Abstract
Lucretius devotes some sections of his De rerum natura to the treatment of dreams. He is particularly interested in the phenomenon of dream deception, namely the belief that the dreamt object is the object itself. This psychological phenomenon has some both unwanted and philosophically interesting implications. Firstly, from an ethical point of view, it can stimulate uncontrolled worries and feelings in the dreamer that undermine his/her mental tranquility and health. Secondly, from a physiological perspective, it seems to reveal a failure in the mechanism undergoing the formation of mental representation. Thirdly, from the epistemological point of view, it seems to compromise the veracity of mental representations. This paper aims to explain how Lucretius dealt with this phenomenon. In particular, it will show how he succeeded, on the one hand, to explain the nature and the origin of dream deception and of its emotional aspect, and, on the other hand, to preserve the informative contents of dreams and their correspondence to reality. For this purpose the present essay will address the following issues: (1) which is the condition of the soul and of the mind while sleeping; (2) what kind of mental activity is dreaming; (3) which is the nature and the origin of the simulacra responsible for dreams; (4) which is the contents of dreams and how dream deception comes about; (5) and finally why and how dream deception emotionally effects the dreamer.
Bibliografia
Asmis, E. 1981. “Lucretius’ Explanation of Moving Dream Figures at 4.768–76”, American Journal of Philology 102, 138‒145.10.2307/294304Search in Google Scholar
Avotins, I. 1980. “Alexander of Aphrodisias on Vision in the Atomists”, Classical Quarterly 33, 429–454.10.1017/S0009838800042385Search in Google Scholar
Bailey, C. 1926. Epicurus. The Extant Remains, edited by C. Bailey, Oxford, Oxford Clarendon Press [rist. Hildesheim–New York, Olms, 1970].Search in Google Scholar
Cavini, W. 2009. “Phantasma: L’immagine onirica come apparenza illusoria nel pensiero greco del sogno”, Medicina nei secoli. Arte e Scienza. Journal of History of Medicine 21, 737–772.Search in Google Scholar
Clay, D. 1988. “An Epicurean Interpretation of Dreams”, in D. Clay, Paradosis and Survival: Three Chapters in the History of Epicurean Philosophy, Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press, 211–231.Search in Google Scholar
Corti, A. 2015. “ ̔Ομοιοσχήμων e ὁμοιόμορφος. Alcune riflessioni sulle proprietà degli εἵδωλα”, in Masi–Maso (2015) 83–105.Search in Google Scholar
DeWitt, N. W. 1939. “Epicurus, Περὶ φαντασίας”, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 70, 414–427.10.2307/283099Search in Google Scholar
Diano, C. 1974. “La psicologia d’Epicuro e la teoria delle passioni”, in C. Diano, Scritti epicurei, Firenze, Olschki, 129–280.Search in Google Scholar
Everson, S. 1999. “Epicurean Psychology”, in K. Algra, J. Barnes, J. Mansfeld, M. Schofield (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 542–559.10.1017/CHOL9780521250283.017Search in Google Scholar
Gigandet, A. 2015. “L’âme défaite: la théorie du sommeil dans l’Épicurisme”, in V. Leroux, N. Palmieri et C. Pigne, Le sommeil. Approches philosophiques et médicales de l’Antiquité à la Renaissance, Paris, Honoré Champion Editeur, 85–96.Search in Google Scholar
Gigandet, A. 2017. “Diogène, Lucrèce et la théorie épicurienne de l’imaginaire. Fragment 9 – De rerum natura IV 971–993”, in Hammerstaedt–Morel–Güremen (2017) 207–220.Search in Google Scholar
Godwin, J. 1986. Lucretius. De Rerum Natura IV, Edited with Translation and Commentary, Warminster, Aris & Phillips.10.3828/liverpool/9780856683084.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Gordon, P. 1996. Epicurus in Lycia. The Second–Century World of Diogenes of Oenoanda, Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.14312Search in Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.–B. 2017. “La critique des stoïciens dans l’inscription d’Œnoanda”, in Hammerstaedt–Morel–Güremen (2017) 165–185.10.2307/j.ctt1pwtcnh.13Search in Google Scholar
Guidorizzi, G. 2013. Il compagno dell’anima. I Greci e il sogno, Milano, Raffaello Cortina Editore.Search in Google Scholar
Güremen, R. 2017. Diogenes of Oinoanda and the Epicurean Epistemology of Dreams, in Hammerstaedt–Morel–Güremen (2017) 187–205.10.2307/j.ctt1pwtcnh.14Search in Google Scholar
Hammerstaedt, J., Morel, P.M., Güremen, R. 2017. Diogenes of Oinoanda: Epicureanism and Philosophical Debates, Leuven, Leuven University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. 1971. “Epicurus’ Doctrine of the Soul”, Phronesis 16, 80–96.10.1163/156852871X00061Search in Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2007. Lucrezio e la psicologia epicurea, Milano, Vita e Pensiero.Search in Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2008. A Life Worthy of the Gods. The Materialist Psychology of Epicurus, Las Vegas/Zurich/Athens, Parmenides Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Lapini, W. 2015. L’Epistola a Erodoto e il Bios di Epicuro in Diogene Laerzio. Note testuali, esegetiche e metodologiche, Roma, Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Search in Google Scholar
Lathiere, A.–M. 1972. “Lucrèce Traducteur d’Épicure: Animus, Anima dans les Livres 3 et 4 du De rerum natura”, Phoenix 26, 123–133.10.2307/1087712Search in Google Scholar
Laursen, S. 1995. “The Early Parts of Epicurus, On Nature, 25th Book”, Cronache Ercolanesi 25, 5–109.Search in Google Scholar
Leone, G. 2002. “Epicuro, Della natura: libro XXXIV. PHerc. 1431”, Cronache Ercolanesi 32, 7–135.Search in Google Scholar
Leone, G. 2012. Epicuro, Sulla natura: libro II, Napoli, Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar
Leone, G. 2015. “Nuovi spunti di riflessione sulla dottrina epicurea degli εἵδωλα dalla rilettura del II libro Sulla natura”, in Masi–Maso (2015) 35–53.Search in Google Scholar
Masi, F. G. 2014. “Gli atomi ricordano? Fisicalismo e memoria nella psicologia di Epicuro”, Antiquorum Philosophia 8, 121–141.Search in Google Scholar
Masi, F. G. 2015. “Dagli occhi alla mente: il cammino tortuoso degli εἵδωλα”, in Masi–Maso (2015) 107–134.Search in Google Scholar
Masi, F. G. 2017. “Sognare oggetti nascosti. La teoria onirica epicurea”, in F. Alesse, A. Fermani, S. Maso, Studi su Ellenismo e Filosofia Romana, Roma, Edizioni di storia e letteratura, 65–94.Search in Google Scholar
Masi, F. G., Maso, S. 2015. Epicurus on Eidola, Peri Physeos, Book II. Updates, Proposals, and Discussions, Amsterdam, Adolf M. Hakkert.Search in Google Scholar
Masi, F. G., Verde, F. 2018. “Mind in an Atomistic World”, in J. Sisko, Philosophy of Mind in Antiquity. The History of the Philosophy of Mind, vol. 1, New York, Routledge, 236–257.10.4324/9780429508219-13Search in Google Scholar
Nemeth, A. 2017. Epicurus on the Self, New York, Routledge.10.4324/9781315207001Search in Google Scholar
Repici, L. 2008. Il pensiero dell’anima in Epicuro e Lucrezio, in F. Alesse, F. Aronadio, M. C. Dalfino, L. Simeoni, E. Spinelli (a cura di), Anthropine Sophia: Studi di filologia e storiografia filosofica in memoria di Gabriele Giannantoni, Napoli, Bibliopolis, 379–406.Search in Google Scholar
Schrijvers, P. H. 1976. “La pensée d’Épicure et Lucrèce sur le sommeil (DRN, IV, 907–961, Scolie ad Épicure, Ep. ad Her. 66): un chapitre des Parva Naturalia épicuriens”, in J. Bollack, A. Laks (drs.), Études sur l’Épicurisme antique (Cahiers de Philologie, 1), Villeneuve d’Ascq, Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, 229–259.10.4000/books.septentrion.118360Search in Google Scholar
Smith, M. F. 1993. Diogenes of Oinoanda. The Epicurean Inscription, Napoli, Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. 2003. “Portare davanti agli occhi: Una tecnica retorica nelle opere ‘morali’ di Filodemo”, Cronache Ercolanesi 33, 243–247.Search in Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. (forthcoming), “Epicurean Dreams”.10.1515/elen-2018-0015Search in Google Scholar
Verde, F. 2015. “Monismo psicologico e dottrina dell’anima in Epicuro e Lucrezio”, in E. Canone (a cura di), Anima–corpo alla luce dell’etica. Antichi e Moderni, Firenze, Olschki, 49–64.Search in Google Scholar
Verde, F. 2016. “Percezione errore e residuo percettivo in Aristotele, Epicuro e Alessandro di Afrodisia”, Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana 1, 44–62.Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
