skip to main content
10.1145/1080829.1080851acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Modeling media access in embedded two-flow topologies of multi-hop wireless networks

Published:28 August 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we decompose a large- or small-scale multi-hop wireless network into embedded subgraphs, each consisting of four nodes and two flow pairs. We systematically study all twelve possible topologies that arise according to whether the different nodes are in radio range of each other. We show that under both a random spatial distribution of nodes and random waypoint mobility with shortest-path routing, a critical and highly probable scenario is a class in which the channel state shared by the two flows is not only incomplete (i.e., the graph is not fully connected), but there is also asymmetry in the state between the two flows. We develop an accurate analytical model validated by simulations to characterize the long-term unfairness that naturally arises when CSMA with two- or four-way handshake is employed as a random access protocol. Moreover, we show that another key class of topologies consists of incomplete but symmetric shared state. We show via modeling and simulations that in this case, the system achieves long-term fairness, yet endures significant durations in which one flow dominates channel access with many repeated transmissions before relinquishing the channel. The model predicts the time-scales of this unfairness as a function of system parameters such as the maximum retransmission limit.

References

  1. G. Berger-Sabbatel, A. Duda, M. Heusse, and F. Rousseau. Short-term fairness of 802.11 networks with several hosts. In Proceedings of the 6th IFIP/IEEE International Conference on Mobile and Wireless Communication Networks, Paris, France, October 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. V. Bharghavan, S. Demers, S. Shenker, and L. Zhang. MACAW: A media access protocol for wireless LANs. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM '94, London, UK, August 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. V. Bharghvan. Performance evaluation of algorithms for wireless medium access. In Proceedings of IEEE International Computer Performance and Dependability Symposium (IPDS '98), Durham, NC, March 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. G. Bianchi. Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 18(3):535--547, March 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Carvalho and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. Delay analysis of IEEE 802.11 in single-hop networks. In Proceedings of IEEE ICNP '03: 11th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, Atlanta, Georgia, November 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. Chaudet, D. Dhoutaut, and I. G. Lassous. Experiments of some performance issues with IEEE 802.11b in ad hoc networks. In Second Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS'05), St. Moritz, Switzerland, January 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. B. P. Crow, I. K. Widjaja, G. Jeong, and P. T. Sakai. IEEE 802.11 wireless local area networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 35(9):116--126, September 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves and A. Tzamaloukas. Reversing the collision-avoidance handshake in wireless networks. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom '99, Seattle, Washington, August 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Garetto, T. Salonidis, and E. Knightly. Starvation in CSMA-Based Multi-hop Wireless Networks: Model and Solutions. Technical report, Rice University, Houston, TX, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. N. Gupta and P. R. Kumar. A Performance Analysis of the 802.11 Wireless LAN Medium Access Control. Communications in Information and Systems, 3(4):279--304, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. V. Kanodia, C. Li, A. Sabharwal, B. Sadeghi, and E. Knightly. Ordered packet scheduling in wireless ad hoc networks: Mechanisms and performance analysis. In Proceedings of ACM MobiHoc, Lausanne, Switzerland, June 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. P. Karn. MACA: A new channel access method for packet radio. In ARRL/CRRL Amateur Radio 9th Computer Networking Conference, April 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Kumar, E. Altman, D. Miorandi, and M. Goyal. New insights from a fixed point analysis of single cell IEEE 802.11 WLANs. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '05, Miami, FL, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. L. E. Miller. Distribution of link distances in a wireless network. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 106(2):401--412, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. S. Ray, J. Carruthers, and D. Starobinski. Evaluation of the masked node problem in ad-hoc wireless LANs. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, in press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Ray, D. Starobinski, and J. Carruthers. Performance of wireless networks with hidden nodes: A queueing-theoretic analysis. Journal of Computer Communications (Special Issue on the Performance of Wireless LANs, PANs, and Ad-Hoc Networks), in press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Y. Sun, X. Gao, E. M. Belding-Royer, and J. Kempf. Model-based resource prediction for multi-hop wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS), Ft. Lauderdale, FL, October 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. F. A. Tobagi and L. Kleinrock. Packet switching in radio channels: Part II - the hidden terminal problem in carrier sense multiple access and the busy tone solution. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 23(12):1417--1433, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Y. Wang and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. A new hybrid channel access scheme for ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of Med-Hoc-Net, Sardegna, Italy, September 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Y. Wang and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. Channel sharing of competing flows in ad hoc networks. In IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC '03), Kemer-Antalya, Turkey, July 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. R. W. Wolff. Stochastic Modeling and the Theory of Queues. Prentice Hall, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. J. Yoon, M. Liu, and B. Noble. Sound mobility models. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom '03, San Diego, CA, September 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Modeling media access in embedded two-flow topologies of multi-hop wireless networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MobiCom '05: Proceedings of the 11th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
        August 2005
        325 pages
        ISBN:1595930205
        DOI:10.1145/1080829

        Copyright © 2005 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 August 2005

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate440of2,972submissions,15%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader