skip to main content
10.1145/2396761.2398559acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

You should read this! let me explain you why: explaining news recommendations to users

Published:29 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recommender systems have become ubiquitous in content-based web applications, from news to shopping sites. Nonetheless, an aspect that has been largely overlooked so far in the recommender system literature is that of automatically building explanations for a particular recommendation. This paper focuses on the news domain, and proposes to enhance effectiveness of news recommender systems by adding, to each recommendation, an explanatory statement to help the user to better understand if, and why, the item can be her interest. We consider the news recommender system as a black-box, and generate different types of explanations employing pieces of information associated with the news. In particular, we engineer text-based, entity-based, and usage-based explanations, and make use of a Markov Logic Networks to rank the explanations on the basis of their effectiveness. The assessment of the model is conducted via a user study on a dataset of news read consecutively by actual users. Experiments show that news recommender systems can greatly benefit from our explanation module as it allows users to discriminate between interesting and not interesting news in the majority of the cases.

References

  1. G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 17(6):734--749, june 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Blanco and H. Zaragoza. Finding support sentences for entities. In Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, SIGIR '10, pages 339--346, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, CSCW '00, pages 241--250, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Richardson and P. Domingos. Markov logic networks. Mach. Learn., 62(1-2):107--136, Feb. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Vig, S. Sen, and J. Riedl. Tagsplanations: explaining recommendations using tags. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pages 47--56. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. You should read this! let me explain you why: explaining news recommendations to users

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CIKM '12: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
          October 2012
          2840 pages
          ISBN:9781450311564
          DOI:10.1145/2396761

          Copyright © 2012 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 29 October 2012

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader