Abstract
The morpheme dāk 得 has a broad range of functions in modern Cantonese, including being used as a particle introducing an adverbial construction, as a particle introducing the so-called ‘potential complement’ (we refer to this as the ‘long potential’) and as a verbal (quasi-)suffix (the ‘short potential’), which indicates that the state of affairs denoted by the verb may happen. In this paper, we first offer a general introduction on dāk 得 in modern Cantonese, which we then compare with Mandarin de 得 and parallel acquisitive modals in Lao, Vietnamese, and Zhuang, also with a focus on their modal meanings. We will then provide a diachronic overview of Cantonese dāk 得 based on a sample of texts from the 19th and early 20th century written in Cantonese by Western scholars, missionaries, and officers. The historical Cantonese data will be analyzed and compared to the development of the cognate morpheme de 得 in mainstream Chinese written sources: because of the limited diachronic depth of Cantonese data, this is necessary to delve further into the history of this item and of the related constructions. We will argue that: a. all the contemporary Cantonese (and Mandarin) uses seem to derive from the attainment sense of postverbal de/dāk 得; b. the vast majority of possible word order configurations were attested at some point in the recorded history of Chinese, but there appear to be also some patterns which could be specific to Cantonese; c. there seems to be a (partial) structural and semantic split between the ‘short’ potential and the ‘long’ potential; d. the adverbial construction probably had a more straightforward development.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Jimmy Kin-wah Lam and Pui Yiu Szeto for their help and insights. For academic purposes, Luisa Maria Paternicò is responsible for Sections 1, 2, and 4, Giorgio Francesco Arcodia is responsible for Sections 3, 5–7.
References
Primary sources
Bonney, Samuel W. 1853. Phrases in the Canton colloquial dialect. Canton. https://archive.org/details/phrasesincantonc00bonn.Search in Google Scholar
Bridgman, Eliah C. 1841. Chinese chrestomathy in the Canton dialect. Macao: S. Wells Williams.Search in Google Scholar
Cowles, Roy T. 1915. Inductive course in Cantonese. Hong Kong: Kelly and Walsh.Search in Google Scholar
Dennys, Nicholas B. 1874. A handbook of the Canton vernacular of the Chinese language. London-Hong Kong: China Mail Office.Search in Google Scholar
Devan, Thomas T. 1847. The beginner’s first book in the Chinese language (Canton vernacular). Hong Kong: China Mail.Search in Google Scholar
Leblanc, Jacques. 1910. Cours de langue Chinoise parlée, dialecte Cantonnais, 1ere partie, Grammaire. Hanoi-Haiphong: Imprimerie d’Extrême-Orient.Search in Google Scholar
Legge, James. 1841. A lexilogus of English, Malay, and Chinese languages. Malacca: Anglo-Chinese College Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lobscheid, Wilhelm. 1864. Grammar of the Chinese language. Hong Kong: Daily Press.Search in Google Scholar
Morrison, Robert. 1828. A vocabulary of the Canton dialect. Macau: Honorable East India Company’s Press.Search in Google Scholar
Stedman, Thomas L. & Kuei-p’an Lee. 1888. A Chinese and English phrase book in the Canton dialect. New York: William R. Jenkins Co.Search in Google Scholar
Wells Williams, Samuel. 1842. Easy lessons in Chinese. Macao: Chinese Repository.Search in Google Scholar
Secondary sources
Ansaldo, Umberto. 2010. Surpass comparatives in Sinitic and beyond: Typology and grammaticalization. Linguistics 48(4). 919–950.Search in Google Scholar
Auwera, Johan van der, Petar Kehayov & Alice Vittrant. 2009. Acquisitive modals. In Lotte Hogeweg, Helen de Hoop & Andrej L. Malchukov (eds.), Cross-linguistic semantics of tense, aspect, and modality, 271–302. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar
Auwera, Johan van der & Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79–124.Search in Google Scholar
Basciano, Bianca. 2010. Verbal compounding and causativity in Mandarin Chinese. Verona: University of Verona PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Bauer, Robert S. & Stephen Matthews. 2017. Cantonese. In Randy J. LaPolla & Graham Thurgood (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 2nd edn., 169–184. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren 趙元任. 1947. Cantonese primer. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren 趙元任. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa L. & Rint P. E. Sybesma. 2004. Postverbal ‘can’ in Cantonese (and Hakka) and agree. Lingua, an International Review of General Linguistics 114. 419–445.Search in Google Scholar
Cheung, Lai-Yin 張勵妍, Liht Waaih Ngaih 倪列懷 & Laih Meih Pun 潘禮美 (eds.). 2018. Hong Kong Cantonese dictionary – Xianggang Yueyu Dacidian《香港粵語大詞典》. Hong Kong: Cosmos books.Search in Google Scholar
Cheung, Samuel Hung Nin 張洪年. 1997. Completing the completive: (Re)Constructing Early Cantonese grammar. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 10. 133–165.Search in Google Scholar
Cheung, Samuel Hung Nin 張洪年. 2007 [1972]. Xianggang Yueyu Yufa Yanjiu (Zengdingban)香港粵語語法的研究 (增訂版) [Grammar of Cantonese as spoken in Hong Kong (augmented edition)]. Hong Kong: The Commercial Press.Search in Google Scholar
Chiu, Po Yee 丘寶怡. 2010. Tan Yueyu nengxing shubu jiegou [V de X] he [A de X] de yuyi wenti 談粵語能性述補結構「V 得 X」和「A 得 X」的語義問題 [On the meaning of Cantonese potential structures V 得 X and A 得 X]. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 24. 186–200.Search in Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick J. 2001. On genetic and areal linguistics in Mainland South-East Asia: Parallel polyfunctionality of ‘acquire’. In Alexandra A. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics, 255–290. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick J. 2003. Linguistic epidemiology: Semantics and grammar of language contact in Mainland Southeast Asia. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Hong, Bo 洪波. 2005. Litihua Gudai Hanyu Jiaocheng 立體化古代漢語教程 [Advanced course of classical Chinese]. Beijing: Gaodeng Jiaoyu Chubanshe.Search in Google Scholar
Lamarre, Christine. 2004. Verb complement constructions in Chinese dialects: Types and markers. In Hilary Chappell (ed.), Chinese grammar: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives, 85–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lee, Siu Lun. 2005. History and current trends of teaching Cantonese as a foreign language: Investigating teaching approaches. Leicester: University of Leicester dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Luo, Yongxian. 2008. Zhuang. In Anthony V. N. Diller, Jerold A. Edmondson & Yongxian Luo (eds.), The Tai-Kadai languages, 317–377. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen & Virginia Yip. 2011. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Ōta, Tatsuo 太田辰夫. 1987 [1958]. Zhongguoyu Lishi Yufa 中国语历史文法 [Historical grammar of Chinese]. Beijing: Beijing Daxue Chubanshe.Search in Google Scholar
Paternicò, Luisa M. 2019. Shaping Cantonese grammar – Early western contribution. Histoire Epistémologie Langage 41(1). 15–37.Search in Google Scholar
Shi, Yuzhi 石毓智. 2002. The establishment of modern Chinese grammar. The formation of the resultative construction and its effects. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar
Sparvoli, Carlotta. 2017. Competing markers: Acquisitive and core modals in Modern Mandarin Chinese. Irish Journal of Asian Studies 3. 35–58.Search in Google Scholar
Sun, Chaofen 孙朝奋. 1996. Word-order change and grammaticalization in the history of Chinese. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sybesma, Rint P. E. 2008. Zhuang: A Tai language with some Sinitic characteristics. Postverbal ‘can’ in Zhuang, Cantonese, Vietnamese and Lao. In Pieter Muysken (ed.), From linguistic areas to areal linguistics, 221–274. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar
Tang, Sze-Wing 鄧思穎. 2002. Focus and DAK in Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 30(2). 266–309.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Li 王力. 1980. Hanyu Shigao 漢語史稿 [Draft history of Chinese language]. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Search in Google Scholar
Xu, Dan 徐丹. 2006. Typological change in Chinese syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Yang, Ping 杨平. 1990. Dai ‘de’ de shubu jiegou de changsheng he fazhan 带 ‘得’ 的述补结构的产生和发展 [The creation and development of complement structure with ‘de’]. Guhanyu Yanjiu 1. 56–63.Search in Google Scholar
Yang, Jingyu 杨敬宇. 2005. San bu Yue’ou zuopinzhong de kenengshi fouding xingshi 三部粤讴作品中的可能式否定形式 [On the negative potential construction in three Cantonese folk ballads]. Fangyan 4. 319–322.Search in Google Scholar
Yue-Hashimoto, Anne O.-K. 余靄芹. 1993. Comparative Chinese dialectal grammar. Handbook for investigators. Paris: EHESS-CRLAO.Search in Google Scholar
Yue, Anne O.-K. 余靄芹. 2004a. The verb complement constructions in historical perspective with special reference to Cantonese. In Hilary Chappell (ed.), Chinese grammar: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives, 232–265. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Yue, Anne O.-K. 余靄芹. 2004b. Materials for the diachronic study of the Yue dialects. In Feng Shi & Zhongwei Shen (eds.), The joy of research: A festschrift in honour of William S.-Y. Wang on his seventieth birthday, 246–271. Tianjin: Nankai Daxue Chubanshe.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
