Next Article in Journal
Thymoquinone Enhances Paclitaxel Anti-Breast Cancer Activity via Inhibiting Tumor-Associated Stem Cells Despite Apparent Mathematical Antagonism
Next Article in Special Issue
Lignosulfonate Microcapsules for Delivery and Controlled Release of Thymol and Derivatives
Previous Article in Journal
Mapping the Photochemistry of European Mid-Latitudes Rivers: An Assessment of Their Ability to Photodegrade Contaminants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Valorization of Lignin as an Immobilizing Agent for Bioinoculant Production using Azospirillum brasilense as a Model Bacteria
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Eucalyptus nitens Lignins Obtained by Biorefinery Methods Based on Ionic Liquids

1
Chemical Engineering Department, Polytechnical Building, University of Vigo (Campus Ourense), As Lagoas, 32004 Ourense, Spain
2
Department of Pharmacy, University of Naples ‘Federico II’, Via Domenico Montesano, 49, 80131 Naples, Italy
3
Department of Molecular Sciences and Nanosystems, University of Venice ‘Ca’Foscari’, Via Torino 155, 30170 Venice Mestre, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(2), 425; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020425
Submission received: 23 December 2019 / Revised: 14 January 2020 / Accepted: 17 January 2020 / Published: 20 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lignin—Chemistry and Materials: Past, Present and Future)

Abstract

:
Eucalyptus nitens wood samples were subjected to consecutive stages of hydrothermal processing for hemicellulose solubilization and delignification with an ionic liquid, i.e., either 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hydrogen sulfate or triethylammonium hydrogen sulfate. Delignification experiments were carried out a 170 °C for 10–50 min. The solid phases from treatments, i.e., cellulose-enriched solids, were recovered by centrifugation, and lignin was separated from the ionic liquid by water precipitation. The best delignification conditions were identified on the basis of the results determined for delignification percentage, lignin recovery yield, and cellulose recovery in solid phase. The lignins obtained under selected conditions were characterized in deep by 31P-NMR, 13C-NMR, HSQC, and gel permeation chromatography. The major structural features of the lignins were discussed in comparison with the results determined for a model Ionosolv lignin.

1. Introduction

Lignocellulosic materials represent a widespread, low cost and renewable bioresource suitable as a raw material for the sustainable production of fuels, chemicals and materials. In quantitative terms, woods are the most important type of lignocellulosic materials. Considered as feedstocks for the industry, woods show important comparative advantages over other lignocellulosic materials of agricultural origin, including large availability, non-seasonal character, favorable composition, and ability to grow in lands unsuitable for agriculture (avoiding direct and indirect competition with the food chain).
In typical cases, about 90% of the wood weight correspond to the structural components, which include polysaccharides, i.e., cellulose and hemicelluloses, and lignin, an amorphous and aromatic biosynthesized polymer.
Eucalyptus spp. are fast growing hardwoods with favorable features to be valorized by sustainable conversion technologies [1]. Eucalyptus is the most widely planted type of hardwoods and can be produced at relatively low cost [2]. Although the most important Eucalyptus species in terms of world plantations are E. grandis, E. urophylla, E. camaldulensis, and E. globulus, growing attention is being paid to E. nitens, owing to their decreased susceptibility to Gonipterus plagues and to its ability to resist a wide range of environmental conditions, i.e., altitudes between 600 and 1600 m, with moderate temperatures in summer and cold temperatures, frost and snow in winter [3,4]. Because of this, E. nitens is an interesting raw material for lignocellulose biorefineries, conceived as integrated industrial facilities enabling the separation of the major feedstock components and their separate processing.
The fractionation of the raw materials according to the biorefinery concept can be achieved by diverse technologies. In the past few years, ionic liquids (ILs) have emerged as alternative agents for physical separation and/or chemical transformation of lignocellulosic materials in biorefineries [5].
Ionic liquids (ILs) present low melting temperatures, very low volatility, and good thermal and chemical stabilities. Owing to these properties, ILs have been considered environmentally friendly materials for the fractionation of lignocellulosic biomass [6,7].
ILs are usually classified according the type of cation. The most suited ones for Eucalyptus wood fractionation bear the methylimidazolium cation: studies have been reported on the utilization of several ILs of this type, i.e., 1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride, 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium acesulfamate, 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate for processing woods of E. nitens, E. globulus, E. grandis, and unidentified species [8,9,10,11].
One of the possible targets in the IL-mediated fractionation of wood is the isolation of lignin. To our knowledge, the only study on the delignification of E. nitens wood with ILs has been reported by Pinkert et al. [9], who employed 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium acesulfamate to isolate lignin fractions that were characterized by IR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, and thermal methods.
In the last years, the application of NMR-based methods has enabled a deeper understanding on the structure and chemistry of lignins: 31P-NMR enables the identification of the functional groups present in lignins [12], whereas the Heteronuclear Single Quantum Coherence spectroscopy (HSQC) allows the study of the aromatic subunits and the degree of condensation, as well as the presence of ether bonds [13,14].
As a typical hardwood, E. nitens possess a lignin mainly made up of syringyl units. Milled wood lignin from E. nitens has been reported to show a predominance of β-O-4′ ether linkages, followed by β-β′ resinol-type linkages and lower amounts of β-5′ phenylcoumaran-type and β-1′ spirodienone-type linkages [15]. When the lignin is fractionated from lignocellulose for further characterization, the isolation method affects the properties of the samples, also in the case of IL-mediated approaches. Besides the study of Pinkert et al. [9] cited above, experimental information has been reported on the characterization of E. nitens lignins isolated in media containing concentrated acetic acid [16].
Obtaining added value from lignin is a key requirement for the implementation lignocellulose biorefineries. This work deals with a complete fractionation of E. nitens wood, which enabled the production of highly functionalyzed, sulfur-free, soluble, reactive lignin potentially suitable for applications in a number of fields highlighted in literature [17,18,19], including materials and polymers, such as carbon fibers, dispersants, emulsifiers, chelating agents, adsorbents, adhesives, composites, and resins, transformation by depolymerization into simple phenols, including aromatic acids, alcohols, esters, ethers, and aldehydes, or a feedstock for producing specialty and commodity products, including hydrocarbon fuels. In summary, our study provides a sound assessment on a complete fractionation method, based on two reaction steps (hemicellulose solubilization in aqueous media and delignification in ionic liquids). This operational scheme allowed an extensive and selective separation of fractions, which are suitable for specific applications, according to the biorefinery philosophy. The complete set of experimental data allowed the formulation of material balances, and the chemical structure of lignin-derived products is assessed in deep. Specifically, E. nitens wood was first subjected to hydrothermal processing to achieve the selective solubilization of hemicelluloses, leaving solid phase with increased contents of cellulose and lignin. Delignification of this solid substrate yielded a solid enriched in cellulose, and a liquid phase containing the IL and soluble lignin fragments. The hydrothermal treatment was performed under optimal conditions identified in a previous study [16], and the delignification of the hemicellulose-depleted solid (denoted autohydrolyzed wood, AW) was performed in media containing an ionic liquid, 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hydrogen sulfate, denoted [bmim]HSO4, or triethylammonium hydrogen sulfate, denoted [TEA]HSO4. Figure 1 summarizes the method for lignin separation considered in this study. After delignification, the IL-rich media were mixed with ethanol to facilitate the separation of the cellulosic phase by centrifugation. After ethanol recovery by evaporation, the lignins were separated from the reaction media by precipitation with water, and characterized by 31P-NMR, 13C-NMR, HSQC and Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC), to obtain key information defining their potential as substrates for further chemical conversion into added-value products. Quantitative data concerning the yields and compositions of the various phases involved in the considered processing scheme are also provided. The results are discussed in comparison with the results obtained for an Ionosolv pine lignin obtained under optimal fractionation conditions [20].

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Wood Composition

The E. nitens wood lot employed in experiments was the same employed in a previous article [21] and showed the following contents of the structural components (as wt%): cellulose, 42%; hemicelluloses, 22.3% and Klason lignin, 21.4%. Other components appearing in minor amounts were: ash, 0.25%; extractives, 4.7%; and acid soluble lignin, 1.5%.

2.2. Wood Autohydrolysis

The aqueous fractionation of wood was performed under non-isothermal conditions reaching up to 195 °C, the temperature at which the maximum conversion of xylan into soluble saccharides was achieved [21]. The combined effects of temperature and time during the reaction were assessed in terms of severity as defined by Overend and Chornet [22]:
Severity = log ( T 0 T max e T ( t ) T ref T ω · dt )
where T0 is the initial temperature, Tmax the maximum temperature, T(t) the temperature profile and Tref the reference temperature (100 °C), while the parameter Tω takes the value 14.75 °C. Using this equation, the severity calculated for the experiment performed at 195 °C (including the heating and cooling periods) was 3.62. Operating under these conditions, the autohydrolyzed wood (AW), was recovered at 72.8% solid yield, while 80.7% xylan was solubilized. The compositions of the solid and liquid phases from autohydrolysis processing are the same detailed in Penín et al. [21].

2.3. Ionic Liquid (IL) Delignification: Lignin Removal and Recovery

In order to achieve the separation of lignin from cellulose, AW was subjected to delignification in ionic liquid (IL) in the presence of 20% water (measured respect to the solid mass). Two ionic liquids ([bmim]HSO4 and [TEA]HSO4) were used as delignification agents. [bmim]HSO4 has been used to produce furfural from C5 saccharides [23,24], evidencing that the acidic character of [bmim]HSO4 enabled a double role as a catalyst and as a solvent, a behavior potentially useful for achieving the delignification of lignocellulosic materials. In comparison, [TEA]HSO4 is a low cost ionic liquid that shows comparative advantages respect to other ILs in terms of dissolution ability and thermal stability [25].
Preliminary experiments (data not shown) were performed at 160–180 °C. The maximum delignification percentage of was achieved operating at 180 °C, but the selectivity was poor owing to increased cellulose losses. Because of this, 170 °C was chosen as compromise temperature enabling both a satisfactory reaction rate and a high cellulose recovery in solid phase, and the reaction time was considered as an operational variable for optimization.
Figure 2 shows the experimental results obtained in treatments at 170 °C with both ILs. In experiments using [bmim]HSO4 (Figure 2a), the degree of delignification reached 87.9% in the experiment lasting 40 min, but the percentage of cellulose recovery dropped considerably (83%) with respect to treating the sample under these conditions for only 30 min (92%). The percentage of delignification reached 87.7% in the experiment lasting 30 min, and then remained almost unchanged, indicating a fast reaction rate. These results were in the range reported by Xu et al. [26] for the delignification of Tamarix austromongolica using the ionic liquid [bmim]Ace (50% delignification after 3 hours), and Brandt et al. [27] (90% delignification after 22 h).
Lower delignification degrees were achieved with the ionic liquid [TEA]HSO4 (see Figure 2b). The maximum delignification percentage was 69% (reached after 50 min), similar to the result reported by Li et al. [28] (69% lignin removal after 3 h). However, this IL enabled high cellulose recoveries, which remained fairly constant (90–95%) along the experimental domain.
The yields and compositions of the solid phases obtained after delignification are shown in Table 1. Low contents of residual xylan were observed in all cases, with tendency to decrease with the reaction time. No arabinan was present, and the contents of acetyl groups were negligible. The cellulose contents increased along treatments, reaching 80–88% in assays with [bmim]HSO4 and 72–77% in assays with [TEA]HSO4. In [bmim]HSO4 media, the Klason lignin content presented a minimum value (5.9% after 30 min). The observed dependence of the Klason lignin content with the reaction severity (measured by the reaction time) suggested that lignin is first dissolved, and then the soluble lignin fragments underwent repolymerization, according to a mechanism of two reactions in series: under low severity conditions (in our case, short reaction times), lignin solubilization is the major effect); but in further reaction stages, the increase in the concentration of soluble lignin fragments resulted in increased lignin repolymerization, which becomes the predominant reaction. This behavior is in agreement with literature reported for lignocellulose delignification in media made up of ionic liquids [29,30].
In comparison, lower delignification degrees were reached with [TEA]HSO4 (minimum lignin content 13.2%, reached after 50 min).

2.4. Lignin Characterization

E. nitens lignin samples isolated under the optimal delignification conditions identified above were characterized for structural features and molecular mass aspects. Additionally, to assist in the comparison of the identified biomass fractionation methods between hardwoods and softwoods, experimental data were also recorded for an Ionosolv pine lignin (IP) isolated in [bmim]HSO4/water media under conditions reported as optimal [20] (170 °C, 90 min, 5:1 liquid to solid mass ratio). The diverse lignin samples were structurally analyzed using the following techniques: quantitative 31P-NMR, qualitative HSQC and 13C-NMR [12,31]. The results are presented in Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4, respectively. While 31P-NMR is best for both qualitatively and quantitatively analysing the OH-group contents, HSQC is an established technique for evaluating complex structural motifs in lignin and 13C-NMR serves to identify groups not visible in the HSQC, while exhibiting the possibility to validate HSQC interpretations, and vice versa. Additionally, gel permeation chromatography (GPC) was used to determine the molecular weight distribution of the lignins under study (see data in Table 5).
The OH-group analysis via quantitative 31P-NMR [12] essentially reveals that the two different IL-preparations differ significantly only in the amount of aliphatic OH-group content. In the case of [TEA]HSO4, intensity of the signal attributable to aliphatic OH groups is significantly stronger. In terms of phenolic end groups, no meaningful differences between [bmim]HSO4 and [TEA]HSO4 preparations were found in the phenolic OH-group content. Differences between the aliphatic OH-group content of the two samples can arise either from an insufficient cellulose separation in the case of [TEA]HSO4, leaving behind carbohydrates that cause an artificial increase in aliphatic OH-group content, or from a partial degradation of the phenylpropanoid structure, leading to a loss in aliphatic OH-groups along the chain in case of [bmim]HSO4.
For identifying the more likely reason of the aliphatic OH-group difference, comparative HSQC analysis was performed, using a standard, non-quantitative HSQC sequence, keeping sample concentration and acquisition parameters constant. The results are given in Table 5, whereas the HSQC spectra are shown in Figure 3.
A detailed analysis and comparison of the various NMR data generated confirmed the presence of the groups indicated in Table 3. Analysis of the identified structural motifs suggests that both ionic liquid treatments were efficiently, albeit not fully removing cellulose and hemicellulose. Only traces of carbohydrate impurities are present in comparable amounts in both samples, comprising a weak signal attributable to benzyl ether motifs claimed in lignin-carbohydrate complexes (LCCs) [32]. Data obtained from 31P-NMR (Table 2) show a low content in aliphatic OH groups and a very high content in phenolic groups with respect to data previously reported for milled wood lignins [13]. In all cases, significant amounts of condensed groups, i.e., non-etherified 5-5′, 4-O-5′ and diphenylmethane are present in the isolated lignins. This indicates that all the considered treatments induce significant structural modifications in the native lignin backbone, since these units are absent in milled wood lignins. The generation of condensed units upon acidic fractionation conditions has been previously reported in the literature [33]. The ratio of condensed units to total phenolic content in the two eucalyptus lignin samples, however, is not significantly different thus implying a similar behavior of the two different ionic liquids examined. The phenolic to aliphatic hydroxy groups ratio was found much higher in the [bmim]HSO4 rather than in the [TEA]HSO4-E. nitens lignin sample. Since the difference is clearly more significant than suggested by the HSQC spectra obtained, this indicates a significant decrease of the aliphatic OH groups, an increase of the phenolic units or both.
The intensities of the signals assigned to the lignin interunit bondings as revealed by HSQC, were normalized to the signal of the methoxy groups in order to obtain a relative amount ratio. On this basis one can conclude that the use of [bmim]HSO4 yields an overall depletion of typical lignin interunit bonding signals with respect to [TEA]HSO4-E. nitens lignin. This implies that the lignin backbone has suffered more during the [bmim]HSO4 isolation process. Very severe depletion of interunit bonding motifs could be expected to lead to a larger number of unsaturated motifs within the backbone. Yet the HSQC spectra do not exhibit significant evidence for drastic degeneration. The HSQC spectrum IEB does indicate, however, an elevated level of α-oxidised β-O-4′ units with respect to IET. Also, this explains a reduced aliphatic OH to phenolic OH ratio. The listed observations suggest that the treatment with [bmim]HSO4 is overall less suitable for isolating also a higher value lignin stream.
In case of [bmim]HSO4, data further suggest that the washing out of the ionic liquid from the lignin was not fully successful. As focused cross peaks in the aliphatic region indicate the presence of noticeable amounts of IL, this may as such also influence the 31P-NMR results leading to underestimation of absolute OH-groups amount in the [bmim]HSO4 lignin.
Additional 13C-NMR analyses of the two lignins were performed to eventually support HSQC-based structural characterization, identified structural motifs are listed in Table 4. The 13C-NMR data support the HSQC-based conclusions: ILB ([bmim]HSO4-derived E. nitens lignin) generated signals typical for oxidized β-O-4′ units, while signals of interunit bonding motifs in general show lower intensities compared to [TEA]HSO4-E. nitens lignin in qualitative comparative analyses.
Structural analyses were completed by gel permeation chromatography for molecular weight features (see Table 5). GPC data indicated that E nitens lignin isolated using [bmim]HSO4 consisted of lower molecular weight distribution than [TEA]HSO4-derived E nitens lignin; polydispersity is higher for IEB as well. This, at least partially, explains the higher phenolic to aliphatic OH ratio in this sample. These observed differences in the molecular weight can be interpreted as a confirmation of the fact that the use of [bmim]HSO4 leads to a more significant degradation of the lignin backbone during the fractionation process.
Comparing the structural observations generated in this study with previously reported data, it can be stated that this study is by and large in line with findings made by other groups using various ILs for fractionating lignocellulosic biomass from different hard- and softwoods. The problem is incorporation of [bmim]-type ions as impurity has been reported before [9]. Our study does not manage to delineate in a concluding fashion whether the IL impurities found in LEB resulted from residues just not washed out efficiently, or whether the observable cross-peaks resulted from eventually covalently bound former bmim ions, that under the chosen process conditions lost their chemical inertness. Brandt et al. [27] reported a relatively sluggish performance of [bmim]-type ionic liquids in general compared to other ionic liquids in terms of fractionating lignocellulosic biomass. TEA-based ionic liquids, on the contrary, have been found to work well in fractionation processes before [25]. Most noteworthy, however, is the fact that various groups observed partial lignin degradation when using acidic ILs in biomass fractionation. Varanasi et al. [10] suggested that the observed differences in the ratio between aliphatic OH-groups and phenolic OH-groups, in combination with the significantly reduced molecular weight, could be indeed attributed to a partial degradation. The fact that this is observed mainly in case of [bmim]HSO4 suggests a crucial role of the tight interplay between cation and anion also in biorefinery applications of ionic liquids, as hypothesized before. Given that existing reports blame IL acidity for lignin degradation, it could be speculated that the ammonium ion mitigates this acidity. More detailed studies are needed, however, to shed light into this aspect.
Comparing the results generated for the E. nitens hardwood with the structural data generated for the pine Ionosolv lignin (in light of both the information available for this specific case and the results reported for pine fractionation using other ionic liquids), it can be stated that [TEA]HSO4 yields a less degraded lignin also in the case of pine, that is not suffering from background backbone degradation or trapped IL residues.
With respect to an eventual downstream processing of the lignin, the differing structural features of IEB and IET might represent a valuable feature of the developed process. Given that both methods led to a by and large successful fractionation of the biomass components, assuming further that the yet insufficient removal of [bmim] from IEB can be remedied in a second process optimization, the presented fractionation processes are thus valuable additional methods for eventually pre-tailoring the lignin already during its isolation for a downstream use.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Raw Material and Analysis

Eucalyptus nitens wood samples were collected locally, milled to a particle size below 1 cm, air-dried and stored for further analysis and processing as described below. Samples were assayed for moisture, extractives and quantitative acid hydrolysis using standard TAPPI or NREL methods. Klason lignin was measured as the insoluble material from the quantitative acid hydrolysis. The contents of cellulose and hemicellulose were measured from HPLC determination of the monosaccharides present in hydrolyzates. More detailed information on the methodology can be found in Penín et al. [21]. All NMR reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich/Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

3.2. Hydrothermal Processing of Wood and Analysis of Phases

Water and E. nitens wood samples were mixed at a liquid to solid ratio of 8 kg liquid/kg oven-dry wood. The mixture was heated in a 3.75 L stainless steel, pressurized reactor (Parr Instruments Company, Moline, IL) up to reach the desired temperature (195 °C), and then cooled immediately. Solid samples from the resulting solid (AW) were used for solid yield determination and analysis, using the same methods employed for the characterization of native wood. Aliquots of the liquid phases from the autohydrolysis stage were filtered through 0.45 µm membranes and analyzed by HPLC for monosaccharides, acetic acid, hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) and furfural (F), using the same conditions specified above.

3.3. Delignification with Ionic Liquids and Lignin Recovery

Delignification of autohydrolyzed wood (AW) was carried out using [bmim]HSO4 or [TEA]HSO4 in the presence of water (20% respect to the amounts of IL and solid substrate). Operation was performed in flasks immersed in an oil bath at 160–180 °C using 5:1 liquid to solid mass ratio. 96% ethanol was added to the reaction media (4:3 w/w) to facilitate the separation of the cellulose-enriched solids (SPEC, see Figure 1) by centrifugation (5000 rpm, 15 min). For purification, SPEC were washed three times with 96% ethanol and extracted in Soxhlet for 6 h before determination of yield and composition (using the same methodology as for raw material). The supernatants from centrifugation, the washing liquors, and the liquid phases from Soxhlet extraction were mixed and vacuum-evaporated at 40 °C, leaving an ionic liquid-lignin solution, from which lignin was precipitated by adding water (3 g water/g medium). The precipitated solids (lignin-derived products, LDP) were separated by filtration, washed with water and dried, as shown in Figure 1. Water was removed from the IL phase by evaporation for IL recovery.

3.4. Variables Employed to Characterize the Separation and Recovery of Components

The variables employed and their definitions are as follows:
Cellulose   recovery   yield ,   CRY =   Cellulose   in   SPEC Cellulose   in   AW · 100
Delignification   percentage ,   Del % =   100 Lignin   in   SPEC Lignin   in   AW · 100
Lignin   recovery   yield ,   LRY =   LDP   mass Lignin   in   AW · 100
The obtained LDP were further characterized as described below. For IL recovery, water was removed from the liquid phase by evaporation.

3.5. Lignin Characterization by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)

The lignins from IL treatments were assayed using the following NMR methods:
  • 31P-NMR Analysis [12]. An accurately weighed amount of lignin (approximately 30 mg) was dissolved in 425 μL of anhydrous CDCl3/pyridine solution (1:1.6 (v/v)). 100 μL of a standard solution of cholesterol (0.1 M in anhydrous CDCl3/pyridine solution) containing Cr(III) acetylacetonate as the relaxation agent was added. Finally, 75 μL of 2-chloro-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaphospholane (Cl-TMDP, 95%, Sigma-Aldrich) was added, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The mixture was then transferred into 5 mm NMR tubes, and the spectra were measured on a Bruker (Billerica, MA, USA) AVANCE 400 MHz spectrometer equipped with a 5 mm double resonance broadband BBI inverse probe (256 scans at 20 °C), operated by Topspin software (Version 3.5). All chemical shifts reported are relative to the reaction product of water with Cl-TMDP, which gives a sharp signal in pyridine/CDCl3 at 132.2 ppm. NMR data were processed with MestreNova (Version 8.1.1, Mestrelab Research, Santiago de Compostela, Spain).
  • HSQC Measurements. Samples of around 50 mg were dissolved in 600 μL DMSO-d6 (providing NMR sample solutions with concentrations of around 83 mg/mL); chromium acetyl acetonate was added as spin-relaxing agent at a final concentration of ca. 1.5–1.75 mg/mL. HSQC spectra were recorded at 303 K on a Bruker (Billerica, MA, USA) AVANCE 400 MHz spectrometer equipped with a 5 mm double resonance broadband BBI inverse probe operated by TopSpin software (Version 3.5). The Bruker hsqcetgp pulse program in DQD acquisition mode was used, with NS = 32; TD = 2048 (F2), 512 (F1); SW = 15.0191 ppm (F2), 149.9819 ppm (F1); O2 (F2) = 2000.65 Hz, O1 (F1) = 7545.96 Hz; D1 = 2 s; CNST2 (1J(C–H) = 145; acquisition time F2 channel = 85.1968 ms, F1 channel = 8.4818 ms; pulse length of the 90° high power pulse P1 was optimised for each sample. NMR data were processed with MestreNova (Version 8.1.1, Mestrelab Research, Santiago de Compostela, Spain).
  • 13C-NMR Measurements. Samples of approx. 80 mg of lignin were dissolved in 550 μL DMSO-d6; 50 μL chromium acetyl acetonate in DMSO-d6 (approx. 1.5 mg mL−1) were added as a spin-relaxation agent; 50 μL of trioxane in DMSO-d6 (approx. 15 mg mL−1) was used as an internal standard. The spectra were recorded at room temperature on a Bruker (Billerica, MA, USA) AVANCE 400 MHz spectrometer equipped with a 5 mm double resonance broadband BBI inverse probe operated by TopSpin software (Version 3.5). An inverse-gated proton decoupling pulse sequence was applied with a 90° pulse width, a relaxation delay of 1.7 s and an acquisition time of 1.2 s. A total of 20000-24000 scans were acquired for each spectrum. NMR data were processed with MestreNova (Version 8.1.1, Mestrelab Research, Santiago de Compostela, Spain).

3.6. Lignin Characterization by Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)

A previously reported protocol was applied [34]: approximately 5 mg of lignin was suspended in 1 mL glacial acetic acid/acetyl bromide (9:1 v/v) for 2 h. The solvent was then carefully removed in vacuo, and the residue was dissolved in THF and filtered over 0.45 μm syringe filter prior to injection. By means of a sample loop, aliquots of 20 μL of the filtered solutions were analyzed at a time. GPC analyses were performed using a Shimadzu (Kyoto, Japan) instrument, operated via the LabSolutions software (Version 5.42 SP3) consisting of a controller unit (CBM-20A), pumping unit (LC 20AT), degasser (DGU-20A3), column oven (CTO-20AC), diode array detector (SPD-M20A), and refractive index detector (RID-10A). Different setups comprising either two 7.5 mm × 30 mm GPC columns Agilent (Santa Clara, CA, USA) PLgel 5 μm 10000 Å, followed by Agilent PLgel 5 μm 1000 Å) or three GPC columns (the ones mentioned above plus an Agilent PLgel 5 μm 500 Å) in series were employed. HPLC grade THF (Chromasolv®) was used as an eluent (0.75 mL min−1, at 40 °C). Standard calibration was performed with polystyrene standards (Sigma-Aldrich, MW range 162–165 × 106 g·mol−1). Final analyses of samples were performed using the intensities of the UV signal at λ = 280 nm.

4. Conclusions

Efficient delignification of Eucalyptus nitens wood was achieved a 170 °C in media containing [bmim]HSO4 or [TEA]HSO4. [bmim]HSO4 performed as a remarkable delignification agent, yielding cellulose-enriched pulps of very low Klason lignin contents (5.9%). However, under conditions leading to an optimal delignification, limited selectivity toward cellulose losses was achieved (cellulose recovery yield, 83%). In comparison, [TEA]HSO4 enabled less lignin removal (yielding samples with 13.2% Klason lignin content), but the cellulose recovery yield increased notably (90–95%).
The structural analysis of the isolated lignins shows the suitability of both ionic liquids as media for biomass fractionation. The isolated lignins are however highly degraded with respect to milder isolation processes such dioxane extraction (yielding milled wood lignin) or organosolv treatments [34]. The lignin isolated from [bmim]HSO4 treatments presented a lower molecular weight distribution and comparatively low content of aliphatic OH groups, a fact ascribed to a partial degradation of the backbone. Based on the experimental data resulting from chemical characterization in form of the ratio between aliphatic OH-groups and phenolic OH-groups, presence of signals typical for oxidized β-O-4′ units, molar mass distribution and polydispersity, confirmed that the lignin isolated from [TEA]HSO4 media holds a satisfactory valorization potential via chemical transformation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L., V.S., C.C. and J.C.P.; Data curation, L.P. and H.L.; Investigation, L.P., H.L., V.S., C.C. and J.C.P.; Methodology, L.P., H.L., V.S., C.C. and J.C.P.; Project administration, J.C.P.; Resources, C.C.; Supervision, V.S., C.C. and J.C.P.; Validation, H.L. and C.C.; Writing—original draft, L.P., H.L. and V.S.; Writing—review & editing, C.C. and J.C.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the “Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness” of Spain (research project “Modified aqueous media for wood biorefineries”, reference CTQ2017-82962-R).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cherubini, F.; Strømman, A.H. Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: State of the art and future challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 437–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Magaton, A.D.A.S.; Colodette, J.L.; De Gouvêa, A.F.G.; Gomide, J.L.; Muguet, M.C.D.S.; Pedrazzi, C. Eucalyptus wood quality and its impact on kraft pulp production and use. Tappi J. 2009, 8, 32–39. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pérez, S.; Renedo, C.J.; Ortiz, A.; Mañana, M.; Silió, D. Energy evaluation of the Eucalyptus globulus and the Eucalyptus nitens in the north of Spain (Cantabria). Thermochim. Acta 2006, 451, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yáñez-S, M.; Matsuhiro, B.; Maldonado, S.; González, R.; Luengo, J.; Uyarte, O.; Serafine, D.; Moya, S.; Romero, J.; Torres, R.; et al. Carboxymethylcellulose from bleached organosolv fibers of Eucalyptus nitens: Synthesis and physicochemical characterization. Cellulose 2018, 25, 2901–2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Peleteiro, S.; Rivas, S.; Alonso, J.L.; Santos, V.; Parajó, J.C. Utilization of ionic liquids in lignocellulose biorefineries as agents for separation, derivatization, fractionation or pretreatment. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 8093–8102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Earle, M.J.; Seddon, K.R. Ionic liquids. Green solvents for the future. Pure Appl. Chem. 2000, 72, 1391–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Huddleston, J.G.; Visser, A.E.; Reichert, W.M.; Willauer, H.D.; Broker, G.A.; Rogers, R.D. Characterization and comparison of hydrophilic and hydrophobic room temperature ionic liquids incorporating the imidazolium cation. Green Chem. 2001, 3, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, J.; Liu, B.; Hou, H.; Hu, J. Pretreatment of eucalyptus with recycled ionic liquids for low-cost biorefinery. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 234, 406–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pinkert, A.; Goeke, D.F.; Marsh, K.N.; Pang, S. Extracting wood lignin without dissolving or degrading cellulose: Investigations on the use of food additive-derived ionic liquids. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 3124–3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Varanasi, P.; Singh, P.; Auer, M.; Adams, P.D.; Simmons, B.A.; Singh, S. Survey of renewable chemicals produced from lignocellulosic biomass during ionic liquid pretreatment. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2013, 6, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Tywabi, Z.; Deenadayalu, N.; Sithole, B. Dissolution of South African Eucalyptus sawdust wood in [Emim][OAc]/co-solvent mixtures. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 2017, 76, 166–172. [Google Scholar]
  12. Meng, X.; Crestini, C.; Ben, H.; Hao, N.; Pu, Y.; Ragauskas, A.J.; Argyropoulos, D.S. Determination of hydroxyl groups in biorefinery resources via quantitative 31P-NMR spectroscopy. Nat. Protoc. 2019, 14, 2627–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Crestini, C.; Melone, F.; Sette, M.; Saladino, R. Milled wood lignin: A linear oligomer. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12, 3928–3935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Crestini, C.; Lange, H.; Sette, M.; Argyropoulos, D.S. On the structure of softwood kraft lignin. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 4104–4121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rencoret, J.; Marques, G.; Gutiérrez, A.; Ibarra, D.; Li, J.; Gellerstedt, G.; Santos, J.I.; Jiménez-Barbero, J.; Martínez, Á.T.; Del Río, J.C. Structural characterization of milled wood lignins from different eucalypt species. Holzforschung 2008, 62, 514–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Penín, L.; Santos, V.; del Río, J.C.; Parajó, J.C. Assesment on the chemical fractionation of Eucalyptus nitens wood: Characterization of the products derived from the structural components. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 281, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Toledano, A.; Serrano, L.; Labidi, J. Organosolv lignin depolymerization with different base catalysts. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2012, 87, 1593–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Laskar, D.D.; Yang, B.; Wang, H.; Lee, J. Pathways for biomass-derived lignin to hydrocarbon fuels. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 2013, 7, 602–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Malutan, T.; Nicu, R.; Popa, V.I. Contribution to the study of hydroxymethylacion reaction of alkali lignin. Bioresources 2008, 3, 13–20. [Google Scholar]
  20. Penín, L.; Peleteiro, S.; Rivas, S.; Santos, V.; Parajó, J.C. Production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from pine wood via biorefinery technologies based on fractionation and reaction in ionic liquids. Bioresources 2019, 14, 4733–4747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Penín, L.; Peleteiro, S.; Santos, V.; Alonso, J.L.; Parajo, J.C. Selective fractionation and enzymatic hydrolysis of Eucalyptus nitens wood. Cellulose 2019, 26, 1125–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Overend, R.P.; Chornet, E. Fractionation of lignocellulosics by steam-aqueous pretreatments. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 1987, 321, 523–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Peleteiro, S.; Santos, V.; Garrote, G.; Parajó, J.C. Furfural production from Eucalyptus wood using an Acidic Ionic Liquid. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 146, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Peleteiro, S.; Santos, V.; Parajó, J.C. Furfural production in biphasic media using an acidic ionic liquid as a catalyst. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 153, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gschwend, F.J.V.; Malaret, F.; Shinde, S.; Brandt-Talbot, A.; Hallett, J.P. Rapid pretreatment of: Miscanthus using the low-cost ionic liquid triethylammonium hydrogen sulfate at elevated temperatures. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 3486–3498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Xu, J.; Hou, H.; Hu, J.; Liu, B. Coupling of hydrothermal and ionic liquid pretreatments for sequential biorefinery of Tamarix austromongolica. Appl. Energy 2018, 229, 745–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Brandt, A.; Ray, M.J.; To, T.Q.; Leak, D.J.; Murphy, R.J.; Welton, T. Ionic liquid pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass with ionic liquid-water mixtures. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 2489–2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, C.; Knierim, B.; Manisseri, C.; Arora, R.; Scheller, H.V.; Auer, M.; Vogel, K.P.; Simmons, B.A.; Singh, S. Comparison of dilute acid and ionic liquid pretreatment of switchgrass: Biomass recalcitrance, delignification and enzymatic saccharification. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 4900–4906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Long, J.; Lou, W.; Wang, L.; Yin, B.; Li, X. [C4H8SO3Hmim]HSO4 as an efficient catalyst for direct liquefaction of bagasse lignin: Decomposition properties of the inner structural units. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2015, 122, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cox, B.J.; Ekerdt, J.G. Depolymerization of oak wood lignin under mild conditions using the acidic ionic liquid 1-H-3-methylimidazolium chloride as both solvent and catalyst. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 118, 584–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ralph, J.; Landucci, L. NMR of Lignins. In Lignins and Lignans; Heitner, C., Dimmel, D., Schmidt, J., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010; pp. 137–243. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yuan, T.-Q.; Sun, S.-N.; Xu, F.; Sun, R.-C. Characterization of Lignin Structures and Lignin–Carbohydrate Complex (LCC) Linkages by Quantitative 13 C and 2D HSQC-NMR Spectroscopy. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 10604–10614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Guerra, A.; Filpponen, I.; Lucia, L.A.; Argyropoulos, D.S. Comparative evaluation of three lignin isolation protocols for various wood species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 9696–9705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lange, H.; Rulli, F.; Crestini, C. Gel Permeation Chromatography in determining molecular weights of lignins: Critical aspects revisited for improved utility in the development of novel materials. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 5167–5180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Figure 1. General scheme followed for lignin separation.
Figure 1. General scheme followed for lignin separation.
Molecules 25 00425 g001
Figure 2. Results obtained in delignification treatments carried out at 170 °C using: (a) [bmim]HSO4, and (b) [TEA]HSO4.
Figure 2. Results obtained in delignification treatments carried out at 170 °C using: (a) [bmim]HSO4, and (b) [TEA]HSO4.
Molecules 25 00425 g002
Figure 3. HSQC spectra of (A) IEB and (B) IET. The aliphatic region is shown on the left, while the aromatic region is displayed on the right. (C) Important identified and colour-coded structural units.
Figure 3. HSQC spectra of (A) IEB and (B) IET. The aliphatic region is shown on the left, while the aromatic region is displayed on the right. (C) Important identified and colour-coded structural units.
Molecules 25 00425 g003
Table 1. Yield and composition of the solid phase enriched in cellulose obtained upon delignification (SPEC stream in Figure 1).
Table 1. Yield and composition of the solid phase enriched in cellulose obtained upon delignification (SPEC stream in Figure 1).
Ionic LiquidTime (min)Solid Yield (%)Composition (kg/100 kg SPEC)
GlucanXylanArabinanAcetyl GroupsKlason Lignin
[bmim]HSO41065.780.53.00.00.28.7
2061.280.82.30.00.27.0
3061.786.32.10.00.15.9
4058.582.31.60.00.06.1
5058.287.71.80.00.18.7
[TEA]HSO41073.871.73.80.00.518.2
2075.572.43.70.00.418.0
3071.374.93.50.00.314.9
4070.773.73.40.00.315.5
5069.076.83.30.00.213.2
Table 2. Results from quantitative 31P-NMR analysis of E. nitens lignin recovered after delignification treatment for both ionic liquids and the Ionosolv lignin from Pinus pinaster wood (IPB).
Table 2. Results from quantitative 31P-NMR analysis of E. nitens lignin recovered after delignification treatment for both ionic liquids and the Ionosolv lignin from Pinus pinaster wood (IPB).
Lignin Hydroxyl GroupsδP (ppm)Amount (mmol/g)
IEBIETIPB
Aliphatic OH149.0–146.01.283.391.36
Condensed 4-O-5′ + 5–5′142.8–140.32.052.181.25
Syringyl units143.8–142.81.231.44-
Guaiacyl units140.2–138.80.730.961.56
p-OH phenol138.8–137.40.140.160.24
Total phenolic OH144.3–137.44.154.742.75
Carboxylic OH135.5–134.00.050.090.22
Total phenolic OH/Aliphatic OH 3.21.42.02
Total phenolic OH/Condensed phenolic OH 2.02.22.2
IEB—Lignin E. nitens [bmim]HSO4; IET—Lignin E. nitens [TEA]HSO4; IPB—Lignin Pinus pinaster [bmim]HSO4.
Table 3. Structural units identified in qualitative 1H–13C-HSQC analyses of E. nitens lignin recovered after delignification treatment for both ionic liquids; for comparison, data for the Ionosolv lignin from Pinus pinaster wood (IPB) [20] are listed. Chemical shifts of cross peaks used for identification are indicated.
Table 3. Structural units identified in qualitative 1H–13C-HSQC analyses of E. nitens lignin recovered after delignification treatment for both ionic liquids; for comparison, data for the Ionosolv lignin from Pinus pinaster wood (IPB) [20] are listed. Chemical shifts of cross peaks used for identification are indicated.
AssignmentCross Peak (δCH) (ppm)IEBIETIPB
syringyl units (S)103.4/6.70xx
guaiacyl units (G)121.9/6.69
115.7/6.72
110.8/6.97
xxx
β-O-4′ linked to S (erythro)85.7/4.64xx
β-O-4′ linked to S (thero)86.6/4.14
β-O-4′ linked to S with α-C=O 106.9/7.3xx
β-O-4′ linked to G84.8/4.38
81.7/4.77
68.0/4.84
xxx
ϒ-acylated β-O-4´63.0/4.36 x
β-5´87.5/5.49
62.2/3.76
xxx
β-β´85.7/4.67
71.7/4.22
53.1/3.77
xxx
cinnamyl aldehyde126.9/6.82 x
cinnamyl alcohol 61.2/4.09 xx
Υ-acylated cinnamyl alcohol 60.3/4.83 x
methoxy56.4/3.77xxx
IEB—Lignin E. nitens [bmim]HSO4; IET—Lignin E. nitens [TEA]HSO4; IPB—Lignin Pinus pinaster [bmim]HSO4.
Table 4. Structural units clearly identified in qualitative 13C-NMR analyses of E. nitens lignins recovered after delignification treatment for both ionic liquids, for comparison, data for the Ionosolv lignin from Pinus pinaster wood (IPB) [20] are listed. Chemical shifts used for identification are indicated.
Table 4. Structural units clearly identified in qualitative 13C-NMR analyses of E. nitens lignins recovered after delignification treatment for both ionic liquids, for comparison, data for the Ionosolv lignin from Pinus pinaster wood (IPB) [20] are listed. Chemical shifts used for identification are indicated.
AssignmentδC (ppm)IETIEBIPB
syringyl units (S)106.91–103.03
134.38–134.24
xx
etherified syringyl units (S)152.72–152.28
137.96
134.74
xx
guaiacyl units (G)147.8
134.38–134.24
120.32
116.79–115.40
110.64
xxx
etherified guaiacyl units (G)149.15
146.75
134.13
xxx
5-5′143.38
131.74
126.5
xxx
etherified 5-5′145.1–144.75
132.66
x
cinnamyl aldehyde129.65xxx
cinnamyl alcohol127.79
H units128.71 x
S type β-O-4′ with α-C=O106.7xx
G type β-O-4′ (erythro and threo)85.37
83.32
71.32
60.53
xx
G type β-O-4′ with α-C=O63.52x
β-1 62.21 xx
methoxy55.91xxx
β-β′ 72.5
53.67
x
β-5′86.87–86.05x
CH3 groups, ketones (conj.) or in aliphatic38.36–35.67 xx
CH2 in aliphatic side chain30.7–28.63xxx
Υ-CH3 in n-propyl side chain14.14xxx
IEB—Lignin E. nitens [bmim]HSO4; IET—Lignin E. nitens [TEA]HSO4; IPB—Lignin Pinus pinaster [bmim]HSO4.
Table 5. Results from Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC) analysis of E. nitens lignins recovered after delignification treatment for both ionic liquids and the Ionosolv lignin from Pinus pinaster wood (IPB) [20].
Table 5. Results from Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC) analysis of E. nitens lignins recovered after delignification treatment for both ionic liquids and the Ionosolv lignin from Pinus pinaster wood (IPB) [20].
Molecular WeightIEBIETIPB
Mn (g/mol)120017001500
Mw (g/mol)400047004100
Polydispersity index (Mw/Mn)3.32.82.7
IEB—Lignin E. nitens [bmim]HSO4; IET—Lignin E. nitens [TEA]HSO4; IPB—Lignin Pinus pinaster [bmim]HSO4.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Penín, L.; Lange, H.; Santos, V.; Crestini, C.; Parajó, J.C. Characterization of Eucalyptus nitens Lignins Obtained by Biorefinery Methods Based on Ionic Liquids. Molecules 2020, 25, 425. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020425

AMA Style

Penín L, Lange H, Santos V, Crestini C, Parajó JC. Characterization of Eucalyptus nitens Lignins Obtained by Biorefinery Methods Based on Ionic Liquids. Molecules. 2020; 25(2):425. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020425

Chicago/Turabian Style

Penín, Lucía, Heiko Lange, Valentín Santos, Claudia Crestini, and Juan Carlos Parajó. 2020. "Characterization of Eucalyptus nitens Lignins Obtained by Biorefinery Methods Based on Ionic Liquids" Molecules 25, no. 2: 425. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020425

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop