skip to main content
10.1145/2254556.2254573acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaviConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Metaphor modelling for tangible interfaces evaluation

Published:21 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we discuss metaphor modeling and interpretation in human computer interaction. We aim at evaluating metaphors in Tangible User Interfaces by matching entities and operations between the two domains of the metaphor: the physical interaction domain and the digital domain. A case study in tangible interaction is analyzed and a structured definition of interaction metaphor is derived and evaluated.

References

  1. P. B. Andersen. Computer semiotics. Scandinavian Journal of Information systems, 4:3--30, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. V. L. Averbukh et al. Searching and analysis of interface and visualization metaphors. In K. Asai, editor, Human Computer Interaction: New Developments. InTech, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. P. Barr, R. Biddle, and J. Noble. A semiotic model of user-interface metaphor. In 6th International Workshop on Organisational Semiotics, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Beaudouin-Lafon. Instrumental interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '00, pages 446--453, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Black. Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 55:273--294, 1954.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. E. Dubois and P. Gray. A design-oriented information-flow refinement of the ASUR interaction model. In J Gulliksen, M. Harning, P. Palanque, G. van der Veer, and J. Wesson, editors, Proc. Int. Conf. on Engineering Interactive Systems EIS'07, volume 4940, pages 465--482. Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. E. Dubois, L. Nigay, and J. Troccaz. Consistency in augmented reality systems. In M. R. Little and L. Nigay, editors, Proc. EHCI '2001, pages 111--122. Springer Verlag, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. K. P. Fishkin. A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 8(5):347--358, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. E. Hornecker and J. Burr. Getting a grip on tangible interaction: A framework on physical space and social interaction. In Proc. CHI 2006, pages 436--446. ACM Press, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. B. Indurkhya. Constrained semantic transference: A formal theory of metaphors. Synthese, 68(3):515--551, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. W. Kintsch. Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7(2):257--266, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. G. Lakoff and M. Johnson. Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. F. Pittarello and R. Stecca. Querying and navigating a database of images with the magical objects of the wizard zurlino. In IDC 2010, 9th international Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pages 250--253. ACM Press, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. F. Pittarello and R. Stecca. Mapping physical objects to digital functions: A tangible interface for querying and navigating a multimedia database. In DEXA '11, Proc. of the 22nd International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pages 134--138. IEEE Computer Society, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. C. Sickenius de Souza. The semiotic engineering of user interface languages. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud., 39(5):753--773, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. B. Ullmer and H. Ishii. Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces. IBM Syst. J., 39(3--4):915--931, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. B. Ullmer, H. Ishii, and R. J. K. Jacob. Token+constraint systems for tangible interaction with digital information. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 12(1):81--118, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Metaphor modelling for tangible interfaces evaluation

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          AVI '12: Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces
          May 2012
          846 pages
          ISBN:9781450312875
          DOI:10.1145/2254556

          Copyright © 2012 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 21 May 2012

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate107of408submissions,26%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader