Next Article in Journal
Inventory and Spatial Distribution of Ancient Landslides in Hualong County, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Contrasting Response of Mountain Plant-Pollinator Network to Fragmented Semi-Natural Grasslands
Previous Article in Journal
Carbonate Mineral Dissolution and Its Carbon Sink Effect in Chinese Loess
Previous Article in Special Issue
Depth of Edge Influence in a Madagascar Lowland Rainforest and Its Effects on Lemurs’ Abundance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identifying Critical Thresholds in the Impacts of Invasive Alien Plants and Dune Paths on Native Coastal Dune Vegetation

by
Maria Carla de Francesco
1,†,
Francesco Pio Tozzi
1,†,
Gabriella Buffa
2,
Edy Fantinato
2,
Michele Innangi
1 and
Angela Stanisci
1,*
1
EnvixLab, Department of Biosciences and Territory, University of Molise, Via Duca degli Abruzzi, 67, 86039 Termoli, Italy
2
Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, University Ca’ Foscari of Venice, Via Torino, 155, 30172 Venice, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
First authors.
Land 2023, 12(1), 135; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010135
Submission received: 3 December 2022 / Revised: 22 December 2022 / Accepted: 29 December 2022 / Published: 31 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Species Vulnerability and Habitat Loss)

Abstract

:
Invasive alien plants (IAP) pose a major threat to biodiversity and have a negative impact on the integrity and conservation status of plant communities. Mediterranean dunes are widely exposed to IAP, due to their environmental heterogeneity and the anthropogenic pressures to which they are subjected. The current study explored the possible existence of critical thresholds of IAP cover/abundance and dune path impacts that may cause the decline in diagnostic species cover in shifting and transition dunes. A random sampling of 126 plots in areas invaded and not invaded by IAP across the Italian Adriatic dunes has been used and the recorded species have been classified in ecological guilds. In order to explore the effect of plant community composition and distances from dune paths on the diagnostic species cover, a Random Forest regression model has been fitted. The results revealed that three main critical thresholds can be detected concerning IAP total cover, IAP Oenothera stucchii Soldano abundance and the distance from dune paths and they work differently in shifting and transition dunes. The identification of such cut-off points provides useful insights for an array of actions to preserve the biodiversity of the Mediterranean coastal dunes.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Invasive alien plants (IAP) are considered to be the second major threat to biodiversity [1] and their negative impact on the integrity of plant communities and ecosystems has been observed and demonstrated worldwide [2,3]. Still, the presence of IAP has been associated with significant changes in species composition, unfavorable conservation status of invaded habitats [4] and loss of related Ecosystem Services [5,6].
Coastal dunes are among the most invaded ecosystems by IAP in Europe [7,8], as they are recognized as one of the most threatened ecosystems, mainly due to human-related disturbance (e.g., urbanization, trampling, pollution) [9].
The degradation and loss of ecological integrity of coastal dune habitats is particularly striking along the Mediterranean coasts [10,11], where urban expansion, agriculture, afforestation, industrial and harbor development as well as sea tourism exploitation are considerable [12]. Human pressures cause habitat fragmentation that limits the plasticity and the evolutionary potential of native plants while exacerbating the negative impacts of climate change [13] and enhancing IAP spread [14,15].
The native plant communities of coastal dunes present a highly specialized flora [16], which includes species that are tolerant to extreme abiotic conditions [17] and provide essential benefits to society [18].
Such plant communities are arranged in a zonation of habitats with a natural discontinuous distribution making this ecosystem particularly vulnerable to the loss of native plant species and biodiversity [19]. The harsh and diversified abiotic conditions that are reflected in the habitat heterogeneity, the severe anthropic pressure and the consequent intense propagule pressure [20,21,22] have been directly linked to the risk of IAP invasion in dune ecosystems [23].
Along the Italian coastal dunes, several IAP have been recorded such as Acacia saligna (Labill.) H.L. Wendl., Ambrosia artemisiifolia L., Carpobrotus sp.pl., Cenchrus longispinus (Hack.) Fernald, Oenothera sp.pl. and Xanthium orientale L. subsp. italicum (Moretti) Greuter [24,25,26,27,28]. Recent research showed that these IAP often caused the decline in species richness and the decrease in cover of diagnostic/focal species of Italian native plant communities [27,29,30,31]. Moreover, the homogenization of plant species composition [32], the spread of disturbance-tolerant species [33] and the co-occurrence of plant species belonging to different communities [34] were recorded in coastal dunes invaded by IAP. Finally, an increase in IAP occurrence and a decrease in diagnostic species of native plant communities was registered where beach goer trampling is widespread and close to the dune paths [11,35]. These findings are consistent with those found in other European coastal dunes [15,36,37]. However, critical thresholds of IAP abundance/cover impact on native plant communities have not been studied or are poorly understood or documented [38].
Low abundances of an invader have little impact on the resident plant community; yet, when IAP abundance and cover increase, a threshold level may exist above which native communities rapidly decline [39]. A meta-analysis of abundance-impact relationships for all invasive species (plants and animals) by [40] showed mostly linear relationships, and no density-dependence thresholds for impacts of invasive plants on native plant communities have been yet detected.
In such a context, our aim was to investigate potential critical thresholds of IAP cover/abundance impact and other environmental constrains that may cause the decline in diagnostic species cover of shifting and transition dunes vegetation across the Adriatic sandy coast in Italy. For this purpose, we fitted a Random Forest (RF) regression model on the basis of a vegetation stratified sampling, considering ecological guilds cover, IAP cover and abundance and species richness as descriptors of plant community composition and using the distance from the dune paths and the beach as environmental descriptors.
We focused on shifting and transition dune plant communities that, although spatially closed, have several distinctive attributes in terms of species composition, structure and spatial occupancy pattern, to assess whether critical thresholds of IAP abundance/cover and dune path impacts are consistent among plant communities.
Our findings may provide quantitative information to improve coastal dune management and conservation, contributing to monitoring and mitigating drastic changes in structural and functional features in natural coastal dunes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study took place on the shifting and transition dunes along the Italian Adriatic coast in three different administrative regions (North to South: Veneto, Abruzzo and Molise). Within this area, we chose nine sampling sites that are shown in Figure 1.
The study area is mainly composed of narrow and recent sandy dunes (Holocene) up to 10 m in height [41], relatively simple in structure and usually with only one ridge [42]. Recent dunes are in contact with ancient ones (Pleistocene) or alluvial and lacustrine deposits and terraces or pelitic-clay hills [43] and bordered by river mouths and tidal inlets [44].
Under low anthropogenic disturbance, the vegetation zonation of sampling sites follows the typical sea-inland ecological gradient that ranges from pioneer formations of herbaceous annual communities, close to the seashore, to xerophilous grasslands with herbaceous vegetation and Mediterranean maquis with shrubs on the inland fixed dunes [45,46,47].
These dune systems are characterized by a high plant diversity, host endemic plant communities and species that have now become very rare along the Italian Adriatic coast [48,49,50,51].
The northern part of the study area shows a Temperate Oceanic bioclimate [52], while the southern part has a Mediterranean bioclimate with meso and thermo-Mediterranean thermo-types and dry and humid ombro-types [48,53].
The climatic data recorded in the last 50 years (1970–2020) in three meteorological stations in the study area from North to South: Venezia Tessera (45.495358 N, 12.341777 E), Pescara (42.436975 N, 14.186808 E) and Termoli (42.004294 N, 14.996316 E) have shown mean yearly temperatures, respectively, of 13.5, 14.7, 16.7 °C; the annual rainfalls amount to 775, 702, 361 mm, respectively [54,55,56].
The sampled area (Figure 1) included eight Sites of Natura 2000 Network (N2K) established according to the Council Directive 92/43/EEC: SPA IT3250041 “Valle Vecchia-Zumelle-valli di Bibione”, SCI IT3250013 “Laguna del Mort e pinete di Eraclea”, SPA and SCI IT3250003 “Penisola del Cavallino: biotopi lioranei”, SAC IT7120215 “Torre del Cerrano”, SAC IT7140108 “Punta Aderci-Punta della Penna”, SAC IT7140109 “Marina di Vasto”, SAC IT7228221 “Foce Trigno-Marina di Petacciato” and SAC “IT7282216 Foce Biferno-Litorale di Campomarino”.
To identify the areas suitable for vegetation sampling (Figure 1), the distribution maps of the European Community Interest habitats were excerpted from reports of the European LIFE projects LIFE16 NAT/IT/000589 REDUNE, LIFE10 NAT/IT/000262 MAESTRALE and LIFE17 NAT/IT/000565 CALLIOPE [11,57,58].
Along the dune zonation, we focused on shifting and transition dunes, where different native plant communities grow along the environmental sea-inland gradient.
The shifting dunes host perennial grasses such as Elymus farctus (Viv.) Runemark ex Melderis, Sporobolus virginicus (L.) Kunth and Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link subsp. australis (Mabille) Lainz and perennial forbs and small shrubs such as Echinophora spinosa L., Eryngium maritimum L., Lotus cytisoides L. and Medicago marina L. [59].
Moving further inward, transition dunes are covered with a vegetation mosaic composed of dune annual grasslands, dominated by ephemeral species with early spring phenology and suffrutescent communities. In that habitat, several species show narrow geographic ranges and are related to specific climatic conditions or local biogeographic or geological histories [52]; in the Northern Adriatic Fumana procumbens (Dunal) Gren. et Godr., Teucrium capitatum L., Thymus pulegioides L. and perennial forbs such as Silene otites (L.) Wibel and Scabiosa triandra L. occur; while, in the Southern Adriatic, we recorded Artemisia campestris L. subsp. variabilis (Ten.) Greuter and the endemic biennial forb Verbascum niveum Ten. subsp. garganicum (Ten.) Murb. [60,61,62,63]. The most common IAP of these habitats are Ambrosia psilostachya DC., Oenothera stucchii Soldano and Xanthium orientale L. [30,50,64] (Table 1).
Ambrosia psilostachya originates from Western North America and is a perennial forb that survives from year-to-year through a rhizome, which propagates in clonal populations that can cover large areas rapidly [65]. It also shows an effective chemical defense against stress and predators and its pollen is known to be an important allergen.
Oenothera stucchii has a North American origin and is an erect leafy forb characterized by a biennial life cycle that guarantees resilience and tolerance to the disturbance and, in adverse environmental conditions, the individuals can persist in vegetative phase for more than two years in rosette stage, perfectly adapted to trampling [66]. That species is also characterized by self-pollination (autogamous); therefore, it does not suffer from the lack of pollinators [34] and produces a large number of seeds with a high rate of germination and a successful dispersal strategy [67]. The seeds have strong affinity for light [68] and sand movements caused by trampling on dunes and other disturbances are indirectly able to favor germination [69]. In southern investigated shifting and transition dunes, O. stucchii blooms for a long time (July–December) whereas the majority of native plant species have already disseminated.
Xanthium orientale has a North American origin and is an erect broadleaved forb that reproduces annually [70]. The species is common in coastal dunes but also usually in low-lying riparian areas and in agricultural fields [71]. Its fruits are covered in hooked spikes and transported by attaching to animal hair, clothing and other fibrous material; moreover, air cavities around the seeds allow them to float on water [72]. Although they are both not perennial species, but biennial or annual, they generate a consistent and persistent seed bank in the soil, which continuously produces new generations [73,74].

2.2. Vegetation Sampling

For the sampling, a 50 m regular grid was projected on the maps of habitats of European Concern [75] in a geographic information system (GIS) environment and a total of 126 plots in 63 grids were surveyed, 56 for shifting and 70 for transition dunes. Plots were randomly located both in areas with and without IAP occurrence. Plot size ranged from 1 × 1 to 2 × 2 m, considered to be comparable in previous floristic studies [76,77] and commonly judged adequate for vegetation sampling of Mediterranean coastal dune communities [73].
During the period May–July 2021, for each plot, georeferenced by GPS, a complete list of vascular plants was compiled and species cover was visually estimated by using the Braun-Blanquet seven-degree scale of abundance and dominance [78,79]. Before carrying out the statistical analyses, we converted the species cover values from Braun-Blanquet scale to the mean percentage value of each degree (r = 0.05%; + = 0.5%; 1 = 3%; 2 = 15%; 3 = 37.5%; 4 = 62.5% and 5 = 87.5%). Species nomenclature follows the updated checklist of Flora d’Italia [80].
To explore the ecological effects of IAP invasion on habitat composition and structure, we classified the recorded species in ecological guilds [29]. Guilds are groups of species that share ecological requirements and features, useful to establish plant community quality [33]. We classified species as diagnostic of the investigated plant communities, generalist, alien and diagnostic species of other dune habitats since these guilds should react differently to alien invasions [30,81].
Diagnostics were native key species pivotal to habitat structure and function and representative of a particular plant community, which distinguish it from other vegetation units, listed in [59,60,82].
Generalists were opportunistic species not specific to dune environments, well adapted to disturbed habitats and determined by previous phytosociological studies in the same areas [83]. Alien plants grow outside their natural and potential range of dispersion due to human introduction [84] and could modify the features and functionality of ecosystems, facilitating the settlement of other alien species [85]. They were identified following the inventory of the non-native flora of Italy [86,87]. As O. stucchii was the IAP with higher cover value, we have also counted individuals of this species in each plot.
We also classified, in a separate guild, those species that were diagnostic of other habitats, i.e., all native species that were descriptors of other coastal plant communities but not of shifting and transition dunes.
In order to account also for other factors affecting the communities, for each plot we recorded the distance from the closest dune path used by beach goers (such as, for example, beach access walkways) and the distance from seashore.

2.3. Statistical Analyses

In order to explore the effect of plant community composition and the distance from dune paths and seashore on the abundance of diagnostic species in shifting and transition dunes, we fitted a Random Forest (RF) regression model [88,89]. Random Forest is a non-linear machine learning model that consists of combining the results of many decision trees, with each tree developed using a subsample of data. Separately for the two dune sectors (i.e., shifting and transition dunes), we fitted RF using the cover of diagnostic species as dependent variable. Cover of generalist species, cover of diagnostic species from other habitats, species richness, number of O. stucchii individuals and total IAP cover were used as plant community composition covariates, while distances from dune paths and seashore were used as environmental conditions covariates.
We fitted the models with 50, 100, 500, 1000, 2000 and 5000 trees. The number of variables tried at each split (mtry) was appraised with values ranging from 1 to 7 and the node size was set to default. The mean absolute error (MAE) was chosen as the criterion to select the best number of trees and mtry value to use in the final models. We used 5-time repeated 10-fold cross-validation to tune the models [90]. The increase in mean square error (MSE) was used to assess variable importance in the final models.
The effect shape of those variables summing up to 50% of variable importance in each model was explored by plotting partial dependence plots (PDP). The visual inspection of the PDP results (in particular regarding the number of O. stucchii individuals) was also used to individuate a threshold so as to separate invaded and control plots. Thus, we split the datasets from both habitats in control and invaded plots according to the RF results. Using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index, we tested whether the control/invaded communities were different according to a one-way PERMANOVA (with 10,000 permutations). Subsequently, we used Similarity Percentage (SIMPER) to ascertain which species contributed the most to the change in community composition (cover and occurrence) in shifting and transition dunes plant communities between control and invaded plots. All analyses were conducted using R version 4.2.1 [91] using packages ‘caret’ [92], ‘ggplot2’ [93], ‘randomForest’ [94], ‘vegan’ [95] and ‘pdp’ [96].

3. Results

A total of 56 vascular plant taxa were recorded in shifting dunes (Table S1) and invaded conditions (total IAP cover ≥15%).
These taxa included 12 diagnostic, 12 generalist and 6 alien species and 26 diagnostics for other coastal habitats. Among diagnostic species, the species with the highest cover was E. farctus, followed by L. cytisoides, M. marina, Cyperus capitatus Vand. and A. arenaria subsp. australis. The IAP taxa were O. stucchii, X. orientale, A. psilostachya, Erigeron canadensis L., C. longispinus and Carpobrotus edulis (L.) N.E. Br.
In transition dunes 74 vascular plant taxa were recorded (Table S2).
These taxa included 19 diagnostic, 15 generalist and 10 alien species and 30 diagnostics for other habitats. Among the diagnostic species, the species showing the highest cover was Phleum arenarium L. subsp. caesium H. Scholz, followed by Festuca fasciculata Forssk., Silene colorata Poir., Ononis variegata L., Medicago littoralis Rohde ex Loisel. and F. procumbens. The most common IAP were O. stucchii, A. psilostachya, C. longispinus, Amorpha fruticosa L., E. canadensis and X. orientale.
All alien species found in shifting and transition dunes are listed in Table 1, where the species are reported in order of mean cover per habitat. Five IAP species have been found in both habitats of the Adriatic coast. The exceptions are A. fruticosa, Sporobolus pumilus (Roth) P.M. Peterson et Saarela, Cuscuta campestris Yunck. and Senecio inaequidens DC., which were only found in the northern sector of the Adriatic, while C. edulis and Erigeron sumatrensis Retz. were only found in the southern sector (Table 1).
The Random Forest regression showed that, according to cross validation, the best number of trees and the best variables tried at each split (mtry) were selected for 2000 and 2, respectively, resulting in R2 = 63.0% and MAE = 14.7 for shifting dunes and to 1000 and 3, respectively, resulting in R2 = 41.1% and MAE = 15.6 for transition dunes.
The two most important variables that affected the cover of diagnostic species in shifting dunes were clearly total IAP cover and the number of O. stucchii individuals, accounting for 37% and 29% variable importance, respectively; while the most important variable in transition dunes was the distance from dune paths, accounting for 66% of variable importance (Figure 2).
According to PDP plots for single-variable effect, the total IAP cover and the number of O. stucchii individuals had an unfavorable effect on diagnostic species cover of shifting dunes, lowering the mean cover from 50% to about 32%. Such a detrimental effect was detected for the critical thresholds at around 15–20% of the total IAP cover (Figure 3A) and 20–25 of number of O. stucchii individuals (Figure 3B). Beyond such thresholds, a clear effect of IAP species was no longer visible, with diagnostic species cover remaining rather constant.
Distance from dune paths was clearly the most important variable for transition dune (Figure 2) and the PDP showed its impact on diagnostic species cover, increasing from 22% in the vicinity of the dune paths up to 45% at 150 m or more away from the paths (Figure 3C). Compared to shifting dunes, the effect of IAP species was not consistent.
According to the Random Forest results, we labeled as “invaded” all those plots which had a total cover of alien species ≥15%, while the other plots were considered as control. Following one-way PERMANOVA, the invaded plots were significantly different from control plots for shifting and transition dune diagnostic species cover (p < 0.001).
The outcomes of Similarity Percentage (SIMPER) showed that five taxa contributed the most to the change in community composition (cover and occurrence) in shifting and transition dunes, between control and invaded plots (Table S3). Oenothera stucchii was the most discriminating taxon, showing a cover up to 21% in invaded plot vs. 0% in control plots in both habitats. In shifting dunes, the remaining taxa were all diagnostic, L. cytisoides, E. farctus, M. marina and C. capitatus and they all showed a reduction in invaded plots vs. control plots. In transition dunes, two diagnostics, P. arenarium subsp. caesium and F. fasciculata decreased their cover in invaded plots, as well as C. capitatus species of shifting dunes, whereas L. cytisoides species of shifting dunes increased its cover.

4. Discussion

Our findings confirmed the drop in diagnostic species cover in native coastal dune vegetation invaded by IAP species as had already been recorded in previous research [3,15,30,31].
So far, to the best of our knowledge, it has not been ascertained which is the critical threshold of IAP species abundance/cover-impact relationships in coastal dune environments. Our results have helped to fill this gap in knowledge, identifying such thresholds for shifting and transition dune vegetation in a Mediterranean case study.
We recorded a significant decline of shifting dune diagnostic species cover on the critical threshold corresponding to ≥15–20% of total IAP cover and at 20–25 individuals of O. stucchii. A similar IAP species cover threshold was also found for the invasive alien herbaceous Tradescantia fluminensis Vell., in a temperate rainforest community of southern Australia [97]. In general, however, empirical tests of cover/abundance–impact relationships for invasive plants in other environments vary remarkably, revealing from no relationship with native species [98] to much higher thresholds of cover before native species are impacted, such as 75–80% for Lantana camara L. [39].
Our results clearly showed that, when the total IAP cover was beyond the threshold revealed by the model, the cover of the diagnostic species of resident native community reduced by one third. In detail, the decrease in cover mainly concerned dune-building beachgrasses E. farctus and A. arenaria subsp. australis and the other perennial plants such as C. capitatus, L. cytisoides and M. marina (Table S1), which greatly contribute to the physiognomy and functioning of Adriatic shifting dunes [59,99,100]. Beyond this critical threshold, we can thus assume that the structure and function of shifting dune ecosystems drastically change. Indeed, the reduction of dune-building species cover may strongly affect the above- and belowground structure of the shifting dune community, reducing the ability to retain sand, build the dunes and filter the salt wind, eventually limiting their ability to create suitable environmental conditions for the settlement and development of other native species [18]. In addition, the decline of the diagnostic species cover may hasten community degradation [21], reducing the resistance and resilience of plant communities to meteorological extreme events and other effects of climate change [101,102] and compromising other important ecosystem services including recreation, wildlife habitat and carbon sequestration [103,104,105].
Currently, the most widespread and harmful IAP in the investigated shifting dunes were the biennial O. stucchii and the annual X. orientale, as found in other comparable sandy coastal dunes [15,27,30]. Beside these, we also recorded, other harmful IAP: the erect annual leafy forbs E. canadensis, the erect annual grass C. longispinus, the perennial forb, A. psilostachya and the succulent mat C. edulis.
Except for Carpobrotus, these plants have rapid resource acquisitive strategy, growing and disseminating in the late summer-autumn, when native species have already completed their reproductive cycle so filling a temporal niche not exploited by native species [106,107]. Besides, flowering at a different time could represent an advantage for alien and native species, allowing avoidance of competition for pollinators through the segregation of ecological-temporal niches [71,108,109,110].
Conversely, Carpobrotus blooms in spring and uses a “grow-and-die” strategy, making a hostile environment into a more favorable habitat [111] and showing a frequent clonal reproductive strategy [112]. This species is still uncommon across the investigated Adriatic coastal dunes, but it could become more widespread in the next decades fostered by climate change [113].
Transition dunes showed a higher IAP species richness than shifting dune communities, with the most common IAP being O. stucchii and A. psilostachya. This result agrees with previous research that highlighted that transition dunes are highly impacted by IAP [15,37].
However, despite the high richness of IAP, our results showed that the most important variable affecting diagnostic species cover in transition dunes was the distance from dune paths, while IAP occurrence and spread seems to be subordinate to land use constraints, that reduced natural space and caused widespread anthropogenic disturbance.
Until 50 m from marked paths diagnostic species cover was low (between 22% and 30% of the plot surface) and only at a distance greater than 150 m the cover of diagnostics reached around 45%.
Although the degradation of dune vegetation due to trampling has already been widely observed [14,35,36,59,62,114,115,116], we contributed to quantification of the spatial width of human impact and the ecological effect on diagnostic species. These results are consistent with those found by [73] who proved that the most susceptible areas of transition dune habitats prone to O. stucchii invasion combined proximity to beach accesses (lower than 50 m), low resident vegetation cover (<40%), high number of annual species (10 species) and low shifting dune ridges (<5.5 m).
The diagnostic species that were most affected within this buffer zone were the perennial F. procumbens in Northern Adriatic sites and the annual species F. fasciculata, P. arenarium subsp. caesium and S. colorata. They are typical of the Adriatic coastal transition dune vegetation, which is characterized by perennial grasslands dominated by chamaephytes and biennial erect leafy forbs and grasses [63] and short grasslands with annual species rich in spring-blooming therophytes [60].
The flat topography of transition dunes favors the widespread presence of beach goers and associated trampling damage [73], and the perennial plants, once damaged, can regenerate very slowly [33,117]. Such a direct pressure leads to the fragmentation of plant communities, increasing the percentage of bare soil areas [62]. Non-vegetated areas can be colonized by opportunistic and alien species that are well-adapted to the establishment of open and irregularly disturbed habitats [67], preferably germinating in the light [68] and benefitting from mild environmental conditions in comparison with shifting dunes [19]. In addition to the direct pressure of trampling, human presence increases propagule pressure, determines the abandonment of waste and the presence of pets [23,118,119], thus altering local environmental conditions, with an effect increasing in proximity to the closest beach access [11].
It is worth noting that the investigated Adriatic transition dunes had a general low cover of perennial diagnostic species and this is likely due to the fact that their flat morphology has been favored by a long term frequent direct and indirect anthropogenic pressure, which caused the homogenization of plant species composition [32], the spread of disturbance-tolerant species [33] and the co-occurrence of plant species belonging to different communities [34].

5. Conclusions

A detailed knowledge of ongoing ecological processes can be very important to manage coastal dune habitats and plan effective restoration actions.
Although the spreading of alien invasive species in coastal-dune environments is well-known in the scientific literature, our contribution focused on a little-known aspect, namely, the identification of the critical IAP abundance/cover impact level determining relevant changes in the native vegetation.
According to the present research, such a critical threshold exists in the shifting dunes, signaling a low tolerance to the presence of IAP in these frontier environments towards the sea. Limiting the propagation of IAP in such environments is, hence, to be pursued in order to limit the decline of the dune-building beachgrasses that trap and stabilize sand. Shifting dunes that have lower levels of native and perennial vegetation cover are more prone to erosion and provide lower-quality habitat for other taxa. Restoration of coastal dunes, by planting seedlings of perennial dune-building beachgrasses and by placing wooden fences at the foredune foot to protect the restored dunes, was proven to be highly effective in fostering the recovery of dune structure and function and thus even reducing the spread of IAP [11].
Instead, the degradation of the transition dunes turns out to be attributable to sea-side tourism and to both direct and indirect disturbances that beach goers bring about. A critical threshold was found for dune paths’ impact on the cover of diagnostic species, causing native vegetation deterioration and making way for IAP.
Our findings can provide important management information to optimize accessibility to beaches and the protection of dune ecosystems. The access to the beach should be managed in order to protect vulnerable dune vegetation from trampling impacts. The replacement of sand paths with raised wooden boardwalks over the dunes can greatly reduce the ecological impact of human presence in coastal transition dunes, promoting a rapid recovery of native plant communities, as observed in previous studies [35,120,121].
It is a priority, in such areas, to return spaces to wilderness over 150 m from the dune paths and subsequently enlarge the distance between paths and utilize raised wooden paths, directing the beach goers in a few ramps of access, thus preventing the spread of trampling of natural environments. All measures need to be supplemented with explanatory information for visitors and should be developed with local stakeholders in order to minimize distrust and support acceptance [122].
Therefore, it is fundamental to enforce management of the coastal areas to mitigate the spread of IAP and the negative effects of the anthropic pressure, thus conserving their unique biodiversity and the numerous ecosystem services they provide.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/land12010135/s1, Table S1: Complete list of plant taxa matched to the respective ecological guild and mean cover (%) for the shifting dunes under control (total IAP cover <15%) and invaded conditions (total IAP cover ≥15%); Table S2: Complete list of plant taxa matched to the respective ecological guild and mean cover (%) for the transition dunes under control (total IAP cover <15%) and invaded conditions (total IAP cover ≥15%); Table S3: SIMPER analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.C.d.F., F.P.T. and A.S; methodology, F.P.T., M.C.d.F., A.S, M.I., G.B. and E.F.; software, F.P.T. and M.I.; validation, A.S. and G.B.; formal analysis, F.P.T. and M.I.; investigation, F.P.T., M.C.d.F., A.S, G.B. and E.F.; resources, F.P.T. and E.F.; data curation, F.P.T. and E.F.; writing—original draft preparation, F.P.T., M.C.d.F., A.S, M.I., G.B. and E.F.; writing—review & editing F.P.T., M.C.d.F., A.S, M.I., G.B. and E.F.; visualization, F.P.T., M.I. and E.F.; supervision, A.S. and G.B.; project administration, A.S. and G.B.; funding acquisition, A.S. and G.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was partially funded by LIFE16 NAT/IT/000589 REDUNE, LIFE17 NAT/IT/000565 CALLIOPE and INTERREG V-A IT-HR CBC Programme—‘Strategic’ project—CASCADE—ID: 10255941.

Data Availability Statement

The current study did not use any public archived dataset and did not generate any public dataset. The complete list of plant taxa and their cover values and the SIMPER analysis are available in the Supplementary Materials. Other relevant data to support this study are available from the authors upon request or in Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely appreciate all MDPI editors and external reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which helped us in improving the quality of the manuscript. We are thankful to Italian Long Term Ecological Research network (LTER) for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Genovesi, P.; Shine, C. European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species: Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Habitats (Bern Convention); Nature and Environment, 137; Council of Europe Publishing: Bern, Switzerland, 2004; pp. 1–68. [Google Scholar]
  2. Vilá, M.; Espinar, J.L.; Hejda, M.; Hulme, P.E.; Jarošík, V.; Maron, J.L.; Pergl, J.; Schaffner, U.; Sun, Y.; Pyšek, P. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: A meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14, 702–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pyšek, P.; Jarosik, V.; Hulme, P.E.; Pergl, J.; Hejda, M.; Schaffner, U.; Vila, M. A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: The interaction of impact measure,; invading species’ traits and environment. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2012, 18, 1725–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Maes, J. A Model for the Assessment of Habitat Conservation Status in the EU. JRC Scientific and Policy Report; Publication Office of the European Commission: Luxembourg City, Luxembourg, 2013; pp. 1–45. [Google Scholar]
  5. Milanović, M.; Knapp, S.; Pyšek, P.; Kühn, I. Linking traits of invasive plants with ecosystem services and disservices. Ecosyst. Serv. 2020, 42, 101072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gigante, D.; Acosta, A.T.R.; Agrillo, E.; Armiraglio, S.; Assini, S.; Attorre, F.; Bagella, S.; Buffa, G.; Casella, L.; Giancola, C.; et al. Habitat conservation in Italy: The state of the art in the light of the first European red list of terrestrial and freshwater habitats. Rend. Lincei. Sci. Fis. Nat. 2018, 29, 251–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chytrý, M.; Maskell, L.C.; Pino, J.; Pyšek, P.; Vilá, M.; Font, X.; Smart, S.M. Habitat Invasions by Alien Plants: A Quantitative Comparison among Mediterranean, Subcontinental and Oceanic Regions of Europe. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45, 448–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chytrý, M.; Pyšek, P.; Wild, J.; Pino, J.; Maskell, L.C.; Vilá, M. European Map of Alien Plant Invasions Based on the Quantitative Assessment across Habitats. Divers. Distrib. 2009, 15, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sperandii, M.G.; Barták, V.; Carboni, M.; Acosta, A.T.R. Getting the measure of the biodiversity crisis in Mediterranean coastal habitats. J. Ecol. 2021, 109, 1224–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ciccarelli, D. Mediterranean Coastal Sand Dune Vegetation: Influence of Natural and Anthropogenic Factors. Environ. Manag. 2014, 54, 194–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Della Bella, A.; Fantinato, E.; Scarton, F.; Buffa, G. Mediterranean developed coasts: What future for the foredune restoration? J. Coast Conserv. 2021, 25, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Delgado-Fernandez, I.; O’Keefe, N.; Davidson-Arnott, R.G. Natural and human controls on dune vegetation cover and disturbance. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 672, 643–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Matesanz, S.; Valladares, F. Ecological and evolutionary responses of Mediterranean plants to global change. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 103, 53–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Malavasi, M.; Carboni, M.; Cutini, M.; Carranza, M.L.; Acosta, A.T.R. Landscape fragmentation; land-use legacy and propagule pressure promote plant invasion on coastal dunes: A patch-based approach. Landsc. Ecol. 2014, 29, 1541–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Giulio, S.; Acosta, A.T.R.; Carboni, M.; Campos, J.A.; Chytrý, M.; Loidi, J.; Pergl, J.; Pyšek, P.; Isermann, M.; Janssen, J.A.M.; et al. Alien flora across European coastal dunes. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2020, 23, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. van der Maarel, E. Some remarks on the functions of European coastal ecosystems. Phytocoenologia 2003, 33, 187–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. García-Mora, M.R.; Gallego-Fernández, J.B.; García-Novo, F. Plant functional types in coastal foredunes in relation to environmental stress and disturbance. J. Veg. Sci. 1999, 10, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Drius, M.; Jones, L.; Marzialetti, F.; de Francesco, M.C.; Stanisci, A.; Carranza, M.L. Not just a sandy beach. The multi-service value of Mediterranean coastal dunes. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 668, 1139–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Carboni, M.; Santoro, R.; Acosta, A.T. Dealing with Scarce Data to Understand How Environmental Gradients and Propagule Pressure Shape Fine-scale Alien Distribution Patterns on Coastal Dunes. J. Veg. Sci. 2011, 22, 751–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Basnou, C.; Iguzquiza, J.; Pino, J. Examining the Role of Landscape Structure and Dynamics in Alien Plant Invasion from Urban Mediterranean Coastal Habitats. Landsc. Urban Plan 2015, 136, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lozano, V.; Marzialetti, F.; Carranza, M.L.; Chapman, D.; Branquart, E.; Dološ, K.; Große-Stoltenberg, A.; Fiori, M.; Capece, P.; Brundu, G. Modelling Acacia saligna Invasion in a Large Mediterranean Island Using PAB Factors: A Tool for Implementing the European Legislation on Invasive Species. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 116, 106516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cao Pinna, L.; Axmanová, I.; Chytrý, M.; Malavasi, M.; Acosta, A.T.R.; Giulio, S.; Attorre, F.; Bergmeier, E.; Biurrun, I.; Campos, J.A.; et al. The Biogeography of Alien Plant Invasions in the Mediterranean Basin. J. Veg. Sci. 2021, 32, e12980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Malavasi, M.; Santoro, R.; Cutini, M.; Acosta, A.T.R.; Carranza, M.L. The impact of human pressure on landscape patterns and plant species richness in Mediterranean coastal dunes. Plant Biosyst. 2016, 150, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Acosta, A.; Carranza, M.L.; Ciaschetti, G.; Conti, F.; Di Martino, L.; D’Orazio, G.; Frattaroli, A.; Izzi, C.F.; Pirone, G.; Stanisci, A. Specie vegetali esotiche negli ambienti costieri sabbiosi di alcune regioni dell’Italia centrale/Alien plant species in sandy coastal environment in some regions of central Italy. Webbia 2007, 62, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pizzo, L.; Buffa, G. Principali specie vegetali alloctone e invasive presenti negli habitat Natura 2000 delle dune del litorale nord adriatico (NE Italia)/Main alien invasive species occurring in Nature 2000 habitats of North Adriatic coastal dunes. Boll. Mus. St. Nat. 2014, 65, 23–45. [Google Scholar]
  26. Celesti-Grapow, L.; Alessandrini, A.; Arrigoni, P.V.; Assini, S.; Banfi, E.; Barni, E.; Bovio, M.; Brundu, G.; Cagiotti, M.R.; Camarda, I.; et al. Non-native flora of Italy: Species distribution and threats. Plant Biosyst. 2010, 144, 12–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lazzaro, L.; Bolpagni, R.; Buffa, G.; Gentili, R.; Lonati, M.; Stinca, A.; Acosta, A.T.R.; Adorni, M.; Aleffi, M.; Allegrezza, M.; et al. Impact of invasive alien plants on native plant communities and Natura 2000 habitats: State of the art; gap analysis and perspectives in Italy. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 274, 111140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tozzi, F.P.; Carranza, M.L.; Frate, L.; Stanisci, A. The impact of Acacia saligna on the composition and structure of the Mediterranean maquis. Biodiversity 2021, 22, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Santoro, R.; Carboni, M.; Carranza, M.L.; Acosta, A.T.R. Focal species diversity patterns can provide diagnostic information on plant invasions. J. Nat. Conserv. 2012, 20, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Del Vecchio, S.; Pizzo, L.; Buffa, G. The response of plant community diversity to alien invasion: Evidence from a sand dune time series. Biodivers. Conserv. 2014, 24, 371–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Cascone, S.; Sperandii, M.G.; Cao Pinna, L.; Marzialetti, F.; Carranza, M.L.; Acosta, A.T.R. Exploring Temporal Trends of Plant Invasion in Mediterranean Coastal Dunes. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Buffa, G.; Del Vecchio, S.; Fantinato, E.; Milano, V. Local versus landscape-scale effects of anthropogenic land-use on forest species richness. Acta Oecol. 2018, 86, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Del Vecchio, S.; Slaviero, A.; Fantinato, E.; Buffa, G. The use of plant community attributes to detect habitat quality in coastal environments. AoB PLANTS 2016, 8, plw040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fantinato, E. The impact of (mass) tourism on coastal dune pollination networks. Biol. Conserv. 2019, 236, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Prisco, I.; Acosta, A.T.R.; Stanisci, A. A bridge between tourism and nature conservation: Boardwalks effects on coastal dune vegetation. J. Coast. Conserv. 2021, 25, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Šilc, U.; Caković, D.; Küzmič, F.; Stešević, D. Trampling impact on vegetation of embryonic and stabilised sand dunes in Montenegro. J. Coast. Conserv. 2016, 21, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. de Salamanca, E.Á. Synanthropisation of coastal vegetation in southern Spain. Mediterr. Bot. 2022, online first, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Downey, P.O.; Richardson, D.M. Alien plant invasions and native plant extinctions: A six-threshold framework. AoB Plants 2016, 8, plw047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Gooden, B.; French, K.; Turner, P.J.; Downey, P.O. Impact threshold for an alien plant invader; Lantana camara, L.; on native plant communities. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142, 2631–2641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Bradley, B.A.; Laginhas, B.B.; Whitlock, R.; Allen, J.M.; Bates, A.E.; Bernatchez, G.; Sorte, C.J.B. Disentangling the abundance-impact relationship for invasive species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 9919–9924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Bezzi, A.; Fontolan, G. Foredune classification and morphodynamic processes along the Veneto coast (N. Adriatic; Italy). In MEDCOAST ’03; Ozhan, E., Ed.; MEDCOAST Secretariat: Ankara, Turkey, 2003; pp. 1425–1434. [Google Scholar]
  42. Acosta, A.T.R.; Carranza, M.L.; Izzi, C.F. Are there habitats that contribute best to plant species diversity in coastal dunes? Biodivers. Conserv. 2009, 18, 1087–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Aucelli, P.P.C.; Di Paola, G.; Rizzo, A.; Rosskopf, C. Present day and future scenarios of coastal erosion and flooding processes along the Italian Adriatic coast: The case of Molise region. Environ. Earth Sci. 2018, 77, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. ARPAV. I Suoli della Provincia di Venezia/Soils of Venice Province; Grafiche Erredici: Padova, Italy, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  45. Stanisci, A.; Conti, F. Aspetti vegetazionali di un settore costiero molisano-abruzzese/Vegetation features of coastal dunes in Molise and Abruzzo regions. Ann. Bot. 1990, 48, 85–94. [Google Scholar]
  46. Buffa, G.; Fantinato, E.; Pizzo, L. Effects of disturbance on sandy coastal ecosystems of N-Adriatic coasts (Italy). In Biodiversity Enrichment in a Diverse World Rijeka; Lameed, G.A., Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012; pp. 339–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Malavasi, M.; Santoro, R.; Cutini, M.; Acosta, A.T.R.; Carranza, M.L. What has happened to coastal dunes in the last half century? A multitemporal coastal landscape analysis in Central Italy. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 119, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Frattaroli, A.R.; Acosta, A.; Ciaschetti, G.; Di Martino, L.; Pirone, G.; Stanisci, A. Indagine sulla qualità ambientale della costa dell’Abruzzo meridionale e del Molise (Adriatico centrale) su base floristico-vegetazionale/Research on environmental quality of coastal dunes in Southern Abruzzo and Molise (central Adriatic). Fitosociologia 2007, 44, 117–127. [Google Scholar]
  49. Stanisci, A.; Acosta, A.; Carranza, M.L.; Feola, S.; Giuliano, M. Gli habitat di interesse comunitario sul litorale molisano e il loro valore naturalistico su base floristica/The habitats of European concern of Molise coastal dunes and their naturalistic value based on flora. Fitosociologia 2007, 44, 171–175. [Google Scholar]
  50. Stanisci, A.; Acosta, A.T.R.; Carranza, M.L.; de Chiro, M.; Del Vecchio, S.; Di Martino, L.; Frattaroli, A.R.; Fusco, S.; Izzi, C.F.; Pirone, G.; et al. EU Habitats Monitoring along the Coastal Dunes of the LTER Sites of Abruzzo and Molise (Italy). Plant Sociol. 2014, 51, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sburlino, G.; Buffa, G.; Filesi, L.; Gamper, U.; Ghirelli, L. Phytocoenotic diversity of the N-Adriatic coastal sand dunes—The herbaceous communities of the fixed dunes and the vegetation of the interdunal wetlands. Plant Sociol. 2013, 50, 57–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Del Vecchio, S.; Fantinato, E.; Janssen, J.A.M.; Bioret, F.; Acosta, A.; Prisco, I.; Tzonev, R.; Marcenò, C.; Rodwell, J.; Buffa, G. Biogeographic variability of coastal perennial grasslands at the European scale. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2018, 21, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Pesaresi, S.; Galdenzi, D.; Biondi, E.; Casavecchia, S. Bioclimate of Italy: Application of the worldwide bioclimatic classification system. J. Maps 2014, 10, 538–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Desiato, F.; Lena, F.; Toreti, A. SCIA: A system for a better knowledge of the Italian climate. Boll. Di Geofis. Teor. Ed Appl. 2007, 48, 351–358. [Google Scholar]
  55. Desiato, F.; Fioravanti, G.; Fraschetti, P.; Perconti, W.; Toreti, A. Climate indicators for Italy: Calculation and dissemination. Adv. Sci. Res. 2011, 6, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. SCIA: Sistema Nazionale per L’elaborazione e Diffusione di Dati Climatici/National System for Computation and Distribution of Climate Data. Available online: http://www.scia.isprambiente.it/wwwrootscia/Home_new.html (accessed on 20 September 2022).
  57. Prisco, I.; Berardo, F.; Carranza, M.L.; Frate, L.; Fusco, S.; Iannotta, F.; Loy, A.; Roscioni, F.; Stanisci, A. SOS Dune: Le Buone Pratiche del Progetto Life Maestrale/SOS Dunes:The Best Practices of LIFE Project Maestrale. Layman’s Report; Aracne Editrice: Roma, Italy, 2017; ISBN 978-88-255-0224-4. [Google Scholar]
  58. de Francesco, M.C.; Chiuchiarelli, I.; Frate, L.; Carranza, M.L.; Pagliani, T.; Stanisci, A. Towards new marine-coastal Natura 2000 sites in the central Adriatic Sea. In Eighth International Symposium “Monitoring of Mediterranean Coastal Areas. Problems and Measurement Techniques; Bonora, L., Carboni, D., De Vincenzi, M., Eds.; University Press: Firenze, Italy, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Prisco, I.; Acosta, A.T.R.; Ercole, S. An overview of the Italian coastal dune EU habitats. Ann. Bot. 2012, 2, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Biondi, E.; Blasi, C.; Burrascano, S.; Casavecchia, S.; Copiz, R.; Del Vico, E.; Galdenzi, D.; Gigante, D.; Lasen, C.; Spampinato, G.; et al. Manuale Italiano di Interpretazione degli Habitat della Direttiva 92/43/CEE/Italian Manual for the Interpretation of Habitats Listed in the Directive 92/43CEE; Published by Italian Botany Society and Ministry of Environment and Protection of the Ierritory and Sea. 2009. Available online: http://vnr.unipg.it/habitat/index.jsp (accessed on 22 September 2022).
  61. Pirone, G.; Ciaschetti, G.; Di Martino, L.; Cianfaglione, K.; Giallonardo, T.; Frattaroli, A.R. Contribution to the knowledge of the coastal vegetation of Abruzzo (central Adriatic). Plant Sociol. 2014, 51, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Silan, G.; Del Vecchio, S.; Fantinato, E.; Buffa, G. Habitat quality assessment through a multifaceted 458 approach: The case of the habitat 2130* in Italy. Plant Sociol. 2017, 54, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rivieccio, G.; Aleffi, M.; Angiolini, C.; Bagella, S.; Bazan, G.; Bonini, F.; Caria, M.C.; Casavecchia, S.; Castello, M.; Dagnino, D.; et al. New national and regional Annex I Habitat records: From #26 to #36. Plant Sociol. 2021, 58, 77–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Acosta, A.T.R.; Ercole, S. Gli Habitat delle Coste Sabbiose Italiane: Ecologia e Problematiche di Conservazione/Habitats of Italian Sandy Coasts: Ecology and Conservation Issues; Serie Rapporti; ISPRA: Roma, Italy, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  65. Montagnani, C.; Gentili, R.; Smith, M.; Guarino, M.F.; Citterio, S. The Worldwide Spread, Success, and Impact of Ragweed (Ambrosia spp.). CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2017, 36, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Canullo, R.; Falinska, K. Ecologia Vegetale. La struttura gerarchica della vegetazione/Plant Ecology. In The Hierarchical Structure of Vegetation; Liguori Editore: Napoli, Italy, 2003; ISBN 9788820734145. [Google Scholar]
  67. Mihulka, S.; Pyšek, P.; Martínková, J.; Jarošík, V. Invasiveness of Oenothera congeners alien to Europe: Jack of all trades; master of invasion? Perspect. Plant Ecol. 2006, 8, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Del Vecchio, S.; Mattana, E.; Ullian, T.; Buffa, G. Functional seed traits and germination patterns predict species coexistence in NE Mediterranean foredune communities. Ann. Bot. 2021, 127, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hilton, M.; Konlechner, T.; McLachlan, K.; Lim, D.; Lord, J. Long-lived seed banks of Ammophila arenaria prolong dune restoration programs. J. Coast. Conserv. 2019, 23, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Saeed, A.; Hussain, A.; Khan, M.I.; Arif, M.; Maqbool, M.M.; Mehmood, H.; Iqbal, M.; Alkahtani, J.; Elshikh, M.S. The influence of environmental factors on seed germination of Xanthium strumarium L.: Implications for management. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0241601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Guarino, R.; Chytrý, M.; Attorre, F.; Landucci, F.; Marcenò, C. Alien plant invasions in Mediterranean habitats: An assessment for Sicily. Biol. Invasions 2021, 23, 3091–3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ullah, R.; Khan, N.; Hewitt, N.; Ali, K.; Jones, D.A.; Khan, M.E.H. Invasive Species as Rivals: Invasive Potential and Distribution Pattern of Xanthium strumarium L. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Buffa, G.; Gaetan, C.; Piccoli, S.; Del Vecchio, S.; Fantinato, E. Using fine-scale field data modelling for planning the management of invasions of Oenothera stucchii in coastal dune systems. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 125, 107564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, Y.; Tang, J.; Ren, G.; Zhao, K.; Wang, X. Global potential distribution prediction of Xanthium italicum based on Maxent model. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 16545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Italian Ministry of Ecological Transition. EC Habitat Maps and Forms. Available online: https://www.mite.gov.it/pagina/schede-e-cartografie (accessed on 22 September 2022).
  76. Haveman, R.; Janssen, J.A.M. The analysis of long-term changes in plant communities using large databases: The effect of stratified resampling. J. Veg. Sci. 2008, 19, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gigante, D.; Attorre, F.; Venanzoni, R.; Acosta, A.; Agrillo, E.; Aleffi, M.; Alessi, N.; Allegrezza, M.; Angelini, P.; Angiolini, C.; et al. A methodological protocol for Annex I Habitats monitoring: The contribution of Vegetation science. Plant Sociol. 2016, 53, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Braun-Blanquet, J. Pflanzensoziologie, Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde, 3rd ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Westhoff, V.; Van Der Maarel, E. The Braun-Blanquet approach. In Classification of Plant Communities; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1978; pp. 287–399. [Google Scholar]
  80. Pignatti, S.; La Rosa, M.; Guarino, R. Flora d’Italia Flora of Italy; Edagricole: Bologna, Italy, 2017–2019. [Google Scholar]
  81. Santoro, R.; Jucker, T.; Carranza, M.L.; Acosta, A.T.R. Assessing the Effects of Carpobrotus Invasion on Coastal Dune Soils. Does the Nature of the Invaded Habitat Matter? Commun. Ecol. 2011, 12, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. European Commission. Interpretation Manual of European Union Habitats. Directorate-General for the Environment; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  83. Prisco, I.; Stanisci, A.; Acosta, A.T.R. Mediterranean Dunes on the Go: Evidence from a Short Term Study on Coastal Herbaceous Vegetation. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2016, 182, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Richardson, D.M.; Pyšek, P.; Rejmánek, M.; Barbour, M.G.; Panetta, F.D.; West, C.J. Naturalization and Invasion of Alien Plants: Concepts and Definitions. Divers. Distrib. 2000, 6, 93–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Pyšek, P.; Hulme, P.E.; Simberloff, D.; Bacher, S.; Blackburn, T.M.; Carlton, J.T.; Dawson, W.; Essl, F.; Foxcroft, L.C.; Genovesi, P.; et al. Scientists’ Warning on Invasive Alien Species. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2020, 95, 1511–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Celesti-Grapow, L.; Pretto, F.; Brundu, G.; Carli, E.; Blasi, C. Plant Invasion in Italy. An Overview; Palombi & Partner S.r.l.: Rome, Italy, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  87. Galasso, G.; Conti, F.; Peruzzi, L.; Ardenghi, N.M.G.; Banfi, E.; Celesti-Grapow, L.; Albano, A.; Alessandrini, A.; Bacchetta, G.; Ballelli, S.; et al. An Updated Checklist of the Vascular Flora Alien to Italy. Plant Biosyst. 2018, 152, 556–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Prasad, A.M.; Iverson, L.R.; Liaw, A. Newer classification and regression tree techniques: Bagging and random forests for ecological prediction. Ecosystems 2006, 9, 181–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Cutler, D.R.; Edwards Jr, T.C.; Beard, K.H.; Cutler, A.; Hess, K.T.; Gibson, J.; Lawler, J.J. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 2007, 8, 2783–2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Probst, P.; Wright, M.N.; Boulesteix, A.L. Hyperparameters and tuning strategies for random forest. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2019, 9, e1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  92. Kuhn, M. Classification and Regression Training. R Package Version 6.0-93. 2022. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=caret> (accessed on 1 July 2022).
  93. Wickham, H. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  94. Liaw, A.; Wiener, M. Classification and Regression by randomForest. R News 2002, 2, 18–22. [Google Scholar]
  95. Oksanen, J.; Simpson, G.; Blanchet, F.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; Minchin, P.; O’Hara, R.; Solymos, P.; Stevens, M.; Szoecs, E.; et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 2.6-2. 2022. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (accessed on 1 July 2022).
  96. Greenwell, B.M. An R Package for Constructing Partial Dependence Plots. R J. 2017, 9, 421–436. [Google Scholar]
  97. O’Loughlin, L.S.; Panetta, F.D.; Gooden, B. Identifying thresholds in the impacts of an invasive groundcover on native vegetation. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 20512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Prober, S.M.; Thiele, K.R.; Speijers, J. Competing drivers lead to non-linear native: Exotic relationships in endangered temperate grassy woodlands. Biol. Invasions 2016, 18, 3001–3014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Stešević, D.; Luković, M.; Caković, D.; Ružić, N.; Bubanja, N.; Šilc, U. Distribution of alien species along sand dune plant communities zonation. Period. Biol. 2017, 119, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Valdesolo, T.; Del Vecchio, S.; Buffa, G. Patterns of Seed Dispersal in Coastal Dune Plant Communities. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Prisco, I.; Carboni, M.; Acosta, A.T.R. The Fate of Threatened Coastal Dune Habitat in Italy under Climate Change Scenarios. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. MedECC. Climate and Environmental Change in the Mediterranean Basin—Current Situation and Risks for the Future. First Mediterranean Assessment Report; UNEP/MAP: Marseille, France, 2020; p. 632. ISBN 978-2-9577416-0-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Barbier, E.B.; Hacker, S.D.; Kennedy, C.; Koch, E.W.; Stier, A.C.; Silliman, B.R. The Value of Estuarine and Coastal Ecosystem Services. Ecol. Monog. 2011, 81, 169–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Drius, M.; Carranza, M.L.; Stanisci, A.; Jones, L. The Role of Italian Coastal Dunes as Carbon Sinks and Diversity Sources. A Multi-Service Perspective. Appl. Geog. 2016, 75, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Biel, R.G.; Hacker, S.D.; Ruggiero, P.; Cohn, N.; Seabloom, E.W. Coastal Protection and Conservation on Sandy Beaches and Dunes: Context-Dependent Tradeoffs in Ecosystem Service Supply. Ecosphere 2017, 8, e01791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Stanisci, A.; Acosta, A.T.R.; Di Iorio, A.; Vergalito, M. Leaf and root trait variability of alien and native species along Adriatic coastal dunes (Italy). Plant Biosyst. 2010, 144, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Carboni, M.; Münkemüller, T.; Lavergne, S.; Choler, P.; Borgy, B.; Violle, C.; Essl, F.; Roquet, C.; Munoz, F.; DivGrass Consortium. What it takes to invade grassland ecosystems: Traits; introduction history and filtering processes. Ecol. Lett. 2016, 19, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Lambdon, P.W.; Lloret, F.; Hulme, P.E. Do alien plants on Mediterranean islands tend to invade different niches from native species? Biol. Invasions 2008, 10, 703–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Sargent, R.D.; Ackerly, D.D. Plant–pollinator interactions and the assembly of plant communities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Fantinato, E.; Del Vecchio, S.; Giovanetti, M.; Acosta, A.T.R.; Buffa, G. New insights into plants co-existence in species-rich communities: The pollination interaction perspective. J. Veg. Sci. 2018, 29, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Fenollosa, E.; Roach, D.A.; Munné-Bosch, S. Death and Plasticity in Clones Influence Invasion Success. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 551–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Campoy, J.G.; Roiloa, S.R.; Santiso, X.; Retuerto, R. Ecophysiological differentiation between two invasive species of Carpobrotus competing under different nutrient conditions. Am. J. Bot. 2019, 106, 1454–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Campoy, J.G.; Lema, M.; Fenollosa, E.; Munné-Bosch, S.; Retuerto, R. Functional responses to climate change may increase invasive potential of Carpobrotus edulis. Am. J. Bot. 2021, 108, 1902–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Farris, E.; Pisanu, S.; Ceccherelli, G.; Filigheddu, R. Human trampling effects on Mediterranean coastal dune plants. Plant Biosyst. 2013, 147, 1043–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Pinna, M.S.; Bacchetta, G.; Cogoni, D.; Fenu, G. Is vegetation an indicator for evaluating the impact of tourism on the conservation status of Mediterranean coastal dunes? Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 674, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Sarmati, S.; Bonari, G.; Angiolini, C. Conservation status of Mediterranean coastal dune habitats: Anthropogenic disturbance may hamper habitat assignment. Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei 2019, 3, 623–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Cole, D.N. Experimental Trampling of Vegetation II. Predictors of Resistance and Resilience. J. Appl. Ecol. 1995, 32, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. de Francesco, M.C.; Carranza, M.L.; Varricchione, M.; Tozzi, F.P.; Stanisci, A. Natural Protected Areas as Special Sentinels of Littering on Coastal Dune Vegetation. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Marzialetti, F.; Bazzichetto, M.; Giulio, S.; Acosta, A.T.R.; Stanisci, A.; Malavasi, M.; Carranza, M.L. Modelling Acacia saligna invasion on the Adriatic coastal landscape: An integrative approach using LTER data. Nat. Conserv. 2019, 34, 127–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Seer, F.K.; Irmler, U.; Schrautzer, J. Beaches under pressure—Effects of human access on vegetation at Baltic Sea beaches. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2016, 19, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Purvis, K.G.; Gramling, J.M.; Murren, C.J. Assessment of Beach Access Paths on Dune Vegetation: Diversity, Abundance, and Cover. J. Coast. Res. 2015, 31, 1222–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Defeo, O.; McLachlan, A.; Schoeman, D.S.; Schlacher, T.A.; Dugan, J.; Jones, A.; Lastra, M.; Scapini, F. Threats to sandy beach ecosystems: A review. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2009, 81, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Study area in Italy. The sites have been colored according to their location along the Adriatic coast of Italy (red dots for North Adriatic sites and blue dots for South Adriatic sites) and labelled according to their ID. 1: Caorle, 2: Eraclea, 3: Cavallino Treporti, 4: San Michele al Tagliamento, 5: Pineto, 6: Ortona, 7: Vasto, 8: Petacciato, 9: Campomarino.
Figure 1. Study area in Italy. The sites have been colored according to their location along the Adriatic coast of Italy (red dots for North Adriatic sites and blue dots for South Adriatic sites) and labelled according to their ID. 1: Caorle, 2: Eraclea, 3: Cavallino Treporti, 4: San Michele al Tagliamento, 5: Pineto, 6: Ortona, 7: Vasto, 8: Petacciato, 9: Campomarino.
Land 12 00135 g001
Figure 2. Community composition and environmental covariates for shifting and transition dunes using cover of diagnostic species as response variable. Mean square error (MSE) was used to assess variable importance, reported as percentage. Light blue bars indicate the most important variables.
Figure 2. Community composition and environmental covariates for shifting and transition dunes using cover of diagnostic species as response variable. Mean square error (MSE) was used to assess variable importance, reported as percentage. Light blue bars indicate the most important variables.
Land 12 00135 g002
Figure 3. Dependence Plots (PDP) for the three most important covariates in RF (Random Forest) model for shifting dunes ((A): Total IAP cover and (B): Oenothera stucchii individuals) and for transition dunes ((C): Distance from dune paths). The blue line represents a smoother (general additive model) to enhance visualization of the general trend, shown as dotted black line.
Figure 3. Dependence Plots (PDP) for the three most important covariates in RF (Random Forest) model for shifting dunes ((A): Total IAP cover and (B): Oenothera stucchii individuals) and for transition dunes ((C): Distance from dune paths). The blue line represents a smoother (general additive model) to enhance visualization of the general trend, shown as dotted black line.
Land 12 00135 g003
Table 1. List of IAP found in shifting and transition dunes in the study area. For each taxon, the family, the habitus and the geographical origin are reported, alongside the mean cover per habitat and the presence in the corresponding Adriatic sector.
Table 1. List of IAP found in shifting and transition dunes in the study area. For each taxon, the family, the habitus and the geographical origin are reported, alongside the mean cover per habitat and the presence in the corresponding Adriatic sector.
Mean Cover per Habitat (%)Presence in Adriatic Sector
TaxonFamilyHabitusOriginShifting DunesTransition DunesNorthSouth
Oenothera stucchiiOnagraceaeBiennial erect leafy forbNorth America10.9411.68xx
Ambrosia psilostachyaAsteraceaePerennial erect leafy forbNorth America0.341.74xx
Cenchrus longispinusPoaceaeAnnual erect grassNorth America0.200.79xx
Xanthium orientaleAsteraceaeAnnual erect leafy forbNorth America0.540.14xx
Erigeron canadensisAsteraceaeAnnual erect leafy forbNorth America0.250.19xx
Amorpha fruticosaFabaceaeDeciduous bushNorth America 0.21x-
Sporobolus pumilusPoaceaePerennial grassNorth America 0.09x-
Carpobrotus edulisAizoaceaePerennial succulent matSouth Africa0.05 -x
Cuscuta campestrisConvolvulaceaeAnnual parasiteNorth America 0.01x-
Erigeron sumatrensisAsteraceaeAnnual erect leafy forbCentral America 0.01-x
Senecio inaequidensAsteraceaeAnnual erect leafy forbSouth Africa 0.01x-
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Francesco, M.C.; Tozzi, F.P.; Buffa, G.; Fantinato, E.; Innangi, M.; Stanisci, A. Identifying Critical Thresholds in the Impacts of Invasive Alien Plants and Dune Paths on Native Coastal Dune Vegetation. Land 2023, 12, 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010135

AMA Style

de Francesco MC, Tozzi FP, Buffa G, Fantinato E, Innangi M, Stanisci A. Identifying Critical Thresholds in the Impacts of Invasive Alien Plants and Dune Paths on Native Coastal Dune Vegetation. Land. 2023; 12(1):135. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010135

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Francesco, Maria Carla, Francesco Pio Tozzi, Gabriella Buffa, Edy Fantinato, Michele Innangi, and Angela Stanisci. 2023. "Identifying Critical Thresholds in the Impacts of Invasive Alien Plants and Dune Paths on Native Coastal Dune Vegetation" Land 12, no. 1: 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010135

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop