS) in a Si-CNT heterojunction (HJ). Upon photon absorption in n-Si, holes are injected into the VB of CNT, increasing the number of carries and thereby decreasing the resistance (ΔR < 0) in the p-doped CNT layer. (e,f) Schematic representation of the effects of gas interactions with CNTs at the basis of gas sensing in p-doped CNT-based chemiresistors: (e) interaction with oxidizing molecules increases the p doping and decreases the resistivity of p-type CNT (ΔR < 0); (f) interaction with reducing molecules decreases the p doping and increases the resistivity (ΔR > 0).

So far the interplay between the photon harvesting and gas sensing functionalities of CNTs has virtually been neglected, but the nature of the junctions and the morphology of the CNT layer (usually made of CNT bundles), may disclose new potentialities. In particular the CNT-Si junction prepared by using a layer of CNT bundles can be regarded as an open system: for example chemical interactions are known to affect also the CNT-Si interface and ultimately the cell properties through selective etching or optimal oxidation of the buried SiOx layer at the interface13,44,45. Etching with HNO3 or HF is known to selectively tailor the thickness and the chemical properties of the buried SiOx layer, allowing to explore its role in determining the PV cell efficiency. These effects are usually permanent along the PV cell life time. Recently, temporary effects of environment on the PV cell performances were also investigated by exposing the cells to air, O2, and water vapour46 and N2 flow47, though changes were mainly related to relative humidity and cooling effects of the gas flowing on the layers. In particular, Fan et al.47 investigated the photovoltaic behaviour of CNT-Si solar cells under N2 gas flow, showing that a change in the cell temperature induced by the gas flow can lead to an enhancement in the cell efficiency, thereby suggesting that these cells can act as gas flow sensors while generating energy through the photovoltaic effect.

Devices that combine energy generation and other specific functions are also highly desirable for the development of wearable applications. Self-powered sensors with both energy-harvesting and sensing capabilities in a single device have recently drawn much attention for application in wearable devices. For instance, energy-harvesting devices can be directly employed for the detection of mechanical and thermal stimuli, leading to self-powered sensors48,49.

In the case of devices based on CNTs, hybrid CNT-Si cells have been used as pressure sensors50, or wind sensors47.

Self-powering and wearability are two features that could be matched by CNT-Si devices, provided that the devices can be assembled on flexible substrates. The fabrication of flexible PV cells based on the CNT-Si junction has been recently demonstrated by Sun et al.51. This result discloses the possibility to use CNT-Si junctions to develop self-powered, wearable, gas sensing devices working at room temperature. In this case, the PV cell functionality can power the gas sensing functionality, which does not require the power-consuming modules typical of metal-oxide based gas sensors that need to be operated at high temperatures through additional heating elements.

In the present study we explore the interplay between photovoltaic and gas sensing functionalities in CNT-Si based PV cells. We demonstrate that (i) cross-functionality can enable further developments of the CNT-Si PV cells, and that (ii) the selectivity and sensitivity of CNT-based gas-sensing devices can be improved by coupling these layers with n-doped Si.

In particular, we demonstrate the possibility to tune the cell efficiency by reversible interaction with selected gas (namely NH3 or NO2), and the possibility to use the PV devices as chem-FET, driven by light absorption, for the selective detection of polluting gases. Furthermore, as the open circuit voltage (VOC), the short circuit current (ISC), the fill factor (FF), and the peak power (PP) parameters of the PV cell showed to be quite sensitive to gas exposure, the readout of these parameters alone provides a way to use the PV cell directly as a gas sensor, with sensitivities that in some cases were higher than those registered with the chemiresistive read-out scheme.

Results

This study is based on two CNT-Si based PV cells prepared by depositing a single-walled CNT layer in contact with an n-type Si wafer to obtain a hybrid CNT-Si junction. The schematic layout of the hybrid CNT-Si cell is shown in Fig. 1-c, where the different layers of the PV cells are evidenced. In one cell, hereafter denoted as Cell 15, the thickness of the CNT bundle layer is 25.0 ± 1.2 nm, while in the other, hereafter denoted as Cell 55, has a thicker CNT bundle layer of 45.0 ± 1.5 nm. Upon fabrication, these cells displayed a PCE of 0.26% and 1.31%, respectively. These are not record efficiencies, as more efficient cells have been produced by using the same method and improving the overall device assembly and the quality of the CNT layer (see, e.g. ref. 52), but they were chosen because the CNTs were contacted with two parallel electrodes that enable also a chemiresistive readout of the signal along the CNT bundle layer. The main features of the cells are summarized in Table 1. AFM scan of the Cell 15 and the overall view of the PV cell with the two parallel electrodes is shown in Fig. 1-d.

Table 1 CNT-layer thickness (nm), PCE (η0) defined as PP/Pinc and measured after the cell preparation, PCE relative change (ηNO2 − ηi)/ηi during NO2 exposure, optical trasmittivity at 550 nm (%).

Reversible Steering of Efficiency

A systematic study of the PV cell characteristics upon exposure to oxidizing (NO2), reducing (NH3), or weakly interacting gases (acetone, ethyl alcohol) has been carried out through measurements of the I-V curves under different ambient conditions. As expected, the effects of weakly interacting gases on the I-V characteristics were negligible (with PV cell parameters variations below 1% of the values recorded before exposure), therefore in the following we will focus on the effects of NH3 and NO2. Cell cycling through multiple gas exposure/recovery processes resulted in a good cell stability. An example of cycling is shown in Fig. S1 of the Supplementary Information, where the VOC variation of Cell 55 is tracked as a function of time during the exposure processes.

To highlight the main features of the I-V curves and the possible changes induced by gas adsorption, the I-V data collected from both cells upon exposure up to 2 ppm NO2 are shown in Fig. 3, along with the corresponding Power(VI)-V curves.

Figure 3: Tracking of I-V curves of Cell 15 (left panel) and Cell 55 (right panel) upon exposure to up to 2 ppm NO2 (blue lines) For both cells a data set of I-V curves and the corresponding IV-V curves are displayed.
figure 3

Red curves correspond to 0 ppm NO2.

As can be observed, the cell parameters are clearly affected by the exposure to gas, though at different extents, depending on the cell type. In addition to changes of the overall I-V curve shape, the most evident change can be retrieved in the VOC and ISC values. Changes in VOC and ISC are known to occur in PV cells when an external load is connected to the cell, either in series or in parallel, to the series resistance RS and to the shunt resistance RSh, respectively. This means that gas exposure is mainly acting on the RS or RSh values of the PV cell, allowing one to steer these resistances and therefore the electrical behaviour of the PV cell.

This assumption is consistent with the behaviour observed when an external load was systematically applied to both cells, either in series or in parallel, and changes in the I-V curve were tracked. The results (shown in the Supplementary Information, Fig. S2) indicate that the overall behaviour resembles that expected for a PV junction, as described in many textbooks53. For both cells, the increase of RS determines a drop of Isc, while VOC is constant. In turn, the increase of RSh determines in both cells an increase of Voc.

The effects of charge injection or extraction (depending on the adsorbed molecule) on RS, RSh, and on the FF can be accounted for by modelling the PV cell with the one-diode scheme shown in Fig. 4 (refs 54 and 55), that is suitably modified to account for the effect of gas exposure with additional, variable, RS and RSh loads.

Figure 4
figure 4

Scheme of the PV cell, suitably modified to account for the effect of gas exposure with additional, variable, Rs and RSh loads.

The equation (Eq. 1) underlying this scheme is:

where RS and RSh are now corrected by the terms RS,gas and RSh,gas that are dependent on the gas concentration.

The I-V curves upon gas exposure have been tracked spanning a time window of several hours, depending on the recovery time of the initial conditions at room temperature. The time window includes ten minutes before gas exposure, the gas exposure itself, and the recovery time. Each I-V curve typically takes 25 seconds to be automatically measured by our I-V tracker. The gas concentration during each exposure is measured with a calibrated chemiresistor.

In Figs 5 and 6 the behaviour of VOC, ISC, PP, FF of the PV cells is shown as a function of time across the exposure to NH3 (Fig. 5) and NO2 (Fig. 6). The time window of gas exposure is marked by shaded areas. The main results are also summarized in Table 2. In this Table the results are reported as a relative variation (ΔIsc/Isc,0, ΔVoc/Voc,0, ΔFF/FF0, ΔPP/PP0) with respect to the parameter values before gas exposure.

Figure 5: Effects on Cell 15 (left) and Cell 55 (right) of the exposure to NH3.
figure 5

The shaded areas represent the exposure time. The top panels show the NH3 concentration. The maximum NH3 concentration was 30 ppm.

Figure 6: Effects on Cell 15 (left) and cell 55 (right) of the exposure to NO2.
figure 6

The shaded areas represent the exposure time. The top panels show the reference sensor signal. The maximum NO2 concentration was 2 ppm. The jump in VOC and FF registered at time = 100 s for Cell 15 is an experimental artefact.

Table 2 Variation of PV cell parameters and chemiresistor resistivity during exposure to both NH3 and NO2.

In principle, if charge injection or extraction occur during gas adsorption on the CNT bundle layer, the PV cell efficiency is expected to be affected by changes of the CNT charge carrier density. In the case of NH3, an increase of RS for both cases is expected, since NH3 behaves as an electron donor with respect to p-doped CNTs. This is confirmed by the data shown in Fig. 5. Along with a reduction of Isc (ΔIsc/Isc,0 = −15% and −1.3% for Cell 15 and Cell 55, respectively) expected from an increase of RS, also a Voc reduction is observed for both PV cells (ΔVoc/Voc,0 = −13% and −4.0% for Cell 15 and Cell 55, respectively). Larger effects on the PV cell parameters are observed for Cell 15. It is also interesting to observe that while for Cell 15 (Fig. 5-left panel) the Isc and Voc values recover at room temperature to those measured before exposure, in the case of Cell 55 (Fig. 5-right panel) the exposure to NH3 induces an increase of PP, that does not show a recovery after 200 minutes, in spite of the recovery of both Isc and Voc.

Exposure to NO2 results in a quite different behaviour (Fig. 6). For Cell 55 (Fig. 6-right panel), interaction with NO2 yields an increase of Isc (ΔIsc/Isc,0 = +0.1%), as expected from the decrease of RS related to p-doping, but a decrease of Voc (ΔVoc/Voc,0 = −1.2%). The FF decreases (ΔFF/FF0 = −2%), along with the PP (ΔPP/PP0 = −0.5%) and, ultimately, the PCE, defined as the ratio between PP and the incident power Pinc (60 mW/cm2 provided by an halogen lamp). However, the cell does not recover quickly to the initial conditions, indicating that interaction with NO2 does not produce reversible effects on a short timescale. In the case of exposure to NO2 the recovery can be assisted by UV illumination, as discussed in ref. 56.

In the case of Cell 15, the effects of p-doping on the CNT layer are confirmed by the Isc increase (ΔIsc/Isc,0 = +17%). Also Voc increases (ΔVoc/Voc,0 = +6.4%), along with PP (ΔPP/PP0 = +28%), resulting in a remarkable increase of PCE.

Therefore, we show that the PCE can be steered by interaction with molecules and that changes in PCE can be reversible on different time scales, depending on the adsorbed gas and on the thickness of the CNT bundle layer. Namely, the initial conditions can be restored more easily in the device with the thinner layer (Cell 15) and after exposure to NH3. Exposure to NO2 yields a PCE increase in Cell 15 but with a longer recovery time at room temperature with respect to the NH3 case.

It is important to observe that changes in PV cell parameters upon gas exposure are themselves a way to use these PV cells as gas sensors. Therefore a comparison with the results obtained in the chemiresistive read-out scheme (Fig. 1-a) is also reported in Table 2. These results are expressed in terms of the (ΔR/R)/[NH3] and (ΔR/R)/[NO2] sensitivity values, where [NH3] and [NO2] are the NH3 and NO2 concentrations during the exposure, respectively. A remarkable increase of sensitivity ΔIsc/Isc/[gas] with respect to the chemiresistor readout configuration is registered in Cell 15 after exposure to both NH3 (from 0.153 to 0.500, absolute value) and NO2 (from 6.74 to 8.50, absolute value), whereas the best performance for Cell 55 is registered in the chemiresistor configuration. This suggests that the thinner CNT layer of Cell 15 (25 nm) could favour the effects that determine the variation of electrical parameters across the junction, while in Cell 55 these effects are weakened by the relatively thicker CNT layer (45 nm). Indeed, the dependence of the cell PCE on the CNT layer thickness shows a well-defined behaviour13,57,58,59. PCE increases with thickness up to an optimal value (e.g. 32 nm in cells similar to the present ones59) and then drops for larger thickness values. The maximum value of the PCE is interpreted in terms of competition between the nanotube film optical transparency, the total number of nanotube/Si heterojunctions (i.e. the Si surface area covered by CNT) and nanotube network resistance13. The present cells are, respectively, too thin (Cell 15) and too thick (Cell 55) to present enhanced response to gas directly related to an enhanced PCE. Therefore, we ascribe the gas effect on the PV cell parameters to the distance of the CNT surface layer from the interface, i.e. the smaller the distance, the larger the effects.

It is also important to note that while ΔIsc/Isc,0 changes remarkably in Cell 15 after exposure to NH3 and NO2 (−15%, +17%, respectively), even larger changes are detected for the ΔPP/PP0 parameter (−23%, +28%, respectively). This implies that the gain observed with respect to the chemiresistive configuration can be further enhanced if ΔPP/PP0 is tracked upon gas exposure rather than ΔIsc/Isc.

Optically driven-ChemFET

So far the measurements (I-V tracking curves or chemiresistor read-out) have been carried out under ambient light. In order to investigate the extent of photo-effects on the gas sensing properties we measured the current through the chemiresistors both in dark conditions and under illumination. At this stage we added a chemiresistor made with a CNT bundle layer deposited onto an alumina substrate with interdigitated electrodes. This device is just a conventional, non-FET, CNT-based chemiresistor, to be used as benchmarking to discuss the origin of photoinduced effects. Upon illumination, in the PV cells, holes are transferred from Si to CNTs [see, e.g., ref. 7 and Refs. therein] and therefore, as the gate voltage in a FET, the intensity of the light source (triggering the photoabsorption in Si) is expected to control and shift the Fermi level in the CNT density of states (Fig. 2d). Indeed, the overall cell structure can be described as a FET, where the gate potential is represented by the built-in potential of the p-n heterojunction. It is important to recall that CNT-Si cells based on a p-type CNT bundle layer can be regarded as MIS9,44, as they can display a Si oxide layer at the interface between the CNT bundle layer and the n-Si. This justifies the choice to describe these junctions as a FET architecture.

In a chemiresistor configuration, charges flow in the CNT layer, where two electrodes on top of the CNT layer collect the in-plane current, but their flow can be affected by the potential at the junction. If not driven by the n-type Si back-contact, in principle this potential is fixed, depending on the characteristics of the junction. However, charge carriers can be created at the junction through illumination at different wavelengths and intensities. This allows to drive the gate-equivalent potential through optical absorption. As CNT-based FET are known to be able to detect gas molecules adsorbed on the CNT surface (acting therefore as chem-FETs30), the present devices can be operated as chem-FETs driven by photon absorption.

We tested as first the Cell 55 and Cell 15 devices as gas sensors, under dark conditions, in a chemiresistor configuration, i.e. by detecting the signal value between source and drain electrode and monitoring the resistance (or current) variation during the exposure to NH3 and NO2 polluting gases. We observed an increase of the sensor resistance in the presence of NH3, and a decrease in the presence of NO2, as expected for a p-type semiconductor60, indicating that the interaction is between gas molecules and the CNT top layer (Fig. 3, left panel). Changes in Cell 15 and Cell 55 response to gas exposure were observed when the same measurements were carried out under illumination, while the reference sensor did not display any appreciable change with respect to the dark conditions. This excludes that the observed changes in the electrical properties of Cell 15 and Cell 55 are due to photocurrents created by photon absorption in the CNT bundle layer.

Results on gas sensing in chemiresistive and chem-FET configurations are summarized in Fig. 7 and Table 3. These data show that, when gas exposure is carried out under illumination conditions, the CNT bundles of both samples react displaying an enhanced sensitivity (+33% and +37% for Cell 55 and Cell 15, respectively) to reducing gases (e.g. NH3) and a reduced sensitivity (−19% and −23% for Cell 55 and Cell 15, respectively) to oxidizing gases (e.g. NO2). In addition to the sensitivity enhancement, this result also demonstrates a selectivity enhancement, as the effects of the reducing and oxidizing molecules yield opposite changes.

Figure 7
figure 7

Effects of light on the sensitivity of Cell 15 and Cell 55 operated as chemiresistor to detect NH3 (left panel) and NO2 (right panel) target molecules.

Table 3 Results, normalized to the gas concentration, obtained for ΔR/R0 after exposure to NH3 and NO2.

The cell behaviour can be rationalized as follows. Upon illumination holes are injected from the n-side to the p-side of the junction (see Fig. 2-d and ref. 7). This favours the interaction with reducing molecules (e.g. NH3) which can more easily transfer electrons to the CNT layer. In turn, the interaction with oxidizing molecules is inhibited, as they find a lower density of states available for charge transfer to the molecules themselves.

Discussion

Beneficial effects on PV cells

The exposure to gas during the operation as a PV device clearly shows how the PV cell parameters are strongly affected by the interaction of the device with both reducing and oxidizing molecules. It is likely that these molecules can interact with the device both at the level of CNT bundles and at the CNT-Si interface. In general this interaction is made possible by the porous structure of the CNT layer (see e.g. AFM mapping of Cell 15, Fig. 1-d).

The most important factors that can be considered to discuss the change of PV parameters are the CNT-doping and changes in the CNT work function. As for the first factor, this is clearly visible in Cell 15 where the thin CNT bundle layer interacts with the gas molecules and the extent of CNT p-doping can be modified, depending on the type of molecules: reducing NH3 injects electrons and reduce the p-doping, oxidizing NO2 extract electron from CNT an increase p-doping. Indeed when the layer is exposed to NH3 Isc decreases in both cells, more in Cell 15 than in Cell 55. In turn, exposure to NO2 determines an increase of Isc in Cell 15. Effects on Cell 55 are usually weaker than on Cell 15, as the gas may diffuse less through the thicker bundle layer of Cell 55 with respect to Cell 15.

Changes in VOC can be ascribed to changes in the CNT work function. As the present PV devices are usually described in a MIS scheme9,44, VOC (Equation 2) can be expressed61,62 as:

where n is the diode ideality factor, ϕB is the barrier height, T is the temperature, kB is the Boltzmann constant, δ is the thickness of the insulating layer in the MIS junction, χ is the Si bulk work function, JL is the diode saturation current density, and A* is the Richardson constant.

After CNT p-doping with NO2 molecules, an up-shift of the CNT work function occurs and the consequent increase of the barrier height ϕB yields an increase of VOC.

Beneficial effects on gas sensors

Here a single device can be operated (i) as a conventional chemiresistor, (ii) as a chemiresistor affected by the junction underlying the sensing layer (optical chem-FET), and (iii) as a heterojunction where the I-V curves are affected by gas absorption, thereby providing an electrical output (in terms of VOC, ISC, FF, and PP) suitable for gas monitoring. The possibility to work in a FET-like condition is remarkable. This configuration is well known for single-CNT FET63, one of the most important architectures so far created to probe the transport properties at the nanoscale, but has not been systematically applied to a rougher device where the single CNT is substituted by a CNT bundle layer. The latter set up has the advantage to be much more easily fabricated and has looser requirements on the morphological and electrical features, thereby enabling an easier testing of new architectures and the scale-up to large devices.

In gas sensing functionality we registered the following improvements:

(i) Higher sensitivity to NH3 and NO2 when the device is operated with the PV cell readout scheme (Cell 15); (ii) Higher sensitivity to NH3 (Cell 15, Cell 55) when the devices are operated under illumination; (iii) Higher selectivity to NH3 vs. NO2 as interfering gas by operating both cells under illumination and in dark conditions.

On the basis of the results so far presented, this study establishes a starting point to explore different kinds of CNT-Si based PV cells, where (i) different classes of CNTs can be selected (e.g., double walled CNTs64 or multi-walled CNT52) and (ii) the device architecture can be improved to obtain a higher PCE. Our preliminary study on a similar cell (semiconducting CNT, thickness 28 nm, PCE = 6.25%) where the significant increase in PCE was mainly achieved by replacing the parallel electrodes contacts with a single frame electrode shows that gas effects (namely NO2 exposure) on the cell behavior are still observed, and an increase of the PCE of about 50.4% is registered. Unfortunately these contacting scheme cannot be used to test the cell as a chemiresistor. However if we consider, in addition to the PCE increase, also the relative variations ΔVOC/VOC (+14.5%) and ΔISC/ISC (+2.4%) upon gas exposure, the results indicate that also this PV cell can be used as a gas detector in the PV-cell readout scheme (Fig. 1-b) by measuring the relative change of, e.g., VOC and PCE that results to be the parameters mostly affected by the interaction with target gas molecules.

Concluding remarks

CNT-Si heterojunctions were considered as an «open» system to build PV devices that can be tailored and improved through interaction with gas molecules at the interface. A reversible steering of PV cell parameters has been demonstrated through absorption of reducing or oxidizing gas molecules on the CNT bundle layer. For the PV device with thinner CNT layer (Cell 15), an increase of efficiency (tracked through an increase of ΔPP/PP0 = 28%) has been recorded upon exposure to NO2. This is ascribed to an effective p-doping of the cell induced by the adsorption of the oxidizing molecule. Moreover, CNT-Si heterojunctions can be regarded as a playground to explore novel concepts in PV/gas sensing.

A general benchmarking with other systems is generally hindered by the different device architecture (contacting pads, layer thickness) and materials selection (CNT layer preparation, Si doping, thickness of Si wafer, thickness of the SiOx layer). However, in gas sensing applications the possibility to use different read-out schemes allows one to select the scheme where major changes upon gas absorption occurs, exploiting at their best the cross-functional properties of the device.

In particular, the possibility to choose the read-out configuration which yields the best performances for gas sensing is demonstrated, both in terms of sensitivity and selectivity. For the thinner layer (Cell 15) the response read-out through the cell parameters yielded an increased sensitivity to both NO2 and NH3 as referred to the variation of ΔIsc/Isc,0, and even larger if referred to ΔPP/PP0. The FET-like operation under illumination in a chemiresistive readout configuration has shown that both sensitivity and selectivity can be tuned: under illumination both devices are more sensitive to NH3, while readout in dark conditions enhances the sensitivity to NO2.

Further implications of this study can be envisaged by considering gas adsorption on the CNT-layer as a tool to reversibly time-control the doping of the p-type CNT layer, providing further degrees of freedom in the design, engineering and optimization of the CNT-Si hybrid PV cells.

Methods

Cell fabrication

In the present study two PV cells have been considered. Both of them have been prepared by using a p-type single-walled CNT (SWCNT) layer in contact with an n-type Si wafer to obtain a hybrid CNT-Si junction. The substrates consisted of 5 × 10 mm2 slices of a SiO2 passivated (thickness 300 nm) n-type Si(100), with an aluminum ohmic back contact. The oxide layer was patterned by a lithographic process with a positive resist followed by a chemical etching in order to obtain a 5 × 5 mm2 bare Si window delimited aside by two SiO2 steps. Therefore, the device active area is 5 × 5 mm2. The chemical etching was carried out by wetting for 5 min the bare SiO2 by a HF/NH4F buffer solution.

Networked SWCNT films were obtained from SWCNT powders (diameter d = 0.7−1.4 nm, carbon > 90%, purity ≥ 77%, density 0.09 g/cm3) provided by Sigma-Aldrich. For the deposition of the SWCNT film onto the Si patterned substrates, a SWCNT dispersion was prepared by ultrasound treatment of 100 μg of SWCNT powder in a 3 wt% aqueous solution of sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) (98.5% Sigma Aldrich). After the ultrasound treatment, the dispersion was left to settle down, and the clear supernatant containing unbundled nanotubes was divided from the precipitate (mostly bundled nanotubes) and used to fabricate the film. Once the SWCNT film was cast on the membrane filter, the residual SDS was removed by washing with deionized water and subsequently by an ethanol/methanol/water mixture (15:15:70 in volume). Films with different thickness were obtained by filtering different aliquots in volume of the same solution. The SWCNT film was transferred on the patterned Si substrate flipping it over and pressing the SWCNT coated membrane onto the Si/SiO2 surface. The residual cellulose acetate membrane lying on top of SWCNT film was removed by dipping the entire sample in warm acetone and finally rinsing in isopropanol. Finally, two parallel silver painted metallic contacts are created on the SWCNT film just on top of the SiO2 steps (inset of Fig. 1-d). The SiO2 steps between the metal electrodes and the Si underneath avoid short-circuits causing electron leakage.

The thickness of the CNT layer and the optical transmittance T (%) measured at 550 nm for the two samples are reported in Table 1.

The thickness was estimated according to the method presented in refs 13 and 52, based on a combination of angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy and optical spectroscopy measurements.

Further details on the cell assembly are reported in ref. 13.

The schematic layout of the hybrid Si-CNT cell is shown in Fig. 1-c, where the different layers of the PV cells are evidenced. The cells have been selected with different thickness of the CNT layer. One cell, hereafter denoted as Cell 15, has a thickness of the CNT bundle layer of 25.0 ± 1.2 nm, while the other, hereafter denoted as Cell 55, has a thicker CNT bundle layer of 45.0 ± 1.5 nm.

After the cell fabrication, the PCE (η0) was measured with a solar simulator, in air, under AM 1.5G conditions and the cells displayed a PCE of 0.26% (Cell 15) and 1.31% (Cell 55). In turn, the use of polluting gases (especially NO2 which is already irritating for throat and lungs at few ppm concentrations) require to follow a safety protocol. Therefore the measurements during gas exposure were carried out in a gas-tight chamber. Since it was not possible to couple the solar simulator with this chamber, the cell was illuminated through a glass viewport with a halogen lamp resulting in a power on the cell surface of 60 mW/cm2, a condition not directly comparable to the AM 1.5 G. Consistently, in Table 1 we have reported the relative PCE variations Δη/ηi = (ηNO2 − ηi)/ηi, where ηi is the PCE just before exposure to gas and ηNO2 is the PCE during gas exposure, rather than the PCE absolute values.

The devices were fabricated and preliminarily tested at the Physics Department of the University of Rome - Tor Vergata.

Response of the CNT layer as an ordinary chemiresistor

In order to check the CNT response to the gas adsorbed on the surface, we carried out measurements of the resistivity change across the CNT layer. As shown in Fig. 2, depending on the target gas, the chemiresistor can display a resistivity increase (when exposed to a reducing gas, such as NH3) or a resistivity decrease (when exposed to an oxidizing gas, such as NO2).

The variation RS/R0 of sample resistance RS upon gas exposure with respect to the baseline resistance value R0 is measured according to the electrical scheme shown in Fig. 1-c. All sensors and PV devices, including humidity and temperature sensors, will be mounted on a specifically designed circuit board connected to a personal computer through a National Instrument PCIe-6251 data acquisition board. The gas mixing is equipped with three mass flow controllers (MFCs). Two low-flow MFCs for controlling the flow rate of the target gas (10.00 ± 0.78 ppm NO2 diluted or 47.1 ± 1.2 ppm NH3 both diluted in dry air) and a high-flow MFC for further dilution in dry air. The gas concentration has also been measured with a calibrated, commercially available, chemiresistor gas sensor (Figaro, Mod. TGS 2602). The reliability of this sensor calibration curve is routinely cross-checked by measures in the testing chamber with the calibrated MFCs. Further details can be retrieved in ref. 37.

During the exposure to target gas molecules, the testing chamber was filled by keeping the same flux for both gases. This was done to avoid differences in the response due to a different flux, as gas flow was recognized to affect the cell behaviour47. After setting the same gas flow for both target gas molecules, we set the target molecule concentration (30 ppm for NH3 and 2 ppm for NO2) and continued to fill the chamber until these values were reached. Depending on the characteristics of mass-flow-controllers feeding the chamber, this resulted in a longer filling time for NO2 with respect to NH3. Gas sensing measurements were carried out at I-LAMP labs of the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Brescia.

Response of the overall cell to gas exposure

Current-voltage (I-V) curves were collected during exposure to gas, either in dark or under light illumination. From each I-V curve the short circuit current (Isc), the open circuit voltage (Voc), the fill factor (FF), and the peak power (PP) were collected and related to the effects of gas exposure. The voltage drop upon gas exposure was measured between the Ag pads on the CNT layer (source) and the Al (Cr-Au) back-electrode below the Si substrate (drain). The I-V curves were collected with a suitably developed I-V tracker based on Labview-driven National Instruments board. Sample illumination was achieved by using a halogen lamp with selectable output power. The different read-out schemes adopted for the FET-like configuration and for the chemiresistor are shown in Fig. 1-c. Current-voltage measurements under different ambient conditions were carried out at the I-LAMP labs of the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Brescia.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Rigoni, F. et al. A cross-functional nanostructured platform based on carbon nanotube-Si hybrid junctions: where photon harvesting meets gas sensing. Sci. Rep. 7, 44413; doi: 10.1038/srep44413 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.