Accuracy of botulinum toxin type A injection into the gastrocnemius muscle of adults with spastic equinus: Manual needle placement and electrical stimulation guidance compared using ultrasonography
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0970Keywords:
rehabilitation, spasticity, botulinum toxin, injection guidance, gastrocnemius, stroke.Abstract
Objective: To investigate the accuracy of manual needle placement and electrical stimulation guidance, compared using ultrasonography, for injection of botulinum toxin type A into the gastrocnemius muscle of adults with spastic equinus. Design: Prospective clinical study. Subjects: A total of 81 adults with stroke who were scheduled to receive botulinum toxin type A injection into the gastrocnemius muscle. Methods: After randomization into two groups, each patient was injected into two sites at each head of the gastrocnemius muscle. The manual needle placement group (n = 42) underwent injections using anatomical landmarks and palpation. The electrical stimulation guidance group (n = 39) underwent injections under electrical stimulation guidance. The accuracy of needle placement and muscle thickness at each injection site were compared by means of ultrasonography. Results: The overall accuracy of manual needle placement and electrical stimulation guidance, measured using ultrasonography, was significantly higher for the gastrocnemius medialis than for the lateralis (92. 0% vs 79. 0%). The gastrocnemius medialis was significantly thicker than the lateralis (mean 13. 25 mm (standard deviation (SD) 1. 86 mm) vs 10. 84 mm (SD 1. 52 mm). Conclusion: Electrical stimulation guidance may be useful for injections into the gastrocnemius lateralis of adults with spastic equinus. However, neither manual needle placement nor electrical stimulation guidance showed complete accuracy, when measured using ultrasonography.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.