Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 11, 2018

The Costs of Firm Exit and Labour Market Policies: New Evidence from Europe

  • Dan Andrews , Irene Ferrari EMAIL logo and Alessandro Saia

Abstract

The churning of firms is an inherent process of industrialized economies, which entails a high rate of job destruction. Thus, a key question is: what are the policies that minimize the costs of worker displacement due to business closure? Accordingly, this paper exploits a retrospective panel of workers in 13 European countries over the period 1985–2008 to explore the factors which shape the reemployment prospects of workers displaced due to business closure. The results suggest that higher spending on active labour market policies increases the reemployment prospects of the unemployed workers displaced by business closure, both in terms of unemployment duration and in terms of stability of reemployment. On the contrary, there is evidence of a negative and sizable impact of passive labour market policies on unemployment duration.

JEL Classification: J63; J68; O40

A Appendix

Table 9:

Data sources.

VariableDefinitionSource
ALMPPlacement and Administration, Training, Employment Incentives, Direct Job Creation and Start-up Incentives, (public expenditure as a percentage of GDP)OECD Labour Market Programmes Database
PLMPOut-of-work income support and Early retirement, (public expenditure as a percentage of GDP)OECD Labour Marketr Programmes Database
Out of income SupportCorresponds to public expenditure in unemployment benefits, redundancy compensation, and bankruptcy compensationOECD Labour Market Programmes Database
Average Replacement rateProportion of income in work that is maintained after job lossBassanini and Duval (2009)
Entry barriersRegulation in energy, transport, and communicationsOECD.stat

B Appendix

Table 10:

Heterogeneous effects of labour market policies according to worker’s age.

(1)
ALMP (% of GDP)0.166***
(0.0505)
PLMP (% of GDP)0.137***
(0.0257)
Age0.0132***
(0.00189)
ALMP × Age0.00323
(0.00454)
PLMP × Age0.00462**
(0.00193)
Demographic controlsYES
Country-fixed effectsYES
Year-fixed effectsYES
Observations1,348
R20.142
  1. Notes: The estimates are based on a sample of displaced workers in 13 European countries over the period 1985 to 2008. Changes in the sample size are due to different coverage of the explanatory variables. The dependent variable is a dummy that takes value 1 if an individual who lost her job due to business closure in a given year found a new job within the next year. Demographic controls include gender, age, previous job tenure, relationship status, and number of children. Robust standard errors clustered at the country 5-year period level in parentheses. ***, **, and * denote statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10%, respectively.

Table 11:

Robustness to the inclusion of additional controls.

(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)
ALMP (% of GDP)0.171***0.170***0.172***0.155***0.121**0.117*0.128*
(0.0525)(0.0534)(0.0541)(0.0565)(0.0591)(0.0645)(0.0672)
PLMP (% of GDP)0.0967***0.0953***0.0979***0.103***0.141***0.149***0.152***
(0.0243)(0.0255)(0.0256)(0.0261)(0.0305)(0.0296)(0.0302)
Demographic controlsYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
Country-fixed effectsYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
Year-fixed effectsYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
EducationNOYESYESYESYESYESYES
Industry-fixed effectsNONOYESYESYESYESYES
Total tenure and Total tenure × EducationNONONOYESYESYESYES
Output gapNONONONOYESYESYES
ETCR & EPLNONONONONOYESYES
Labour tax wedgeNONONONONONOYES
Observations951951951951951951951
R20.1730.1790.1910.2500.2530.2540.255
  1. Notes: The estimates are based on a sample of displaced workers in 13 European countries over the period 1985 to 2008. Changes in the sample size are due to different coverage of the explanatory variables. The dependent variable is a dummy that takes value 1 if an individual who lost her job due to business closure in a given year found a new job within the next year. Demographic controls include gender, age, previous job tenure, relationship status, and number of children. Robust standard errors clustered at the country 5-year period level in parentheses. ***, **, and * denote statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10%, respectively.

Table 12:

Robustness to alternative definitions of labour market policies.

(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
ALMP spending per unemployed0.00251***0.00295***0.00285***0.00328***
divided by GDP p.c. (%)(0.000728)(0.000722)(0.000727)(0.000701)
PLMP spending per unemployed0.00320*0.00362*0.00400***0.00436***
divided by GDP p.c. (%)(0.00181)(0.00181)(0.00145)(0.00150)
Average unemployment benefit0.00569**0.00714***
replacement rate (%)(0.00258)(0.00229)
Demographic controlsYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
Country-fixed effectsYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
Year-fixed effectsYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
EducationNOYESNOYESNOYESNOYES
Industry-fixed effectsNOYESNOYESNOYESNOYES
Total tenure and Total tenure × EducationNOYESNOYESNOYESNOYES
Output gapNOYESNOYESNOYESNOYES
ETCR & EPLNOYESNOYESNOYESNOYES
Labour tax wedgeNOYESNOYESNOYESNOYES
Observations9729729729729729721,0211,021
R20.1650.2450.1620.2410.1700.2500.1560.246
  1. Notes: The estimates are based on a sample of displaced workers in 13 European countries over the period 1985 to 2008. Changes in the sample size are due to different coverage of the explanatory variables. The dependent variable is a dummy that takes value 1 if an individual who lost her job due to business closure in a given year found a new job within the next year. Demographic controls include gender, age, previous job tenure, relationship status, and number of children. Robust standard errors clustered at the country 5-year period level in parentheses. ***, **, and * denote statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10%, respectively.

Table 13:

Robustness to the adoption of an alternative model: probit model.

(1)(2)(3)
ALMP (% of GDP)0.463**0.472***
(0.202)(0.151)
PLMP (% of GDP)0.361***0.366***
(0.0798)(0.0792)
Demographic controlsYESYESYES
Country-fixed effectsYESYESYES
Year-fixed effectsYESYESYES
Observations1,3041,3671,304
  1. Notes: The estimates are based on a sample of displaced workers in 13 European countries over the period 1985 to 2008. Changes in the sample size are due to different coverage of the explanatory variables. The dependent variable is a dummy that takes value 1 if an individual who lost her job due to business closure in a given year found a new job within the next year. Demographic controls include gender, age, previous job tenure, relationship status, and number of children. Robust standard errors clustered at the country 5-year period level in parentheses. ***, **, and * denote statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10%, respectively.

Table 14:

Robustness to alternative clustering: country-year level.

(1)(2)(3)
ALMP (% of GDP)0.165**0.164**
(0.0817)(0.0771)
PLMP (% of GDP)0.123***0.122***
(0.0275)(0.0282)
Demographic controlsYESYESYES
Country-fixed effectsYESYESYES
Year-fixed effectsYESYESYES
Observations1,3041,3671,304
R20.1260.1340.136
  1. Notes: The estimates are based on a sample of displaced workers in 13 European countries over the period 1985 to 2008. Changes in the sample size are due to different coverage of the explanatory variables. The dependent variable is a dummy that takes value 1 if an individual who lost her job due to business closure in a given year found a new job within the next year. Demographic controls include gender, age, previous job tenure, relationship status, and number of children. Robust standard errors clustered at the country year-level in parentheses. ***, **, and * denote statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10%, respectively.

Figure 5: Percentage of workers aged 20–64 displaced from one year to the next, 1985–2008.Notes: this graph shows the percentage of workers aged 20 to 64 who lose their job each year due to business closure, by country. Years 1985 to 2008.
Figure 5:

Percentage of workers aged 20–64 displaced from one year to the next, 1985–2008.

Notes: this graph shows the percentage of workers aged 20 to 64 who lose their job each year due to business closure, by country. Years 1985 to 2008.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Co-Editor Frans de Vries and one anonymous referee for their helpful comments and suggestions. The authors would also like to thank Catherine L. Mann, Giuseppe Nicoletti, Jean-Luc Schneider, Lilas Demmou, Oliver Denk, Paula Garda, Valentine Millot, Andrea Bassanini, Axel Börsch-Supan, Tabea Bucher-Koenen, and seminar participants at the OECD and Munich Center for the Economics of Aging for their valuable comments; Catherine Chapuis and Sarah Michelson for statistical and editorial support. The SHARE data collection has been primarily funded by the European Commission through FP5 (QLK6-CT-2001-00360), FP6 (SHARE-I3: RII-CT-2006-062193, COMPARE: CIT5-CT-2005-028857, SHARELIFE: CIT4-CT-2006-028812) and FP7 (SHARE-PREP: N211909, SHARE-LEAP: N227822, SHARE M4: N261982). Additional funding from the German Ministry of Education and Research, the Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science, the U.S. National Institute on Aging and from various national funding sources is gratefully acknowledged (see www.share-project.org).

References

Akerlof, G. A., A. K. Rose, J. L. Yellen, L. Ball, and R. E. Hall. 1988. “Job Switching and Job Satisfaction in the US Labor Market.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (2): 495–594.10.2307/2534536Search in Google Scholar

Antonova, L., L. Aranda, G. Pasini, and E. Trevisan. 2014. “Migration, family history and pension: the second release of the SHARE Job Episodes Panel.” SHARE Working Paper Series 18, SHARE-ERIC.Search in Google Scholar

Bassanini, A., G. Brunello, and E. Caroli. 2017. “Not in My Community: Social Pressure and the Geography of Dismissals.” Journal of Labor Economics 35 (2): 429–483.10.1086/689285Search in Google Scholar

Bassanini, A., and R. Duval. 2009. “Unemployment, institutions, and reform complementarities: re-assessing the aggregate evidence for OECD countries.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 25 (1): 40–59.10.1093/oxrep/grp004Search in Google Scholar

Bassanini, A., and A. Garnero. 2013. “Dismissal protection and worker flows in OECD countries: Evidence from cross-country/cross-industry data.” Labour Economics 21: 25–41.10.1016/j.labeco.2012.12.003Search in Google Scholar

Bekker, S., T. Wilthagen, P. K. Madsen, J. Zhou, R. Rogowski, M. Keune, and A. Tangian. 2008. “Flexicurity – a European approach to labour market policy.” Intereconomics 43 (2): 68–111.10.1007/s10272-008-0244-0Search in Google Scholar

Bergemann, A., B. Fitzenberger, and S. Speckesser. 2009. “Evaluating the dynamic employment effects of training programs in East Germany using conditional difference-in-differences.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 24 (5): 797–823.10.1002/jae.1054Search in Google Scholar

Bertrand, M., and F. Kramarz. 2002. “Does Entry Regulation Hinder Job Creation? Evidence from the French Retail Industry.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4): 1369–1413.10.1162/003355302320935052Search in Google Scholar

Biewen, M., B. Fitzenberger, A. Osikominu, and M. Paul. 2014. “The effectiveness of public-sponsored training revisited: The importance of data and methodological choices.” Journal of Labor Economics 32 (4): 837–897.10.1086/677233Search in Google Scholar

Boone, J., and J. C. Van Ours. 2004. “Effective active labor market policies.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4707, Centre for Economic Policy Research.10.2139/ssrn.602406Search in Google Scholar

Börsch-Supan, A., M. Brandt, C. Hunkler, T. Kneip, J. Korbmacher, F. Malter, B. Schaan, S. Stuck, and S. Zuber. 2013. “Data resource profile: the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).” International Journal of Epidemiology 42 (4): 992–1001.10.1093/ije/dyt088Search in Google Scholar

Brand, J. E. 2006. “The effects of job displacement on job quality: Findings from the wisconsin longitudinal study.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 24 (3): 275–298.10.1016/j.rssm.2006.03.001Search in Google Scholar

Browning, M., and E. Heinesen. 2012. “Effect of job loss due to plant closure on mortality and hospitalization.” Journal of Health Economics 31 (4): 599–616.10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.03.001Search in Google Scholar

Brugiavini, A., D. Cavapozzi, G. Pasini, and E. Trevisan. 2013. “Working life histories from SHARELIFE: a retrospective panel.” SHARE Working Paper Series 11, SHARE-ERIC.Search in Google Scholar

Caliendo, M., K. Tatsiramos, and A. Uhlendorff. 2013. “Benefit Duration, Unemployment Duration and Job Match Quality: A Regression-Discontinuity Approach.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 28 (4): 604–627.10.1002/jae.2293Search in Google Scholar

Card, D., R. Chetty, and A. Weber. 2007. “The spike at benefit exhaustion: Leaving the unemployment system or starting a new job?” The American Economic Review 97 (2): 113–118.10.1257/aer.97.2.113Search in Google Scholar

Card, D., J. Kluve, and A. Weber. 2010. “Active Labour Market Policy Evaluations: A Meta-Analysis.” The Economic Journal 120 (548): F452–F477.10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02387.xSearch in Google Scholar

Carrington, W. J., and B. Fallick. 2017. “Why do Earnings Fall with Job Displacement?” Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 56 (4): 688–722.10.26509/frbc-wp-201405Search in Google Scholar

Cremer, H., J.-M. Lozachmeur, and P. Pestieau. 2009. “Use and misuse of unemployment benefits for early retirement.” European Journal of Political Economy 25 (2): 174–185.10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2008.09.009Search in Google Scholar

Davis, S. J., J. Haltiwanger, and R. Jarmin. 2008. “Turmoil and Growth: Young Businesses, Economic Churning, and Productivity Gains.” Business Dynamics Statistics Briefings, Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.10.2139/ssrn.1139944Search in Google Scholar

Davis, S. J., and T. M. Von Wachter. 2011. “Recessions and the cost of job loss.” NBER Working Paper 17638, National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w17638Search in Google Scholar

de Beer, P., and T. Schils. 2010. “Introduction: achieving an optimal social policy mix.” In The labour market triangle: employment protection, unemployment compensation and activation in Europe, Chapter 1, edited by P. de Beer and T. Schils. Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781849803274.00009Search in Google Scholar

De Serres, A., and F. Murtin. 2014. “Unemployment at risk: the policy determinants of labour market exposure to economic shocks.” Economic Policy 29 (80): 603–637.10.1111/1468-0327.12038Search in Google Scholar

Eliason, M., and D. Storrie. 2009. “Does job loss shorten life?” Journal of Human Resources 44 (2): 277–302.10.1353/jhr.2009.0020Search in Google Scholar

Estevão, M. 2003. “Do active labor market policies increase employment?” IMF Working Papers 3-234, International Monetary Fund.10.5089/9781451875645.001Search in Google Scholar

Felbermayr, G., and J. Prat. 2011. “Product market regulation, firm selection, and unemployment.” Journal of the European Economic Association 9 (2): 278–317.10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01011.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gathmann, C., I. Helm, and U. Schönberg. 2017. “Spillover effects of mass layoffs.” Working paper, University College London.10.1093/jeea/jvy045Search in Google Scholar

Givord, P., and E. Maurin. 2004. “Changes in job security and their causes: An empirical analysis for France, 1982–2002.” European Economic Review 48 (3): 595–615.10.1016/S0014-2921(03)00043-6Search in Google Scholar

Hijzen, A., R. Upward, and P. W. Wright. 2010. “The income losses of displaced workers.” Journal of Human Resources 45 (1): 243–269.10.1353/jhr.2010.0000Search in Google Scholar

Jacobson, L. S., R. J. LaLonde, and D. G. Sullivan. 1993. “Earnings Losses of Displaced Workers.” The American Economic Review 83 (4): 685–709.10.17848/wp92-11Search in Google Scholar

Jespersen, S. T., J. R. Munch, and L. Skipper. 2008. “Costs and benefits of Danish active labour market programmes.” Labour Economics 15 (5): 859–884.10.1016/j.labeco.2007.07.005Search in Google Scholar

Kletzer, L. G. 1998. “Job Displacement.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (1): 115–136.10.1257/jep.12.1.115Search in Google Scholar

Kluve, J. 2010. “The effectiveness of European active labor market programs.” Labour Economics 17 (6): 904–918.10.1016/j.labeco.2010.02.004Search in Google Scholar

Kuhn, P. J. 2002. Losing Work, Moving On: International Perspectives on Worker Displacement. Kalamazoo, Michigan: WE Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.10.17848/9781417505333Search in Google Scholar

Lalive, R. 2007. “Unemployment benefits, unemployment duration, and post-unemployment jobs: A regression discontinuity approach.” The American Economic Review 97 (2): 108–112.10.1257/aer.97.2.108Search in Google Scholar

Lalive, R., J. C. Van Ours, and J. Zweimüller. 2008. “The Impact of Active Labour Market Programmes on The Duration of Unemployment in Switzerland.” The Economic Journal 118 (525): 235–257.10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02111.xSearch in Google Scholar

Marcus, J. 2013. The effect of unemployment on the mental health of spouses–Evidence from plant closures in Germany. Journal of Health Economics 32 (3): 546–558.10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.02.004Search in Google Scholar

Murtin, F., and J.-M. Robin. 2018. “Labor market reforms and unemployment dynamics.” Labour Economics 50: 3–19.10.1016/j.labeco.2016.05.025Search in Google Scholar

Nekoei, A., and A. Weber. 2017. “Does Extending Unemployment Benefits Improve Job Quality?” The American Economic Review 107 (2): 527–61.10.1257/aer.20150528Search in Google Scholar

OECD. 2013. “Back to work: Re-employment, earnings and skill use after job displacement.” In OECD Employment Outlook 2013, Chapter 4, pp. 191–233. Paris: OECD Publishing.10.1787/empl_outlook-2013-8-enSearch in Google Scholar

OECD. 2017. “Employment database.” Data retrieved from OECD.Stats. http://stats.oecd.org//Index.aspx?QueryId=8540.Search in Google Scholar

Rege, M., K. Telle, and M. Votruba. 2011. “Parental job loss and children’s school performance.” The Review of Economic Studies 78 (4): 1462–1489.10.1093/restud/rdr002Search in Google Scholar

Schmieder, J. F., T. Von Wachter, and S. Bender. 2012. “The effects of extended unemployment insurance over the business cycle: Evidence from regression discontinuity estimates over 20 years.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 127 (2): 701–752.10.1093/qje/qjs010Search in Google Scholar

Schwerdt, G. 2011. “Labor turnover before plant closure: “Leaving the sinking ship” vs.“Captain throwing ballast overboard”.” Labour Economics 18 (1): 93–101.10.1016/j.labeco.2010.08.003Search in Google Scholar

Sianesi, B. 2004. “An Evaluation of the Swedish System of Active Labor Market Programs in the 1990s.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (1): 133–155.10.1162/003465304323023723Search in Google Scholar

Sullivan, D., and T. Von Wachter. 2009. “Job displacement and mortality: An analysis using administrative data.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (3): 1265–1306.10.1162/qjec.2009.124.3.1265Search in Google Scholar

Tatsiramos, K. 2014. “Unemployment benefits and job match quality.” IZA World of Labor 44. URL https://wol.iza.org/articles/unemployment-benefits-and-job-match-quality/long.10.15185/izawol.44Search in Google Scholar

Topel, R. H., and M. P. Ward. 1992. “Job Mobility and the Careers of Young Men.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (2): 439–479.10.2307/2118478Search in Google Scholar

Van Ours, J. C., and M. Vodopivec. 2008. “Does reducing unemployment insurance generosity reduce job match quality?” Journal of Public Economics 92 (3-4): 684–695.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.05.006Search in Google Scholar

Von Wachter, T., J. Song, and J. Manchester. 2009. “Long-term earnings losses due to mass layoffs during the 1982 recession: An analysis using us administrative data from 1974 to 2004.” Unpublished paper, Columbia University.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-10-11

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/bejeap-2017-0211/html
Scroll to top button