Abstract
If the ancient Stoics conceived passion as a judgment or the consequence of a judgment referring to external reality, it is correct to define their conception of the psyche as ‘monistic’; it is very different if we consider that passion is due to another faculty independent of reason. In this second case, a scenario opens up in which a realistic and ‘reified’ conception of passion emerges. With reference to this, in the Letter 113 Seneca discusses the paradoxical thesis of the ancient Stoic scholars according to whom “the soul is an animal”, just as virtues and passions are. Through a series of close logical arguments, he shows the absurdities that can be reached in this way. By comparing this letter with the De ira we can define the position of Seneca as a type of practical/operational imaginary dualism: the development of an original coherent form of monism. Not to give in to passion (for example to anger or libido) will not be just or not so much a psychological exercise of reason and will, but certainly a physical experience of resistance.
Bibliografia
Alesse, F., Fermani, A., Maso, S. (a cura di) 1998. Studi su Ellenismo e Filosofia romana, Roma, Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Search in Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1997. Logic & Imperial Stoa, Leiden/New York/Köln, Brill.10.1163/9789004321007Search in Google Scholar
Brennan, T. 1998. “The Old Stoic Theory of Emotions”, in Sihvola–Engberg‒Pedersen 1998, 21‒70.10.1007/978-94-015-9082-2_2Search in Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 1999. Reason and Emotion, Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory, Princeton, N. J., Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691223261Search in Google Scholar
Donini, P. 1995. “Pathos nello stoicismo romano”, Elenchos 16, 193‒216.Search in Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1986. “The Stoic Doctrine of the Affections of the Soul”, in Schofield‒Striker 1986, 93‒110.Search in Google Scholar
Gill, C. 1998. “Did Galen Understand Platonic and Stoic Thinking on Emotions?”, in Sihvola–Engberg‒Pedersen 1998, 113‒123.10.1007/978-94-015-9082-2_4Search in Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.B. 2014. “Les causes sont causes des predicats”, in Natali–Viano 2014, 65‒93.Search in Google Scholar
Graver, M. 2002. Cicero on the Emotions, Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4, Chicago/London, The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226305196.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 1985. Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 2007. Seneca. Selected philosophical Letters, Transl. with an Introduction and Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 2014. Ethics after Aristotle, Cambridge Massachusetts/London, Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674369788Search in Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. 1980. Aristone di Chio e lo stoicismo antico, Napoli, Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. 1987. “Il monismo psicologico degli stoici antichi”, Elenchos 8, 449‒466.Search in Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. 1995. “L’ὁρμὴ πλεονάζουσα nella dottrina stoica della passione”, Elenchos 16, 25‒38.Search in Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. 1969. The Tragedies of Ennius: The Fragments, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Maso, S. 2014a. “La filosofia stoica e la questione del libero arbitrio”, in Tugnoli 2014, 57‒61.Search in Google Scholar
Maso, S. 2014b. “Causa efficiens et causa superveniens. The Question of Causality in Seneca and Roman Stoicism”, in Natali‒Viano 2014, 157‒161.Search in Google Scholar
Maso, S. 2017. “Teorie stoiche in Seneca tragico”, in Alesse–Fermani–Maso 2017, 3‒31.Search in Google Scholar
Meyer. S.S. 2018.“Passion, Impulse, and Action in Stoicism”, Rhizomata 6(1), 109–134.10.1515/rhiz-2018-0006Search in Google Scholar
Movia, G. 2001. Aristotele. L’anima, Milano, Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Natali, C., Viano, C. (édd.) 2014. Aitia II. Avec ou sans Aristote. Le débat sur les cuases à l’âge hellénistique et impérial, Leuven, Peeters.Search in Google Scholar
Radice, R. 1998. Stoici Antichi. Tutti i frammenti, Milano, Rusconi.Search in Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. 1965. L. Annaei Senecae Ad Lucilium epistulae morales, recognovit et adnotatione critica instruxit L. D. R., Oxonii e typographeo Clarendoniano.Search in Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. 1977. L. Annaei Senecae Dialogorum libri duodecim, recognovit et adnotatione critica instruxit L. D. R., Oxonii e typographeo Clarendoniano.10.1093/actrade/9780198146599.book.1Search in Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 1984. “Ariston of Chios ant the Unity of Virtue”, Ancient Philosophy 4, 83‒96.10.5840/ancientphil19844124Search in Google Scholar
Schofield M., Striker, G. (eds.) 1986. The Norms of Nature. Studies in Hellenistic Ethics, Cambridge/Paris, CUP-Ed. de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.Search in Google Scholar
Sihvola, J., Engberg‒Pedersen, T. (eds.) 1998. The Emotions in Ellenistic Philosophy, Dordrecht/Boston/London, Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-015-9082-2Search in Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1998. “A Hight-level Debate on Emotion”, in Sihvola–Engberg‒Pedersen 1998, 149‒169.10.1007/978-94-015-9082-2_5Search in Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 1996. Galen & Chrysippus on the Soul. Argument & Refutation in the De Placitis, Books II‒III, Leiden/New York/Köln, Brill.10.1163/9789004320925Search in Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 2003. Chrysippus’ On Affections: Reconstruction and Interpretation, Leiden, Brill.10.1163/9789004321175Search in Google Scholar
Tugnoli, C. (a cura di) 2014. Libero arbitrio. Teorie e prassi della libertà, Napoli, Liguori.Search in Google Scholar
Viano, C. (a cura di) 2016a. Materia e causa materiale in Aristotele e oltre, Roma, Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Search in Google Scholar
Viano, C. 2016b. “Materia e causa materiale delle passioni: Aristotele e la definizione fisica della collera”, in Viano 2016a, 61‒76.Search in Google Scholar
Viansino, G. (a cura di) 1992. Seneca. Dialoghi, Milano, Mondadori.Search in Google Scholar
Viansino, G. (a cura di) 1993. Seneca. Teatro, Milano, Mondadori.Search in Google Scholar
Zwierlein, O. 1986. L. Annaei Senecae Tragoediae, recognovit brevique adnotatione critica instruxit O. Z., Oxonii e typographeo Clarendoniano.Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Foreword
- Articles
- L’equilibrio dopo il movimento: percezione e conoscenza fra Democrito e i medici ippocratici
- I pathe di Epicuro tra epistemologia ed etica
- Epicurean Dreams
- Passione e immaginazione in Lucrezio: il caso dell’inganno onirico
- La peur, passion radicale
- Keine Furcht mit Diogenes!
- La trattazione vetero-stoica dell’ira: componenti logiche e caratteri fisiologici
- The Stoics on the Mental Mechanism of Emotions: Is There a “Pathetic Syllogism”?
- Seneca e la passione come esperienza fisica
- Note
- Destructible Worlds in an Aristotelian Scholion (Alexander of Aphrodisias’ Lost Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics, Frag. 539 Rashed)
- Review
- Review
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Foreword
- Articles
- L’equilibrio dopo il movimento: percezione e conoscenza fra Democrito e i medici ippocratici
- I pathe di Epicuro tra epistemologia ed etica
- Epicurean Dreams
- Passione e immaginazione in Lucrezio: il caso dell’inganno onirico
- La peur, passion radicale
- Keine Furcht mit Diogenes!
- La trattazione vetero-stoica dell’ira: componenti logiche e caratteri fisiologici
- The Stoics on the Mental Mechanism of Emotions: Is There a “Pathetic Syllogism”?
- Seneca e la passione come esperienza fisica
- Note
- Destructible Worlds in an Aristotelian Scholion (Alexander of Aphrodisias’ Lost Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics, Frag. 539 Rashed)
- Review
- Review