Abstract
Latin deponents are usually treated as morphological idiosyncrasies in which the Middle morphology is not related to an anticausative (change of state), reflexive or passive syntactic structure, in which it would be expected and grammatically justified (Embick, David. 2000. Features syntax and categories in the Latin perfect. Linguistic Inquiry 31(2). 185–230; Xu, Zheng, Mark Aronoff and Frank Anshen. 2007. Deponency in Latin. In Matthew Baerman et al. (eds.), Deponency and morphological mismatches, 127–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press). Focusing on the non-denominal deponents, I show that these verbs are always reflexives or anticausatives. In the reflexive and anticausative structures a single argument gains two thematic roles, the most external one, doer for the reflexives, undergoer for the anticausatives, and a lower one (holder of a state, benefactive, etc.). The Latin Middle morphology marks the external role as syntactically deactivated but semantically existential and allows for the assignment of the external role to a lower argument. The peculiarity of deponents is not the presence of the Middle, but the fact that, because of specific lexical constraints, these verbs cannot be present in an Active derivation. Similar lexically constrained verbs which can only appear in anticausative or reflexive structures are crosslinguistically attested: deponents are not Latin idiosyncrasies.
References
Acedo-Matellán, Victor. 2010. Argument structure and the syntax–morphology interface. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Acedo-Matellán, Victor & Jaume Mateu. 2012. The manner/result complementarity revisited: A syntactic approach. In M. C. Cuervo & Y. Roberge (eds.), The end of argument structure? Vol. 38, 209–238. Bingley: Emerald.10.1108/S0092-4563(2012)0000038011Search in Google Scholar
Acedo-Matellán, Victor & Jaume Mateu. 2013. Satellite framed Latin vs. verb framed Romance: A syntactic approach. Probus 25. 227–265.10.1515/probus-2013-0008Search in Google Scholar
Acedo-Matellán, Victor & Cristina Real-Puigdollers 2015. Location and locatum verbs revisited: Evidence from aspect and quantification. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 62. 111–140.10.1556/064.2015.62.2.1Search in Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2014. Roots don’t take complements. Theoretical Linguistics 40(3/4). 287–297.10.1515/tl-2014-0012Search in Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulu. 2004. Voice morphology in the causative-inchoative alternation: Evidence for a non-unified structural analysis of unaccusatives. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle, 114–136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0005Search in Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Giorgos Spathas & Schäfer. Florian 2015. Middle Voice and reflexive interpretations, afto-prefixation in Greek. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33. 1293–1350.10.1007/s11049-014-9279-zSearch in Google Scholar
Bertocci, Davide. 2009. Nasal present and weak causativity: Evidence from Sanskrit and Latin. In Kateřina Ludová & Marie Žáková (eds.), Early European languages in the eyes of modern linguistics, 37–46. Brno: Masaryk University.Search in Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. In name only. Structuring sense, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7Search in Google Scholar
Cennamo, Michela. 1999. Late pleonastic reflexives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Transactions of the Philological Society 97(1). 103–150.10.1111/1467-968X.00046Search in Google Scholar
Cennamo, Michela. 2009. Argument structure and alignment variations and changes in Late Latin. In Jóhanna Barđdal & Shobhana L. Chelliah (eds.), The role of semantic, pragmatic, and discourse factors in the development of case, 307–346. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.108.17cenSearch in Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1988. On si constructions and the theory of Arb. Linguistic Inquiry 19(4). 521–581.Search in Google Scholar
Claflin, Edith Frances. 1927. The nature of the Latin passive in the light of recent discoveries. The American Journal of Philology 48(2). 157–175.10.2307/290570Search in Google Scholar
Cuervo, María Cristina. 2014. Alternating unaccusatives and the distribution of roots. Lingua 141. 48–70.10.1016/j.lingua.2013.12.001Search in Google Scholar
Cuervo, María Cristina. 2015. Causation without a cause. Syntax 18(4). 388–424.10.1111/synt.12115Search in Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, Roberta. 2007. Impersonal si constructions. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207514Search in Google Scholar
De Vaan, Michiel. 2008. Etymological dictionary of Latin and the other Italic languages. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 1998. Impersonal se constructions in Romance and the passivization of unergatives. Linguistic Inquiry 29(3). 399–437.10.1162/002438998553806Search in Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 2006. The SE-anaphor and its role in argument realization. In M. Everaert & H. Van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 4, 118–179. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996591.ch56Search in Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3). 547–619.10.1353/lan.1991.0021Search in Google Scholar
Embick, David. 2000. Features syntax and categories in the Latin perfect. Linguistic Inquiry 31(2). 185–230.10.1162/002438900554343Search in Google Scholar
Flobert, Pierre. 1975. Les Verbs Déponents Latins, des origines à Charlemagne. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Heidi Harley. 2005. Flavors of v. In Paula Kempchinsky & Slabakova Roumyana (eds.), Aspectual Inquiries, 95–120. The Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3033-9_5Search in Google Scholar
Gianollo, Chiara. 2010. I verbi deponenti latini e l’unità della flessione in -r. Incontri triestini di filologia classica 8. 23–49.Search in Google Scholar
Gianollo, Chiara. 2014. Labile verbs in Late Latin. Linguistics 52(4). 945–1002.10.1515/ling-2014-0013Search in Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth & Samuel J. Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20, Essays in linguistics in honour of Sylvain Bromberger, 53–110. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth & Samuel J. Keyser. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5634.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20, Essays in linguistics in honour of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2009. The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP. In Monika Rathert & Anastasia Giannadikou (eds.), Quantification, definiteness and nominalization, 320–342. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2010. A minimalist approach to argument structure. In C. Boeckx (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism, 426–447. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0019Search in Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2014a. On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40(3/4). 225–276.10.1515/tl-2014-0010Search in Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2014b. Reply to commentaries “On the identity of roots”. Theoretical Linguistics 40(3/4). 447–474.10.1515/tl-2014-0024Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity, 87–120. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.23.05hasSearch in Google Scholar
Haugen, Jason. 2008. Morphology at the interfaces. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.117Search in Google Scholar
Haverling, Gerd. 2000. On -sco verbs, prefixes and semantic functions, a study in the development of prefixed and unprefixed verbs from early to late Latin. In Karin Hult & Gunhilt Vidén (eds.), Studia Graeca et Latina Gothoburgensia LXIV. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Search in Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1981. Binding, quantifiers, clitics, and control. In Frank Heny (ed.), Bindings and filtering, 191–211. London: Croom Helm.Search in Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1989. Null subject and clitic climbing. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & Kenneth J. Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter, 239–261. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3_8Search in Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1991. Romance clitics, verb movement and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 22(4). 647–686.Search in Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelica. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck et al. (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5Search in Google Scholar
Larson, Richard Kurth. 2010. On Pylkkänen’s semantics for low applicatives. Linguistic Inquiry 41. 701–704.10.1162/LING_a_00020Search in Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport-Hovav 1995. Unaccusativity at the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka 2005. Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610479Search in Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 2005. Objects out of the lexicon! Argument-structure in the syntax. http://web.mit.edu/marantz/Public/UConn/UConnHOApr05.pdf (accessed 11 January 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 2013. Verbal argument structure – Events and participants. Lingua 130. 152–168.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.10.012Search in Google Scholar
Lavidas, Nikolaos & Dimitra Papangeli. 2007. Deponency in the diachrony of Greek. In Matthew Baerman et al. (eds.), Deponency and morphological mismatches, 97–126. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.5871/bacad/9780197264102.003.0005Search in Google Scholar
OLD. 2012. Oxford Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Pescarini, Diego. 2015. Le costruzioni con si, italiani, dialetti e lingue romanze. Roma: Carocci.Search in Google Scholar
Pinzin, Francesco. 2015. VoiceP deactivation and deponency in Latin. Annali di Ca’ Foscari Serie Occidentale 49. 423–452.Search in Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian Catriona. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon, a first-phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486319Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and head movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Schäfer, Florian. 2008. The syntax of (anti)-causatives, external arguments in change of state contexts. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.126Search in Google Scholar
Schäfer, Florian. 2017. Romance and Greek medio-passives and the typology of Voice. In & Roberta D’Alessandro, Franco, Irene & Ángel Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain, 129–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198767886.003.0006Search in Google Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique. 2014. Assessing unaccusativity and reflexivity, using focus alternatives to decide what gets which theta role. Linguistic Inquiry 45(2). 305–321.10.1162/LING_a_00156Search in Google Scholar
Tichy, Eva. 2002. Gr. οἴ σειν, Lat. ūtī. Glotta 78. 179–202.Search in Google Scholar
Wood, Jim & Alec Marantz . 2017. The interpretation of external arguments. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Franco, Irene & Ángel Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198767886.003.0011Search in Google Scholar
Xu, Zheng, Mark Aronoff & Frank Anshen. 2007. Deponency in Latin. In Matthew Baerman et al. (eds.), Deponency and morphological mismatches, 127–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.5871/bacad/9780197264102.003.0006Search in Google Scholar
Zombolou, Katerina & Artemis Alexiadou. 2013. The canonical function of deponent verbs in Modern Greek. In Wolfgang U. Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds.), Morphology and meaning, selected papers from the 15th International Morphology Meeting, 331–344. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.327.23zomSearch in Google Scholar
Zombolou, Katerina & Artemis Alexiadou. 2014. Deponents in Greek: Losing and creating active voice counterparts. Paper presented at the workshop “Voice Systems in Diachrony: A Comparative Perspective”, Pavia, 11 September.Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
