Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pricing ROI, pricing capabilities and firm performance

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management Aims and scope

Abstract

Pricing is not only an important activity but frequently also a very important expense for industrial companies. In this short article we examine whether an improvement in measuring the return from pricing (pricing return on investment (ROI)) leads to an improvement in pricing capabilities and firm profits. The answer to this question is not trivial: performance measurement is costly and could, at least in theory, reduce performance. We survey 166 marketing and pricing managers from business-to-business companies globally and find that the effectiveness of pricing ROI measurement is positively related to firm performance only if pricing capabilities are well developed. This article offers two contributions: it explores the concept of pricing ROI, and it documents a positive link between pricing ROI and firm performance. To the ongoing debate on antecedents of pricing capabilities this research thus adds a further, so-far unexplored, perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambler, T. (2003) Marketing and the Bottom Line: The Marketing Metrics to Pump Up Cash Flow, 2nd edn Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amburgey, T.L. and Rao, H. (1996) Organizational ecology: Past, present, and future directions. The Academy of Management Journal 39 (5): 1265–1286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, L. (2013) Pricing capability development and its antecedents. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Business Administration, School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Sweden.

  • Armstrong, J.S. and Overton, T.S. (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 14 (3): 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E.R. (2007) The Practice of Social Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, R. (2012) Market-Based Management: Strategies for Growing Customer Value and Profitability. . 6th edn Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B.M. (2009) Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassels, J. (1936) The significance of early economic thought on marketing. Journal of Marketing 1 (2): 129–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill Jr., G.A. (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research 16 (1): 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commander, C., Wilson, M. and Stevenson, J. (2007) The Evolved CMO. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research and Heidrich & Struggles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, B. (2008) Q&A with Beth Comstock (GE). Marketing NPV 5 (1): 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (2002) Fortune 1000 IT Buyer Survey: What Could Shorten Sales Cycles and Further Increase Win Rates for Technology Vendors? London, UK: Ernst & Young Report.

  • Corporate Executive Board (2007) 2007 Marketing Performance Measurement Benchmarks for Midsized Companies. Washington DC: Marketing Leadership Roundtable Benchmarking Center.

  • Danaher, P.J. and Rust, R.T. (1996) Determining the optimal return on investment for an advertising campaign. European Journal of Operational Research 95 (3): 511–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey, K.K.S., Childs, A. and Carlotti, S.J. (1998) Why your price band is wider than it should be. McKinsey Quarterly 1 (3): 116–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. (1966) Does advertising belong in the capital budget? Journal of Marketing 30 (4): 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doctorow, D., Hoblit, R. and Sekhar, A. (2009) Measuring marketing: Mckinsey global survey results. McKinsey Quarterly 45 (1): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, S., Zbaracki, M.J. and Bergen, M. (2003) Pricing process as a capability: A resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal 24 (7): 615–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris, P.W., Bendle, N.T., Pfeifer, P.E. and Reibstein, D.J. (2010) Marketing Metrics: The Definitive Guide to Measuring Marketing Performance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbis, J.L. and Mehta, N.T. (1981) Value-based strategies for industrial products. Business Horizons 24 (3): 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germann, F., Lilien, G.L. and Rangaswamy, A. (2013) Performance implications of deploying marketing analytics. International Journal of Research in Marketing 30 (2): 114–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, M., Heinemann, F., Brettel, M. and Hungeling, S. (2010) Configurations of resources and capabilities and their performance implications: An exploratory study on technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal 31 (12): 1337–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., Black, W.C. and Anderson, R.E. (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, 7th edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pearson–Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallberg, N. (2008) Pricing capabilities and its strategic dimensions. PhD thesis, School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Sweden.

  • Han, S., Gupta, S. and Lehmann, D.R. (2001) Consumer price sensitivity and price thresholds. Journal of Retailing 77 (4): 435–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilarides, B. (1999) What makes a trade promotion successful? Frozen Food 47 (12): 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, A. and Liozu, S. (2012) Is it time to rethink your pricing strategy? MIT Sloan Management Review 53 (4): 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., Jensen, O. and Hahn, A. (2012) How to organize pricing? Vertical delegation and horizontal dispersion of pricing authority. Journal of Marketing 76 (5): 49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igbaria, M., Iivari, J. and Maragahh, H. (1995) Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study. Information & Management 29 (5): 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juran, J.M. (1992) Juran on Quality by Design: The New Steps for Planning Quality into Goods and Services. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirpalani, V.H. and Shapiro, S.S. (1973) Financial dimensions of marketing management. Journal of Marketing 73 (3): 40–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A.K. and Jaworski, B.J. (1990) Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. The Journal of Marketing 54 (2): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koufteros, X., Vonderembse, M. and Doll, W. (2002) Integrated product development practices and competitive capabilities: The effects of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy. Journal of Operations Management 20 (4): 331–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy, R. (2010) Mix models: From predicting the future to managing it. Presentation at MSI Conference, Los Angeles, CA, 2–3 March.

  • Kumar, V., Bhaskaran, V., Mirchandani, R. and Shah, M. (2013) Creating a measurable social media marketing strategy: Increasing the value and ROI of intangibles and tangibles for hokey pokey. Marketing Science 32 (2): 194–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Jones, E., Venkatesan, R. and Leone, R.P. (2011) Is market orientation a source of sustainable competitive advantage or simply the cost of competing? Journal of Marketing 75 (1): 16–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenskold, J. (2003) Marketing ROI: The Path to Campaign, Customer, and Corporate Profitability. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liozu, S. and Hinterhuber, A. (2013) CEO championing of pricing, pricing capabilities and firm performance in industrial firms. Industrial Marketing Management 42 (4): 633–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liozu, S. and Hinterhuber, A. (2014) Pricing capabilities: The design, development and validation of a scale. Management Decision 52 (1): 144–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, S.B. and Podsakoff, P.M. (2012) Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of Retailing 88 (4): 542–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D.P., Lockwood, C.M., Hoffman, J.M., West, S.G. and Sheets, V. (2002) A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods 7 (1): 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J.E. and Taylor, S.R. (2006) Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior 27 (8): 1031–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medsker, G.J., Williams, L.J. and Holahan, P.J. (1994) A review of current practices for evaluating causal models in organizational behavior and human resources management research. Journal of Management 20 (2): 439–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrilees, B., Rundle-Thiele, S. and Lye, A. (2011) Marketing capabilities: Antecedents and implications for B2B SME performance. Industrial Marketing Management 40 (3): 368–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, O. and Currim, I.S. (2013) What drives managerial use of marketing and financial metrics and does metric use affect performance of marketing-mix activities? Journal of Marketing 77 (2): 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, C. (2013) The CMO survey: Highlights and insights. Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC, August. PowerPoint presentation, http://cmosurvey.org/results/survey-results-august-2013/, accessed 5 March 2015.

  • Morgan, N., Vorhies, D. and Mason, C. (2009) Market orientation, marketing capabilities, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 30 (8): 909–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossman, F.H., Fischer, P.M. and Crissy, W. (1974) New approaches to analyzing marketing profitability. Journal of Marketing 38 (2): 43–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagle, T.T. and Holden, R.K. (2002) The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing: A Guide to Profitable Decision Making. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nail, J. (2005) ForrTel: The State of Marketing Measurement. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narver, J.C. and Slater, S.F. (1990) The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. The Journal of Marketing 54 (4): 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. (1978) Fundamentals of factor analysis. In: J. Nunnally (ed.) Psychometric Methods, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 237–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, D. and Abela, A.V. (2007) Marketing performance measurement ability and firm performance. Journal of Marketing 71 (2): 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W.G. (1979) A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science 25 (9): 833–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H.-S., Auh, S., Maher, A.A. and Singhapakdi, A. (2012) Marketing’s accountability and internal legitimacy: Implications for firm performance. Journal of Business Research 65 (11): 1576–1582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, K. et al. (2008) Dashboards and Marketing: Why, What, How and What Research Is Needed? Cambridge, MA: MSI Report No. 08–203.

  • Perot, R. (1988) The GM system is like a blanket of fog. Fortune 15 (February): 48–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T.J. and Waterman, R.H. (1982) In Search of Excellence: Lessons from American’s Best-Run Companies. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. (1997) Return on Investment in Training and Performance Improvement Programs: A Step-by-Step Manual for Calculating the Financial Return. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A.V. and Van Der Velda, M. (1991) Operations as marketing: A competitive service strategy. Journal of Operations Management 10 (3): 303–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, R.T., Lemon, K.N. and Zeithaml, V.A. (2004) Return on marketing: Using customer equity to focus marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing 68 (1): 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapienza, H.J., Smith, K.G. and Gannon, M.J. (1988) Using subjective evaluations of organizational performance in small business research. American Journal of Small Business 12 (3): 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuble, P. (1969) ROI for new-product policy. Harvard Business Review 47 (6): 110–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seggie, S.H., Cavusgil, E. and Phelan, S.E. (2007) Measurement of return on marketing investment: A conceptual framework and the future of marketing metrics. Industrial Marketing Management 36 (6): 834–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, R. and Ward, P.T. (2003) Lean manufacturing: Context, practice bundles, and performance. Journal of Operations Management 21 (2): 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spanos, Y.E. and Lioukas, S. (2001) An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: Contrasting Porter’s competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal 22 (10): 907–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalk, G. (1988) Time: The next source of competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review 66 (4): 42–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.B.E.M. and Baumgartner, H. (1998) Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 25 (1): 78–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D.W. (2009) Marketing accountability: Linking marketing actions to financial results. Journal of Business Research 62 (6): 636–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, G.N., Greis, N.P. and Kasarda, J.D. (2000) Enterprise logistics and supply chain structure: The role of fit. Journal of Operations Management 18 (5): 531–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streukens, S., van Hoesel, S. and de Ruyter, K. (2011) Return on marketing investments in B2B customer relationships: A decision-making and optimization approach. Industrial Marketing Management 40 (1): 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittink, D.R. (2002) Analysis of ROI for Pharmaceutical Promotion (ARPP). New Haven, CT: Yale School of Management. Working paper, 18 September.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hinterhuber & Partners, Innsbruck, Austria

    Andreas Hinterhuber

  2. Business & Entrepreneurship Department, Chatham University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Stephan M Liozu

Authors
  1. Andreas Hinterhuber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephan M Liozu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Hinterhuber.

Additional information

2holds a PhD in Management from the Weatherhead School of Management at Case Western Reserve University. He is Assistant Professor of Management and Strategy at Chatham University in Pittsburgh, PA, USA. His research focus is on value and pricing management from an organizational and managerial perspective.

Appendix

Appendix

Table A1

Table A1 Constructs and scales
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hinterhuber, A., Liozu, S. Pricing ROI, pricing capabilities and firm performance. J Revenue Pricing Manag 14, 211–228 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/rpm.2015.11

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/rpm.2015.11

Keywords

Search

Navigation